Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Comparison of 90° and 120° Arm Positions in Costoclavicular Block (COSTO-RCT)

6. juni 2026 opdateret af: ALGAN TURGUT ÇARSANCAKLI, Ankara Etlik City Hospital

Effect of Arm Abduction Degree ( 90° vs. 120° ) on Block Onset Time and Block Success in Costoclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Patients Undergoing Hand, Wrist and Forearm Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

The costoclavicular approach of the infraclavicular brachial plexus block is widely used for upper extremity surgeries due to its reliable anatomy and high success rates. Patient positioning, particularly the degree of arm abduction, may influence the spread of local anesthetic and the characteristics of the block. However, the optimal arm abduction angle during this procedure remains unclear.

This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to investigate the effect of two different arm abduction angles (90° and 120°) on block onset time and block success in patients undergoing hand, wrist, and forearm surgery under ultrasound-guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block.

Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups according to the degree of arm abduction. The primary outcome is block onset time. Secondary outcomes include block success, sensory and motor block characteristics, perfusion index changes, hemodynamic parameters, readiness for surgery at 15 and 20 minutes, block performance time, need for additional anesthesia, postoperative neurological evaluation at 4 and 24 hours, complications, and patient satisfaction.

The findings of this study are expected to provide evidence on optimal patient positioning to improve the effectiveness and reliability of ultrasound-guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block.

Studieoversigt

Detaljeret beskrivelse

The costoclavicular approach is a recently described infraclavicular technique for brachial plexus block that provides reliable anesthesia for upper extremity surgeries. Due to the compact arrangement of the cords in the costoclavicular space, this technique has gained popularity for its high success rates and consistent anatomy. However, procedural factors such as patient positioning may influence the distribution of local anesthetic and the effectiveness of the block.

Arm abduction is known to alter the anatomical relationships within the infraclavicular region, potentially affecting needle visualization, spread of local anesthetic, and block characteristics. Despite its clinical relevance, there is limited evidence regarding the optimal degree of arm abduction during ultrasound-guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block.

This prospective randomized controlled study aims to compare two different arm abduction angles 90° and 120° in patients undergoing elective hand, wrist, and forearm surgery. After obtaining written informed consent, eligible patients will be randomly assigned into two groups according to the degree of arm abduction.

All procedures will be performed under ultrasound guidance using a standardized technique. The local anesthetic will be administered in the costoclavicular space, and block characteristics will be assessed systematically. The primary outcome is block onset time, defined as the time from completion of local anesthetic injection to the achievement of adequate sensory block for surgery.

Secondary outcomes include block success, sensory and motor block scores, perfusion index measurements, hemodynamic parameters, readiness for surgery at 15 and 20 minutes, block performance time, need for additional anesthesia or conversion to general anesthesia, early complications, postoperative neurological evaluation at 4 and 24 hours, and patient satisfaction assessed using a Likert scale.

The results of this study are expected to provide valuable evidence regarding optimal patient positioning and contribute to improving the clinical effectiveness and reliability of ultrasound-guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Anslået)

106

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiekontakt

Undersøgelse Kontakt Backup

  • Navn: Reyhan POLAT, Professor
  • Telefonnummer: +90 532 673 43 10
  • E-mail: reyhanp9@gmail.com

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged between 18 and 80 years.
  • Patients scheduled for elective upper extremity surgery (hand, wrist, forearm).
  • Patients classified as ASA I-III.
  • Patients who provide informed consent after being informed about the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of previous surgery, scar tissue, tumor, or trauma that may alter brachial plexus anatomy.
  • Presence of infection, hematoma, severe edema, burn, or open wound at the block application site.
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics or other medications used in the study.
  • Coagulopathy, use of anticoagulants, or platelet count < 100,000/mm³.
  • History of peripheral neuropathy, neurological deficit, cervical radiculopathy, or CRPS.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Patients with BMI < 18 kg/m².
  • Patients with BMI > 35 kg/m².
  • Severe cardiac, pulmonary, renal, or hepatic failure.
  • Mental retardation, communication difficulties, or lack of cooperation.
  • Deformity, amputation, or large mass in the surgical extremity that may interfere with sensorimotor assessment.
  • Preoperative significant sensory loss, motor weakness, or signs of neurological disease.
  • Severe anemia (Hb < 9 g/dL) or polycythemia (Hb > 18 g/dL).
  • Psychiatric disorders, substance abuse, or any condition that may interfere with study compliance.

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Screening
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: 90° Arm Abduction
Patients receive ultrasound-guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block with the arm positioned at 90° abduction.
Ultra-sound Guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block performed for upper extremity surgery using a standard local anesthetic technique
Eksperimentel: 120° Arm Abduction
Patients receive ultrasound-guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block with the arm positioned at 120° abduction.
Ultra-sound Guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block performed for upper extremity surgery using a standard local anesthetic technique

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Block Onset Time
Tidsramme: Up to 30 minutes after block performance
Time from completion of local anesthetic injection to achievement of adequate sensory block sufficient for surgery, assessed by pinprick test.
Up to 30 minutes after block performance

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Block Success
Tidsramme: İntraoperative period
Successful completion of surgery without the need for additional anesthesia.
İntraoperative period
Sensory Block Score
Tidsramme: Baseline and at 5-minute intervals up to 20 minutes after block performance.
Sensory block was assessed using a 3-point pinprick scale ( 0= normal sensation, 1= loss of pinprick sensation, 2= complete sensory block).
Baseline and at 5-minute intervals up to 20 minutes after block performance.
Motor Block Score
Tidsramme: Baseline and at 5-minute intervals up to 30 minutes after block performance.
Motor block was assessed using a 3-point motor scale (0= normal motor function, 1= reduced motor strength, 20 complete motor block).
Baseline and at 5-minute intervals up to 30 minutes after block performance.
Perfusion Index
Tidsramme: Baseline and at 5,10,15 and 20 minutes after block performance.
Perfusion index values measured using a Masimo pulse oximeter probe placed on the blocked upper extremity.
Baseline and at 5,10,15 and 20 minutes after block performance.
Readiness for Surgery
Tidsramme: 15 minutes after block
Proportion of patients ready for surgery at 15 and 20 minutes.
15 minutes after block
Readiness for Surgery
Tidsramme: 20 minutes after block
Proportion of patients ready for surgery at 15 and 20 minutes
20 minutes after block
Block Performance Time
Tidsramme: During procedure ( min )
Time required to perform the block.
During procedure ( min )
Need for Additional Anesthesia
Tidsramme: Intraoperative period
Requirement for supplemental anesthesia or conversion to general anesthesia.
Intraoperative period
Complications
Tidsramme: Up to 24 hours
Early complications related to block
Up to 24 hours
Postoperative Sensory and Motor Function Assessment
Tidsramme: 4 hours after surgery
Postoperative neurological evaluation including sensory and motor function examination of the blocked upper extremity to assess for neurological complications.
4 hours after surgery
Postoperative Sensory and Motor Function Assessment
Tidsramme: 24 hours after surgery
Postoperative neurological evaluation including sensory and motor function examination of the blocked upper extremity to assess for neurological complications.
24 hours after surgery
Patient Satisfaction
Tidsramme: At the end of the surgery and 24 hours postoperatively
Patient satisfaction assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 indicates very dissatisfied and 5 indicates very satisfied.
At the end of the surgery and 24 hours postoperatively
Hemodynamic Parametres
Tidsramme: Baseline and at 5,10,15 and 20minutes after block performance
Heart rate
Baseline and at 5,10,15 and 20minutes after block performance
Systolic Blood Pressure
Tidsramme: Baseline and at 5,10,15 and 20 minutes after block performance.
Systolic blood pressure values measured during and after block performance.
Baseline and at 5,10,15 and 20 minutes after block performance.
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Tidsramme: Baseline and at 5,10,15 and 20 minutes after block performance.
Diastolic blood pressure values measured during and after block performance.
Baseline and at 5,10,15 and 20 minutes after block performance.
Mean Arterial Pressure
Tidsramme: Baseline and at 5,10,15 and 20 minutes after block performance.
Mean arterial pressure values measured during and after block performance.
Baseline and at 5,10,15 and 20 minutes after block performance.

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Studieleder: Reyhan Polat, Professor, Ankara Etlik City Hospital

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Anslået)

15. maj 2026

Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)

15. juli 2026

Studieafslutning (Anslået)

27. august 2026

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

7. april 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

8. maj 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

14. maj 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

9. juni 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

6. juni 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. juni 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • AEŞH-EK-2026-07

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Abonner