Effects of Concept Mapping and AI Dialogue on Flow and Learning Outcomes in Simulation-Based Learning
2. august 2026 opdateret af: Yang,Bao-Huan, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology
Exploring the Impact of Flipped Classroom Combined With Concept Mapping and AI Dialogue on Students' Flow Experience and Learning Outcomes in Simulation Scenarios: From Personal Traits to Learning Practices
This mixed-methods educational study evaluates the integration of concept mapping and artificial intelligence (AI)-supported dialogue into simulation-based learning for nursing students. The learning activities include structured pre-class preparation, concept mapping, AI-supported dialogue using ChatGPT, and participation in simulated clinical scenarios. The study examines students' flow experience, defined as a state of focused engagement, and their learning outcomes.
Quantitative assessments are used to examine critical thinking, self-efficacy, communication skills, and other learning outcomes specified in the study protocol. Interviews and observations are used to explore students' learning processes and experiences. The study also examines whether individual characteristics, including openness and self-efficacy, are associated with learning practices, flow experience, and learning outcomes.
Studieoversigt
Status
Aktiv, ikke rekrutterende
Betingelser
Detaljeret beskrivelse
Baseline Big Five personality traits will be assessed using the Chinese 15-item Big Five Inventory (BFI-15), including extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience.
The five personality traits will be modeled as exogenous predictors of flow experience and learning-related outcomes in the structural equation model.
Flow experience will also be examined as a potential mediator between personality traits and learning-related outcomes.
Undersøgelsestype
Interventionel
Tilmelding (Faktiske)
168
Fase
- Ikke anvendelig
Kontakter og lokationer
Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.
Studiesteder
-
-
Guishan
-
Taoyuan, Guishan, Taiwan, 333324
- Chang Gung University of Science and Technology
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
- Voksen
- Ældre voksen
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Ja
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Nursing students enrolled in the participating pediatric nursing course and in one of the classes selected for the study.
- Aged 18 years or older.
- Able to read and communicate in Chinese.
- Willing to provide written informed consent and participate in the study activities and assessments.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous participation in the pilot testing or development phase of the same instructional program.
- Students who are on leave of absence or are not expected to attend the scheduled learning activities during the study period.
Studieplan
Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Primært formål: Andet
- Tildeling: Randomiseret
- Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
- Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)
Våben og indgreb
Deltagergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentel: ChatGPT-Assisted Preparation Group
Classes randomized to this arm will complete preclass preparation for pediatric nursing simulation.
Students will watch instructional videos, prepare concept maps, engage in structured dialogue with ChatGPT, and upload their work before class.
The preclass activities are intended to improve learning readiness and support efficient participation in the in-class course.
During class, students will participate in the same high-fidelity scenario-based simulation, virtual reality learning, and instructor-guided discussion as the comparator group.
|
Students watch instructional videos, prepare concept maps, and engage in structured dialogue with ChatGPT before class.
They then participate in high-fidelity pediatric nursing simulation, virtual reality learning, and instructor-guided discussion.
The preparation activities are intended to improve learning readiness and support efficient participation in class.
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Standard Preparation Group
Classes randomized to this arm will complete standard preclass preparation for pediatric nursing simulation.
Students will watch the same instructional videos, prepare concept maps, and upload their work before class, but will not engage in structured dialogue with ChatGPT.
The preclass activities are intended to improve learning readiness and support efficient participation in the in-class course.
During class, students will participate in the same high-fidelity scenario-based simulation, virtual reality learning, and instructor-guided discussion as the experimental group.
|
Students watch the same instructional videos and prepare concept maps before class but do not engage in structured dialogue with ChatGPT.
They then participate in the same high-fidelity pediatric nursing simulation, virtual reality learning, and instructor-guided discussion as the experimental group.
|
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Pediatric Nursing Knowledge Test Score
Tidsramme: From baseline before the intervention to immediately after completion of all three simulation scenarios
|
Pediatric nursing knowledge will be assessed using a test covering fever management for an infant with febrile seizures, chest physiotherapy for a child with pneumonia, and nursing care for a child with epilepsy.
Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater pediatric nursing knowledge.
The change score will be calculated as the post-intervention score minus the baseline score.
|
From baseline before the intervention to immediately after completion of all three simulation scenarios
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Critical Thinking Disposition Score
Tidsramme: From baseline before the intervention to immediately after completion of all three simulation scenarios
|
Critical thinking disposition will be assessed using a 6-item questionnaire adapted by Lin et al. from Chai et al.
Each item is rated from 1 to 5. Total scores range from 6 to 30, with higher scores indicating a greater tendency to evaluate information, consider different perspectives, and use logical and analytical thinking.
The change score will be calculated as the post-intervention score minus the baseline score.
|
From baseline before the intervention to immediately after completion of all three simulation scenarios
|
|
Change From Baseline in Self-reported Communication Competence Score
Tidsramme: From baseline before the intervention to immediately after completion of all three simulation scenarios
|
Self-reported communication competence will be assessed using the 8-item Communication Competence Scale developed by Li (2013) for nursing students.
The scale assesses communication with patients and family members, including initiating communication, establishing therapeutic relationships, using verbal and nonverbal communication, identifying key information, active listening, recognizing emotions, providing health guidance, and organizing communication content.
Each item is rated from 1 to 5. Total scores range from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater self-reported communication competence.
The change score will be calculated as the post-intervention score minus the baseline score.
|
From baseline before the intervention to immediately after completion of all three simulation scenarios
|
|
Change From Baseline in Learning Self-Efficacy Score
Tidsramme: From baseline before the intervention to immediately after completion of all three simulation scenarios
|
Learning self-efficacy will be assessed using the 8-item self-efficacy subscale of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire.
Each item is rated from 1 to 5. Total scores range from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater confidence in successfully completing the learning tasks.
The change score will be calculated as the post-intervention score minus the baseline score.
|
From baseline before the intervention to immediately after completion of all three simulation scenarios
|
|
Change From Baseline in Flow Experience Score
Tidsramme: From the baseline learning activity before the intervention to immediately after completion of all three simulation scenarios
|
Flow experience will be assessed using an 8-item questionnaire based on the Flow Experience Scale developed by Pearce et al.
The questionnaire assesses perceived control, involvement, enjoyment, immersion, interest, altered perception of time, curiosity, and understanding of the learning activity.
Each item is rated from 1 to 5. Total scores range from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating a greater level of flow experience.
The change score will be calculated as the post-intervention score minus the baseline score.
|
From the baseline learning activity before the intervention to immediately after completion of all three simulation scenarios
|
|
Post-intervention Perceived Learning Objective Achievement Score
Tidsramme: Immediately after each corresponding simulation scenario
|
Perceived achievement of the learning objectives will be assessed using a researcher-developed 15-item questionnaire covering fever management (4 items), chest physiotherapy (6 items), and epilepsy care (5 items).
Each item is rated from 1 to 5. Total scores range from 15 to 75, with higher scores indicating greater perceived achievement of the learning objectives.
|
Immediately after each corresponding simulation scenario
|
Andre resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Students in the experimental group will be invited to participate in semi-structured interviews to explore their experiences with the ChatGPT-assisted learning approach.
Tidsramme: Within 4 weeks after finalization of the course grades
|
Students' experiences with the learning approach will be explored through semi-structured interviews.
The interviews will examine perceived differences from previous learning methods, advantages, learning gains, areas requiring improvement, willingness to use the approach again, and willingness to recommend the approach to students and instructors.
Interview recordings will be transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis.
Findings will be reported as themes and subthemes describing students' learning experiences.
|
Within 4 weeks after finalization of the course grades
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.
Datoer for undersøgelser
Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.
Studer store datoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
23. september 2025
Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)
30. september 2026
Studieafslutning (Anslået)
30. september 2026
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
2. august 2026
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
2. august 2026
Først opslået (Faktiske)
6. august 2026
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
6. august 2026
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
2. august 2026
Sidst verificeret
1. august 2026
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Nøgleord
Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- 202402091B0 (Anden identifikator: Chang Gung Medical Foundation Institutional Review Board)
Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)
Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?
INGEN
Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt
Ingen
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt
Ingen
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .