NAVA Use in Preterm Neonates With Respiratory Distress Syndrome

November 5, 2026 updated by: Rania Ali El-Farrash, Ain Shams University

Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist [NAVA] Versus Conventional Ventilation in Preterm Neonates With Respiratory Distress Syndrome

A randomized controlled clinical trial evaluates the efficacy of NAVA in comparison with conventional ventilation (SIMV) in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Numerous methods for ventilating patients are available in both invasive and noninvasive modes. However, patient-ventilator asynchrony has been a persistent problem .

Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) improves patient-ventilator synchrony in preterm infants, leading to reduced work of breathing, lower peak inspiratory pressures (PIP), and decreased oxygen requirements compared to conventional ventilation . This improved synchrony results in better oxygenation and ventilation, potentially reducing the risk of lung injury and other complications associated with mechanical ventilation in preterm neonates . . NAVA is a mechanical ventilation modality in which the ventilator assists the patient breath in proportion to and in synchrony with the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) .EAdi is a fast and accurate reflection of phrenic nerve activity arising from central respiratory centers.

During NAVA use, a nasogastric or orogastric tube with electrodes is placed in the patient to detect changes in the diaphragm's electrical activity (Edi) more than 60 times per second . The diaphragm contracts as the phrenic nerves deliver the signal to breathe. The ventilator measures the strength of this activity and provides an appropriately sized breath based on the patient's own effort .

As synchronization in NAVA is independent of pressure or flow trigger and independent of leaks, NAVA has a strong potential to increase invasive ventilation efficiency .

Patient-ventilator asynchrony occurs when the ventilator fails to detect the patient's breath or detects it too late in the breathing cycle, leading to complications that include increased sedation, discomfort, and possibly higher morbidity and mortality .

With NAVA, the patient is actually controlling the trigger, delivery and cycling of every breath. The ventilator becomes completely synchronous with the patient avoiding the undesirable outcomes of patient-ventilator asynchrony. Since the Edi is a reflection of neural respiratory output, ventilator breath delivery is in synchrony with neural control of ventilation .

.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Rania Ali El-Farrash
  • Phone Number: +201222208550

Study Locations

    • Abbasia
      • Cairo, Abbasia, Egypt, 11517
        • Recruiting
        • Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), Ain Shams University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 day to 1 month (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Gestational age ≤ 34 weeks.
  2. Neonates that have RDS according to clinical and radiological findings
  3. Neonates requiring invasive mechanical ventilation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1) Preterm neonates that have respiratory distress due to causes other than respiratory distress syndrome including transient tachypnea of new born , congenital pneumonia and sepsis. 2)Central and peripheral conditions that limit the respiratory drive, as well as diaphragmatic anatomical defects in patients with an intact respiratory drive, comprise the contraindications to NAVA

    • Examples are the following:

      • Central disorder: paralytic drug use, respiratory drive suppression due to heavy sedation or brain injury.
      • Peripheral disorder: phrenic nerve injury, paralytic agent administration.
      • Structural (anatomical) disorder: esophageal atresia, diaphragmatic hernia. 3) Cardiac patients including aortic coarctation , double outlet right ventricle (DORV), Tetralogy of Fallot and Transposition of the great arteries (TGA). 4) Surgical patients including gastroschisis , omphalocele , tracheoesophageal fistula and congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental: Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist [NAVA] .

After documenting parental consent, preterm neonates with respiratoryd by insufficiency randomly ventilated on NAVA will be assessed by transcranial Doppler ultrasonographic examination and echocardiography.

ventilator settings will be recorded such as: NAVA level , Edi peak , peep, apnea time

Active Comparator: Active Comparator: Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (SIMV)

After documenting parental consent, preterm neonates with respiratoryd by insufficiency randomly ventilated on SIMV will be assessed by transcranial Doppler ultrasonographic examination and echocardiography.

ventilator settings will be recorded such as peep , PIP , Fio2

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Echocardiography
Time Frame: baseline and after 24 hours from enrollment in the study

to assess any structural cardiac anomalies, the patency of ductus arteriosus, right ventricular output (RVO), left ventricular output (LVO), and superior vena cava (SVC) flow, ejection fraction (EF) and pulmonary pressure performed by a specialized echocardiographist.

baseline and after 24 hours from enrollment in the study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Transcranial ultrasonography Doppler
Time Frame: baseline and after 24 hours from enrollment in the study

applied to the middle cerebral artery to provide an estimate of cerebral blood flow performed by a specialized pediatric radiologist .

baseline and after 24 hours from enrollment in the study
Duration of admission
Time Frame: up to 8 weeks or till patient discharged or die which comes first

To document total number of days of admission

up to 8 weeks or till patient discharged or die which comes first
Mortality rate
Time Frame: up to 8 weeks or till patient death which comes first

To document incidence of mortality during hospitalization

up to 8 weeks or till patient death which comes first
Incidence of feeding intolerance
Time Frame: up to 8 weeks or till patient discharged or die which comes first

Percentage of Patients who developed feeding intolerance

up to 8 weeks or till patient discharged or die which comes first
Days to reach full intake
Time Frame: up to 8 weeks or till patient discharged or die which comes first

Number of days needed by each patient to reach full intake

up to 8 weeks or till patient discharged or die which comes first
Chest x ray change
Time Frame: upon NICU admission and one hour after enrollment in the study .

Chest x ray grading of RDS performed to patient before and after the assigned mode to compare lung aeration degree

upon NICU admission and one hour after enrollment in the study .

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 24, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2026

Last Verified

October 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe