Tato stránka byla automaticky přeložena a přesnost překladu není zaručena. Podívejte se prosím na anglická verze pro zdrojový text.

Testing New Formats for the Presentation of Research Evidence to Health Care Managers and Policy Makers

5. května 2020 aktualizováno: Unity Health Toronto

A Randomized Trial to Compare the Effects of a Novel Versus Traditional Systematic Review Format on the Ability of Health Care Managers and Policy Makers to Understand and Apply Evidence

The purpose of this project is to identify and use our knowledge on the barriers and facilitators to using systematic reviews (SR) by health care managers (HCM) and policy markers (PM) to develop and test a novel format for presentation of SR for HCM and PM. We will invite HCM and PM from hospitals and regional authorities in Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia to participate in a randomized-control trial. Participants will receive a link to an online consent survey, and then be randomly allocated to receive access to a novel SR or its traditional presentation. There is no time limit to completing the task, and participants are able to save their responses and finish later. Participants are able to withdraw from the study by not completing the task.

Přehled studie

Postavení

Dokončeno

Detailní popis

Despite advances in the conduct and reporting of traditional systematic reviews, current evidence suggests that they are used infrequently by health care managers and policy makers in decision making. Managers and policy makers have suggested that concise presentation positively affects the use of systematic reviews. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to assess the impact of a traditional systematic review format compared with the innovative format on the ability of health care managers and policy makers to understand the evidence in the review and apply it to a relevant health care decision making scenario.

The two end-user groups have different formatting needs and we will therefore run 2 parallel studies, randomizing each group separately. Once participants have consented to participate, a computer generated randomization process will allocate them to one of 2 arms (1:1 ratio). Participants will either receive either a traditional format or a novel format. Unequal block randomization will be used and allocation will be concealed through central assignment. Outcomes assessors will be blinded and participants will be blinded to the citation of the review so that the traditional version will not be easily accessible in its original format from the relevant journal.

This study will be the first study to engage health care managers and policy makers in the testing of formats for presentation of research evidence relevant to their needs. The results of the project will help increase the uptake of systematic review results in health care management policy decision-making, ultimately leading to informed decision making and positively impacting the health of Canadians.

Typ studie

Intervenční

Zápis (Aktuální)

257

Fáze

  • Nelze použít

Kontakty a umístění

Tato část poskytuje kontaktní údaje pro ty, kteří studii provádějí, a informace o tom, kde se tato studie provádí.

Studijní místa

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Kanada, M5B 1W8
        • St. Michael's Hospital

Kritéria účasti

Výzkumníci hledají lidi, kteří odpovídají určitému popisu, kterému se říká kritéria způsobilosti. Některé příklady těchto kritérií jsou celkový zdravotní stav osoby nebo předchozí léčba.

Kritéria způsobilosti

Věk způsobilý ke studiu

18 let a starší (Dospělý, Starší dospělý)

Přijímá zdravé dobrovolníky

Ano

Pohlaví způsobilá ke studiu

Všechno

Popis

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Health care managers from the Alberta SCNs, CAHO in Ontario, the RHAs and AQESSS in Quebec and RHAs from BC will be invited to participate.
  • Policy makers/analysts from the Ontario, BC, Alberta and Quebec Ministries of Health

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Health care managers or policy makers who are unwilling or unable to give informed consent.

Studijní plán

Tato část poskytuje podrobnosti o studijním plánu, včetně toho, jak je studie navržena a co studie měří.

Jak je studie koncipována?

Detaily designu

  • Primární účel: Výzkum zdravotnických služeb
  • Přidělení: Randomizované
  • Intervenční model: Paralelní přiřazení
  • Maskování: Dvojnásobek

Zbraně a zásahy

Skupina účastníků / Arm
Intervence / Léčba
Experimentální: Novel systematic review format
A 2-page summary of systematic review content that has been designed in collaboration with policy makers and health care managers. Participants receiving the intervention will be asked to read and answer questions using a novel systematic review format.
A 2-page summary of systematic review content that has been designed in collaboration with policy makers and health care managers.
Žádný zásah: Traditional systematic review format
Control participants will be asked to read and answer questions using a traditional systematic review format.

Co je měření studie?

Primární výstupní opatření

Měření výsledku
Popis opatření
Časové okno
Proportion of participants (health care managers or policy makers) who appropriately consider and apply the evidence from each systematic review format
Časové okno: This measure will be assessed at the particular time the intervention is administered (i.e., at the time the participant reads the systematic review format, an average of 2 hours).
The proportion of participants (health care managers or policy makers) who appropriately consider and apply the evidence from each systematic review format to the scenario as measured by agreement with an expert panel's recommendation. A panel of 4 health care managers or policy makers from our research team and 2 content experts. Their answers will provide the definition of appropriate application of the evidence. Two investigators who will be blind to allocation will independently determine if the participant's answer agrees with that from the expert panel. Disagreements will be resolved by a third investigator, independently. Agreement between investigators will be reported using the kappa statistic.
This measure will be assessed at the particular time the intervention is administered (i.e., at the time the participant reads the systematic review format, an average of 2 hours).

Sekundární výstupní opatření

Měření výsledku
Popis opatření
Časové okno
Comprehension of the review
Časové okno: This measures will be assessed at the particular time the intervention is administered (i.e., at the time the participant reads the systematic review format, an average of 2 hours).
Comprehension of the review - defined as the proportion of participants (health care managers or policy makers) who accurately define the bottom line from the systematic review as defined by an expert panel. A panel of 4 health care managers or policy makers from our research team and 2 content experts. Their answers will provide the definition of the bottom line from the systematic review. Two investigators who will be blind to allocation will independently determine if the participant's answer agrees with that from the expert panel. Disagreements will be resolved by a third investigator, independently. Agreement between investigators will be reported using the kappa statistic.
This measures will be assessed at the particular time the intervention is administered (i.e., at the time the participant reads the systematic review format, an average of 2 hours).
Intention to use evidence
Časové okno: This measures will be assessed at the particular time the intervention is administered (i.e., at the time the participant reads the systematic review format, an average of 2 hours).
Intention to use evidence - collected through a 12-item likert scale survey. The survey has good face validity amongst policy makers and managers. The mean and SD of each item in the survey will be reported and we will provide a summary score of all items and convert it to a percentage.
This measures will be assessed at the particular time the intervention is administered (i.e., at the time the participant reads the systematic review format, an average of 2 hours).
Perceived tentativeness of research findings
Časové okno: This measures will be assessed at the particular time the intervention is administered (i.e., at the time the participant reads the systematic review format, an average of 2 hours).
Perceived tentativeness of research findings - collected through a 6-item likert scale survey. This has been pre-tested to make sure that the items are intelligible to people and to achieve high levels of face validity and reliability. The mean and SD of each item in the survey will be reported and we will provide a summary score of all items and convert it to a percentage.
This measures will be assessed at the particular time the intervention is administered (i.e., at the time the participant reads the systematic review format, an average of 2 hours).
Provisional opinion about the intervention
Časové okno: This measures will be assessed at the particular time the intervention is administered (i.e., at the time the participant reads the systematic review format, an average of 2 hours).
Provisional opinion about the intervention - collected through a 14-item likert scale survey. This has been pre-tested to make sure that the items are intelligible to people and to achieve high levels of face validity and reliability. The mean and SD of each item in the survey will be reported and we will provide a summary score of all items and convert it to a percentage.
This measures will be assessed at the particular time the intervention is administered (i.e., at the time the participant reads the systematic review format, an average of 2 hours).

Spolupracovníci a vyšetřovatelé

Zde najdete lidi a organizace zapojené do této studie.

Vyšetřovatelé

  • Vrchní vyšetřovatel: Sharon e Straus, Unity Health Toronto

Termíny studijních záznamů

Tato data sledují průběh záznamů studie a předkládání souhrnných výsledků na ClinicalTrials.gov. Záznamy ze studií a hlášené výsledky jsou před zveřejněním na veřejné webové stránce přezkoumány Národní lékařskou knihovnou (NLM), aby se ujistily, že splňují specifické standardy kontroly kvality.

Hlavní termíny studia

Začátek studia (Aktuální)

16. května 2017

Primární dokončení (Aktuální)

30. listopadu 2019

Dokončení studie (Aktuální)

30. listopadu 2019

Termíny zápisu do studia

První předloženo

5. ledna 2017

První předloženo, které splnilo kritéria kontroly kvality

1. února 2017

První zveřejněno (Odhad)

2. února 2017

Aktualizace studijních záznamů

Poslední zveřejněná aktualizace (Aktuální)

7. května 2020

Odeslaná poslední aktualizace, která splnila kritéria kontroly kvality

5. května 2020

Naposledy ověřeno

1. května 2020

Více informací

Termíny související s touto studií

Další identifikační čísla studie

  • SMH-312381

Plán pro data jednotlivých účastníků (IPD)

Plánujete sdílet data jednotlivých účastníků (IPD)?

NE

Informace o lécích a zařízeních, studijní dokumenty

Studuje lékový produkt regulovaný americkým FDA

Ne

Studuje produkt zařízení regulovaný americkým úřadem FDA

Ne

Tyto informace byly beze změn načteny přímo z webu clinicaltrials.gov. Máte-li jakékoli požadavky na změnu, odstranění nebo aktualizaci podrobností studie, kontaktujte prosím register@clinicaltrials.gov. Jakmile bude změna implementována na clinicaltrials.gov, bude automaticky aktualizována i na našem webu .

Předplatit