Decrease of renal resistance during hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion is associated with early allograft function in extended criteria donation kidney transplantation

Franziska A Meister, Zoltan Czigany, Katharina Rietzler, Hannah Miller, Sophie Reichelt, Wen-Jia Liu, Joerg Boecker, Marcus J Moeller, Rene H Tolba, Karim Hamesch, Pavel Strnad, Peter Boor, Christian Stoppe, Ulf P Neumann, Georg Lurje, Franziska A Meister, Zoltan Czigany, Katharina Rietzler, Hannah Miller, Sophie Reichelt, Wen-Jia Liu, Joerg Boecker, Marcus J Moeller, Rene H Tolba, Karim Hamesch, Pavel Strnad, Peter Boor, Christian Stoppe, Ulf P Neumann, Georg Lurje

Abstract

Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) was recently tested in preclinical trials in kidney transplantation (KT). Here we investigate the effects of HOPE on extended-criteria-donation (ECD) kidney allografts (KA). Fifteen ECD-KA were submitted to 152 ± 92 min of end-ischemic HOPE and were compared to a matched group undergoing conventional-cold-storage (CCS) KT (n = 30). Primary (delayed graft function-DGF) and secondary (e.g. postoperative complications, perfusion parameters) endpoints were analyzed within 6-months follow-up. There was no difference in the development of DGF between the HOPE and CCS groups (53% vs. 33%, respectively; p = 0.197). Serum urea was lower following HOPE compared to CCS (p = 0.003), whereas the CCS group displayed lower serum creatinine and higher eGFR rates on postoperative days (POD) 7 and 14. The relative decrease of renal vascular resistance (RR) following HOPE showed a significant inverse association with serum creatinine on POD1 (r = - 0.682; p = 0.006) as well as with serum urea and eGFR. Besides, the relative RR decrease was more prominent in KA with primary function when compared to KA with DGF (p = 0.013). Here we provide clinical evidence on HOPE in ECD-KT after brain death donation. Relative RR may be a useful predictive marker for KA function. Further validation in randomized controlled trials is warranted.Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03378817, Date of first registration: 20/12/2017).

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Enrollment of hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) preserved allografts, compared to a historical cohort transplanted after conventional cold storage (CCS) at the University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany. (B) Connecting the renal artery to the renal artery cannula following back-table preparation. (C) Positioning of the allograft in the kidney holder mesh of the device. (D) The kidney holder mesh is closed. After its placement into the organ container the allograft is ready to be perfused. (E) Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion of the kidney allograft with the Kidney Transport Assist (Organ Assist b.v., Groningen, The Netherlands). ECD, Extended criteria donor; DBD, Donation after brain death, KT, kidney transplantation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Time course of serum creatinine levels during the early postoperative phase in the hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) and conventional cold storage (CCS) groups (n = 45). Serum creatinine was higher after HOPE at postoperative day (POD) 7 (4.9 ± 2.2 mg/dl vs. 3.7 ± 3.2/ mg/dl p = 0.033) and POD 14 (4.1 ± 2.5 mg/dl vs. 2.6 ± 2.1 mg/dl p = 0.034). (B) Serum urea levels on POD1 were higher in CCS than in the HOPE group (78 ± 32 mg/dl vs. 103 ± 26 mg/dl p = 0.003; MWU). (C) Time course of serum creatinine levels in allografts with PF during the early postoperative days in HOPE and CCS groups (n = 24; MWU). Allografts with DGF were excluded, considering the effect of dialysis on these values. (D) Duration of hospital stay following kidney transplantation in HOPE and CCS groups (25 ± 13d vs. 21 ± 22d p = 0.570; MWU). (E) Postoperative 90-day complications assessed by the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification following HOPE and CCS, without significant between-group differences. (F) Postoperative 90-day complications assessed by comprehensive complication index in HOPE and CCS groups (32 ± 22 vs. 36 ± 24 p = 0.647; MWU). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Decrease of renal resistance (RR) during hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE). During the first hour of HOPE, RR changes significantly and reaches a plateau in the later phase of perfusion (Wilcoxon rank sum test). (B) Alterations of relative RR correlate with recipients’ serum creatinine on POD1 (Spearman's rank-order). (C) Development of flow and RR in kidney allografts with primary function (PF, blue) and delayed graft function (DGF, red) during HOPE. Initial flow was lower in the PF group (36 ± 22 ml/min vs. 77 ± 45 ml/min p = 0.040; MWU). (D) Increase of mean flow and decrease of mean RR compared to baseline during HOPE in PF and DGF kidney allografts. Mean alterations of flow and RR were higher in the PF than in the DGF group (RR: 54 ± 16% vs. 25 ± 15% p = 0.013; MWU) *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 ***p < 0.001.

References

    1. Merion RM, et al. Deceased-donor characteristics and the survival benefit of kidney transplantation. JAMA. 2005;294:2726–2733. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.21.2726.
    1. Siedlecki A, Irish W, Brennan DC. Delayed graft function in the kidney transplant. Am. J. Transplant. 2011;11:2279–2296. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03754.x.
    1. Requiao-Moura LR, Durao Junior MDS, Matos AC, Pacheco-Silva A. Ischemia and reperfusion injury in renal transplantation: Hemodynamic and immunological paradigms. Einstein. 2015;13:129–135. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082015RW3161.
    1. Hameed AM, Pleass HC, Wong G, Hawthorne WJ. Maximizing kidneys for transplantation using machine perfusion: from the past to the future: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2016;95:e5083. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005083.
    1. Moers C, Pirenne J, Paul A, Ploeg RJ, Machine Preservation Trial Study, G Machine perfusion or cold storage in deceased-donor kidney transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366:770–771. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1111038.
    1. Moers C, et al. Machine perfusion or cold storage in deceased-donor kidney transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;360:7–19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802289.
    1. Czigany Z, et al. Machine perfusion for liver transplantation in the era of marginal organs-new kids on the block. Liver Int. 2018;39:228–249. doi: 10.1111/liv.13946.
    1. Czigany Z, et al. Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) for orthotopic liver transplantation of human liver allografts from extended criteria donors (ECD) in donation after brain death (DBD): A prospective multicentre randomised controlled trial (HOPE ECD-DBD) BMJ Open. 2017;7:e017558. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017558.
    1. Treckmann J, et al. Machine perfusion versus cold storage for preservation of kidneys from expanded criteria donors after brain death. Transpl. Int. 2011;24:548–554. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01232.x.
    1. Yao L, et al. Hypothermic machine perfusion in DCD kidney transplantation: A single center experience. Urol Int. 2016;96:148–151. doi: 10.1159/000431025.
    1. Tingle SJ, et al. Machine perfusion preservation versus static cold storage for deceased donor kidney transplantation. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019;3:CD011671.
    1. Karpinski J, et al. Outcome of kidney transplantation from high-risk donors is determined by both structure and function. Transplantation. 1999;67:1162–1167. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199904270-00013.
    1. Bissolati M, et al. Renal resistance trend during hypothermic machine perfusion is more predictive of postoperative outcome than biopsy score: Preliminary experience in 35 consecutive kidney transplantations. Artif. Organs. 2018;42:714–722. doi: 10.1111/aor.13117.
    1. Jochmans I, et al. The prognostic value of renal resistance during hypothermic machine perfusion of deceased donor kidneys. Am. J. Transplant. 2011;11:2214–2220. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03685.x.
    1. Kron P, et al. Short, cool, and well oxygenated—HOPE for kidney transplantation in a rodent model. Ann. Surg. 2016;264:815–822. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001766.
    1. de Rougemont O, et al. One hour hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) protects nonviable liver allografts donated after cardiac death. Ann. Surg. 2009;250:674–683. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bcb1ee.
    1. Minor T, et al. Energetic recovery in porcine grafts by minimally invasive liver oxygenation. J. Surg. Res. 2012;178:e59–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.01.018.
    1. Kron P, et al. Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE)—A simple and effective method to modulate the immune response in kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2019;103:128–136. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002634.
    1. Darius T, et al. Brief O2 uploading during continuous hypothermic machine perfusion is simple yet effective oxygenation method to improve initial kidney function in a porcine autotransplant model. Am. J. Transplant. 2020;20:2030–2043. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15800.
    1. Meister FA, et al. Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion—Preliminary experience with end-ischemic reconditioning of marginal kidney allografts. Clin. Transplant. 2019;33:e13673. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13673.
    1. Ravaioli M, et al. Successful dual kidney transplantation after hypothermic oxygenated perfusion of discarded human kidneys. Am. J. Case Rep. 2017;18:1009–1013. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.905377.
    1. Ravaioli M, et al. Hypothermic oxygenated new machine perfusion system in liver and kidney transplantation of extended criteria donors: First Italian clinical trial. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:6063. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62979-9.
    1. Meister FA, et al. Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion of extended criteria kidney allografts from brain dead donors: Protocol for a prospective pilot study. JMIR Res. Protoc. 2019;8:e14622. doi: 10.2196/14622.
    1. Aubert O, et al. Long term outcomes of transplantation using kidneys from expanded criteria donors: Prospective, population based cohort study. BMJ. 2015;351:h3557. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3557.
    1. Pascual J, Zamora J, Pirsch JD. A systematic review of kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2008;52:553–586. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.06.005.
    1. Dutkowski P, et al. First comparison of hypothermic oxygenated perfusion versus static cold storage of human donation after cardiac death liver transplants: An international-matched case analysis. Ann. Surg. 2015;262:764–770. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001473.
    1. Jochmans I, et al. Machine perfusion versus cold storage for the preservation of kidneys donated after cardiac death: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Ann. Surg. 2010;252:756–764. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ffc256.
    1. Lich R, Howerton LW, Davis LA. Recurrent urosepsis in children. J. Urol. 1961;86:554–558. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)65219-4.
    1. Gregoir W. The surgical treatment of congenital vesico-ureteral reflux. Acta Chir. Belg. 1964;63:431–439.
    1. Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J, Puhan MA, Clavien PA. The comprehensive complication index: A novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann. Surg. 2013;258:1–7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318296c732.
    1. Taber DJ, et al. Overall graft loss versus death-censored graft loss: Unmasking the magnitude of racial disparities in outcomes among us kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2017;101:402–410. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001119.
    1. Jupiter DC. Propensity score matching: Retrospective randomization? J. Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;56:417–420. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.01.013.
    1. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J. Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–383. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
    1. Czigany Z, et al. Ischemia-reperfusion injury in marginal liver grafts and the role of hypothermic machine perfusion: Molecular mechanisms and clinical implications. J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:846. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030846.
    1. Jochmans I, Nicholson ML, Hosgood SA. Kidney perfusion: Some like it hot others prefer to keep it cool. Curr. Opin. Organ Transpl. 2017;22:260–266. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000405.
    1. Jochmans I, O'Callaghan JM, Pirenne J, Ploeg RJ. Hypothermic machine perfusion of kidneys retrieved from standard and high-risk donors. Transpl. Int. 2015;28:665–676. doi: 10.1111/tri.12530.
    1. Ishii D, et al. Applicability of hypothermic oxygenate machine perfusion preservation for split-liver transplantation in a porcine model: An experimental study. Ann. Transplant. 2020;25:e919920. doi: 10.12659/AOT.919920.
    1. Gelpi R, et al. The development of a predictive model of graft function in uncontrolled donors after circulatory death: Validity of a pulsatile renal preservation machine cut-off value for kidney acceptance. Nephrol. Dial Transplant. 2019;34:531–538. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy241.
    1. Sonnenday CJ, et al. The hazards of basing acceptance of cadaveric renal allografts on pulsatile perfusion parameters alone. Transplantation. 2003;75:2029–2033. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000065296.35395.FD.
    1. Gallinat A, et al. Reconditioning by end-ischemic hypothermic in-house machine perfusion: A promising strategy to improve outcome in expanded criteria donors kidney transplantation. Clin. Transplant. 2017;31:e12904. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12904.
    1. Cannon RM, et al. To pump or not to pump: A comparison of machine perfusion vs cold storage for deceased donor kidney transplantation. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2013;216:625–633. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.025.
    1. Summers DM, et al. Cold pulsatile machine perfusion versus static cold storage for kidneys donated after circulatory death: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Transplantation. 2019;104:1019–1025. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002907.
    1. Akkina SK, et al. Similar outcomes with different rates of delayed graft function may reflect center practice, not center performance. Am. J. Transplant. 2009;9:1460–1466. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02651.x.
    1. Hall IE, et al. Delayed graft function phenotypes and 12-month kidney transplant outcomes. Transplantation. 2017;101:1913–1923. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001409.
    1. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. EPTS Calculator. Vol. 2019 (2018).

Source: PubMed

Upcoming Clinical Trials

Subscribe