Effectiveness of Theta Burst Stimulation For Upper and Lower Extremity Recovery in Stroke
Effects of Different Theta Burst Stimulation Protocols Combined With Conventional Rehabilitation on Upper and Lower Extremity Motor Recovery in Patients With Early-Stage Stroke
This single-center, single-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial will include 60 patients aged >45 years who are within 3 months of a first-ever middle cerebral artery ischemic stroke. Participants will be randomized into four groups: coupled TBS (contralesional cTBS followed by ipsilesional iTBS), cTBS plus sham iTBS, sham cTBS plus iTBS, or sham TBS. TBS will be delivered over the primary motor cortex for 10 sessions over 2 weeks. Stimulation intensity will be set at 80% of the resting motor threshold determined using EMG-guided motor evoked potentials. Each cTBS and iTBS application will consist of 600 pulses. All participants will additionally receive standardized conventional rehabilitation for at least 4 weeks.
The primary outcome will be upper-extremity motor recovery assessed using the motor domain of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment. Secondary outcomes will include lower-extremity motor recovery, spasticity, sensory function, cortical excitability, functional ambulation, activities of daily living, and stroke-specific quality of life. Assessments will be performed at baseline, after the 2-week intervention, and at 1-month post-treatment follow-up.
Studienübersicht
Status
Bedingungen
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Geschätzt)
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienkontakt
- Name: Fatma Melis Ertuğrul Öztürk, Resident
- Telefonnummer: 03127970000
- E-Mail: melis.ertugrul@hotmail.com
Studienorte
-
-
Yenimahalle
-
Ankara, Yenimahalle, Türkei (türkiye), 06170
- Rekrutierung
- Ankara Etlik Şehir Hastanesi
-
Kontakt:
- Fatma Melis Ertuğrul Öztürk, Resident
- Telefonnummer: 03127970000
- E-Mail: melis.ertugrul@hotmail.com
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of ischemic stroke due to middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
- Within the first 3 months after stroke.
- First-ever stroke.
- Age ≥45 years.
- Brunnstrom stage 1, 2, or 3 for the upper extremity and hand.
- No previous physical therapy after the current stroke.
- Ability to maintain at least minimal semi-sitting balance.
- Medically and neurologically stable.
- Mini-Mental State Examination score >24.
- Native Turkish speaker who voluntarily agrees to participate and provides written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of epilepsy.
- Presence of a pacemaker.
- Pregnancy.
- Neurological disease other than stroke.
- Metallic implants in the brain or scalp, including cochlear implants.
- History of brain surgery.
- Comorbid disease that may significantly impair general health, such as heart f-failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and/or severe infection.
- Diagnosis of malignancy.
- Peripheral nerve injury and/or musculoskeletal disorder affecting motor function of the upper or lower extremities, such as fracture.
- Cardiac arrhythmia.
- Aphasia, spatial neglect, or visual field loss.
- Visual or hearing impairment that prevents communication.
- Alcohol and/or drug dependence.
- Refusal to participate or failure to provide informed consent.
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Behandlung
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Vervierfachen
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Coupled TBS Group
Participants will receive contralesional continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) followed by ipsilesional intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) within the same session. Ten sessions will be administered over 2 weeks in addition to standardized conventional rehabilitation. |
Continuous theta burst stimulation will be applied over the contralesional primary motor cortex (M1) at 80% of the resting motor threshold. A total of 600 pulses will be delivered over 40 seconds as triplets at 50 Hz repeated every 200 ms. Intermittent theta burst stimulation will be applied over the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) at 80% of the resting motor threshold. A total of 600 pulses will be delivered over approximately 190 seconds using 2-second trains repeated every 10 seconds. |
|
Experimental: cTBS + Sham iTBS Group
Participants will receive contralesional continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) followed by ipsilesional sham intermittent theta burst stimulation (sham iTBS) within the same session. Ten sessions will be administered over 2 weeks in addition to standardized conventional rehabilitation. |
Continuous theta burst stimulation will be applied over the contralesional primary motor cortex (M1) at 80% of the resting motor threshold. A total of 600 pulses will be delivered over 40 seconds as triplets at 50 Hz repeated every 200 ms. Sham intermittent theta burst stimulation will be delivered over the ipsilesional primary motor cortex using a sham coil for approximately 190 seconds. |
|
Experimental: Sham cTBS + iTBS Group
Participants will receive contralesional sham continuous theta burst stimulation (sham cTBS) followed by ipsilesional intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) within the same session. Ten sessions will be administered over 2 weeks in addition to standardized conventional rehabilitation. |
Intermittent theta burst stimulation will be applied over the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) at 80% of the resting motor threshold. A total of 600 pulses will be delivered over approximately 190 seconds using 2-second trains repeated every 10 seconds. Sham continuous theta burst stimulation will be delivered over the contralesional primary motor cortex using a sham coil for 40 seconds. |
|
Schein-Komparator: Sham TBS Group
Participants will receive contralesional sham continuous theta burst stimulation (sham cTBS) followed by ipsilesional sham intermittent theta burst stimulation (sham iTBS) within the same session. Ten sessions will be administered over 2 weeks in addition to standardized conventional rehabilitation. |
Sham intermittent theta burst stimulation will be delivered over the ipsilesional primary motor cortex using a sham coil for approximately 190 seconds. Sham continuous theta burst stimulation will be delivered over the contralesional primary motor cortex using a sham coil for 40 seconds. |
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Upper Extremity Motor Function Assessed by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Upper Extremity Motor Subscale (FMA-UE)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 2, and Week 6
|
Upper extremity motor function will be assessed using the motor subsection of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment. The FMA-UE motor score ranges from 0 to 66, with higher scores indicating better upper extremity motor function. Each item is scored on a 3-point ordinal scale: 0 = cannot perform, 1 = performs partially, and 2 = performs fully |
Baseline, Week 2, and Week 6
|
|
Change in Lower Extremity Motor Function Assessed by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Lower Extremity Motor Subscale
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 2, and Week 6
|
Lower extremity motor recovery will be assessed using the lower extremity motor subsection of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment. |
Baseline, Week 2, and Week 6
|
|
Change in Motor Recovery Stage Assessed by the Brunnstrom Motor Recovery Stages
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 2, and Week 6
|
Motor recovery of the upper and lower extremities will be evaluated using the Brunnstrom Motor Recovery Stages. Each assessed region is rated separately from stage I (1) to stage VI (6), with higher stages indicating better motor recovery. |
Baseline, Week 2, and Week 6
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Spasticity Assessed by the Modified Ashworth Scale
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 2, and Week 6
|
Spasticity of the upper and lower extremities will be assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). Scores range from 0 (no increase in muscle tone) to 4 (rigidity in flexion or extension), with six ordinal categories: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4. Higher scores indicate greater muscle tone and resistance to passive movement, representing a worse outcome. |
Baseline, Week 2, and Week 6
|
|
Change in Sensory Function Assessed by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Sensory Subscale
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 2, and Week 6
|
Sensory function of the upper and lower extremities will be assessed using the sensory subsection of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment. This subsection evaluates light touch and joint position sense, with each item scored on a three-point ordinal scale (0-2). The combined sensory score for the upper and lower extremities ranges from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating better sensory function. |
Baseline, Week 2, and Week 6
|
|
Change in Cortical Excitability Assessed by Motor Evoked Potential Amplitude
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 2, and Week 6
|
Cortical excitability will be evaluated by measuring motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude. |
Baseline, Week 2, and Week 6
|
|
Change in Cortical Excitability Assessed by Motor Evoked Potential Latency
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 2, and Week 6
|
Cortical excitability will be evaluated by measuring motor evoked potential (MEP) latency. |
Baseline, Week 2, and Week 6
|
|
Change in Functional Ambulation Assessed by the Functional Ambulation Scale
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 2, and Week 6
|
Functional ambulation will be assessed using the Functional Ambulation Scale (FAS). The scale consists of six ordinal categories ranging from 0 to 5. A score of 0 indicates an inability to walk or the need for assistance from two or more people, whereas a score of 5 indicates independent walking on level and uneven surfaces, including stairs. Higher scores indicate greater independence in walking and a better functional outcome. |
Baseline, Week 2, and Week 6
|
|
Change in Independence in Activities of Daily Living Assessed by the Modified Barthel Index
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 2, and Week 6
|
Independence in activities of daily living and mobility will be assessed using the Modified Barthel Index. The index consists of 10 items, with item scores summed to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 100. A score of 0 indicates total dependence, whereas a score of 100 indicates independence in all assessed activities. Higher scores indicate greater functional independence and a better outcome. |
Baseline, Week 2, and Week 6
|
|
Change in Stroke-Specific Quality of Life
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Week 2, and Week 6
|
Stroke-specific quality of life will be assessed using the Turkish version of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL). The scale consists of 48 items across eight domains. Each item is rated on a five-point scale ranging from 1 to 5. The mean item score will be calculated by averaging the scores of all 48 items, resulting in an overall score ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. |
Baseline, Week 2, and Week 6
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen
- Long H, Wang H, Zhao C, Duan Q, Feng F, Hui N, Mao L, Liu H, Mou X, Yuan H. Effects of combining high- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper limb hemiparesis in the early phase of stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2018;36(1):21-30. doi: 10.3233/RNN-170733.
- Kuzu O, Adiguzel E, Kesikburun S, Yasar E, Yilmaz B. The Effect of Sham Controlled Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation and Low Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Upper Extremity Spasticity and Functional Recovery in Chronic Ischemic Stroke Patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Jul;30(7):105795. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105795. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
- Chen Q, Shen D, Sun H, Ke J, Wang H, Pan S, Liu H, Wang D, Su M, Fang Q. Effects of coupling inhibitory and facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery in patients following acute cerebral infarction. NeuroRehabilitation. 2021;48(1):83-96. doi: 10.3233/NRE-201606.
- Fu Y, Wang C, Zhang L, Ji D, Xiang A, Qi J, Zhao R, Wu L, Jin S, Zhang Q. The effectiveness of theta burst stimulation for motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Eur J Med Res. 2024 Nov 29;29(1):568. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02170-2.
- Meng Y, Zhang D, Hai H, Zhao YY, Ma YW. Efficacy of coupling intermittent theta-burst stimulation and 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to enhance upper limb motor recovery in subacute stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2020;38(1):109-118. doi: 10.3233/RNN-190953.
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)
Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- AEŞH-2025-070
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .