Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Randomized Evaluation of Lumbar Injection Effectiveness and Function (RELIEF)

2. Oktober 2026 aktualisiert von: SpinaFX Medical Inc.

Safety and Effectiveness of the Triojection® System in Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Radiculopathy With or Without Back Pain Resultant From a Contained Herniated Lumbar Disc (L1-S1): A Pivotal, Randomized, Prospective, Multi-centered Study

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether the Triojection® System is safe and effective for treating symptomatic lumbar radiculopathy (leg pain caused by nerve irritation or compression) resulting from a contained herniated lumbar disc. The study will enroll adults 18 to 75 years of age with a single-level contained lumbar disc herniation who continue to have symptoms despite at least 6 weeks of non-surgical treatment and a previous lumbar spine injection.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does treatment with the Triojection® System improve leg pain and overall clinical outcomes compared with Selective Nerve Root Block (SNRB) alone?
  • Is treatment with the Triojection® System safe, as measured by the absence of device- or procedure-related serious adverse events and persistent neurological deficits?

Researchers will compare participants who receive Triojection® followed by SNRB with participants who receive SNRB alone to determine whether the investigational treatment provides improved clinical outcomes.

Participants will:

  • Be randomly assigned to receive either Triojection® plus SNRB or SNRB alone.
  • Complete questionnaires about leg pain, back pain, disability, quality of life, sleep, anxiety, depression, and overall improvement.
  • Undergo physical and neurological examinations during study follow-up visits.
  • Have MRI scans performed at selected study visits to evaluate changes in the treated disc.
  • Attend follow-up visits at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after treatment.

Up to 300 participants will be enrolled at up to 30 investigational sites in the United States and Canada and followed for approximately 24 months after treatment.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Symptomatic lumbar disc herniation is a common cause of lumbar radiculopathy and may result in leg pain, with or without back pain, that can significantly affect daily activities and quality of life. Many patients improve with non-surgical treatment; however, some continue to experience symptoms despite conservative care and spinal injections and may ultimately consider surgical intervention.

This study is a prospective, randomized, participant-blinded, multi-center clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Triojection® System for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar radiculopathy associated with a single-level contained herniated lumbar disc. The Triojection® System is an investigational device that generates and delivers a controlled ozone-oxygen gas mixture into the affected intervertebral disc under image guidance. The intended mechanism is reduction of disc volume through dehydration of disc material, which may reduce pressure on adjacent nerve structures and relieve symptoms.

Approximately 300 participants will be randomized and treated at up to 30 investigational sites in the United States and Canada. Eligible participants will be adults 18 to 75 years of age with symptomatic lumbar radiculopathy resulting from a single-level contained lumbar disc herniation who have failed at least 6 weeks of non-surgical care and have previously undergone a lumbar spine injection with documented initial symptom improvement and subsequent recurrence of symptoms.

Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two treatment groups:

  • Investigational treatment: Triojection® System followed by Selective Nerve Root Block (SNRB).
  • Control treatment: SNRB alone.

Participants will be followed for 24 months after treatment. Clinical evaluations will include patient-reported outcome measures, neurological and physical examinations, monitoring of adverse events, medication review, and assessment of additional treatments or surgical interventions. MRI evaluations will be performed at baseline and selected follow-up visits to assess radiographic changes in the treated disc.

The primary effectiveness evaluation will assess composite clinical success at 6 months after treatment, including improvement in leg pain and freedom from additional interventions or surgery at the treated level. The primary safety evaluation will assess freedom from device- or procedure-related serious adverse events and persistent new or worsening neurological deficits through 6 months. Secondary and exploratory assessments will evaluate disability, quality of life, pain outcomes, imaging findings, and long-term clinical outcomes through 24 months.

The results of this study are intended to provide evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of the Triojection® System for treating symptomatic lumbar radiculopathy caused by a contained herniated lumbar disc.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

300

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre bis 75 Jahre (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • In order to be eligible to participate in this study, participants must meet all of the following criteria:

    1. Age between ≥18 (skeletally mature) - 75 (inclusive)
    2. A single contained posterior lumbar disc herniation, at a single level L1-S1, no greater than 30% of the canal size confirmed by radiographic imaging (via MRI/Axial MRI sequence)
    3. Has a preoperative leg VAS ≥ 50 /100 mm in worse leg AND worse leg is at least 20mm greater than the other leg
    4. The target level herniated disc must have a disc height of at least 33% (1/3) that of the adjacent disc levels, as determined by the investigator
    5. The patient must have pain in a dermatomal distribution consistent with their radiographic findings.
    6. Presents with leg pain for at least 6 weeks and that has not responded to conservative therapies (e.g., bed rest, physical therapy, medications, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation [TENS], etc.).
    7. Patient must have had a single previous epidural steroid injection or selective nerve root block at the target level with documentation of initial response and recurrence of symptoms (Prior injection must be at least 2 weeks or greater from screening visit)
    8. Psychosocially, mentally and physically able to fully comply with the clinical protocol, provide informed consent, and willing to adhere to follow-up schedule and requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in this study:

    1. Evidence of a symptomatic lumbar herniation at more than one level confirmed by patient history and radiographic imaging (via MRI)

    2. Functional neurological deficit evident during neurological exam such as drop foot, incontinence, intractable pain, loss of bladder or bowel control, or rapidly worsening symptoms

    3. Previous spine surgery in the lumbar region involving the index or adjacent level disc as evident on MRI, or instrumented hardware (e.g., total disc replacement, fusion) at any lumbar spine level

    4. Earlier spinal procedures in the lumbar region involving the index or adjacent level discs (basal nerve ablation, radiofrequency ablation, MILD procedure)

    5. Distal spinal cord compression on CT/MRI

    6. Evidence of cauda equina syndrome

    7. Structural deformities i.e.,

      1. ≥ Grade 2 spondylolisthesis (Up to Grade 1 allowed);
      2. Severe Spinal canal stenosis;
      3. Scoliosis > 10 degree Cobb Angle;
      4. Loss of lumbar lordosis (i.e., flatback-syndrome diagnosis);
      5. Hyperlordosis > 10 degrees;
      6. Spinal fracture (at any level);
      7. Disc extrusions or sequestered herniation as evident on CT/MRI.
    8. Evidence of a lumbar disc herniation with a maximal protrusion of disc material >4 mm beyond the posterior vertebral body margin, as assessed by screening MRI.

    9. Calcified disc fragment as evident on CT/MRI

    10. Inaccessible index disc (e.g. due to, overlap of the iliac wings, and/or steep angulation of the L5/S1 disc space.)

    11. Participant has a bleeding disorder, medical condition, or is taking medications that would result in elevated risk (e.g., blood clotting) to undergoing the surgical procedure; or any other clinical reasons deemed by the Investigator in which the patient would not be an appropriate candidate for the study.

    12. Any evidence of osteomyelitis/discitis at any level

    13. Uncontrolled/acute illness

    14. Women who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant during follow-up time period.

    15. Worker's compensation, injury litigation, disability remuneration.

    16. Active participation in another clinical investigation or course of care that may confound the outcome of this study

    17. Systemic infection or infection at the procedure site

    18. Currently a prisoner

    19. Leg pain of non-spinal or unknown etiology

    20. Participant has a spinal cord stimulator

    21. Diabetes with an HbA1c > 8.5

    22. Severe peripheral neuropathy

    23. Active foot ulcer

    24. Any known allergy to steroids or SNRB anesthetic

    25. Lumbar myelopathy

    26. Active malignancy or planned chemotherapy during follow-up time period

    27. Body Mass Index > 35

    28. Evidence of chronic low back pain for ≥ 12 months that is non-responsive to conservative therapy

    29. Current or recent history (within 90 days of screening) of chemical/alcohol abuse or dependency using standard medical definition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5) code

    30. Current or recent history (within 90 days of screening) of Severe anxiety using standard medical definition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5) code

    31. Current or recent history (within 90 days of screening) of Major Depressive Disorder using standard medical definition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5) code

    32. Any contraindication for MRI (e.g. claustrophobia)

    33. Participant has had a previous lumbar discogram

    34. Participant has modic changes at the treatment level (Type 3)

    35. Participant has a Schmorl's node at the proposed treatment level

    36. Participant has opioid medication usage > 20 MME (morphine milligram equivalent)/day or change in opioid prescription within 60 days of procedure

    37. Participant is currently using a Fentanyl patch (at time of screening)

    38. Participant has a known G6PD deficiency disorder

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Investigational: Triojection® System + Selective Nerve Root Block (SNRB)

Participants randomized to the investigational group will receive treatment with the Triojection® System, consisting of an intradiscal ozone-oxygen injection (35 ± 3 µg/mL ozone in oxygen), followed by a Selective Nerve Root Block (SNRB) using dexamethasone and 0.25% bupivacaine (Marcaine).

The Triojection® System is an investigational device that generates and delivers 12 mL of an ozone-oxygen gas mixture at a concentration of 35 ± 3 µg/mL ozone in oxygen for image-guided intradiscal injection into a contained herniated lumbar disc.

Image-guided injection of dexamethasone and 0.25% bupivacaine (Marcaine) around the affected lumbar nerve root as standard of care treatment for lumbar radiculopathy.

These arm and intervention entries follow the standard ClinicalTrials.gov format for a randomized device study with an active comparator.

Aktiver Komparator: Active Comparator: Selective Nerve Root Block (SNRB) Alone

Participants randomized to the control group will receive a Selective Nerve Root Block (SNRB) using dexamethasone and 0.25% bupivacaine (Marcaine) without treatment with the Triojection® System.

Image-guided injection of dexamethasone and 0.25% bupivacaine (Marcaine) around the affected lumbar nerve root as standard of care treatment for lumbar radiculopathy.

These arm and intervention entries follow the standard ClinicalTrials.gov format for a randomized device study with an active comparator.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Composite Clinical Success at 6 Months
Zeitfenster: 6 Months

Composite clinical success at 6 months requiring achievement of all of the following components:

  • Improvement of at least 20 mm in worse-leg Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score compared with baseline
  • Freedom from reintervention or conversion to surgery at the index level
  • Freedom from device- or procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs) or persistent new or worsening neurological deficit
6 Months

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
ODI Responder Rate at 6 Months
Zeitfenster: 6 Months

Proportion of participants achieving an improvement of at least 15 points in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score compared with baseline.

6 Months
Leg Pain Responder Rate at 6 Months
Zeitfenster: 6 Months

Proportion of participants achieving an improvement of at least 20 mm in worse-leg Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score compared with baseline.

6 Months
Incidence of Related Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
Zeitfenster: Through 24 Months

Incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).

Through 24 Months

Andere Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Pain Response at 12 Months
Zeitfenster: 12 Months

Proportion of participants achieving at least a 20 mm improvement in worse-leg VAS pain score compared with baseline.

12 Months
ODI Responder Rate at 12 Months
Zeitfenster: 12 Months

Proportion of participants achieving an improvement of at least 15 points in ODI score compared with baseline.

12 Months
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Zeitfenster: 1, 3, 6, and 12 Months

Participant-reported overall change following treatment.

1, 3, 6, and 12 Months
Change in ODI Score
Zeitfenster: 6 and 12 Months

Change from baseline in Oswestry Disability Index score.

6 and 12 Months
Change in Leg and Back Pain VAS Scores
Zeitfenster: 6 and 12 Months

Change from baseline in leg pain and back pain Visual Analog Scale scores.

6 and 12 Months
Change in PROMIS-29 Score
Zeitfenster: 6 and 12 Months

Change from baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (PROMIS-29) scores.

6 and 12 Months
Change in Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) Score
Zeitfenster: 6 and 12 Months

Change from baseline in ISI score.

6 and 12 Months
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) Score
Zeitfenster: 6 and 12 Months

Change from baseline in GAD-7 score.

6 and 12 Months
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score
Zeitfenster: 6 and 12 Months

Change from baseline in PHQ-9 score.

6 and 12 Months
Change in Neurological Examination Findings
Zeitfenster: 6 and 12 months

Change from baseline in motor, sensory, reflex, and straight-leg-raise neurological assessments.

6 and 12 months
MRI Assessment of Disc Morphology
Zeitfenster: Base, 6 Months, and 12 Months

MRI evaluation of disc herniation size, disc height, and disc degeneration using the modified Pfirrmann scale.

Base, 6 Months, and 12 Months
Time to Additional Intervention at the Treated Level
Zeitfenster: Through 12 Months

Time from index treatment to additional intervention at the treated level.

Through 12 Months
Healthcare Resource Utilization and Work Status
Zeitfenster: Through 12 Months

Cost analysis including subsequent treatments and work status.

Through 12 Months

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Mitarbeiter

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

15. Januar 2027

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

14. Juni 2028

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

6. Dezember 2029

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

28. September 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

28. September 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

5. Oktober 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

7. Oktober 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

2. Oktober 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Oktober 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

UNENTSCHIEDEN

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

At the time of study registration, the sponsor has not yet determined whether de-identified individual participant data (IPD) will be made available to other researchers. Any future decisions regarding data sharing will consider participant privacy, informed consent provisions, applicable regulatory requirements, and sponsor policies. If a data-sharing plan is established, the ClinicalTrials.gov record will be updated accordingly.

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Ja

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren