Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Core Strengthening Effects in Low Back Pain in Overweight Adults (CORE-BACK)

22. Juli 2026 aktualisiert von: Ibadat International University, Islamabad

Effects of Core Strengthening on Mechanical Low Back Pain in Overweight Adults.

Mechanical low back pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders among overweight adults and can lead to pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. Weakness of the core muscles may contribute to poor spinal stability and persistence of symptoms. Core strengthening exercises have been proposed as an effective treatment; however, evidence regarding their additional benefit over conventional physical therapy remains limited.

This randomized controlled trial aimed to determine the effects of adding core strengthening exercises to conventional physical therapy in overweight adults with mechanical low back pain. Sixty participants aged 25-45 years with a body mass index (BMI) of 25 kg/m² or greater and chronic mechanical low back pain lasting more than three months were randomly assigned to either an experimental group or a control group.

The experimental group received core strengthening exercises (planks, side planks, and superman exercises) in addition to conventional physical therapy, while the control group received conventional physical therapy alone. Both groups also received therapeutic hot packs and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Participants attended three treatment sessions per week for six weeks.

Primary outcomes included pain intensity measured by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), functional disability measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and body fat percentage measured using the Jackson-Pollock skinfold method. Outcomes were assessed before and after the six-week intervention.

The study evaluated whether adding core strengthening exercises to conventional physical therapy provides greater improvements in pain, disability, and body fat percentage in overweight adults with mechanical low back pain.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Mechanical low back pain (MLBP) is a common musculoskeletal condition and one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Overweight and obesity increase the mechanical load on the lumbar spine, alter spinal biomechanics, and contribute to reduced physical function and persistent pain. Excess body weight, decreased physical activity, and weakness of the trunk musculature may further compromise spinal stability, increasing the likelihood of chronic low back pain.

Core muscles, including the transversus abdominis, multifidus, erector spinae, diaphragm, pelvic floor muscles, rectus abdominis, and internal and external oblique muscles, play an essential role in maintaining spinal stability and functional movement. Strengthening these muscles may improve trunk stability, reduce mechanical stress on the lumbar spine, decrease pain, and enhance functional ability. Although several studies have investigated core stabilization exercises, evidence regarding their effectiveness in overweight adults with mechanical low back pain remains inconclusive.

This study was designed as a single-blinded randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of conventional physical therapy alone with conventional physical therapy combined with core strengthening exercises in overweight adults with chronic mechanical low back pain.

A total of 60 participants aged 25-45 years with chronic mechanical low back pain of more than three months' duration, BMI ≥25 kg/m², body fat percentage greater than 25%, and Numeric Pain Rating Scale scores below 7 were enrolled. Participants with non-mechanical low back pain, previous lumbar spine surgery, spinal fractures, spondylolisthesis, osteoporosis, neurological disorders, metabolic diseases, spinal trauma, or other serious spinal pathology were excluded.

Eligible participants were randomly allocated into two equal groups.

Experimental Group

Core strengthening exercises:

Plank Side plank Superman exercise

Conventional exercises:

Bridging Knee-to-chest exercise Back extension Pelvic rotation

Baseline physical therapy:

Therapeutic hot pack Continuous Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for 10 minutes

Control Group

Conventional exercises:

Bridging Knee-to-chest exercise Back extension Pelvic rotation

Baseline physical therapy:

Therapeutic hot pack Continuous TENS for 10 minutes

Participants attended three supervised treatment sessions per week for six consecutive weeks (18 treatment sessions). Each exercise was performed for 10 repetitions with a 10-second hold and standardized rest intervals. Participants were advised to avoid heavy physical activities throughout the intervention period.

Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and after completion of the intervention. Pain intensity was evaluated using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Functional disability was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Body fat percentage was measured using the Jackson-Pollock three-site skinfold method.

Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 21. Normality of data distribution was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Because several variables were not normally distributed, non-parametric statistical tests were used. Between-group comparisons were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, while within-group pre- and post-treatment comparisons were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test. Statistical significance was established at a p-value less than 0.05.

The study investigated whether the addition of core strengthening exercises to conventional physical therapy would provide greater reductions in pain intensity, disability, and body fat percentage than conventional therapy alone in overweight adults with chronic mechanical low back pain. The findings are expected to contribute to evidence-based rehabilitation strategies for managing mechanical low back pain in overweight individuals and assist clinicians in selecting effective exercise interventions for this patient population.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

60

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Punjab Province
      • Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
        • Elite Physical Therapy Centre

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

Male and female participants. Age between 25 and 45 years. Diagnosed with chronic mechanical low back pain lasting more than 3 months. Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m² (overweight or obese). Body fat percentage > 25%. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score < 7 at baseline. Able and willing to provide written informed consent. Willing to participate in the complete 6-week intervention program.

Exclusion Criteria:

Non-mechanical low back pain. Acute low back pain. Previous lumbar spine surgery (e.g., laminectomy or discectomy). Spondylolisthesis. Osteoporosis or spinal fractures. Cauda equina syndrome. Current history of spinal trauma or surgery. Lumbar spine myelopathy. Diagnosed metabolic diseases. Neurological disorders affecting the spine or lower limbs. Any medical condition that would contraindicate participation in the exercise program.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Experimental Group (Core Strengthening + Conventional Physical Therapy)
Participants assigned to the experimental arm received a combination of core strengthening exercises (plank, side plank, and superman exercises) together with conventional physical therapy exercises (bridging, knee-to-chest, back extension, and pelvic rotation). All participants also received a therapeutic hot pack and continuous transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 10 minutes. Treatment was provided three times per week for six weeks (18 sessions).
Participants received a supervised exercise program consisting of core strengthening exercises (plank, side plank, and superman exercises) in addition to conventional physical therapy exercises (bridging, knee-to-chest, back extension, and pelvic rotation). Each exercise was performed for 10 repetitions with a 10-second hold. Participants also received a therapeutic hot pack and continuous transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 10 minutes before exercise. Treatment was provided three sessions per week for six weeks (18 sessions).
Participants received conventional physical therapy consisting of bridging, knee-to-chest, back extension, and pelvic rotation exercises. Each exercise was performed for 10 repetitions with a 10-second hold. Participants also received a therapeutic hot pack and continuous transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 10 minutes before exercise. Treatment was provided three sessions per week for six weeks (18 sessions).
Aktiver Komparator: Control Group (Conventional Physical Therapy)
Participants assigned to the control arm received conventional physical therapy consisting of bridging, knee-to-chest, back extension, and pelvic rotation exercises. All participants also received a therapeutic hot pack and continuous transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 10 minutes. Treatment was provided three times per week for six weeks (18 sessions).
Participants received a supervised exercise program consisting of core strengthening exercises (plank, side plank, and superman exercises) in addition to conventional physical therapy exercises (bridging, knee-to-chest, back extension, and pelvic rotation). Each exercise was performed for 10 repetitions with a 10-second hold. Participants also received a therapeutic hot pack and continuous transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 10 minutes before exercise. Treatment was provided three sessions per week for six weeks (18 sessions).
Participants received conventional physical therapy consisting of bridging, knee-to-chest, back extension, and pelvic rotation exercises. Each exercise was performed for 10 repetitions with a 10-second hold. Participants also received a therapeutic hot pack and continuous transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 10 minutes before exercise. Treatment was provided three sessions per week for six weeks (18 sessions).

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Pain Intensity
Zeitfenster: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Lower scores indicate reduced pain intensity.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Functional Disability
Zeitfenster: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Functional disability will be measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The ODI is a validated questionnaire that evaluates disability associated with low back pain. Lower scores indicate better functional status.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Body Fat Percentage
Zeitfenster: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Body fat percentage will be measured using the Jackson-Pollock three-site skinfold method with skinfold calipers. Changes in body fat percentage will be compared before and after the intervention.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Studienstuhl: Dr Jawad Naveed, MS, Riphah College of Rehabilitation & Allied Health Sciences, Riphah International University, Islamabad

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

15. Januar 2023

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

11. Mai 2023

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

30. Juni 2023

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

10. Juli 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

22. Juli 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

27. Juli 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

27. Juli 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

22. Juli 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juli 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

Individual participant data (IPD) collected during this study will not be shared. The informed consent obtained from participants did not include permission for public sharing of individual-level data, and no data-sharing plan was established at the time of study initiation. De-identified aggregate study results are reported in the thesis and may be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding investigator, subject to institutional policies and ethical considerations.

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren