Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Cerebellar Brain Stimulation Plus Language Therapy for People at Risk of Poor Aphasia Recovery After Stroke (PART-CN)

27. Oktober 2026 aktualisiert von: Johns Hopkins University

Predicting Aphasia Recovery and Testing Cerebellar Neuromodulation (PART-CN): A Pilot Wait-List Randomized Trial of Cathodal Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Plus Computerized Language Therapy in Stroke Survivors Predicted to Have Poor Language Recovery

This pilot study tests whether a mild form of brain stimulation to the cerebellum, combined with computer-based language therapy, helps people recover language after a stroke when a poor natural recovery is predicted.

People already taking part in a Johns Hopkins study of stroke and language recovery, whose early data suggest the aphasia is unlikely to resolve without treatment, are invited about 3 months after the stroke. Half begin 15 treatment sessions right away and half begin about 3 months later. Each session pairs 25 minutes of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the right cerebellum with 45 to 60 minutes of language exercises, with a speech-language pathologist present.

The main question is whether language ability, measured with the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient, improves more by 6 months after stroke in the group treated first than in the group still waiting. The study also checks how accurately a machine learning model, built from data collected in the first days after stroke, predicted each person's language ability 12 months after stroke.

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

About one third of people with aphasia after stroke respond poorly to language therapy, and current clinical tools cannot identify these individuals early, when recovery is steepest. This study pairs a recovery prediction model with a targeted treatment.

Aim 1: A machine learning model trained on acute-phase data from the parent longitudinal study (Johns Hopkins IRB NA_00042097; neuroimaging, cognitive-linguistic testing, demographics) predicts each participant's 12-month Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient (WAB-R AQ). Participants predicted to remain below 93.8 (aphasia not expected to resolve) are eligible. Prediction accuracy is evaluated prospectively against observed 12-month scores (mean absolute error, correlation, and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and F1 for the below-93.8 classification).

Aim 2: Eligible participants are randomized 1:1 to early intervention (treatment beginning about 3 months post-stroke) or wait-list control (usual care until about 6 months post-stroke, then the same treatment). Treatment is 15 sessions, up to 5 per week over about 3 to 5 weeks. In each session, cathodal tDCS (2 mA, 25 minutes; cathode over the right cerebellum, 1 cm below the inion and 4 cm lateral; anode over the right deltoid; Soterix Medical 1×1 device) is delivered during the first 25 minutes of 45 to 60 minutes of computer-delivered language therapy targeting picture naming, auditory comprehension, reading and spelling, with a speech-language pathologist present throughout. Sessions may take place at a Johns Hopkins site or at home with a study team member present.

The primary comparison is change in WAB-R AQ from baseline (about 3 months post-stroke) to 6 months post-stroke between the treated early group and the untreated wait-list group. Secondary measures include naming of trained items, discourse (content units and syllables per content unit in picture description), functional communication (Communication Activities of Daily Living, Third Edition), emotional well-being (General Health Questionnaire), quality of life (Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale), and resting-state functional connectivity measured with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Participants are followed to 12 months post-stroke.

As a pilot, the study is designed to show feasibility of the predict-then-intervene approach and to estimate effect sizes for a future fully powered, sham-controlled trial.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

8

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

  • Name: Manuel J Marte, PhD, CCC-SLP
  • Telefonnummer: 845-598-6911
  • E-Mail: mmarte1@jh.edu

Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung

Studienorte

  • Vereinigte Staaten
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, Vereinigte Staaten, 21287
        • The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Phipps Building
        • Kontakt:
          • Manuel J Marte, PhD, CCC-SLP
          • Telefonnummer: 845-598-6911
          • E-Mail: mmarte1@jh.edu

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Enrolled in the Johns Hopkins longitudinal stroke and aphasia study (IRB NA_00042097)
  • Consented to future contact for research studies
  • Predicted to have poor language recovery from acute-phase data, defined as a predicted Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient below 93.8 at 12 months post-stroke
  • Ischemic left hemisphere stroke
  • Aphasia with naming impairment on the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised
  • Approaching 3 months post-stroke at enrollment
  • Fluent speaker of English by self-report
  • Age 18 or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lesion in the right cerebellum
  • Previous neurological disorder other than stroke affecting the brain, or any neurodegenerative or psychiatric disorder
  • Seizures during the previous 6 months
  • Uncorrected visual or hearing loss by self-report
  • Use of medications that lower the seizure threshold (e.g., methylphenidate)
  • Use of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists (e.g., memantine)
  • History of brain surgery or any metal in the head
  • Severely impaired auditory comprehension (below 2 on the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Auditory Verbal Comprehension sub-score)
  • Severely limited verbal output (below 2 on the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Spontaneous Speech rating)

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Early intervention

15 sessions of cathodal right cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS; 2 mA, 25 minutes) during computerized language therapy (45 to 60 minutes per session, with a speech-language pathologist present), up to 5 sessions per week over about 3 to 5 weeks, beginning about 3 months post-stroke.
Gerät: Cathodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation

Cathode (saline-soaked sponge electrode) over the right cerebellum, 1 cm below the inion and 4 cm lateral; anode over the right deltoid. Constant current of 2 mA for 25 minutes, ramped up over the first 15 seconds, from a battery-powered Soterix Medical 1x1 stimulator with pre-programmed parameters. Delivered during the first 25 minutes of each language therapy session.

Andere Namen:
  • tDCS
  • Soterix Medical 1x1 tDCS
Verhalten: Computerized language therapy

Computer-delivered language exercises on a tablet, targeting spoken and written picture naming, auditory comprehension, reading and spelling, 45 to 60 minutes per session, with difficulty adjusted to performance and a speech-language pathologist present. Each participant uses the same delivery platform for all sessions.

Andere Namen:
  • Computer-delivered naming treatment
Sonstiges: Wait-list control (delayed intervention)

Usual care, which may include outpatient speech-language therapy, from about 3 to 6 months post-stroke; then the same 15-session protocol of cathodal right cerebellar tDCS plus computerized language therapy, beginning about 6 months post-stroke.
Gerät: Cathodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation

Cathode (saline-soaked sponge electrode) over the right cerebellum, 1 cm below the inion and 4 cm lateral; anode over the right deltoid. Constant current of 2 mA for 25 minutes, ramped up over the first 15 seconds, from a battery-powered Soterix Medical 1x1 stimulator with pre-programmed parameters. Delivered during the first 25 minutes of each language therapy session.

Andere Namen:
  • tDCS
  • Soterix Medical 1x1 tDCS
Verhalten: Computerized language therapy

Computer-delivered language exercises on a tablet, targeting spoken and written picture naming, auditory comprehension, reading and spelling, 45 to 60 minutes per session, with difficulty adjusted to performance and a speech-language pathologist present. Each participant uses the same delivery platform for all sessions.

Andere Namen:
  • Computer-delivered naming treatment

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change in Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient (WAB-R AQ)
Zeitfenster: Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke) and 6 months post-stroke

The WAB-R AQ is a composite measure of overall language impairment, with scores ranging from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate milder aphasia (better outcome). Change from baseline to 6 months post-stroke is compared between the early intervention group (after treatment) and the wait-list group (before treatment).
Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke) and 6 months post-stroke
Mean Absolute Error Between Predicted and Observed 12-Month Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient
Zeitfenster: 12 months post-stroke

Mean absolute difference, in WAB-R AQ points (scale 0 to 100), between the machine learning model's predicted 12-month Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient (generated from acute-phase data) and the observed 12-month score. Lower values indicate more accurate prediction.
12 months post-stroke

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Percentage of Treatment Items Produced Correctly
Zeitfenster: During treatment, up to one week post final treatment session (about 4 to 6 weeks after treatment starts)

Percentage of items trained during treatment that are produced correctly, scored 0 to 100%; higher values indicate better performance.
During treatment, up to one week post final treatment session (about 4 to 6 weeks after treatment starts)
Change in Number of Content Units in Picture Description
Zeitfenster: Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke) and 6 months post-stroke

Total number of content units (accurate, relevant pieces of information) produced when describing the Modern Cookie Theft picture and the Precarious Painter picture. Higher values indicate more informative discourse.
Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke) and 6 months post-stroke
Change in Syllables per Content Unit in Picture Description
Zeitfenster: Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke) and 6 months post-stroke

Number of syllables produced per content unit in the same picture descriptions
Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke) and 6 months post-stroke
Change in Communication Activities of Daily Living, Third Edition (CADL-3) Total Score
Zeitfenster: Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke) and 6 months post-stroke

The Communication Activities of Daily Living, Third Edition measures everyday functional communication in people with aphasia. Total raw score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better functional communication.
Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke) and 6 months post-stroke
Change in General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) Total Score
Zeitfenster: Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke) and 6 months post-stroke

The General Health Questionnaire (Goldberg and Hillier) measures psychological distress and emotional well-being. Items are rated using 0 to 3 Likert scale, giving a total score from 0 to 84; higher scores indicate greater psychological distress (worse outcome).
Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke) and 6 months post-stroke
Change in Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) Mean Score
Zeitfenster: Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke) and 6 months post-stroke

The Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 measures health-related quality of life after stroke and aphasia. Mean score ranges from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke) and 6 months post-stroke
Change in Resting-State Functional Connectivity Between Cortical Language Regions and the Right Cerebellum
Zeitfenster: Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke), 6 months, and 9 months post-stroke

Resting-state functional connectivity (correlation coefficient of oxygenated hemoglobin signals) between cortical language regions and the right cerebellum, measured with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Higher values indicate stronger connectivity.
Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke), 6 months, and 9 months post-stroke

Andere Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient (WAB-R AQ) at 9 Months Post-Stroke
Zeitfenster: 9 months post-stroke

The WAB-R AQ is a composite measure of overall language impairment (range 0 to 100; higher scores indicate milder aphasia). Compared between groups to explore the effect of treatment timing (treatment starting about 3 versus 6 months post-stroke).
9 months post-stroke
Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient (WAB-R AQ) at 12 Months Post-Stroke
Zeitfenster: 12 months post-stroke

The WAB-R AQ is a composite measure of overall language impairment (range 0 to 100; higher scores indicate milder aphasia). Used to assess durability of treatment effects in all participants.
12 months post-stroke

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Johns Hopkins University

Mitarbeiter

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Melissa D Stockbridge, PhD, CCC-SLP, Johns Hopkins University

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

1. November 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Juni 2028

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Juni 2028

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

27. Oktober 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

27. Oktober 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

3. November 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

3. November 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

27. Oktober 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Oktober 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • IRB00562650
  • 2T32HD007414-31 (US NIH Stipendium/Vertrag)

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

Individual participant data will not be shared outside Johns Hopkins. Data collected in this study are coded protected health information under the approved protocol and consent. Aggregate results will be published.

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Ja

Produkt, das in den USA hergestellt und aus den USA exportiert wird

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren