Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Robot-Assisted Versus Free-Hand CT-Guided Flexible Guidewire Localization of Pulmonary Nodules

7. November 2026 aktualisiert von: Peking University Third Hospital

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Free-Hand CT-Guided Preoperative Flexible Guidewire Localization of Pulmonary Nodules

Small pulmonary nodules can be difficult to identify during thoracoscopic surgery. CT-guided flexible guidewire localization helps surgeons locate these nodules before resection. This study compares robot-assisted and conventional free-hand localization at Peking University Third Hospital. Sixty adults who require preoperative localization will be randomly assigned to one of two groups, with 30 participants in each group. Both groups will use the same type of flexible guidewire localization needle. The primary objective is to compare radiation exposure measured by dose-length product. The study will also assess puncture performance, localization accuracy, procedure duration, CT scan count, and procedure-related complications.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

This investigator-initiated, prospective, single-center, randomized, parallel-group study compares robot-assisted and conventional free-hand CT-guided flexible guidewire localization before thoracoscopic pulmonary nodule resection. Written informed consent is obtained before enrollment.

Participants undergo a localization difficulty assessment. A computer-generated sequence assigns participants in a 1:1 ratio within low- and high-difficulty strata using block randomization. Both groups use the same type of flexible guidewire localization needle. In the robot-assisted group, CT images are used for three-dimensional reconstruction and trajectory planning. The physician confirms the target, entry point, angle, and depth, and inserts the needle with robotic trajectory guidance. Repeat CT confirms the needle position, and the guidewire is deployed after the planned target region has been reached. Post-localization CT assesses guidewire position and complications.

The procedure is open-label. The protocol specifies blinded assessment of post-localization CT images by two independent imaging physicians. Planned and actual puncture angles and depths, and the distance between the planned target and actual needle tip, are also recorded in the robot-assisted group. Conversion to free-hand localization is permitted when required for participant safety because of robotic system failure or failed registration, and the reason is recorded.

Continuous variables are summarized as means and standard deviations or medians and interquartile ranges, as appropriate. Between-group comparisons use the independent-samples t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables are compared using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

60

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studienorte

    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 100191
        • Rekrutierung
        • Peking University Third Hospital
        • Kontakt:

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre bis 80 Jahre (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 to 80 years.
  • A pulmonary nodule identified on preoperative high-resolution chest CT, with planned thoracoscopic wedge resection or segmentectomy.
  • Maximum target nodule diameter of 20 mm or less.
  • A pure ground-glass, part-solid (mixed ground-glass), or small solid nodule.
  • A nodule considered difficult to identify by intraoperative inspection or palpation and requiring preoperative CT-guided localization.
  • Ability to tolerate percutaneous pulmonary localization and subsequent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.
  • Voluntary participation and written informed consent from the participant or a legally authorized representative.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Maximum target nodule diameter greater than 20 mm, or no need for preoperative localization in the investigator's judgment.
  • No safe puncture trajectory that avoids major vessels, the heart, mediastinum, severe bullous disease, or other important structures.
  • Severe pulmonary dysfunction that precludes percutaneous pulmonary puncture or thoracoscopic surgery.
  • Coagulation dysfunction or inability to interrupt anticoagulant or antiplatelet treatment according to clinical standards.
  • Clinically significant pneumothorax, pleural effusion, active infection, or another condition affecting safety assessment before localization.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Inability to cooperate with positioning, breath-holding, or CT scanning.
  • Severe ipsilateral pleural adhesions, previous thoracic surgery, or previous radiotherapy considered to compromise localization safety.
  • Any other condition making participation unsuitable in the investigator's judgment.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Sonstiges
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Robot-Assisted CT-Guided Localization

Participants undergo robot-assisted CT-guided flexible guidewire localization before thoracoscopic resection. The uInterv C550-A system is used for CT-based reconstruction and trajectory planning. The physician confirms the target, entry point, angle, and depth and inserts the needle with robotic trajectory guidance. CT confirms satisfactory needle-tip placement before guidewire deployment. Final CT assesses guidewire position and complications. Both arms use the same type of flexible guidewire localization needle.

The uInterv C550-A robotic puncture navigation and positioning system is used for CT-guided preoperative flexible guidewire localization of pulmonary nodules. CT images are used for three-dimensional reconstruction and trajectory planning. The physician confirms the target, skin entry point, puncture angle, and depth, and inserts the needle with robotic trajectory guidance. CT confirms satisfactory needle-tip placement before the flexible guidewire is deployed. A final CT scan assesses guidewire position and procedure-related complications. The same type of flexible guidewire localization needle is used in both groups.

Andere Namen:
  • uInterv C550-A
Aktiver Komparator: Conventional Free-Hand CT-Guided Localization

Participants undergo conventional free-hand CT-guided flexible guidewire localization before thoracoscopic resection. The physician selects the skin entry point and trajectory on CT images, inserts the localization needle under local anesthesia, and adjusts the needle as needed. CT confirms satisfactory needle-tip placement before guidewire deployment. Final CT assesses guidewire position and complications. Both arms use the same type of flexible guidewire localization needle.

Percutaneous placement of a flexible guidewire localization needle using conventional manual trajectory planning and CT guidance before thoracoscopic resection. The physician inserts and adjusts the needle as needed. CT confirms satisfactory needle-tip placement before guidewire deployment, followed by final CT assessment.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Total Dose-Length Product
Zeitfenster: During the localization procedure, from the first CT scan to completion of the final CT scan after guidewire deployment

Total dose-length product (DLP), measured in mGy·cm, summed across all localization-related CT acquisitions, including the initial planning CT, CT acquisitions during needle placement, and the final post-deployment CT.

During the localization procedure, from the first CT scan to completion of the final CT scan after guidewire deployment

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
First-Attempt Puncture Success Rate
Zeitfenster: During the localization procedure

Percentage of participants with satisfactory needle-tip placement on the first puncture attempt without subsequent needle adjustment.

During the localization procedure
Technical Localization Success Rate
Zeitfenster: From guidewire localization through completion of the subsequent thoracoscopic resection

Percentage of participants in whom flexible guidewire localization enables intraoperative identification and resection of the target pulmonary nodule during thoracoscopic surgery.

From guidewire localization through completion of the subsequent thoracoscopic resection
Localization Deviation
Zeitfenster: During localization, on the CT scan confirming final needle-tip position before guidewire deployment

Distance in millimeters between the planned target point and the actual needle-tip position, measured on CT after needle placement.

During localization, on the CT scan confirming final needle-tip position before guidewire deployment
Number of Needle Adjustments
Zeitfenster: During the localization procedure

Number of adjustments to needle position after the initial needle insertion during CT-guided localization.

During the localization procedure
Number of Pleural Punctures
Zeitfenster: During the localization procedure

Number of needle punctures through the pleura during CT-guided localization.

During the localization procedure
Localization Procedure Duration
Zeitfenster: During the localization procedure, from the first CT scan through completion of the final post-deployment CT scan

Elapsed time in minutes from the start of the first localization-related CT scan to completion of the final CT scan after flexible guidewire deployment.

During the localization procedure, from the first CT scan through completion of the final post-deployment CT scan
Number of CT Acquisitions
Zeitfenster: During the localization procedure

Total number of CT acquisitions performed for localization, including the initial planning CT, scans during needle placement, and the final CT after guidewire deployment.

During the localization procedure
Pneumothorax Rate
Zeitfenster: From localization through 2 months after localization

Percentage of participants with localization-related pneumothorax, assessed on post-localization CT and during follow-up.

From localization through 2 months after localization
Intrapulmonary Hemorrhage Rate
Zeitfenster: From localization through 2 months after localization

Percentage of participants with localization-related intrapulmonary hemorrhage, assessed on post-localization CT and during follow-up.

From localization through 2 months after localization
Guidewire Dislodgement or Migration Rate
Zeitfenster: From guidewire deployment through the subsequent thoracoscopic surgery; safety follow-up through 2 months after localization

Percentage of participants with dislodgement or migration of the localization guidewire after deployment, assessed on CT and during subsequent thoracoscopic surgery. Events are recorded during the 2-month safety follow-up; the guidewire is used for preoperative localization and is not intended to remain in place throughout follow-up.

From guidewire deployment through the subsequent thoracoscopic surgery; safety follow-up through 2 months after localization

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Fuxin Guo, Peking University Third Hospital

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

28. Oktober 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Februar 2027

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. April 2027

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

7. November 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

7. November 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

13. November 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

13. November 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

7. November 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. November 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • M20260645

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren