Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Cognitive Training for Functioning in PTSD

14. Juli 2026 aktualisiert von: VA Office of Research and Development

Cognitive Training to Address Functioning and Symptoms in Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

The proposed study will test a novel, computerized treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) to determine if it helps Veterans functionally recover as measured by reduced cognitive disability and PTSD symptoms. To do so, investigators will evaluate the effects of a cognitive training program that is designed to improve people's ability to manage information in working memory. Investigators will measure self-reported symptoms and disability alongside day-to-day cognition and functioning. The project support the VA Office of Research and Development's mission to improve Veteran participation in their lives and community by determining if this new approach can improve recovery from trauma and exploring for whom the intervention works.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a prevalent and debilitating condition among Veterans, associated with high healthcare utilization, physical comorbidities, and increased suicide risk. Despite the effectiveness of first-line psychotherapies for PTSD, these treatments do not universally address the neuropsychological deficits often seen in PTSD, such as impaired executive functioning, which contributes to both poor functional recovery and exacerbation of symptoms. There is a critical need for novel interventions targeting executive functioning to complement existing therapies and improve outcomes. The investigator team has developed Cognitive ENhancement Training (COGENT), a low-burden, computer-based neurotherapeutic program designed to improve executive functioning. Preliminary data suggest COGENT may improve cognitive and affective symptoms in Veterans with PTSD, but larger, rigorous trials are needed to assess its clinical utility.

COGENT represents a promising innovation in PTSD treatment by focusing on enhancing executive functioning, which is directly implicated in the regulation of PTSD symptoms. Unlike existing therapies, COGENT targets cognitive deficits that drive symptom severity using a relatively brief, computer-administered format, offering a potential alternative pathway for improving recovery. If successful, this intervention could provide a scalable, cost-effective, and easily integrated treatment for Veterans with PTSD, improving their daily functioning and reducing symptom burden.

Specific Aims: 1) Evaluate the impact of COGENT on clinical functioning and PTSD symptoms. Investigators hypothesize that COGENT will lead to significant reductions in cognitive disability and re-experiencing symptoms relative to a control group. 2) Assess the real-world effects of COGENT on cognitive, emotional, and functional outcomes using smartphone-based ecological momentary assessments. Investigators hypothesize that COGENT will improve cognitive performance, reduce mood symptoms, and decrease functional impairment in everyday settings. Exploratory Aim) Identify predictors of treatment outcomes. This will explore how baseline cognitive performance and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics (e.g., traumatic brain injury history) influence the response to COGENT.

Successful outcomes from this will support the translation of COGENT into VA care. If effective, COGENT could be either provided as direct-to-Veteran services or integrated into routine clinical practice within the existing PTSD treatment programs as a cost-effective, widely accessible option for improving cognitive and clinical outcomes. Further research will explore potential for widespread dissemination and individual-level tailoring to optimize treatment benefits for Veterans with PTSD.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

176

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studienorte

    • California
      • San Diego, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 92161-0002
        • VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA
        • Kontakt:
        • Hauptermittler:
          • Jessica A Bomyea, PhD

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of PTSD
  • presence of subjective cognitive complaints
  • fluent in English
  • willing to attend assessment and treatment sessions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • past year history of psychotic or bipolar I disorders
  • past year history of severe alcohol or substance use disorder
  • history of severe traumatic brain injury or other known neurological condition that may be associated with cognitive dysfunction
  • acute suicidality necessitating immediate clinical intervention (within past 3 months)
  • presence of circumstances that require imminent intervention prior to other treatment (e.g., current domestic abuse)
  • plans for medication changes within the study timeframe
  • current or planned evidence-based psychotherapy for PTSD within the study timeframe
  • plans for changes to other psychosocial therapy within the study timeframe
  • presence of life-threatening or unstable medical conditions

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Vervierfachen

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Cognitive ENhancement Training (COGENT)
Participants will be Veterans assigned to the active cognitive training program, Cognitive ENhancement Training (COGENT).
COGENT is a computer-administered cognitive training program and consists of a modified working memory capacity task. COGENT was designed to contain high interference across trials, and requires participants to consistently, actively manage control over working memory interference. By requiring repeated practice with utilization of interference control across trials, COGENT is thought to enhance plasticity of cognitive systems used to manage how information enters and subsequently is removed from working memory, leading to improved performance over time.
Schein-Komparator: Sham Training (ST)
Participants will be Veterans assigned to the sham training comparator (ST), a non-training cognitive program matched for time and memory demands.
The sham training (ST) requires participants to remember the same total number of items as in COGENT; however, this training contains relatively less proactive interference across trials and is designed to be an "inert" version of the experimental program. The sham training condition will allow us to evaluate differences based on the proposed working memory interference training element, rather than general elements of the task (e.g., regular staff contact, contact time, general computer interface time).

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change in World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0), cognitive domain
Zeitfenster: baseline, post (week 10), 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
The WHODAS is a widely used, standardized tool designed to assess the level of disability experienced by individuals across various health conditions, including mental health disorders like PTSD. The WHODAS measures disability across six domains of functioning. The current project will utilize the cognition domain score to measure cognitive disability. A simple score for the WHODAS 2.0 ranges from 36-180 with higher scores indicating the degree of functional limitations.
baseline, post (week 10), 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change in Clinician Administered PTSD Scale-5 (CAPS-5) - reexperiencing scale
Zeitfenster: baseline, post (week 10), 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
The CAPS-5 semi-structured interview is designed to measure posttraumatic stress disorder diagnostic status as well as symptom severity. Total scores range from 0 to 20 with higher scores indicating greater severity; change over time will be evaluated.
baseline, post (week 10), 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up

Andere Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Baseline neuropsychological performance
Zeitfenster: baseline, post (week 10)
A brief neuropsychological test battery will be used to predict response to the study intervention, based on evidence from previous work demonstrating that individuals with lower initial cognitive functioning may experience greater improvement in symptoms. The neuropsychological battery will consist of the Delis-Kaplan Executive Functioning System (DKEFS) Verbal Fluency, TestMyBrain (TMB) Trails, TMB Digit Symbol Matching and Choice Reaction Time, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV (WAIS-IV) (Digit Span, Letter Number Sequencing), AX Continuous Performance Test from the Cognitive Neuroscience Test Reliability and Clinical applications for Schizophrenia (CNTRaCS) battery, and the California Verbal Learning Test-II (CVLT-II). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) screening will also be administered. All measures will be scored using published norms and a composite z-score by domain will be calculated, with higher scores indicating greater cognitive performance.
baseline, post (week 10)
Anxiety symptoms
Zeitfenster: baseline, post (week 10), 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
Change from baseline in anxiety symptoms as measured by General Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7), as part of measuring broad clinical effects. The total score ranges from 0-21, with higher scores indicating higher levels of anxiety symptoms.
baseline, post (week 10), 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
Depression symptoms
Zeitfenster: baseline, post (week 10), 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
Change from baseline in depression symptoms as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), as part of measuring broad clinical effects. The total score ranges from 0-27, with higher scores indicating higher levels of depressive symptoms.
baseline, post (week 10), 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
Suicide risk level
Zeitfenster: baseline, post (week 10), 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
The Columbia Suicide Severity Risk Scale (CSSRS) will be used to measure suicide risk level at all time points, as part of measuring broad clinical effects.
baseline, post (week 10), 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
Impulsivity
Zeitfenster: baseline, post (week 10), 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
Change in impulsivity as measured by the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS), as part of measuring broad clinical effects. The total score ranges from 30-120, with higher scores indicating higher levels of impulsivity.
baseline, post (week 10), 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
Global functioning (WHODAS 2.0)
Zeitfenster: baseline, post (week 10), 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
Change in global functional impairment related to social and life responsibilities will be measured by the WHODAS 2.0 (mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities, participation subscales) as part of measuring broad functional effects. A simple score for the WHODAS 2.0 ranges from 36-180 with higher scores indicating the degree of functional limitations.
baseline, post (week 10), 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
Global functioning (IPF)
Zeitfenster: baseline, post (week 10), 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
Change in global functioning will be measured by the Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning (IPF), as part of measuring broad functional effects. The IPF measures PTSD-related impairment in social and life responsibilities, such as romantic and family relationships, work, friendships and socializing, parenting, education, and self-care. Items are scored on a 0 (never) to 6 (always) scale, with higher scores indicating greater functional impairment.
baseline, post (week 10), 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
Day-to-day functioning
Zeitfenster: baseline, post (week 10)
A composite score, Positive Activities for Cognitive Engagement (PACE), will be used to measure COGENT effects on day-to-day functioning. This composite score will be generated from results of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) surveys and ecological momentary cognitive testing (EMCT), which will be administered to participants via smartphone 3 times per day for the 7-day period directly after the baseline and post-treatment visits.
baseline, post (week 10)

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Jessica A Bomyea, PhD, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

1. Juli 2027

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Januar 2030

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

31. März 2030

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

2. Juli 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

2. Juli 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

9. Juli 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

16. Juli 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

14. Juli 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juli 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Produkt, das in den USA hergestellt und aus den USA exportiert wird

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Posttraumatische Belastungsstörung

Klinische Studien zur COGENT (Cognitive ENhancement Training)

3
Abonnieren