Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Motor Learning in a Customized Body-Machine Interface (BMI)

14 novembre 2019 mis à jour par: Ferdinando Mussa-Ivaldi, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Motor Learning in a Customized Body-Machine Interface for Persons With Paralysis

People with tetraplegia often retain some level of mobility of the upper body. The proposed study will test the hypothesis that it is possible to develop personalized interfaces, which utilize the residual mobility to enable paralyzed persons to control computers, wheelchairs and other assistive devices. If successful the project will result into the establishment of a new family of human-machine interfaces based on wearable sensors that adapt their functions to their users' abilities.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Inconnue

Description détaillée

The goal of these studies is to enable persons paralyzed by spinal cord injury (SCI) to drive powered wheelchairs and interact with computers by acting through an interface that maximizes the effectiveness of their residual motor function. This is called a "body-machine interface" because it maps the motions of the upper-body (arms and shoulders) to the space of device control signals in an optimal way. In this way, paralyzed persons that cannot operate a joystick controller because of lack of hand mobility can effectively use their whole upper body as virtual joystick device. An important characteristic of the proposed approach is that it is based on the possibility to control a computer or a wheelchair by bodily movements through an interactive learning process, in which the interface adapts itself to the subject's mobility and the subject learns to act through the interface. This study aims at developing and testing the customization of this interface to a group of SCI participants with tetraplegia, resulting from high-level cervical injury. The proposed research is organized in three specific aims:

(Aim 1) To develop new functional capabilities in persons with spinal cord injury by customizing a body-machine interface to their individual upper body mobility. After fitting the interface to the residual movements of each subject, participants will practice computer games aimed at training two classes of control actions: operating a virtual joystick and operating a virtual keyboard. This study will test the ability of the subjects to perform skilled maneuvers with a simulated wheelchair.

(Aim 2.) To test the hypothesis that practicing the upper-body control of personalized interfaces results in significant physical and psychological benefits after spinal-cord injury. A study will evaluate and quantify the impact of the practicing functional upper-body motions on the mobility of the shoulder and arms by conventional clinical methods and by measuring the subjects' ability to generate coordinated upper body movements and to apply isometric forces. Other studies under this aim will evaluate the effects of operating the body-machine interface on musculoskeletal pain and on the mood and mental state of the participants.

(Aim 3) To train spinal-cord injury survivors to skillfully operate a powered wheelchair using their enhanced upper body motor skills and customized interface parameters. Finally, the last study will test the hypothesis that the skills learned through practice in the virtual environment are retained for the control of an actual powered wheelchair. After reaching stable performance in the simulated wheelchair, subjects will practice the control of the physical wheelchair in safe a testing environment.

(Aim 4.) To understand how extensive practice with a body machine interface affects the cortical representation of the trained limbs. A study will evaluate and quantify the impact of the practicing functional upper-body motions on corticospinal excitability as a correlate to sensorimotor skill learning. Participants will meet the inclusion criteria for both the main study and satisfy the additional optional criteria. Participant will practice upper-body movements using the body-machine interface. The study will evaluate the evolution of corticospinal excitability in related areas of the motor cortex during the training compared to the baseline and after a follow-up period.

If successful, this study will lead to effective operation of a highly customized interface that adapts to the residual motor capability of its users. Physical and psychological benefits are expected to derive from the sustained and coordinated activity associated with the use of this body-machine interface

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

157

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, États-Unis, 60611
        • Shirley Ryan Abilitylab

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans à 65 ans (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-65
  • Injuries at C3-C6 level, complete (ASIA A) or incomplete (ASIA B and C)
  • Able to follow simple commands
  • Able to speak or respond to questions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of tremors, spasm and other significant involuntary movements
  • Cognitive impairment
  • Deficit of visuo-spatial orientation
  • Concurrent pressure sores or urinary tract infection

(Optional) Additional Exclusion Criteria for evaluation of corticospinal excitability using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation:

  • Any metal in head with the exception of dental work or any ferromagnetic metal elsewhere in the body. This applies to all metallic hardware such as cochlear implants, or an Internal Pulse Generator or medication pumps, implanted brain electrodes, and peacemaker.
  • Personal history of epilepsy (untreated with one or a few past episodes), or treated patients
  • Vascular, traumatic, tumoral, infectious, or metabolic lesion of the brain, even without history of seizure, and without anticonvulsant medication
  • Administration of drugs that potentially lower seizure threshold [62], without concomitant administration of anticonvulsant drugs which potentially protect against seizures occurrence
  • Change in dosage for neuro-active medications (Baclophen, Lyrica, Celebrex, Cymbalta, Gapapentin, Naposyn, Diclofenac, Diazapam, Tramadol, etc) within 2 weeks of any study visit.
  • Skull fractures, skull deficits or concussion within the last 6 months
  • unexplained recurring headaches
  • Sleep deprivation, alcoholism
  • Claustrophobia precluding MRI
  • Pregnancy

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Soins de soutien
  • Répartition: Non randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: SCI Static
SCI group that practices with a static body-machine map
The intervention compares two ways of customizing the body-machine interface which will be used for subjects for 40 sessions (spread over 8 months). In one case (SCI static), the body-machine interface is static. In the other case (SCI Machine Learning), there is a machine learning algorithm that adapts to the movements made by the subject.
Expérimental: SCI Machine Learning
Spinal Cord Injury patients who practice with a body-machine map that is adapted using machine learning
The intervention compares two ways of customizing the body-machine interface which will be used for subjects for 40 sessions (spread over 8 months). In one case (SCI static), the body-machine interface is static. In the other case (SCI Machine Learning), there is a machine learning algorithm that adapts to the movements made by the subject.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in Time to task completion from Baseline at 8 months
Délai: Baseline and 8 months
The subjects will perform computer games requiring different data entry tasks (characters, cursor control) and navigate either a virtual or a real obstacle course. This primary outcome measure is the time it takes subjects to complete each task.
Baseline and 8 months

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in Movement Smoothness from Baseline at 8 months
Délai: Baseline and 8 months
This outcome measure measures the change in movement smoothness when operating the virtual and real wheelchairs
Baseline and 8 months
Change in Strength
Délai: Baseline and 8 months
This outcome measure measures the changes in upper body strength after training
Baseline and 8 months
Change in Mental State
Délai: Baseline and 8 months
This outcome measures measures the change in mental state (as quantified by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) after training
Baseline and 8 months

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi, PhD, Northwestern University

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 février 2013

Achèvement primaire (Anticipé)

1 septembre 2022

Achèvement de l'étude (Anticipé)

1 septembre 2022

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

16 avril 2012

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

28 mai 2012

Première publication (Estimation)

31 mai 2012

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

15 novembre 2019

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

14 novembre 2019

Dernière vérification

1 novembre 2019

Plus d'information

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner