Hop Extract Versus Soy Isoflavone Extract for Menopausal Symptoms (HOPES) (HOPES)

November 4, 2026 updated by: Silvia Pilar González Rodríguez, Menoclinica by Palacios

Efficacy of a Full Spectrum Hop (Humulus Lupulus L.) Extract Versus a Soy Extract in Women With Menopausal Symptoms: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Nutritional Intervention Study (HOPES: Hops On Psychological and Estrogenic Symptoms in Menopause)

HOPES (Hops On Psychological and Estrogenic Symptoms in Menopause) is a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled nutritional intervention study in 120 peri- and postmenopausal women aged 45 to 60 years with moderate to severe menopausal symptoms. For 12 weeks, participants take one capsule per day of either a full spectrum hop (Humulus lupulus L.) extract or a soy isoflavone extract. Both products are marketed dietary supplements, and there is no placebo arm.

The main question is whether the hop extract, which combines prenylated flavonoids with bitter acids, improves the psychological symptoms of menopause (depressive mood, irritability, anxiety, and physical and mental exhaustion) more than the soy extract. The main outcome is the change in the psychological subscale of the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) from baseline to week 12.

Secondary outcomes include the other MRS domains, anxiety, depressive symptoms, menopause-related quality of life, body composition, and safety.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale

Many women cannot or do not wish to use menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) and turn to plant-based supplements. Soy isoflavones act mainly through estrogenic mechanisms and have shown a modest effect on vasomotor symptoms, while the evidence for psychological symptoms and sleep is more limited and less consistent. Hop extract has a dual profile: prenylated flavonoids, linked to estrogenic activity, and bitter acids, described in relation to GABAergic neurotransmission and vagal signalling. No direct comparison of the two extracts is available. HOPES tests whether this profile gives the hop extract a differential effect on the psychological domain of menopausal symptoms.

Design

Candidates complete a secure online screening (visit 0). Eligible women attend a baseline visit (visit 1) at the coordinating center, where eligibility is confirmed, assessments and a blood sample are taken, and participants are randomized 1:1 (computer-generated permuted blocks of variable size, stratified by center and menopausal status: perimenopause or postmenopause). Follow-up includes a visit at week 6 (visit 2, in person or remote) and a final visit at week 12 (visit 3).

Capsules and bottles are identical and coded by the sponsor. Participants, the research team and the statistician remain masked until database lock, and an emergency unblinding procedure is available. Adherence is assessed with a capsule diary and a count of returned product, and dietary intake with a 3-day food record at visits 1 and 3.

Assessments

Menopause Rating Scale (MRS), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Cervantes-31 quality of life scale, and 0-10 visual analogue scales (VAS) for hot flashes, sleep quality and mood; body composition by bioimpedance; and blood tests (liver profile, lipid profile, estradiol and follicle-stimulating hormone) at baseline and week 12.

Analysis

The primary outcome is analyzed in the intention-to-treat population with a mixed model for repeated measures. With 60 participants per arm, the study has 80% power, at a two-sided significance level of 5%, to detect a standardized effect size of about 0.52. Secondary outcomes are tested hierarchically.

A between-group difference of at least 0.5 standard deviations in the change of the MRS psychological subscale is prespecified as clinically relevant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Madrid
      • Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 28009
        • Recruiting
        • Menoclínica by Palacios

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Woman aged 45 to 60 years (both inclusive).
  • Perimenopausal or postmenopausal status according to the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop +10 (STRAW+10) criteria.
  • Moderate to severe menopausal symptoms, defined as a total Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) score of 15 or higher at the baseline assessment prior to randomization.
  • Not receiving menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) and not having received it in the previous 3 months.
  • Ability to understand and complete the study questionnaires autonomously.
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to soy or any of its derivatives.
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to hops or to other species of the Cannabaceae family.
  • Personal history of breast cancer, endometrial cancer or any other hormone-dependent tumor.
  • Genital bleeding of undiagnosed cause.
  • Current use, or use in the previous 3 months, of MHT, tibolone, selective estrogen receptor modulators, or dietary supplements or products specifically intended for menopausal symptoms or with a relevant phytoestrogen content, or anticipated need to start any of them during the study.
  • Current treatment with antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics, gabapentin or pregabalin.
  • Known liver disease or abnormal baseline liver profile (transaminases more than twice the upper limit of normal).
  • Moderate or severe renal insufficiency.
  • History of venous thromboembolic disease.
  • Oral anticoagulant treatment.
  • Body mass index (BMI) of 35 kg/m2 or higher.
  • Pacemaker or any other implantable electronic device (contraindication for bioimpedance).
  • Unstabilized major psychiatric disorder.
  • Risky alcohol consumption or substance dependence.
  • Simultaneous participation in another clinical trial or intervention study, or participation in one within the previous 30 days.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hop extract

One capsule per day for 12 weeks of MENODUO FullSpectrum, a dry hop (Humulus lupulus L.) strobilus extract, 100 mg/day, providing 10 mg/day of bitter acids and derivatives, 3.5 mg/day of prenylated flavonoids and 2.5 mg/day of xanthohumol.

100 mg/day orally, one capsule per day for 12 weeks. Provides 10 mg/day of bitter acids and derivatives, 3.5 mg/day of prenylated flavonoids and 2.5 mg/day of xanthohumol.

Other Names:
  • MENODUO FullSpectrum
Active Comparator: Soy extract

One capsule per day for 12 weeks of a dry soy (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) seed extract, 100 mg/day, standardized to at least 40% total isoflavones (at least 40 mg/day) and selected to provide at least 20 mg/day of genistein.

Description: 100 mg/day orally, one capsule per day for 12 weeks. Standardized to at least 40% total isoflavones (at least 40 mg/day) and at least 20% genistein (at least 20 mg/day).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the psychological subscale score of the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS)
Time Frame: Baseline (visit 1) and week 12 (visit 3)

The MRS psychological subscale is the sum of items 4 to 7 (depressive mood, irritability, anxiety, and physical and mental exhaustion), each rated from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). Score range 0 to 16; higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. Change is the week 12 score minus the baseline score.

Baseline (visit 1) and week 12 (visit 3)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in total MRS score
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6 and week 12

Sum of the 11 MRS items, each rated 0 to 4. Score range 0 to 44; higher scores indicate greater severity.

Baseline, week 6 and week 12
Change in MRS somatic-vegetative subscale score
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6 and week 12

Sum of items 1, 2, 3 and 11. Score range 0 to 16; higher scores indicate greater severity.

Baseline, week 6 and week 12
Change in MRS urogenital subscale score
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6 and week 12

Sum of items 8, 9 and 10. Score range 0 to 12; higher scores indicate greater severity.

Baseline, week 6 and week 12
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) score
Time Frame: Baseline and week 12 (optional at week 6)

Seven items rated 0 to 3. Score range 0 to 21; higher scores indicate more anxiety symptoms.

Baseline and week 12 (optional at week 6)
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score
Time Frame: Baseline and week 12 (optional at week 6)

Nine items rated 0 to 3. Score range 0 to 27; higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms.

Baseline and week 12 (optional at week 6)
Change in the Cervantes Scale global score
Time Frame: Baseline and week 12

The Cervantes Scale is a 31-item, menopause-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire. Each item is rated from 0 to 5. The global score ranges from 0 to 155; higher scores indicate worse health-related quality of life. Change is the week 12 score minus the baseline score.

Baseline and week 12
Change in the Cervantes Scale sexuality domain score
Time Frame: Baseline and week 12

The sexuality domain of the Cervantes Scale (31-item, menopause-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire) comprises 4 items on sexual function, each rated from 0 to 5. The domain score ranges from 0 to 20; higher scores indicate worse sexual function. Change is the week 12 score minus the baseline score.

Baseline and week 12
Change in body fat percentage
Time Frame: Baseline and week 12

Body fat percentage measured by bioimpedance.

Baseline and week 12
Change in estimated visceral fat
Time Frame: Baseline and week 12

Visceral fat estimate measured by bioimpedance.

Baseline and week 12
Change in hot flash intensity (visual analogue scale)
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6 and week 12

0-10 scale; 0 = no hot flashes, 10 = maximum imaginable intensity.

Baseline, week 6 and week 12
Change in sleep quality (visual analogue scale)
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6 and week 12

0-10 scale; 0 = very poor sleep quality, 10 = excellent sleep quality.

Baseline, week 6 and week 12
Change in mood (visual analogue scale)
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6 and week 12

0-10 scale; 0 = very poor mood, 10 = excellent mood.

Baseline, week 6 and week 12
Number of participants with adverse events
Time Frame: From baseline to week 12

Incidence, nature, severity, duration and relationship to the intervention, including events that lead to interruption of the intervention or withdrawal.

From baseline to week 12
Change in liver profile
Time Frame: Baseline and week 12

Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin.

Baseline and week 12
Change in lean mass
Time Frame: Baseline and week 12

Lean mass in kilograms measured by bioimpedance.

Baseline and week 12

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in lipid profile
Time Frame: Baseline and week 12

Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and triglycerides.

Baseline and week 12
Change in serum estradiol
Time Frame: Baseline and week 12

Serum estradiol concentration.

Baseline and week 12
Change in serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)
Time Frame: Baseline and week 12

Serum FSH concentration.

Baseline and week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Silvia Pilar González Rodríguez, Menoclínica by Palacios

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 26, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 5, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

October 29, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2026

Last Verified

October 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared at this stage. Aggregate results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe