Ta strona została przetłumaczona automatycznie i dokładność tłumaczenia nie jest gwarantowana. Proszę odnieść się do angielska wersja za tekst źródłowy.

Comparison of 90° and 120° Arm Positions in Costoclavicular Block (COSTO-RCT)

6 czerwca 2026 zaktualizowane przez: ALGAN TURGUT ÇARSANCAKLI, Ankara Etlik City Hospital

Effect of Arm Abduction Degree ( 90° vs. 120° ) on Block Onset Time and Block Success in Costoclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Patients Undergoing Hand, Wrist and Forearm Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

The costoclavicular approach of the infraclavicular brachial plexus block is widely used for upper extremity surgeries due to its reliable anatomy and high success rates. Patient positioning, particularly the degree of arm abduction, may influence the spread of local anesthetic and the characteristics of the block. However, the optimal arm abduction angle during this procedure remains unclear.

This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to investigate the effect of two different arm abduction angles (90° and 120°) on block onset time and block success in patients undergoing hand, wrist, and forearm surgery under ultrasound-guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block.

Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups according to the degree of arm abduction. The primary outcome is block onset time. Secondary outcomes include block success, sensory and motor block characteristics, perfusion index changes, hemodynamic parameters, readiness for surgery at 15 and 20 minutes, block performance time, need for additional anesthesia, postoperative neurological evaluation at 4 and 24 hours, complications, and patient satisfaction.

The findings of this study are expected to provide evidence on optimal patient positioning to improve the effectiveness and reliability of ultrasound-guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block.

Przegląd badań

Szczegółowy opis

The costoclavicular approach is a recently described infraclavicular technique for brachial plexus block that provides reliable anesthesia for upper extremity surgeries. Due to the compact arrangement of the cords in the costoclavicular space, this technique has gained popularity for its high success rates and consistent anatomy. However, procedural factors such as patient positioning may influence the distribution of local anesthetic and the effectiveness of the block.

Arm abduction is known to alter the anatomical relationships within the infraclavicular region, potentially affecting needle visualization, spread of local anesthetic, and block characteristics. Despite its clinical relevance, there is limited evidence regarding the optimal degree of arm abduction during ultrasound-guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block.

This prospective randomized controlled study aims to compare two different arm abduction angles 90° and 120° in patients undergoing elective hand, wrist, and forearm surgery. After obtaining written informed consent, eligible patients will be randomly assigned into two groups according to the degree of arm abduction.

All procedures will be performed under ultrasound guidance using a standardized technique. The local anesthetic will be administered in the costoclavicular space, and block characteristics will be assessed systematically. The primary outcome is block onset time, defined as the time from completion of local anesthetic injection to the achievement of adequate sensory block for surgery.

Secondary outcomes include block success, sensory and motor block scores, perfusion index measurements, hemodynamic parameters, readiness for surgery at 15 and 20 minutes, block performance time, need for additional anesthesia or conversion to general anesthesia, early complications, postoperative neurological evaluation at 4 and 24 hours, and patient satisfaction assessed using a Likert scale.

The results of this study are expected to provide valuable evidence regarding optimal patient positioning and contribute to improving the clinical effectiveness and reliability of ultrasound-guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block.

Typ studiów

Interwencyjne

Zapisy (Szacowany)

106

Faza

  • Nie dotyczy

Kontakty i lokalizacje

Ta sekcja zawiera dane kontaktowe osób prowadzących badanie oraz informacje o tym, gdzie badanie jest przeprowadzane.

Kontakt w sprawie studiów

Kopia zapasowa kontaktu do badania

  • Nazwa: Reyhan POLAT, Professor
  • Numer telefonu: +90 532 673 43 10
  • E-mail: reyhanp9@gmail.com

Kryteria uczestnictwa

Badacze szukają osób, które pasują do określonego opisu, zwanego kryteriami kwalifikacyjnymi. Niektóre przykłady tych kryteriów to ogólny stan zdrowia danej osoby lub wcześniejsze leczenie.

Kryteria kwalifikacji

Wiek uprawniający do nauki

  • Dorosły
  • Starszy dorosły

Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników

Nie

Opis

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged between 18 and 80 years.
  • Patients scheduled for elective upper extremity surgery (hand, wrist, forearm).
  • Patients classified as ASA I-III.
  • Patients who provide informed consent after being informed about the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of previous surgery, scar tissue, tumor, or trauma that may alter brachial plexus anatomy.
  • Presence of infection, hematoma, severe edema, burn, or open wound at the block application site.
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics or other medications used in the study.
  • Coagulopathy, use of anticoagulants, or platelet count < 100,000/mm³.
  • History of peripheral neuropathy, neurological deficit, cervical radiculopathy, or CRPS.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Patients with BMI < 18 kg/m².
  • Patients with BMI > 35 kg/m².
  • Severe cardiac, pulmonary, renal, or hepatic failure.
  • Mental retardation, communication difficulties, or lack of cooperation.
  • Deformity, amputation, or large mass in the surgical extremity that may interfere with sensorimotor assessment.
  • Preoperative significant sensory loss, motor weakness, or signs of neurological disease.
  • Severe anemia (Hb < 9 g/dL) or polycythemia (Hb > 18 g/dL).
  • Psychiatric disorders, substance abuse, or any condition that may interfere with study compliance.

Plan studiów

Ta sekcja zawiera szczegółowe informacje na temat planu badania, w tym sposób zaprojektowania badania i jego pomiary.

Jak projektuje się badanie?

Szczegóły projektu

  • Główny cel: Ekranizacja
  • Przydział: Randomizowane
  • Model interwencyjny: Przydział równoległy
  • Maskowanie: Brak (otwarta etykieta)

Broń i interwencje

Grupa uczestników / Arm
Interwencja / Leczenie
Eksperymentalny: 90° Arm Abduction
Patients receive ultrasound-guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block with the arm positioned at 90° abduction.
Ultra-sound Guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block performed for upper extremity surgery using a standard local anesthetic technique
Eksperymentalny: 120° Arm Abduction
Patients receive ultrasound-guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block with the arm positioned at 120° abduction.
Ultra-sound Guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block performed for upper extremity surgery using a standard local anesthetic technique

Co mierzy badanie?

Podstawowe miary wyniku

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Block Onset Time
Ramy czasowe: Up to 30 minutes after block performance
Time from completion of local anesthetic injection to achievement of adequate sensory block sufficient for surgery, assessed by pinprick test.
Up to 30 minutes after block performance

Miary wyników drugorzędnych

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Block Success
Ramy czasowe: İntraoperative period
Successful completion of surgery without the need for additional anesthesia.
İntraoperative period
Sensory Block Score
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and at 5-minute intervals up to 20 minutes after block performance.
Sensory block was assessed using a 3-point pinprick scale ( 0= normal sensation, 1= loss of pinprick sensation, 2= complete sensory block).
Baseline and at 5-minute intervals up to 20 minutes after block performance.
Motor Block Score
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and at 5-minute intervals up to 30 minutes after block performance.
Motor block was assessed using a 3-point motor scale (0= normal motor function, 1= reduced motor strength, 20 complete motor block).
Baseline and at 5-minute intervals up to 30 minutes after block performance.
Perfusion Index
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and at 5,10,15 and 20 minutes after block performance.
Perfusion index values measured using a Masimo pulse oximeter probe placed on the blocked upper extremity.
Baseline and at 5,10,15 and 20 minutes after block performance.
Readiness for Surgery
Ramy czasowe: 15 minutes after block
Proportion of patients ready for surgery at 15 and 20 minutes.
15 minutes after block
Readiness for Surgery
Ramy czasowe: 20 minutes after block
Proportion of patients ready for surgery at 15 and 20 minutes
20 minutes after block
Block Performance Time
Ramy czasowe: During procedure ( min )
Time required to perform the block.
During procedure ( min )
Need for Additional Anesthesia
Ramy czasowe: Intraoperative period
Requirement for supplemental anesthesia or conversion to general anesthesia.
Intraoperative period
Complications
Ramy czasowe: Up to 24 hours
Early complications related to block
Up to 24 hours
Postoperative Sensory and Motor Function Assessment
Ramy czasowe: 4 hours after surgery
Postoperative neurological evaluation including sensory and motor function examination of the blocked upper extremity to assess for neurological complications.
4 hours after surgery
Postoperative Sensory and Motor Function Assessment
Ramy czasowe: 24 hours after surgery
Postoperative neurological evaluation including sensory and motor function examination of the blocked upper extremity to assess for neurological complications.
24 hours after surgery
Patient Satisfaction
Ramy czasowe: At the end of the surgery and 24 hours postoperatively
Patient satisfaction assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 indicates very dissatisfied and 5 indicates very satisfied.
At the end of the surgery and 24 hours postoperatively
Hemodynamic Parametres
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and at 5,10,15 and 20minutes after block performance
Heart rate
Baseline and at 5,10,15 and 20minutes after block performance
Systolic Blood Pressure
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and at 5,10,15 and 20 minutes after block performance.
Systolic blood pressure values measured during and after block performance.
Baseline and at 5,10,15 and 20 minutes after block performance.
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and at 5,10,15 and 20 minutes after block performance.
Diastolic blood pressure values measured during and after block performance.
Baseline and at 5,10,15 and 20 minutes after block performance.
Mean Arterial Pressure
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and at 5,10,15 and 20 minutes after block performance.
Mean arterial pressure values measured during and after block performance.
Baseline and at 5,10,15 and 20 minutes after block performance.

Współpracownicy i badacze

Tutaj znajdziesz osoby i organizacje zaangażowane w to badanie.

Śledczy

  • Dyrektor Studium: Reyhan Polat, Professor, Ankara Etlik City Hospital

Daty zapisu na studia

Daty te śledzą postęp w przesyłaniu rekordów badań i podsumowań wyników do ClinicalTrials.gov. Zapisy badań i zgłoszone wyniki są przeglądane przez National Library of Medicine (NLM), aby upewnić się, że spełniają określone standardy kontroli jakości, zanim zostaną opublikowane na publicznej stronie internetowej.

Główne daty studiów

Rozpoczęcie studiów (Szacowany)

15 maja 2026

Zakończenie podstawowe (Szacowany)

15 lipca 2026

Ukończenie studiów (Szacowany)

27 sierpnia 2026

Daty rejestracji na studia

Pierwszy przesłany

7 kwietnia 2026

Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości

8 maja 2026

Pierwszy wysłany (Rzeczywisty)

14 maja 2026

Aktualizacje rekordów badań

Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)

9 czerwca 2026

Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości

6 czerwca 2026

Ostatnia weryfikacja

1 czerwca 2026

Więcej informacji

Terminy związane z tym badaniem

Inne numery identyfikacyjne badania

  • AEŞH-EK-2026-07

Plan dla danych uczestnika indywidualnego (IPD)

Planujesz udostępniać dane poszczególnych uczestników (IPD)?

NIE

Informacje o lekach i urządzeniach, dokumenty badawcze

Bada produkt leczniczy regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Bada produkt urządzenia regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .

Subskrybuj