Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Adolescent Fitness Assessment Program (AFAP)

25. Juni 2012 aktualisiert von: University of Western Ontario, Canada

Increasing Self-efficacy and VO2 Max Scores in Obese Adolescents: a Peer Modeling Intervention

The purpose of this study is to implement a peer modeling intervention to improve self-efficacy and aerobic fitness in obese youth. A total of 40 obese (defined as Body Mass Index greater than the 95th percentile for age and gender) youth will participate in this study.

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Bedingungen

Detaillierte Beschreibung

There has been a dramatic increase in the prevalence of overweight and obese children in all regions of Canada. In fact, Canada has one of the highest rates of childhood obesity compared to other developed countries. This is disconcerting because this preventative condition is strongly associated with the risk of future disease, such as adult obesity, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular problems and psychosocial distress. This trend is a driving factor to develop effective strategies for assessment and intervention.

Aerobic fitness is the ability of the cardiovascular and respiratory system to deliver oxygen to working muscles and utilize that oxygen to produce energy. Aerobic fitness is a strong indicator of physical activity and also correlates with the aforementioned diseases. It is measured as peak ventilatory oxygen (peak VO2; mL/kg min), and is evaluated using a maximal incremental exercise protocol on a treadmill, whereby expired gases are analyzed using a metabolic cart. Aerobic fitness values are inconsistent in youth, particularly obese youth. This discrepancy is due to low self-efficacy. Self-efficacy refers to the belief that one has the power and capabilities to produce an effect. Low self-efficacy is prominent in obese youth because they lack actual and perceived physical competence and social support. This may translate into less effort invested by this population into physical activity, and by the same token, aerobic fitness tests. To date, no experimental studies have attempted to address these psychological variables and apply an intervention to achieve accurate peak VO2 values in obese adolescents.

Peer modelling is the demonstration of particular behaviors that are learned observationally and is a powerful source of self-efficacy. This mode of learning has been very successful in increasing the consumption of new foods (36 subjects) and activity levels (100 subjects) in children. Based on this success, it would suggest that the investigators could confidently apply it to this study. Therefore the main objective is to examine the effect of a modeling intervention (DVD film) on self-efficacy and peak VO2 in obese youth during a maximal treadmill test. Models will demonstrate and articulate increased confidence to perform the test and offer a variety of strategies to cope with the maximal effort and overcome the associated challenges during the test (e.g. shortness of breath, sweating, and increased heart rate). The models will not be participants in the study.

Obese (defined as Body Mass Index greater than the 95th percentile for age and gender) youth (10-17 years, N = 40) who receive written consent from a parent or guardian will be asked to participate in the study. Prior to undertaking the aerobic fitness test, children are required to seek approval from their family physician by completing the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q).

Participants will be randomized after baseline measures are completed into one of two conditions: peer modeling intervention or control to ensure group equivalency. Following randomization, participants in the intervention group will watch the peer modeling DVD film in the lab. Those in the control group will view a DVD film of similar length about nutrition. After seven days, participants in both groups will return for follow-up. One week is a suitable interval because it provides time for participants to reflect on any information they received from the DVD films and minimize external confounding factors, while not providing enough time to see changes in fitness (which requires approximately 3 months). Prior to the second exercise test, participants will watch the DVD film they viewed the previous week. Afterwards, participants will complete their peak VO2 test and self-reported measures. All participants will be asked not to change their normal physical activity patterns during the week.

To complete a peak VO2 test, participants will be required to complete a maximal incremental exercise protocol on a treadmill. The test will be conducted by trained personnel and terminated when participants are unable to continue the protocol, or when their vital signs warranted discontinuation.

The results of this RCT will provide an accurate measurement of aerobic fitness, which is crucial to assessing health status, risk of disease and assisting in planning programs aimed at improving quality of life in adolescents.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

49

Phase

  • Frühphase 1

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Kanada, N6A 5B9
        • Exercise and Health Psychology Laboratory

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

10 Jahre bis 17 Jahre (Kind)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children and adolescents aged 10-17 years who are obese, defined as Body Mass Index greater than the 95th percentile for age and gender

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who smoke, are pregnant or have an illness or disease will be excluded from the study.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Doppelt

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Peer modeling
Participants watch a video geared to increase confidence in ability to preform fitness test. Male participants will watch a video of a male adolescent completing the fitness test and talking about coping mechanisms used to preform to the best of his ability. Female participants will watch a video of a female adolescent completing the fitness test and talking about coping mechanisms used to preform to the best of her ability.
Participants watch a video of an adolescent completing the fitness test and explaining coping mechanisms to preform the test well.
Andere Namen:
  • Observational Learning
  • Coping Model
Aktiver Komparator: Control
Participants watch a video unrelated to the fitness test and self-efficacy. The video depicts healthy food and nutrition options.
watching a video unrelated to the fitness test and self-efficacy
Andere Namen:
  • Aktive Kontrolle
  • Kontaktsteuerung

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Physiological measure: Aerobic Fitness
Zeitfenster: Baseline (day 1) and follow-up (day 7)
Changes in aerobic fitness from baseline (day 1) to follow-up (day 7) will be evaluated by a trained exercise physiologist using a standardized, maximal incremental exercise protocol (Modified Bruce protocol) on a treadmill. Expired gases will be analyzed using a metabolic cart (Cosmed Quark B2 cardiopulmonary testing, Image Monitoring). Peak oxygen consumption (Peak VO2) will be determined by taking the highest values during a 15 second period and expressed in absolute (l/min) and relative (ml/kg/min) units with the latter unit used for subsequent analysis.
Baseline (day 1) and follow-up (day 7)
Psychological: Self-Efficacy
Zeitfenster: Baseline (day 1) and follow-up (day 7)
Changes in self-efficacy from baseline (day 1) to follow-up (day 7) will be evaluated by an 18-item Self-Efficacy Scale (adapted from McAuley & Milhalko, 1998) to evaluate participants' confidence to successfully perform increasing intensities and durations of physical activity.
Baseline (day 1) and follow-up (day 7)

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Changes in variability (standard deviation)
Zeitfenster: Baseline (day 1) and follow-up (day 7)
Changes in variability (standard deviation) in the aerobic fitness and self-efficacy data will be analyzed using statistical software.
Baseline (day 1) and follow-up (day 7)

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Harry Prapavessis, PhD, The University of Western Ontario

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn

1. September 2010

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. April 2012

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Mai 2012

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

21. April 2011

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

23. Juni 2011

Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)

27. Juni 2011

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Schätzen)

26. Juni 2012

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

25. Juni 2012

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juni 2012

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Peer Modeling

Abonnieren