- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk forsøg NCT05356390
Comparative Effects of Stabilization Exercises and Muscle Energy Techniques in Sacroiliac Joint Pain
Comparative Effects of Stabilization Exercises and Muscle Energy Techniques on Pain and Disability in Sacroiliac Joint Patients
Studieoversigt
Status
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Detaljeret beskrivelse
Undersøgelsestype
Tilmelding (Faktiske)
Fase
- Ikke anvendelig
Kontakter og lokationer
Studiesteder
-
-
Punjab
-
Multān, Punjab, Pakistan, 60650
- Bakhtawar Amin Hospital Multan
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Køn, der er berettiget til at studere
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
Both men and women age between 30-50 with positive Laslett's criteria. The Cluster of Laslett is a group of four test used for sacroiliac joint pain, the four tests are:
- Sacroiliac Distraction (Gapping) Test
- Thigh Thrust Test
- Sacroiliac Compression (Squish) Test
- Sacral Thrust test
- If a patient has three or more positive pain provocation tests, and then there is a 59% chance that the patient will have Sacroiliac joint pain.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Trochanteric bursitis
- Pelvic bone fracture
- Pelvic implants
- Pregnancy
- Lumbosacral disc herniation
- Sacroiliac joint inflammation
- Inflammatory bowel disease
- Malignancy
Studieplan
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: Randomiseret
- Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
- Maskning: Enkelt
Våben og indgreb
Deltagergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentel: Stabilization exercises
Group A performed stabilization exercises for 4 weeks.
In stabilization exercises, floor bridging, heel prop and alternate arm and leg exercises were administered in iliopsoas, gluteal and hamstring groups.
|
Stabilization training is an active form of physical therapy designed to strengthen muscles to support the spine and help prevent lower back pain. Group A performed stabilization exercises for 4 weeks. In stabilization exercises, floor bridging, heel prop and alternate arm and leg exercises were administered in iliopsoas, gluteal and hamstring groups. On eligible participants baseline assessment was done,3 sessions were given 3days per week, post intervention assessment was taken at 4th week. |
|
Aktiv komparator: Muscle energy techniques
Muscle energy techniques were given to group B. These techniques are active form of manual therapy in which patient uses its own energy on request to aid in treatment.
|
Muscle Energy Technique (MET) is a is a form of manual therapy, widely used in Osteopathy, that uses a muscle's own energy in the form of gentle isometric contractions to relax the muscles via autogenic or reciprocal inhibition and lengthen the muscle. Muscle energy techniques were given to group B. These techniques are active form of manual therapy in which patient uses its own energy on request to aid in treatment. On eligible participants baseline assessment was done,3 sessions were given 3days per week, post intervention assessment was taken at 4th week. |
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Tidsramme: follow up at 4th week
|
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (an outcome measure) that is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity in adults, including those with chronic pain. The NPRS is a segmented numeric version in which a respondent selects a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of pain. The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable"). The NPRS takes <1 minute to complete The NPRS is a valid and reliable scale to measure pain intensity;
|
follow up at 4th week
|
|
Modified Oswestry disability index
Tidsramme: follow up at 4th week
|
This questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how your back or leg pain is affecting your ability to manage in everyday life. Please answer by checking ONE box in each section for the statement which best applies to you. A score of 0-20 reflects minimal disability, 21-40 moderate disability, 41-60 severe disability, 61-80 crippled, and 81-100 bed-bound. Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, 5 representing the greatest disability. The index is calculated by dividing the summed score by the total possible score, which is then multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percentage. Thus, for every question not answered, the denominator is reduced by 5. |
follow up at 4th week
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Sponsor
Efterforskere
- Ledende efterforsker: Samrood Akram, Mphil, Riphah International University,Lahore
Publikationer og nyttige links
Generelle publikationer
- Cohen SP, Chen Y, Neufeld NJ. Sacroiliac joint pain: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. Expert Rev Neurother. 2013 Jan;13(1):99-116. doi: 10.1586/ern.12.148.
- Sarkar M, Goyal M, Samuel AJ. Comparing the Effectiveness of the Muscle Energy Technique and Kinesiotaping in Mechanical Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: A Non-blinded, Two-Group, Pretest-Posttest Randomized Clinical Trial Protocol. Asian Spine J. 2021 Feb;15(1):54-63. doi: 10.31616/asj.2019.0300. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
- Sanika V, Prem V, Karvannan H. Comparison of Glutues Maximus Activation to Flexion Bias Exercises Along with MET Technique in Subjects with Anterior Rotated Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction-a Randomised Controlled Trial. Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2021 Mar 1;14(1):30-38. eCollection 2021 Mar.
- Garcia-Penalver UJ, Palop-Montoro MV, Manzano-Sanchez D. Effectiveness of the Muscle Energy Technique versus Osteopathic Manipulation in the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction in Athletes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 22;17(12):4490. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124490.
- Cho HJ, Kwak DS. Movement of the sacroiliac joint: Anatomy, systematic review, and biomechanical considerations. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2021 Mar;235(3):357-364. doi: 10.1177/0954411920978021. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
- Sasaki T, Kurosawa D, Murakami E, Watanabe T. Physical therapeutic options for residual sacrotuberous ligament pain after treatment of sacroiliac joint dysfunction. J Phys Ther Sci. 2021 Sep;33(9):646-652. doi: 10.1589/jpts.33.646. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
- Rashbaum RF, Ohnmeiss DD, Lindley EM, Kitchel SH, Patel VV. Sacroiliac Joint Pain and Its Treatment. Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Mar;29(2):42-8. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000359.
- Barros G, McGrath L, Gelfenbeyn M. Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction in Patients With Low Back Pain. Fed Pract. 2019 Aug;36(8):370-375.
- Ahmed UA, Maharaj SS, Van Oosterwijck J. Effects of dynamic stabilization exercises and muscle energy technique on selected biopsychosocial outcomes for patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Scand J Pain. 2021 Feb 24;21(3):495-511. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2020-0133. Print 2021 Jul 27.
- Vaseghnia A, Shadmehr A, Attarbashi Moghadam B, Olyaei G, Hadian Rasanani DM-R, Khazaeipour Z. Effects of Muscle Energy Technique on Daily Activities and Lumbar Stiffness in Women With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Study. Journal of Modern Rehabilitation. 2019;13:23-30.
Datoer for undersøgelser
Studer store datoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)
Studieafslutning (Faktiske)
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
Først opslået (Faktiske)
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
Sidst verificeret
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Nøgleord
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- REC/Lhr/22/0107 Sana
Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)
Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?
Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .