Pancreatic Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided RadioFrequency for Inoperable Carcinoma Treatment (PERFECT)

September 24, 2026 updated by: Bojan Kovacevic

Pancreatic Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided RadioFrequency for Inoperable Carcinoma Treatment (PERFECT Study)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) affects survival in patients with inoperable pancreatic carcinoma. By using a prospective single-arm design with historical controls, this study aims to generate clinically relevant data while minimizing the number of patients exposed to experimental treatment. The findings may support future integration of EUS-RFA into standard care for this high-need patient population.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

56

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult habile patients with a signed informed consent
  • Histologically confirmed pancreatic carcinoma ≤5 cm in largest diameter
  • ECOG performance status 0-2
  • Patients not eligible for curative-intended surgical treatment due to:

Advanced (unresectable) disease, or Unsuitability for surgery due to comorbidities or poor performance status, or Patient preference to decline surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Metastatic disease
  • Uncorrected coagulopathy (INR ≥1.5 or thrombocyte count < 50 mia/L)
  • Altered anatomy or interposition of major vessels precluding safe EUS-RFA
  • Active untreated infection or pancreatitis
  • Life expectancy <3 months
  • Prior local ablative treatment interfering with outcome

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: EUS-RFA plus standard oncological treatment

Participants receive endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) using a 19G RFA needle (EUSRA, STARMed, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea) connected to an RF generator, as a supplement to standard palliative oncological treatment. EUS-RFA is performed under deep sedation or general anesthesia and may be repeated at approximately 4-week intervals contingent on patient condition. All participants continue standard oncological follow-up, including systemic therapy and regular cross-sectional imaging, in parallel with the study intervention.

A 19G RFA needle (EUSRA, STARMed, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea) is introduced through the working channel of an echoendoscope and advanced into the pancreatic tumor under real-time ultrasound guidance.

The needle is connected to a dedicated RF generator delivering a current of 400-500 kHz, which induces coagulative necrosis in the targeted tissue. Treatment is continued until complete ablation is confirmed ultrasonographically, or until an impedance value of 800 Ω is reached, at which point the generator automatically terminates power output to limit further tissue damage. A cooling pump circulates chilled saline through the needle to reduce charring at the ablation site. The procedure is performed transgastrically or transduodenally under deep sedation or general anesthesia, and may involve one or more ablation cycles per session. Treatment may be repeated at approximately 4-week intervals, depending on radiological response and patient tolerance.

Other Names:
  • EUS-RFA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: From index date until death from any cause, assessed up to 4 years

Time from index date (first day of systemic oncological therapy or first visit at the Department of Oncology (for patients who do not receive systemic therapy)) to death from any cause. Participants alive at the time of last follow-up will be censored at that date.

From index date until death from any cause, assessed up to 4 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression- and metastatic-free survival
Time Frame: From index date until progression, metastasis, or last follow-up, assessed up to approximately 4 years

Time from index date to radiological progression of the primary tumor or development of distant metastases, assessed according to RECIST 1.1 on cross-sectional imaging.

From index date until progression, metastasis, or last follow-up, assessed up to approximately 4 years
Local tumor control at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: At 6 and 12 months after index date

Proportion of participants with local tumor control (absence of local progression) on cross-sectional imaging at 6 and 12 months, assessed according to RECIST 1.1.

At 6 and 12 months after index date
Procedure-related adverse events
Time Frame: At 30 days after each EUS-RFA procedure

Adverse events occurring within 30 days of each EUS-RFA treatment, graded according to the AGREE classification.

At 30 days after each EUS-RFA procedure
Time to biliary/duodenal intervention
Time Frame: From index date until intervention or last follow-up, assessed up to approximately 4 years

Time from index date to first biliary or duodenal intervention (e.g., stenting)

From index date until intervention or last follow-up, assessed up to approximately 4 years
Pain score change compared to baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and at 6, 12 and 18 months after inclusion

Change from baseline in pain severity, measured using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10)

Baseline and at 6, 12 and 18 months after inclusion
Opioid consumption change compared to baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and at 6, 12 and 18 months after inclusion

Change in opioid consumption, converted to total daily oral morphine milligram equivalent (MME).

Baseline and at 6, 12 and 18 months after inclusion
Quality of Life change compared to baseline (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Time Frame: Baseline and at 6, 12 and 18 months

Change from baseline in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale, ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Baseline and at 6, 12 and 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bojan Kovacevic, MD, PhD, Herlev Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe