The Dynamic Mechanism of Mindfulness Intervention for Emotional Distress (MIED) Based on Ecological Moment Measurement

September 2, 2026 updated by: Xinghua Liu, Peking University

The goal of this clinical trial is to examine how a mindfulness-based intervention (MIED) affects the moment-to-moment, lagged relationships between mechanism variables at the levels of feelings, thoughts, and behaviors and outcomes (anxiety and depression) in individuals experiencing anxiety and depressive distress, using high-frequency ecological momentary assessment. The main questions it aims to answer are:

At the within-person level, do these mechanism variables significantly predict next-moment anxiety and depressive symptoms at the within-day micro-scale?

How does the temporal dynamic between mechanism and outcomes over the course of MIED?

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with scores greater than 21 on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who could not access the Internet.
  • Subjects with insufficient Chinese ability.
  • Subjects who have participated in mindfulness-based projects for more than 6 weeks before, and / or the current frequency of meditation practice is more than once a week.
  • Patients with schizophrenia or psychotic affective disorder, current organic mental disorder, substance abuse disorder and generalized developmental disorder.
  • Subjects at risk of suicide.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MIED Self-help Intervention Group
Participants receive a 49-day self-help intervention delivered via a Mini Program.
A 49-day digital self-help program delivered via a WeChat Mini Program (or mobile app). Each day, participants receive a new set of materials: (a) a guided mindfulness meditation audio (10-30 minutes), (b) psychoeducational content in text or audio format covering mindfulness principles, emotion, and emotional distress, and (c) daily assignments (such as informal mindfulness practices, emotion journaling, and graded challenging tasks).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
changes of depression
Time Frame: At baseline (within 1 week pre-intervention), at Week 1, Week 4, Week 7 of intervention, within 1 week post-intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
Daily Depression Severity and Impairment Scale,5 items, scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating higher levels of depression.
At baseline (within 1 week pre-intervention), at Week 1, Week 4, Week 7 of intervention, within 1 week post-intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
changes of anxiety
Time Frame: At baseline (within 1 week pre-intervention), at Week 1, Week 4, Week 7 of intervention, within 1 week post-intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
Daily Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale,5 items, scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating higher levels of anxiety.
At baseline (within 1 week pre-intervention), at Week 1, Week 4, Week 7 of intervention, within 1 week post-intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
changes of mindfulness
Time Frame: At baseline (within 1 week pre-intervention), at Week 1, Week 4, Week 7 of intervention, within 1 week post-intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
The Daily Mindfulness Response Scale measures the frequency with which one returns to a nonjudgmental and unconditionally receptive present moment awareness during the day. Each item is rated on a scale ranging from 1 (rarely) to 10 (often). scores range from 4 to 40, with higher scores indicating higher levels of mindful responding
At baseline (within 1 week pre-intervention), at Week 1, Week 4, Week 7 of intervention, within 1 week post-intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
changes of distress tolerance
Time Frame: At baseline (within 1 week pre-intervention), at Week 1, Week 4, Week 7 of intervention, within 1 week post-intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
3 items were chosen to form the Daily Distress Tolerance Scale (DDTS). The DDTS consists of four items. Each item is rated on a scale ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). Scores range from 3 to 15, with higher scores indicating greater distress tolerance.
At baseline (within 1 week pre-intervention), at Week 1, Week 4, Week 7 of intervention, within 1 week post-intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
changes of engaging in life
Time Frame: At baseline (within 1 week pre-intervention), at Week 1, Week 4, Week 7 of intervention, within 1 week post-intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
4 items were chosen from Enaging in Life Scale which assesses the extent to which individuals' daily engagement in life domains (such as work, social interactions, and leisure activities) is affected by physical and psychological discomfort, scores range from 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating higher levels of engaging in everyday life (Chen et al.,2026).
At baseline (within 1 week pre-intervention), at Week 1, Week 4, Week 7 of intervention, within 1 week post-intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
changes of physical distress intolerance
Time Frame: At baseline (within 1 week pre-intervention), at Week 1, Week 4, Week 7 of intervention, within 1 week post-intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
Momentary bodily discomfort tolerance will be assessed using a single self-developed item: "Right now, I am able to allow unpleasant bodily sensations to be present without trying to get rid of them immediately." Participants will respond on a 7-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all able") to 6 ("completely able"). Higher scores indicate greater momentary ability to tolerate and allow unpleasant bodily sensations without immediately attempting to avoid or eliminate them.
At baseline (within 1 week pre-intervention), at Week 1, Week 4, Week 7 of intervention, within 1 week post-intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
changes of experiential avoidance
Time Frame: At baseline (within 1 week pre-intervention), at Week 1, Week 4, Week 7 of intervention, within 1 week post-intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
Based on a preliminary study, the items with the high factor loading (at least higher than 0.6) from each subscale of the Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire ( Gámez et al, 2013) were chosen to form the Daily Experiential Avoidance Scale (DEAS). The DEAS consists of four items. Each item is rated on a scale ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 6 (strongly disagree). Scores range from 5 to 30, with higher scores indicating less experiential avoidance.
At baseline (within 1 week pre-intervention), at Week 1, Week 4, Week 7 of intervention, within 1 week post-intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
changes of rumination
Time Frame: At baseline (within 1 week pre-intervention), at Week 1, Week 4, Week 7 of intervention, within 1 week post-intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
State rumination will be assessed using a single-item visual analogue scale adapted from prior research. Participants will rate the extent to which they are currently caught up in their emotions and problems and find it difficult to step back from them ("Right now, I am caught up in my emotions and problems and find it difficult to distance myself from them") on a slider ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 100 ("extremely"). Higher scores indicate greater momentary rumination.
At baseline (within 1 week pre-intervention), at Week 1, Week 4, Week 7 of intervention, within 1 week post-intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
changes of negative emotion
Time Frame: At baseline (within 1 week pre-intervention), at Week 1, Week 4, Week 7 of intervention, within 1 week post-intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
Negative affect will be assessed using four items adapted from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Participants will rate the intensity of their current feelings of anxiety, sadness, irritability, and tension ("Right now, I feel anxious/sad/irritable/tense") using a visual analogue slider ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 100 ("extremely"). Higher scores indicate greater momentary negative affect.
At baseline (within 1 week pre-intervention), at Week 1, Week 4, Week 7 of intervention, within 1 week post-intervention, and at 1-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 5, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 22, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

September 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • E20260827

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe