Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Dexmedetomidine Versus Dexamethasone as Adjuncts in Erector Spinae Plane Block in Modified Radical Mastectomy

1. Juli 2022 aktualisiert von: Mohammed Magdy Abdelrahman Elsayed, National Cancer Institute, Egypt

Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Versus Dexamethasone as Adjuncts to Levobupivacaine in Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy, Randomized Double-Blinded Comparative Study.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of adding dexmedetomidine versus dexamethasone to levobupivacaine in ultrasound guided ESPB for patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among females. Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM) is one of the main surgical treatments of breast cancer .The most common modality for anesthesia is general anesthesia with or without regional blocks . Nearly 40-60% of patients undergoing breast surgery experience severe acute postoperative pain, with severe pain persisting for 6-12 months in almost 10-30% of patients (Post Mastectomy Pain Syndrome; PMPS) . This pain can be severe enough to cause long-term disabilities and interfere with sleep and performance of daily activities.

Postoperative pain is usually managed by opioids, yet it is usually associated with side effects including; prolonged sedation, increase in the incidence of recurrence, respiratory depression , nausea , vomiting and ileus. In an attempt to reduce these side effects, thoracic epidural analgesia and paravertebral block became the gold standard regional techniques for breast surgery. However, both techniques may be associated with serious complications such as pneumothorax, spinal cord injury, incompatibility with pre-existing anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy and hemodynamic instability. Multiple different regional techniques have been developed in the last decade for postoperative pain management of MRM including including erector spinae plane block (ESPB) aiming to be effective and associated with less complications when compared to the gold standard techniques .

ESPB is a simple and safe paraspinal fascial plane block that involves injection of local anesthetic deep in the erector spinae muscle and superficial to the tips of the thoracic transverse processes hoping to block both ventral and dorsal rami of spinal nerves in the paravertebral area. However, regional blocks after a single dose of local anesthetic are of limited duration and efficacy. Hence, the co-administration of adjuvants with local anesthetics may be helpful for prolongation and potentiation of the analgesic effect. Dexmedetomidine is a potent α2agonist of which α2/α1 selectivity is 8 times greater than clonidine and is now emerging as an adjunct to regional and general anesthesia. It can prolong the duration of the nerve block when used with a local anesthetic .Dexamethasone is considered as an adjuvant as it act by reducing the release of inflammatory mediators and by inhibiting discharge of C-fibers. There is a limited number of studies covering the effect of dexmedetomidine versus dexamethasone when added to ESPB, yet they are still lacking in breast surgeries. Our study aims at studying the effect of adding dexmedetomidine compared to dexamethasone as adjuncts to ESPB in modified radical mastectomy.

Objectives:

To identify the intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption, as well as duration of analgesia and study the effect on hemodynamics.

Hypothesis We hypothesize that the addition of dexmedetomidine to levobupivacaine in US guided ESPB in patients undergoing MRM is superior to either adding dexamethasone to levobupivacaine, or using levobupivacaine alone.

Ethical Considerations The trial will be conducted after approval of departmental and institutional research ethics committee. A written informed consent will be obtained from all participants.

A comparative double-blinded study.

Study setting and location The study will be conducted in the breast operating theatre at National Cancer Institute hospital.

Study population 90 Female patients ASA II,III scheduled for modified radical mastectomy under general anaesthesia.

A. preoperative:

Patient's assessment; History, physical exam, laboratory and radiological investigations at preoperative assessment clinic National Cancer Institute Cairo University. Preoperative assessment on the night of surgery. Patients will be instructed on how to report pain by means of Numeric Pain Rating Scale, in which 0 = "no pain" and 10 = "worst possible pain". An informed consent will be obtained. Preoperative fasting; minimum of 6 hours for food and minimum of 2 hours for water and clear fluids.20G IV cannula is inserted. All patients will be pre-medicated with IV midazolam 0.01-0.02 mg\kg 30 minutes preoperatively. ESPB with either adjuncts or none at all will be done preoperatively with the patients in a lateral position. After allocation of patients to each study group, patients in group 1 will receive dexmedetomidine with levobupivacaine in ESPB, while patients in group 2 will receive dexamethasone with levobupivacaine in ESPB, & patients in group 3 will receive levobupivacaine without adjuncts in ESPB.

Technique of ESPB: The block level will be at T5 with the patient in a lateral position. The ultrasound probe will be placed on the back in a transverse orientation to identify the tip of the T5 transverse process; these are recognizable as flat, squared-off acoustic shadows with only a very faint image of the pleura visible. If the transducer is too lateral, the ribs will be visualized instead; these are recognizable as rounded acoustic shadows with an intervening hyperechoic pleural line. The tip of the transverse process will be centered on the ultrasound screen and the probe will then be rotated into a longitudinal orientation to produce a parasagittal view, in which the following layers will be visible superficial to the acoustic shadows of the transverse processes: skin, subcutaneous tissue, trapezius, erector spinae muscle and T5 transverse process. A skin wheel using 3 ml of lidocaine 1% is made 2-3 cm above the upper aspect of the transducer, then an echogenic block needle will be inserted in plane to the ultrasound beam in a cranial-to-caudal direction until contact is made with the T5 transverse process. Correct location of the needle tip in the fascial plane deep to erector spinae muscle will be confirmed by injecting 0.5-1 ml glucose 5% and seeing the fluid lifting the erector spinae muscle off the transverse process without distending the muscle. After aspiration; to avoid intravascular injection, 30 ml levobupivacaine 0.25% to which dexmedetomidine (1microgram\kg) is added in the first group , while dexamethasone (10 mg) is added to levobupivacaine in the second group, and no adjuncts to levobupivacaine is added to the third group. Upon injection, separation will be seen. 6-13-MHz, linear transducer set for small parts and a depth of 4-6 cm will be used. Fujifilm Sonosite M-Turbo Ultrasound system will be used.

B. Intraoperative:

All patients will be monitored continuously using electrocardiography, non-invasive blood pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation and end tidal carbon dioxide throughout the duration of the surgical procedure. Induction of general anesthesia will be performed using a regimen of IV 2 μg/kg fentanyl and propofol IV 2 mg /kg. Tracheal intubation will be facilitated by using 0.5 mg/kg IV of atracurium. Anesthesia will be maintained with inhaled sevoflurane 2-2.5% in oxygen enriched air (FiO2=0.5). Maintenance doses of atracurium o.1 mg\kg will be provided every 30 minutes. Paracetamol 500 mg and IV ketorolac 30mg will be provided as a part of multimodal analgesia. Rescue analgesia of fentanyl 1 μg/kg will be given if the mean arterial blood pressure or heart rate rises above 20% of the baseline levels. Ringer acetate will be infused to replace the fluid deficit, maintenance and losses, and patients will be mechanically ventilated at an appropriate setting keeping the end-tidal CO2 at 30- 35 mmHg. The first reading of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) will be taken before induction of general anesthesia to be defined as a baseline reading, another reading will be taken immediately before surgical incision and at 30-minute intervals intraoperatively. The residual neuromuscular blockade will be reversed using neostigmine (0.05 mg/kg) and atropine (0.02 mg/kg). Extubation will be performed after complete recovery of the airway reflexes.

C. postoperative:

Patients will be transferred to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) where the Numeric Pain Rating Scale score, MAP and heart rate will be noted immediately on arrival, then observed for 2 hours & discharged to the ward afterwards. Rescue analgesia will be provided in the form of IV morphine 3 mg boluses if the patient indicates Numeric Pain Rating Scale ≥ 4. The total amount of morphine given in 24 hours will be recorded for the three groups. A maximum dose of 0.5 mg/kg/24hours of morphine is allowed. IV paracetamol 500 mg \6 hours and IV ketorolac 30mg\8 hours will be given as a part of multimodal analgesia. Numeric Pain Rating Scale score, MAP and heart rate will be noted at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 hours postoperatively. Side effects such as nausea, vomiting, sedation, respiratory depression (respiratory rate <10/minute) will be recorded. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), will be rated on a four-point verbal scale; (none =no nausea, mild =nausea but no vomiting, moderate=vomiting one attack, severe =vomiting >one attack). 0.1 mg/kg of IV ondansetron will be given to patients with moderate or severe postoperative nausea and vomiting . Sedation will be assessed in the PACU with Ramsay scores.(1 = anxious or restless or both; 2 = cooperative, orientated, and tranquil; 3= responding to commands; 4 = brisk response to stimulus; 5 = sluggish response to stimulus; and 6 = no response to stimulus). A Ramsay score of 5 or 6 will be considered excessively high sedation levels; a Ramsay score of 2 to 4 will be considered adequate sedation levels needing observation; a Ramsay score of 1 will be considered inadequate or insufficient sedation levels .

Sample size As there was no study reporting results on a similar hypothesis, sample size was calculated based on the results of pilot study;SPSS version 23.0 was used to generate a list of 20 subjects who were randomly assigned into two groups each of 10 for the following treatment A) ESPB + Dexamethasone B) ESPB + Precedex Assuming a pooled standard deviation of 2.37 units, the study would require a sample size of thirty for each group (i.e. a total sample size of 60, assuming equal group sizes), to achieve a power of 90% and a level of significance of 1% (two sided), for detecting a true difference in means of post operative morphia consumption between ESPB + Dexamethasone and ESPB + Precedex groups of -2.4 (i.e. 2.4 - 4.8) units.

Statistical analysis PSS version 27.0 will be used in data analysis. Quantitative variables were tested for normality to select appropriate statistical tests. Mean and standard deviation described quantitative data with median and range. Comparison of means (or medians) of two independent groups will be done using t test. To show the effect of time on vitals, parametric repeated measures ANOVA or Friedman test will be used to show changes overtime both intra and post-operative. Post-hoc test will be used for pairwise comparisons and will be Tucky adjusted. Chi-square and Fisher Exact were used for testing proportion independence. P value was always two tailed and set significant at 0.05 level

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

90

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

      • Cairo, Ägypten
        • National Cancer Institute - Cairo University

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre bis 65 Jahre (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Weiblich

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Type of surgery; Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM)
  • Physical status ASA II, III.
  • Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 65 Years.
  • Body mass index (BMI): > 20 kg/m2 and < 35 kg/m2.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's refusal
  • Age <18 years or >65 years
  • BMI <20 kg/m2 and >35 kg/m2
  • Known sensitivity or contraindication to drug used in the study (local anaesthetics, opioids).
  • History of psychological disorders and/or chronic pain.
  • Contraindication to regional anaesthesia e.g. local sepsis, pre- existing peripheral neuropathies and coagulopathy.
  • Severe respiratory or cardiac disorders.
  • Advanced liver or kidney disease. Pregnancy.
  • Physical status ASA IV.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Unterstützende Pflege
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Vervierfachen

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Group 1 (ESPB + Dexmedetomidine)
Patients received Ultrasound guided ESPB with addition of dexmedetomidine 1 Mcg/kg to 30 ml levobupivacaine 0.25%, N=30 (16)
The block level will be at T5 with the patient in a sitting position and full aseptic precautions. T5 transverse process; these are recognizable as flat, squared-off acoustic shadows with only a very faint image of the pleura visible. In a longitudinal US view, in which the following layers will be visible superficial to the transverse processes: skin, subcutaneous tissue, trapezius, erector spinae muscle . Skin is topicalized, then echogenic block needle inserted in plane to the ultrasound beam in a cranial-to-caudal direction until contact is made with the T5 transverse process. After aspiration; to avoid intravascular injection, 30 ml of injectate is injected and separation will be seen. 6-13-MHz, linear transducer set for small parts and a depth of 4-6 cm will be used (18-19).
Experimental: Group 2 (ESPB+ dexamethasone)
Patients received Ultrasound guided ESPB with addition of dexamethasone 10 mg to 30 ml levobupivacaine 0.25%, N=30 (16)
The block level will be at T5 with the patient in a sitting position and full aseptic precautions. T5 transverse process; these are recognizable as flat, squared-off acoustic shadows with only a very faint image of the pleura visible. In a longitudinal US view, in which the following layers will be visible superficial to the transverse processes: skin, subcutaneous tissue, trapezius, erector spinae muscle . Skin is topicalized, then echogenic block needle inserted in plane to the ultrasound beam in a cranial-to-caudal direction until contact is made with the T5 transverse process. After aspiration; to avoid intravascular injection, 30 ml of injectate is injected and separation will be seen. 6-13-MHz, linear transducer set for small parts and a depth of 4-6 cm will be used (18-19).
Aktiver Komparator: Group 3 (ESPB)
Patients received Ultrasound guided ESPB with 30 ml levobupivacaine 0.25%, N=30
The block level will be at T5 with the patient in a sitting position and full aseptic precautions. T5 transverse process; these are recognizable as flat, squared-off acoustic shadows with only a very faint image of the pleura visible. In a longitudinal US view, in which the following layers will be visible superficial to the transverse processes: skin, subcutaneous tissue, trapezius, erector spinae muscle . Skin is topicalized, then echogenic block needle inserted in plane to the ultrasound beam in a cranial-to-caudal direction until contact is made with the T5 transverse process. After aspiration; to avoid intravascular injection, 30 ml of injectate is injected and separation will be seen. 6-13-MHz, linear transducer set for small parts and a depth of 4-6 cm will be used (18-19).

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Total amount of morphine consumed postoperatively for 24 hours.
Zeitfenster: 24 hours
Total amount of morphine consumed postoperatively in mg for 24 hours.
24 hours

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Total amount of fentanyl consumed intraoperatively.
Zeitfenster: Duration of surgery
Total amount of fentanyl in Mcg consumed intraoperatively.
Duration of surgery
Change in heart rate intraoperatively
Zeitfenster: Duration of surgery
Intraoperative measurement of HR at 30 minutes interval in comparison to baseline reading.
Duration of surgery
Change in mean arterial blood pressure intraoperatively
Zeitfenster: Duration of surgery
Intraoperative measurement of MAP at 30 minutes interval in comparison to baseline reading.
Duration of surgery
Postoperative sedation according to Ramsay scores.
Zeitfenster: 24 hours
Scores at 0,2,4,8,12,16,20,24 hours. (1 = anxious or restless or both; 2 = cooperative, orientated, and tranquil; 3= responding to commands; 4 = brisk response to stimulus; 5 = sluggish response to stimulus; and 6 = no response to stimulus). A Ramsay score of 5 or 6 will be considered excessively high sedation levels; a Ramsay score of 2 to 4 will be considered adequate sedation levels needing observation; a Ramsay score of 1 will be considered inadequate or insufficient sedation levels (21).
24 hours
Time to first rescue analgesia.
Zeitfenster: 24 hours
Duration of analgesic effect until the time of 1st rescue analgesia
24 hours
Numeric Pain Rating Scale score, both at rest and during movement
Zeitfenster: 24 hours postoperative

Scores will be recorded in the PACU, and every 4 hours until 24 hours postoperatively.

Patients will be instructed on how to report pain by means of Numeric Pain Rating Scale, in which 0 = "no pain" and 10 = "worst possible pain".

24 hours postoperative
Block related complications
Zeitfenster: 24 hours postoperative
Complications related to the block such as local anaesthetic systemic toxicity and vascular injury.
24 hours postoperative
Patient's satisfaction
Zeitfenster: 24 hours postoperative
the patient will be classified in this group to satisfied or not.
24 hours postoperative
Incidence of Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).
Zeitfenster: 24 hours postoperative
PONV will be rated on a four-point verbal scale; (none =no nausea, mild =nausea but no vomiting, moderate=vomiting one attack, severe =vomiting >one attack). 0.1 mg/kg of IV ondansetron will be given to patients with moderate or severe postoperative nausea and vomiting (20).
24 hours postoperative

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Studienstuhl: Ashgan R Ali, Professor, Anaesthesiology Faculty of Medicine - Cairo University
  • Studienleiter: Heba I Ahmed, Ass. Professor, Anaesthesiology Faculty of Medicine - Cairo University
  • Studienleiter: Reham M Gamal, Lecturer, Anaesthesiology National Cancer Institute - Cairo University
  • Studienleiter: Mohammed M Abdelrahman, Ass. Lecturer, Anaesthesiology National Cancer Institute - Cairo University
  • Hauptermittler: Norhan H El Emam, Resident, Anaesthesiology National Cancer Institute - Cairo University

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

15. Dezember 2020

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

15. März 2022

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

15. März 2022

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

27. Juni 2022

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

1. Juli 2022

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

7. Juli 2022

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

7. Juli 2022

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

1. Juli 2022

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juli 2022

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

Nein

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Produkt, das in den USA hergestellt und aus den USA exportiert wird

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren