Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Validating a Neurocognitive Remediation Model for Visual-Attentional Pathway in Chinese Developmental Dyslexia

12. Juli 2026 aktualisiert von: LEUNG Tsz Wing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Testing the Visual-Attentional Pathway in Chinese Developmental Dyslexia: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Validate a Neurocognitive Cascade Model of Remediation

Developmental dyslexia is a common and serious specific learning disability affecting up to one in eight children in Hong Kong, with profound consequences for academic success and personal well-being. For children learning to read the visually complex Chinese script, the challenge is particularly intense. A key research challenge is a long-standing "chicken-and-egg" debate: are weaknesses in the brain's fast-processing visual system (Magnocellular-Dorsal deficits) a cause of reading difficulties, or merely a consequence of limited reading practice? This uncertainty has constrained theoretical progress, creating a major barrier to developing effective, evidence-based support for struggling readers beyond traditional linguistic-based methods.

This project is designed to resolve this debate by directly testing if training a core visual-attentional skill can causally improve reading. The approach is built on investigator's strong pilot data, which established a novel "Neurocognitive Cascade Model": a framework suggesting that the integrity of foundational visual processing impacts reading through a sequential chain reaction flowing from visual attention to working memory.

To test the model, investigators will employ a rigorous, assessor-blind randomized controlled trial with 100 Cantonese-speaking children with developmental dyslexia. Participants will be randomly assigned to either an intervention group that plays action video games, scientifically proven to enhance visual attention, or an active control group that plays a different type of non-action, engaging game. This design allows investigators to isolate the specific impact of the visual-attentional training. The investigators will track changes at four time points-before, during, immediately after the intervention, and at a 6-month follow-up-using a multi-level assessment battery, including objective neural signals of visual processing, cognitive skills, and real-world reading performance measured with advanced eye-tracking technology.

This research will deliver new knowledge that is both scientifically and socially impactful. It will provide the first causal evidence for a visual-attentional pathway to reading remediation in Chinese developmental dyslexia, fundamentally shifting theoretical understanding of the disorder from a single, phonological deficit to a more comprehensive, multi-component model. The findings will have a significant translational impact, paving the way for innovative, non-reading-based interventions and new early screening tools. Ultimately, this project will offer a new, evidence-based approach to help children overcome the specific neurocognitive bottlenecks that hinder their ability to learn to read, with the potential to improve educational outcomes for a large and underserved population.

Studienübersicht

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

76

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studienorte

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Kind

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Formal diagnosis of dyslexia by an educational or clinical psychologist using the Hong Kong Test of Specific Learning Difficulties in Reading and Writing (HKT-SpLD),39 with a literacy composite score at or below the 10th percentile.
  • Non-verbal IQ score ≥ 85 on Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices.
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal vision (both eyes logMAR 0.1 or better).

Exclusion Criteria:

History of neurological or psychiatric disorders (e.g., epilepsy, psychosis).

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Versorgungsforschung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Fakultätszuweisung
  • Maskierung: Verdreifachen

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Aktiver Komparator: Action Video Game (AVG) Intervention Group
Participants will undergo 12 hours of training with a commercially available AVG (Rabbids: Party of Legends). The game consists of numerous fast-paced mini-games in which players track multiple objects, respond to unpredictable events, and filter out distractions, thereby placing high demands on visual-spatial attention and attentional control.
Participants will undergo 12 hours of training with a commercially available AVG (Rabbids: Party of Legends). This game is a direct successor to the Rayman Raving Rabbids game used in AVG intervention studies and shares its core mechanics. The game consists of numerous fast-paced mini-games in which players track multiple objects, respond to unpredictable events, and filter out distractions, thereby placing high demands on visual-spatial attention and attentional control.
Schein-Komparator: Active Control (Non-Action Video Game) Group
Using a commercially available city-building and management simulation game (e.g., SimCity), which is engaging and cognitively demanding (requiring planning and resource management).
Participants will undergo 12 hours of training with SimCity. To control for non-specific effects (e.g., gaming time, engagement, motivation), this group will play a non-action video game of matched duration and format. The investigators will use a commercially available city-building and management simulation game (e.g., SimCity), which is engaging and cognitively demanding (requiring planning and resource management). However, it critically lacks the fast, unpredictable, and attention-intensive elements of action games, ensuring that any observed group differences can be attributed specifically to the visual-attentional training provided by the AVG.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Visual Attention Span
Zeitfenster: Baseline measurement on day 1, Mid-Intervention on day 1, within 30 minutes post-Intervention on day 1, and Follow-Up on day 180
Cued Number Identification Task: This task assesses the rapid deployment of visual attention. A string of five numbers (Geneva font, size 24, 98% contrast) is presented for 200 ms, followed by a 50-ms visual cue 1 cm beneath the target number. Numbers are spaced to subtend a 3.8° visual angle and minimise lateral masking. The child's task is to verbally report the cued number. The primary metric is the number of correctly reported targets out of 20 trials.
Baseline measurement on day 1, Mid-Intervention on day 1, within 30 minutes post-Intervention on day 1, and Follow-Up on day 180

Andere Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Verbal Backward Digit Span
Zeitfenster: Baseline measurement on day 1, Mid-Intervention on day 1, within 30 minutes post-Intervention on day 1, and Follow-Up on day 180
An experimenter reads a sequence of numbers aloud (e.g., '8-2-5') and the child must mentally reverse the sequence and repeat it back ('5-2-8'). The sequence length progressively increases, placing increasing demands on both the storage and manipulation components of working memory. The score is the number of correctly recalled sequences.
Baseline measurement on day 1, Mid-Intervention on day 1, within 30 minutes post-Intervention on day 1, and Follow-Up on day 180
Coherent Motion Detection
Zeitfenster: Baseline measurement on day 1, Mid-Intervention on day 1, within 30 minutes post-Intervention on day 1, and Follow-Up on day 180
This task measures motion processing sensitivity using a random-dot kinematogram. Stimuli consist of 250 white dots (0.2° diameter; 50 cd/m²) moving at 0.24°/sec within a 5° circular aperture against a dark background (0.02 cd/m²). During each 400-ms trial, a percentage of 'signal' dots move coherently left or right. The task is to indicate the direct of the 'signal' dots.
Baseline measurement on day 1, Mid-Intervention on day 1, within 30 minutes post-Intervention on day 1, and Follow-Up on day 180
Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials (ssVEP)
Zeitfenster: Baseline measurement on day 1, Mid-Intervention on day 1, within 30 minutes post-Intervention on day 1, and Follow-Up on day 180
Participants will view vertically oriented, sinusoidal gratings at 90% contrast. To target the magnocellular pathway, we will use low spatial frequency (SF) gratings of 0.6 cycles/degree, with high-SF gratings of 6.0 cycles/degree as a control. Both stimuli will phase-reverse at 7.5 Hz, generating a dominant 15 Hz ssVEP response. Although fully isolating the parvo- and magnocellular pathways is difficult, this combination of low spatial and high temporal frequency aims to produce a stronger activation of the magnocellular visual pathway.
Baseline measurement on day 1, Mid-Intervention on day 1, within 30 minutes post-Intervention on day 1, and Follow-Up on day 180
Silent Reading and Eye Movement
Zeitfenster: Baseline measurement on day 1, Mid-Intervention on day 1, within 30 minutes post-Intervention on day 1, and Follow-Up on day 180

Task: Participants will silently read 20 sentences constructed from age-appropriate, high-frequency Chinese characters (font: 'Free HK Kai', recommended by the Education Bureau). Each 18-character sentence spans two lines, with characters subtending a 2° visual angle. To ensure comprehension, a multiple-choice question will follow each sentence.

Acquisition: Participants will be seated 50 cm from the screen with a forehead rest for stability. Eye movements will be recorded using a Tobii Pro Fusion eye-tracker (250 Hz sampling rate) following a successful nine-point calibration.

Global Reading Metrics: Reading speed (characters per minute) and comprehension accuracy (%).

Eye-Movement Metrics: Mean fixation duration, mean saccade length, and number of regressions

Baseline measurement on day 1, Mid-Intervention on day 1, within 30 minutes post-Intervention on day 1, and Follow-Up on day 180

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

1. Januar 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

31. Dezember 2028

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

31. Dezember 2029

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

16. Juni 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

12. Juli 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

16. Juli 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

16. Juli 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

12. Juli 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juli 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

UNENTSCHIEDEN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren