Image-Guided Intra-Articular Versus Periarticular Injection in Sacroiliac Joint Pain

September 16, 2026 updated by: Mariam Bassem Shokry Saad, Assiut University

Image-Guided Intra-Articular Versus Periarticular Injection in Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Comparative Study of Early Pain Outcomes

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is a common cause of chronic low back pain that can arise from within the joint itself or from the surrounding ligaments and supporting soft tissues. Image-guided injections using corticosteroids and local anesthetics are widely used to treat SIJ pain when physical therapy or medications fail. However, it remains uncertain whether administering the injection directly inside the joint space (intra-articular) or into the surrounding posterior ligaments (periarticular) provides greater early pain relief and functional recovery.

The primary purpose of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy, safety, and functional outcomes of fluoroscopy-guided intra-articular versus periarticular injections in adult patients with chronic sacroiliac joint pain.

Participants are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive one of two fluoroscopy-guided procedures:

  • Intra-Articular Injection Group: Participants receive an injection of methylprednisolone acetate and bupivacaine delivered directly into the synovial space of the sacroiliac joint under fluoroscopic guidance, confirmed with radiographic contrast.
  • Periarticular Injection Group: Participants receive an injection of methylprednisolone acetate and bupivacaine deposited along the posterior sacroiliac ligament complex and outer capsule under fluoroscopic guidance.

All participants are followed for 8 weeks after the procedure. Changes in pain intensity are tracked using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. Physical function and daily activity impairment are measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. Patient global improvement, side effects, and rescue pain medication consumption will also be monitored throughout the study period.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients aged 18 to 70 years
  • Clinical diagnosis of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain confirmed by at least 3 positive provocation tests out of 5 (FABER, Gaenslen's, thigh thrust, compression, or distraction tests)
  • Chronic SIJ pain with a symptom duration of at least 3 months
  • Pain intensity score of at least 4 out of 10 on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS ≥ 4/10) at enrollment
  • Failure of conservative management (physiotherapy and/or NSAIDs for at least 6 weeks)
  • Willingness and ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known coagulopathy or current anticoagulant therapy that cannot be safely bridged
  • Active local infection at the injection site or systemic infection
  • Known hypersensitivity or allergy to corticosteroids, local anesthetics, or contrast media
  • History of prior SIJ surgery or joint fusion
  • Previous sacroiliac joint injection within the last 3 months
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Severe spinal or pelvic deformity preventing safe and accurate needle placement
  • Significant cognitive impairment precluding informed consent or reliable outcome reporting
  • Active malignancy involving the pelvis or sacrum

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Intra-Articular Sacroiliac Joint Injection

Participants receive a fluoroscopy-guided intra-articular injection into the lower third of the sacroiliac joint. A 22-gauge spinal needle is advanced under C-arm fluoroscopy (15-25° ipsilateral oblique view). Needle placement is confirmed with 0.5-1 mL iohexol contrast medium demonstrating an intra-articular arthrogram. Patients receive 3 mL total injectate containing 40 mg (1 mL) methylprednisolone acetate and 2 mL bupivacaine 0.25%.

Under continuous C-arm fluoroscopic guidance (15-25° ipsilateral oblique view), a 22-gauge spinal needle is advanced into the synovial cavity of the lower third of the sacroiliac joint using a posteroanterior approach. Proper intra-articular needle position is verified by injecting 0.5-1 mL iohexol contrast medium to confirm an arthrogram pattern. A 3 mL injectate consisting of methylprednisolone acetate 40 mg (1 mL) and bupivacaine 0.25% (2 mL) is then administered.

Experimental: Periarticular Sacroiliac Joint Injection

Participants receive a fluoroscopy-guided periarticular injection targeting the posterior sacroiliac ligament complex and posterior capsular tissues overlying the middle and upper thirds of the joint. Needle position is confirmed with contrast showing spread along the posterior capsule without intra-articular filling. Patients receive up to 5 mL total injectate containing 40 mg (1 mL) methylprednisolone acetate and bupivacaine 0.25% in a fan-like distribution.

Under fluoroscopic guidance, a 22-gauge spinal needle is directed toward the posterior capsular region and posterior sacroiliac ligament complex overlying the middle and upper thirds of the joint. Correct placement is confirmed via contrast injection showing spread along the posterior capsular surface without intra-articular entry. An injectate of up to 5 mL containing methylprednisolone acetate 40 mg (1 mL) and bupivacaine 0.25% is deposited in a fan-like distribution.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Pain Intensity on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 4 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks post-injection

Pain intensity is assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where scores range from 0 to 10 (0 = "no pain", 10 = "worst imaginable pain"). This measure evaluates the change in pain score from baseline to 4 weeks post-procedure. A greater reduction or lower score indicates greater pain relief.

Baseline and 4 weeks post-injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe