Effects of Concept Mapping and AI Dialogue on Flow and Learning Outcomes in Simulation-Based Learning
2. august 2026 oppdatert av: Yang,Bao-Huan, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology
Exploring the Impact of Flipped Classroom Combined With Concept Mapping and AI Dialogue on Students' Flow Experience and Learning Outcomes in Simulation Scenarios: From Personal Traits to Learning Practices
This mixed-methods educational study evaluates the integration of concept mapping and artificial intelligence (AI)-supported dialogue into simulation-based learning for nursing students. The learning activities include structured pre-class preparation, concept mapping, AI-supported dialogue using ChatGPT, and participation in simulated clinical scenarios. The study examines students' flow experience, defined as a state of focused engagement, and their learning outcomes.
Quantitative assessments are used to examine critical thinking, self-efficacy, communication skills, and other learning outcomes specified in the study protocol. Interviews and observations are used to explore students' learning processes and experiences. The study also examines whether individual characteristics, including openness and self-efficacy, are associated with learning practices, flow experience, and learning outcomes.
Studieoversikt
Status
Aktiv, ikke rekrutterende
Detaljert beskrivelse
Baseline Big Five personality traits will be assessed using the Chinese 15-item Big Five Inventory (BFI-15), including extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience.
The five personality traits will be modeled as exogenous predictors of flow experience and learning-related outcomes in the structural equation model.
Flow experience will also be examined as a potential mediator between personality traits and learning-related outcomes.
Studietype
Intervensjonell
Registrering (Faktiske)
168
Fase
- Ikke aktuelt
Kontakter og plasseringer
Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.
Studiesteder
-
-
Guishan
-
Taoyuan, Guishan, Taiwan, 333324
- Chang Gung University of Science and Technology
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
- Voksen
- Eldre voksen
Tar imot friske frivillige
Ja
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Nursing students enrolled in the participating pediatric nursing course and in one of the classes selected for the study.
- Aged 18 years or older.
- Able to read and communicate in Chinese.
- Willing to provide written informed consent and participate in the study activities and assessments.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous participation in the pilot testing or development phase of the same instructional program.
- Students who are on leave of absence or are not expected to attend the scheduled learning activities during the study period.
Studieplan
Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Annen
- Tildeling: Randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
- Masking: Ingen (Open Label)
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentell: ChatGPT-Assisted Preparation Group
Classes randomized to this arm will complete preclass preparation for pediatric nursing simulation.
Students will watch instructional videos, prepare concept maps, engage in structured dialogue with ChatGPT, and upload their work before class.
The preclass activities are intended to improve learning readiness and support efficient participation in the in-class course.
During class, students will participate in the same high-fidelity scenario-based simulation, virtual reality learning, and instructor-guided discussion as the comparator group.
|
Students watch instructional videos, prepare concept maps, and engage in structured dialogue with ChatGPT before class.
They then participate in high-fidelity pediatric nursing simulation, virtual reality learning, and instructor-guided discussion.
The preparation activities are intended to improve learning readiness and support efficient participation in class.
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Standard Preparation Group
Classes randomized to this arm will complete standard preclass preparation for pediatric nursing simulation.
Students will watch the same instructional videos, prepare concept maps, and upload their work before class, but will not engage in structured dialogue with ChatGPT.
The preclass activities are intended to improve learning readiness and support efficient participation in the in-class course.
During class, students will participate in the same high-fidelity scenario-based simulation, virtual reality learning, and instructor-guided discussion as the experimental group.
|
Students watch the same instructional videos and prepare concept maps before class but do not engage in structured dialogue with ChatGPT.
They then participate in the same high-fidelity pediatric nursing simulation, virtual reality learning, and instructor-guided discussion as the experimental group.
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Pediatric Nursing Knowledge Test Score
Tidsramme: From baseline before the intervention to immediately after completion of all three simulation scenarios
|
Pediatric nursing knowledge will be assessed using a test covering fever management for an infant with febrile seizures, chest physiotherapy for a child with pneumonia, and nursing care for a child with epilepsy.
Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater pediatric nursing knowledge.
The change score will be calculated as the post-intervention score minus the baseline score.
|
From baseline before the intervention to immediately after completion of all three simulation scenarios
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Critical Thinking Disposition Score
Tidsramme: From baseline before the intervention to immediately after completion of all three simulation scenarios
|
Critical thinking disposition will be assessed using a 6-item questionnaire adapted by Lin et al. from Chai et al.
Each item is rated from 1 to 5. Total scores range from 6 to 30, with higher scores indicating a greater tendency to evaluate information, consider different perspectives, and use logical and analytical thinking.
The change score will be calculated as the post-intervention score minus the baseline score.
|
From baseline before the intervention to immediately after completion of all three simulation scenarios
|
|
Change From Baseline in Self-reported Communication Competence Score
Tidsramme: From baseline before the intervention to immediately after completion of all three simulation scenarios
|
Self-reported communication competence will be assessed using the 8-item Communication Competence Scale developed by Li (2013) for nursing students.
The scale assesses communication with patients and family members, including initiating communication, establishing therapeutic relationships, using verbal and nonverbal communication, identifying key information, active listening, recognizing emotions, providing health guidance, and organizing communication content.
Each item is rated from 1 to 5. Total scores range from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater self-reported communication competence.
The change score will be calculated as the post-intervention score minus the baseline score.
|
From baseline before the intervention to immediately after completion of all three simulation scenarios
|
|
Change From Baseline in Learning Self-Efficacy Score
Tidsramme: From baseline before the intervention to immediately after completion of all three simulation scenarios
|
Learning self-efficacy will be assessed using the 8-item self-efficacy subscale of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire.
Each item is rated from 1 to 5. Total scores range from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater confidence in successfully completing the learning tasks.
The change score will be calculated as the post-intervention score minus the baseline score.
|
From baseline before the intervention to immediately after completion of all three simulation scenarios
|
|
Change From Baseline in Flow Experience Score
Tidsramme: From the baseline learning activity before the intervention to immediately after completion of all three simulation scenarios
|
Flow experience will be assessed using an 8-item questionnaire based on the Flow Experience Scale developed by Pearce et al.
The questionnaire assesses perceived control, involvement, enjoyment, immersion, interest, altered perception of time, curiosity, and understanding of the learning activity.
Each item is rated from 1 to 5. Total scores range from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating a greater level of flow experience.
The change score will be calculated as the post-intervention score minus the baseline score.
|
From the baseline learning activity before the intervention to immediately after completion of all three simulation scenarios
|
|
Post-intervention Perceived Learning Objective Achievement Score
Tidsramme: Immediately after each corresponding simulation scenario
|
Perceived achievement of the learning objectives will be assessed using a researcher-developed 15-item questionnaire covering fever management (4 items), chest physiotherapy (6 items), and epilepsy care (5 items).
Each item is rated from 1 to 5. Total scores range from 15 to 75, with higher scores indicating greater perceived achievement of the learning objectives.
|
Immediately after each corresponding simulation scenario
|
Andre resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Students in the experimental group will be invited to participate in semi-structured interviews to explore their experiences with the ChatGPT-assisted learning approach.
Tidsramme: Within 4 weeks after finalization of the course grades
|
Students' experiences with the learning approach will be explored through semi-structured interviews.
The interviews will examine perceived differences from previous learning methods, advantages, learning gains, areas requiring improvement, willingness to use the approach again, and willingness to recommend the approach to students and instructors.
Interview recordings will be transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis.
Findings will be reported as themes and subthemes describing students' learning experiences.
|
Within 4 weeks after finalization of the course grades
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.
Studierekorddatoer
Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
23. september 2025
Primær fullføring (Antatt)
30. september 2026
Studiet fullført (Antatt)
30. september 2026
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
2. august 2026
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
2. august 2026
Først lagt ut (Faktiske)
6. august 2026
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
6. august 2026
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
2. august 2026
Sist bekreftet
1. august 2026
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Nøkkelord
Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre studie-ID-numre
- 202402091B0 (Annen identifikator: Chang Gung Medical Foundation Institutional Review Board)
Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)
Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?
NEI
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Nei
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Nei
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .