- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07817329
NUT Project: Nutritional Support in Thoracic Oncology (NUT)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
During the first visit, a nutritional screening test such as the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) will be performed, which represents one of the main internationally validated screening tools (recommended by ESPEN and SINPE) for the risk of malnutrition. The test considers both the nutritional status and the degree of severity of the underlying pathology.
The final score (Total Score) is the sum of three parameters:
- Nutritional Status: Assessed by percentage of weight loss, decline in dietary income, and BMI. (Score from 0 to 3).
- Severity of the Pathology: Evaluated according to the increased metabolic requirement linked to the disease (e.g. surgery, COPD, tumors, intensive care). (Score from 0 to 3).
- Age: For patients >70 years of age, a point is added.
Based on the final score:
- patients with a score < 3 (low nutritional risk) will receive simple nutritional advice from the oncologist on the correct management of their diet during treatment.
- patients with score ≥ 3 (high nutritional risk) will be enrolled, after signing the informed consent, and subjected to a dietary - nutritional assessment as per clinical practice.
This nutritional dietary assessment is composed of:
Use of GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition
The patient will then be assessed according to the GLIM (Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition) criteria, which are the international standard for the diagnosis and classification of malnutrition in adults. They are based on a two-stage process:
Initial screening: Identifies the risk of malnutrition using validated tools (NRS2002 test) Diagnosis: Requires the presence of at least one phenotypic criterion and one etiological criterion.
The Three Phenotypic Criteria serve to define the severity of malnutrition and are:
- Unintentional weight loss: Quantified based on the percentage of weight lost over time.
- Low Body Mass Index (BMI) based on age-specific thresholds.
- Reduced muscle mass: Assessed by body composition tests (e.g. BIA or DXA) or anthropometric measurements.
The Two Etiological Criteria serve to guide the therapeutic path and are:
- Reduced food intake or absorption: Intake of a smaller amount than estimated nutritional needs.
- Inflammation or presence of pathologies: acute, chronic conditions (e.g. tumors, inflammatory diseases) or trauma that increase catabolism Based on the extent of the phenotypic criteria, it is then possible to establish the severity (stage 1 or stage 2) of malnutrition.
- Nutrition data collections
- Completion of questionnaires for data collection on health-related quality of life and oncology fatigue data (EORTC -QLQ-C30; EQ-5D-5L; FACIT-F)
This nutritional dietary assessment will be performed, in addition to the diagnosis (Time 0,) also at the following times:
- after 3-4 months i.e. at the first re-evaluation of restaging (time 1)
- after 6-8 months i.e. at the second re-evaluation of restaging (time 2)
- after 12 months i.e. at the third re-evaluation of restaging and one year after diagnosis (time 3) 3) These longitudinal reassessments will allow us to describe the impact of nutritional support on quality of life over time.
Between one evaluation and the next, patients with screening ≥ 3 taken into care, as per clinical practice, from a dietary-nutritional point of view, will receive a personalized intervention on a regular basis (approximately every 30-50 days) that can make use of counseling and/or diet therapy and/or nutritional support (use of Oral Nutritional Supplement, enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition). The study therefore also aims to monitor the frequency and type of nutritional intervention performed (nutritional counseling and/or diet therapy and/or nutritional support) and their correlation with other variables collected as per clinical practice.
Following the enlistment phase (2 years), subjects will be observed for a total duration of 1 year at the end of which a second year is foreseen for the analysis and drafting of the results. Patients will be evaluated through a follow-up visit as per clinical practice, and those who have completed follow-up at the hospital will be contacted by telephone for a telematic data update.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Elisa Roca, MD
- Phone Number: +39 0456444193
- Email: urc@ospedalepederzoli.it
Study Locations
-
-
Verona
-
Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy, 37019
- Recruiting
- Ospedale P. Pederzoli Casa di Cura Privata S.p.A.
-
Contact:
- Elisa Roca, MD
- Phone Number: +39 0456444193
- Email: urc@ospedalepederzoli.it
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Men and women aged ≥ 18 years,
- Diagnosis of advanced/metastatic non-small cell and small cell lung cancer candidates for first-line treatment of thoracic cancer
- High nutritional risk according to NRS2002 screening test (score ≥3)
- Nutritional assessment and care at the center
- Sign Informed Consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Lack of availability of information regarding anamnestic data,
- Failure to sign informed consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Describe the impact of dietary intervention and/or nutritional support on the nutritional status of patients during antiblastic treatments in terms of weight (kg)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Describe the impact of dietary intervention and/or nutritional support on the nutritional status of patients during antiblastic treatments in terms of height (cm)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Describe the impact of dietary intervention and/or nutritional support on the nutritional status of patients during antiblastic treatments in terms of BMI (kg/m^2)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Describe the impact of dietary intervention and/or nutritional support on the nutritional status of patients during antiblastic treatments in terms of fatigue (Units on a Scale)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Describe the impact of dietary intervention and/or nutritional support on the nutritional status of patients during antiblastic treatments in terms of adverse events
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Describe the impact of dietary intervention and/or nutritional support on the nutritional status of patients during antiblastic treatments in terms of strength (Hand Grip)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Neoplasms
- Respiratory Tract Diseases
- Lung Diseases
- Respiratory Tract Neoplasms
- Thoracic Neoplasms
- Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
- Bronchial Neoplasms
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Signs and Symptoms
- Lung Neoplasms
- Fatigue
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
- Diet, Food, and Nutrition
- Physiological Phenomena
- Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
- Population Characteristics
- Health Status
- Demography
- Nutritional Status
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1013CET
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.