Comparative Effect of Dual Task Training and Rhythmic Stabilization in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients

October 28, 2026 updated by: Rabia Majeed, University of Management and Technology Lahore

Comparative Effect of Dual Task Training and Rhythmic Stabilization on Pain, Balance, Proprioception and Physical Function in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a degenerative joint condition that causes pain, stiffness, reduced proprioception, impaired balance, and decreased physical function. This study aims to compare the effects of Dual Task Training and Rhythmic Stabilization Training on balance, proprioception, and physical function in patients with KOA. A randomized clinical trial will be conducted using convenient sampling, with participants randomly allocated into two groups. Both groups will receive a 15-minute hot pack followed by their respective interventions, three times per week for six weeks,12 sessions.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab Province
      • Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
        • University of Management & Technology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Age 40-60 years Both genders male and female Patient have diagnosed OA severity of (Kellgren Lawrence) Grade I-II knee OA. Patients able to walk independently without assistive device. Knee pain ≥ 3 months. Pain intensity score is 3-6 out of 10 on numeric rating scale. Have unilateral or bilateral knee OA.

Exclusion Criteria:

History of total knee replacement surgery. Inflammatory disorders. Severe visual or hearing impairment.(36) Severe cardiovascular disorders (such as Myocardial infarction) Neurological disorders (e.g., stroke, Parkinson's disease). History of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and chronic kidney disease. Lower limb fracture.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dual task training

Participants will receive dual-task training involving simultaneous performance of motor and cognitive tasks alongside conventional physiotherapy. The intervention will include functional activities such as walking, standing, and sit-to-stand while performing cognitive tasks, including counting backward, verbal fluency, or responding to simple questions. Task difficulty will be progressively increased according to participants' abilities and tolerance to improve balance, functional mobility, and cognitive-motor coordination.

Participants will receive dual-task training involving simultaneous performance of motor and cognitive tasks alongside conventional physiotherapy. The intervention will include functional activities such as walking, standing, and sit-to-stand while performing cognitive tasks, including counting backward, verbal fluency, or responding to simple questions. Task difficulty will be progressively increased according to participants' abilities and tolerance to improve balance, functional mobility, and cognitive-motor coordination. The intervention will be performed three times per week for six weeks.

Active Comparator: Rhythmic stabilization

Participants will receive rhythmic stabilization based on proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) principles, targeting the knee joint in supine, sitting, and standing positions. The technique involves applying alternating manual resistance in multiple directions while participants maintain isometric contractions without allowing joint movement. Participants will be instructed to resist the therapist's forces to facilitate muscle co-contraction, improve knee stability, neuromuscular control, and balance.

Participants will receive rhythmic stabilization based on proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) principles, targeting the knee joint in supine, sitting, and standing positions. The technique involves applying alternating manual resistance in multiple directions while participants maintain isometric contractions without allowing joint movement. Participants will be instructed to resist the therapist's forces to facilitate muscle co-contraction, improve knee stability, neuromuscular control, and balance. The intervention will be performed three times per week for six weeks, alongside conventional physiotherapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NPRS
Time Frame: Baseline and after 6 weeks

11-point numeric with 0 representing No pain, 1-3 representing Mild Pain (nagging, annoying, interfering little with ADLs), 4-6 representing Moderate Pains (interferes significantly with ADLs), 7-10 representing Sever Pain (disabling, unable to perform ADL

Baseline and after 6 weeks
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and after 6 weeks

The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) will be used to assess functional balance in patients with knee osteoarthritis. It is a standardized 14-item scale that evaluates balance during daily functional activities such as sitting, standing, turning, reaching, transferring, and single-leg standing. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale, with a total score ranging from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate better balance performance. Scores of 0-20 indicate high fall risk, 21-40 indicate moderate fall risk, and scores ≥41 indicate low fall risk. The BBS is a highly reliable and valid tool for assessing balance in individuals with knee OA

Baseline and after 6 weeks
Joint position Sense Error
Time Frame: Baseline and after 6 weeks

Joint Position Error (JPSE) will be assessed using Smartphone Inclinometer to evaluate proprioception. The participant's limb will be passively positioned at a target angle (e.g., 30° knee flexion) with eyes closed, and then returned to the starting position. The participant will then actively reproduce the same angle, and the smartphone Inclinometer will record the difference between the target and reproduced angle. This difference, measured in degrees, represents the JPSE. Smaller error values indicate better proprioceptive accuracy and joint position sense.

Baseline and after 6 weeks
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index:
Time Frame: Baseline and after 6 weeks

The WOMAC is a valid, reliable, and widely used disease-specific outcome measure for assessing pain, stiffness, and physical function in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. It comprises 24 items divided into three subscales: pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items), and physical function (17 items). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme). The total score is calculated by summing the responses, with higher scores indicating greater pain, stiffness, and functional impairment

Baseline and after 6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 22, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2026

Last Verified

October 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The results data collected , de-identified individual participant data will be shared.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

6 months after the publication of the manuscript

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data can be requested from the corresponding author

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe