Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

CPT for Offenders With SUD (CPT)

29 août 2013 mis à jour par: National Development and Research Institutes, Inc.

Computerized Psychosocial Treatment for Offenders With Substance Use Disorders

This study will evaluate the comparative effectiveness of Therapeutic Education System (TES), a computer-based, psychosocial treatment program, relative to standard care when offered to individuals with substance use disorders in prison settings. The study will assess the comparative effectiveness of these interventions primarily by examining changes in: (1) substance use (e.g., weeks of abstinence), (2) HIV risk behavior (evaluated as both sex-related and drug-related HIV risk behavior) and (3) reincarceration rates. The study will also examine the extent to which these interventions improve psychosocial functioning (e.g., employment, health, and psychological status) and quality of life, and promote relevant skills acquisition (e.g., improve communication skills, reduce "criminal thinking"). The investigators predict significantly better outcomes for E vs. C due to TES' research-based content and use of proven informational technologies.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

The majority of individuals in criminal justice settings across the U.S. have a critical need for science-based, psychosocial treatment that targets substance use and HIV risk behavior. The investigative team has developed and demonstrated the efficacy of an interactive, computer-based, psychosocial treatment pro-gram, the Therapeutic Education System (TES), which can answer this need. TES is theoretically grounded in evidence-based psychosocial treatments (Community Reinforcement Approach and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy), and employs state-of-the-art, proven informational technologies and multimedia learning tools to promote skills acquisition, experiential learning and behavioral change. This computer-based therapeutic tool allows complex interventions to be delivered with fidelity to the evidence-based model and at low cost due to its self-directed nature (e.g., minimal staff time/training needed), thus offering considerable potential for future sustainability and dissemination within criminal justice systems.

The study employs random assignment of incarcerated male and female offenders with substance use disorders (N=526) to either (1) TES (N=263), or (2) Standard Care (N=263), in a multi-site trial conducted in 8 prison substance abuse programs. Along with NDRI (the applicant organization), the collaborating study sites (University of California Los Angeles, Temple University, and the University of Kentucky) operate Research Centers that belong to the Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJDATS) network, a NIDA-funded cooperative agreement, which has established relationships with criminal justice partners from Departments of Corrections across the U.S. Aim 1 is to test the comparative effectiveness of TES vs. Standard Care on measures of drug use (e.g., weeks of abstinence) and HIV risk behavior (both sex-related and drug-related HIV risk behavior) at 3- and 6-months post prison discharge, as well as on reincarceration rates using official Department of Corrections records. Aim 2 is to evaluate the cost and cost-effectiveness of TES relative to standard care. The investigators predict that TES will be significantly more effective and cost effective than Standard Care.

The project is significant in its use of an innovative, computer-based technology and in its potential to produce a major increase in the effective and cost-effective delivery of science-based psychosocial treatment to substance-abusing offenders in prison, and thereby make a considerable public health contribution. Thus, funding the proposed 2-year project can markedly accelerate the pace and achievement of research and dissemination efforts to meet the needs of the U.S. correctional community by providing effective and practical treatment interventions for its large substance-abusing population.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

376

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

  • États-Unis
    • Colorado
      • Canon City, Colorado, États-Unis, 81215
        • Colorado Territorial Correctional Facility
      • Canon City, Colorado, États-Unis, 81215
        • Four Mile Correctional Center
      • Canon City, Colorado, États-Unis, 81215
        • Fremont Correctional Facility
      • Denver, Colorado, États-Unis, 80239
        • Denver Women's Correctional Facility
      • Model, Colorado, États-Unis, 81509
        • Trinidad Correctional Facility
      • Pueblo, Colorado, États-Unis, 81002
        • La Vista Correctional Facility
      • Sterling, Colorado, États-Unis, 80751
        • Sterling Correctional Facility
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, États-Unis, 40511
        • Blackburn Correctional Complex
    • Pennsylvania
      • Cambridge Springs, Pennsylvania, États-Unis, 16403
        • SCI Cambridge Springs
    • Washington
      • Airway Heights, Washington, États-Unis, 99001
        • Airway Heights Corrections Center

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • individual's parole eligibility date or mandatory release date must be scheduled to occur within a minimum of 4 months (to allow intake an treatment to be completed) and a maximum of 6 months (to ensure that their release follows completion of their treatment such that sufficient time remains for post-prison follow-up interviews to occur within the two-year project timeframe)
  • the state criminal justice system must have identified the individual to have a substance use disorder that requires a substance abuse intervention
  • the individual must give their informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • the individual must not already be participating in substance abuse treatment
  • the individual must speak English, as TES is now only available in English

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Therapeutic Education System (TES)
Experimental (E) condition, the Therapeutic Education System (TES) delivered via effective informational technologies and multimedia learning tools.
Comportemental: Therapeutic Education System (TES)
Therapeutic Education System (TES) is an interactive, computer-based, psychosocial treatment program. TES is theoretically grounded in evidence-based psychosocial treatments (Community Reinforcement Approach and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy).
Comparateur actif: Standard Care
The Control (C) condition, Standard Care, consisting of psycho-educational and psycho-social approaches to substance use disorders (commonly offered in prison settings) delivered by counselors in group formats.
Comportemental: Standard Care
Psycho-educational and psycho-social approaches to substance use disorders (commonly offered in prison settings) delivered by counselors in group formats.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Time Line Follow Back for Drug and Alcohol Use (Sobell et al., 1996)
Délai: 6 months post-prison release
Measure for substance use.
6 months post-prison release
Urinalysis
Délai: 6 months post-prison release
To detect any change in illicit drug use.
6 months post-prison release
Risk Behavior Survey (Booth et al., 1993)
Délai: 6 months post-prison release
To assess both drug-related and sex-related HIV risk behavior.
6 months post-prison release
DOC record systems
Délai: At an average of 11 months post-prison release
To provide the reincarceration status of each participant.
At an average of 11 months post-prison release

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Coping Strategies Scale
Délai: 6 months post-prison release
Measures skills acquisition, such as problem solving and dealing with urges to use substances of abuse (Litt et al., 2005), and psychosocial functioning
6 months post-prison release
Addiction Severity Index-Lite
Délai: 6 months post-prison release
Measures areas of health status improvement, psychological status, family/social relationships, and employment. (www.tresearch.org)
6 months post-prison release
The Treatment Services Review instrument (McLellan et al., www.tresearch.org)
Délai: 6 months post-prison release
Used to investigate the role of treatment services received post-release (in aftercare).
6 months post-prison release
Brief Drug Abuse Treatment Cost Analysis Program (BriefDATCAP)
Délai: 6 months post-prison release
Measures for the cost effectiveness analyses.
6 months post-prison release
EuroQol EQ5D (QOL) (the EuroQol Group, 1990)
Délai: 6 months post-prison release
Describes and value health-related quality of life and for constructing Quality-Adjusted Life Year estimates (QALYs).
6 months post-prison release

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

National Development and Research Institutes, Inc.

Collaborateurs

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
University of California, Los Angeles
University of Miami
Temple University
University of Kentucky

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Stan Sacks, PhD, National Development & Research Institutes

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 septembre 2009

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 août 2011

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 août 2012

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

12 janvier 2011

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

14 janvier 2011

Première publication (Estimation)

17 janvier 2011

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)

2 septembre 2013

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

29 août 2013

Dernière vérification

1 août 2013

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • NDRI-612
  • 1RC2DA028967 (Subvention/contrat des NIH des États-Unis)

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner