- ICH GCP
- US-Register für klinische Studien
- Klinische Studie NCT00544557
Study Evaluating The Use Of Etanercept In Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis
23. April 2015 aktualisiert von: Pfizer
Observational Study Of The Use Of Enbrel (Registered) (Etanercept) In Routine Clinical Practice To Treat Ankylosing Spondylitis (as) Patients: An Effectiveness, Safety, And Health Economic Evaluation
This study aims to provide a holistic assessment of patients receiving etanercept in a real-world setting.
Studienübersicht
Status
Abgeschlossen
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
Non-interventional study: subjects to be selected according to the usual clinical practice of their physician
Studientyp
Beobachtungs
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
1715
Kontakte und Standorte
Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.
Studienorte
-
-
-
Berlin, Deutschland, 12200
- Klinikum Benjamin Franklin
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
18 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Nein
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Alle
Probenahmeverfahren
Nicht-Wahrscheinlichkeitsprobe
Studienpopulation
Patients with an established diagnosis of Ankylosing Spondylitis
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Hypersensitivity to etanercept
- Active infection including chronic or localised infection
- Sepsis or risk of sepsis
Studienplan
Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
Kohorten und Interventionen
Gruppe / Kohorte |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis
|
The patients will be treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of etanercept in Germany.
The dosage and duration of therapy is to be determined by the physician to meet the patients' individual needs for treatment.
Andere Namen:
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Partial Remission at Week 26
Zeitfenster: Week 26
|
Percentage of participants achieving partial remission was determined by assessment of spondyloarthritis international society (ASAS) criteria.
Partial remission was defined as a score of less than 2 units (on a scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= high disease activity) in each of the 4 assessment in ASAS domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation.
|
Week 26
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Partial Remission at Week 52
Zeitfenster: Week 52
|
Percentage of participants achieving partial remission was determined by ASAS criteria.
Partial remission defined as a score of less than 2 units (on a scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= high disease activity) in each of the 4 assessment in ASAS domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation.
|
Week 52
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or Adverse Events (AEs)
Zeitfenster: Baseline up to Week 52
|
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life- threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability or incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Percentage of participants with AEs included participants affected with both SAEs and non--SAEs.
|
Baseline up to Week 52
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or Adverse Events (AEs) by Co-morbidity
Zeitfenster: Baseline up to Week 52
|
Baseline up to Week 52
|
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 52
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 52
|
BASDAI is a validated self-assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participant with AS.
Utilizing a 11-point Likert-scale (0= none and 10=very severe) participant's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue.
The index was computed by adding questions 1 to 4 plus the mean of questions 5 and 6.
The resulting 0 to 50 score was divided by 5 to give a final 0-10 BASDAI score (0 being no problem and 10 being the worst problem).
|
Baseline, Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Week 52
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 52
|
BASFI is a validated self assessment tool that determines the degree of functional limitation in AS.
Participants answered 10 questions, consisting of 8 specific questions regarding function in AS and 2 questions reflecting the participant's ability to cope with everyday life.
Each question was answered on a 0-10 scale (0 being no problem and 10 being the worst problem), the sum of which (divided by 10) resulted in the BASFI score (0-10).
|
Baseline, Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Week 52
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 52
|
Occiput-to-wall distance is the distance between the occiput (posterior or back portion of the head) and the wall when the participant stood with heels and shoulder against the wall and the back straight.
|
Baseline, Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Lateral Lumbar Flexion at Week 52
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 52
|
Lateral lumbar flexion was determined by the difference of the finger-floor-distance in normal position and in lateral bending position.
|
Baseline, Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Pain at Week 52
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 52
|
Participants were asked to assess their global pain intensity within the past 7 days.
Pain was evaluated on an 11-point Likert scale: min = 0 (best), max = 10 (worst).
|
Baseline, Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Week 52
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 52
|
Participants were asked to assess their disease activity within the past 7 days.
Disease activity was evaluated on an 11-point Likert scale: min = 0 (best), max = 10 (worst).
|
Baseline, Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity at Week 52
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 52
|
Physicians were asked to assess the disease activity of participants within the past 7 days.
Disease activity was evaluated on an 11-point Likert scale: min = 0 (best), max = 10 (worst).
|
Baseline, Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 52
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 52
|
Duration of morning stiffness is defined as the time elapsed when participant woke up in the morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes.
|
Baseline, Week 52
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Significant Reduction of Morning Stiffness
Zeitfenster: Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
|
Duration of morning stiffness is defined as the time elapsed when participant woke up in the morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes.
A significant reduction of duration of morning stiffness is defined as a reduction of the duration in minutes by at least 20 percent or reduction to 'no morning stiffness' (absence of morning stiffness).
|
Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Presence of Peripheral Arthritis
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
|
Peripheral arthritis is the inflammation of joints that involved asymmetrically.
It involved the hips, shoulder girdle (glenohumeral, acromioclavicular, and sternoclavicular joints), joints of the chest wall (costovertebral joints, costosternal junctions) and symphysis pubis.
|
Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Affected Joints by Peripheral Arthritis at Week 52
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 52
|
Peripheral arthritis is the inflammation of joints that involved asymmetrically.
It involved the hips, shoulder girdle (glenohumeral, acromioclavicular, and sternoclavicular joints), joints of the chest wall (costovertebral joints, costosternal junctions) and symphysis pubis.
In case of no presence of peripheral arthritis the number of affected joints was set to 0.
|
Baseline, Week 52
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Presence of Enthesitis
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
|
Enthesitis is the inflammation of the enthesis, where the joint capsules, ligaments or tendons attach to the bone.
This inflammation can lead to severe pain and discomfort.
|
Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Affected Body Parts by Enthesitis at Week 52
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 52
|
Enthesitis is the inflammation of the enthesis, where the joint capsules, ligaments or tendons attach to the bone.
This inflammation can lead to severe pain and discomfort.
In case of no presence of enthesitis the number of affected body parts was set to 0.
|
Baseline, Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 52
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 52
|
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay.
A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
|
Baseline, Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 52
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 52
|
ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation.
The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube.
Normal range is 0-30 millimeter/hour (mm/hr).
A higher rate is consistent with inflammation.
|
Baseline, Week 52
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20 (ASAS-20) Response
Zeitfenster: Week 12, 26, 38, 52
|
ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in AS participants.
ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation.
ASAS 20= at least >= 20 percent improvement from baseline and an absolute change >=1 unit on a 0-10 numeric scale (0=no disease activity; 10=high disease activity) in at least 3 of the domains (on a 0-10 numerical scale): Global assessment of disease activity by participant, participant's global pain intensity, function measured by BASFI and inflammation measured by the average of the last two Likert-scales in BASDAI concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration and no worsening in the remaining domain.
|
Week 12, 26, 38, 52
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 40 (ASAS-40) Response
Zeitfenster: Week 12, 26, 38, 52
|
ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants.
ASAS =4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation.
ASAS 40= at least (>=) 40 percent improvement from baseline and an absolute change >=2 unit on a 0-10 numeric scale (0=no disease activity; 10=high disease activity) in at least 3 of the domains (on a 0-10 numerical scale): Global assessment of disease activity by participant, participant's global pain intensity, function measured by BASFI and inflammation measured by the average of the last two Likert-scales in BASDAI concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration and no worsening in the remaining domain.
|
Week 12, 26, 38, 52
|
|
Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Time Trade Off (TTO)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 26, 52
|
EQ 5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life.
Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (extreme problems).
Score of each domain is transformed into a single TTO value using formula developed by Greiner et al and results in a total score range -0.205 to 0.999, higher score indicates a better health state.
|
Baseline, Week 26, 52
|
|
Euro Quality of Life (EQ--5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 26, 52
|
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life.
Health.
State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicate worst health state.
Score of each domain is transformed into a single VAS score using formula developed by Greiner et al and results in a total score range of 0 to 100, where higher score indicates a better health state.
|
Baseline, Week 26, 52
|
|
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 26, 52
|
WPAI:SHP is 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the amount of absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss and daily activity impairment attributable to rheumatoid arthritis for a period of 7 days prior to each visit.
It yields 4 sub-scores: work time missed (absenteeism), impairment while working (presenteeism or reduced on-the-job effectiveness), overall work impairment (work productivity loss or absenteeism plus presenteeism) and activity impairment (daily activity impairment).
These sub-scores are transformed to impairment percentages (range from 0 to 100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
|
Baseline, Week 26, 52
|
|
Healthcare Resource Utilization
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 26, 52
|
Participants utilization of healthcare resources was evaluated as number of events for healthcare resources utilization including: number of visits to general practitioners, visits to rheumatologist, visits to other medical specialists, inpatient hospitalizations, inpatient rehabilitations, inpatient follow-up treatment, outpatient rehabilitations, physiotherapy, and other healthcare utilizations.
At baseline, number of events for participants' healthcare resources utilization during last 12 months before enrollment into the study were documented.
After enrollment, number of events for participants' healthcare resources utilization were documented for last 6 months after previous documentation.
|
Baseline, Week 26, 52
|
|
Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 26, 52
|
Participants duration of healthcare resources utilization was evaluated as number of days for healthcare resources utilization including: duration of visits to general practitioners, to rheumatologist, to other medical specialists, inpatient hospitalizations, inpatient rehabilitations, inpatient follow-up treatment, outpatient rehabilitations, physiotherapy, and other healthcare utilizations.
At baseline, number of days for participants' healthcare resources utilizations during last 12 months before enrollment into the study were documented.
After enrollment, number of days for participants' healthcare resources utilization were documented for last 6 months after previous documentation.
|
Baseline, Week 26, 52
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Prior or Concomitant Medication Use for Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis
Zeitfenster: Baseline up to Week 52
|
Participants taking any non-study medications which were administered either prior to or during the study treatment for AS were reported.
|
Baseline up to Week 52
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Discontinuation of Treatment Due to Adverse Events
Zeitfenster: Baseline up to Week 52
|
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
|
Baseline up to Week 52
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.
Sponsor
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn
1. Oktober 2007
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
1. Mai 2014
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
1. Mai 2014
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
15. Oktober 2007
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
15. Oktober 2007
Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)
16. Oktober 2007
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Schätzen)
12. Mai 2015
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
23. April 2015
Zuletzt verifiziert
1. April 2015
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
- Infektionen
- Gelenkerkrankungen
- Erkrankungen des Bewegungsapparates
- Arthritis
- Erkrankungen der Wirbelsäule
- Knochenerkrankungen
- Spondylarthropathien
- Knochenkrankheiten, ansteckend
- Ankylose
- Spondylitis
- Spondylarthritis
- Spondylitis, Ankylosans
- Physiologische Wirkungen von Arzneimitteln
- Agenten des peripheren Nervensystems
- Analgetika
- Agenten des sensorischen Systems
- Entzündungshemmende Mittel, nichtsteroidal
- Analgetika, nicht narkotisch
- Entzündungshemmende Mittel
- Antirheumatika
- Immunsuppressive Mittel
- Immunologische Faktoren
- Magen-Darm-Mittel
- Etanercept
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- 0881X1-4463
- B1801087 (Andere Kennung: Alias Study Number)
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .