Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Stroke Gait Rehabilitation Using Functional Electrical Stimulation

17 février 2021 mis à jour par: Trisha Kesar, PT, PhD, Emory University

Cortical and Spinal Correlates of Post-stroke Gait Rehabilitation

The study is a prospective interventional study to assess the changes in corticospinal excitability and spinal reflex excitability of in response to rehabilitative strategies and protocols that are commonly used during physical therapy treatment of gait disorders among post-stroke subjects. As part of this protocol, 55 individuals with chronic stroke will be assigned to either Cohort 1 or Cohort 2, and will participate in 1-18 gait training sessions. If interested, study participants can also complete both study cohorts sequentially (with at least 3-weeks duration between switching from one cohort to the second). The study examines the effects among two cohorts of post stroke patients. Cohort 1 will participate in 18 sessions of fast treadmill walking plus Functional Electrical Stimulation (FastFES) and Cohort 2 will participate in 1-3 sessions of FastFES and fast walking without FES.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Stroke is the number one cause of disability. Difficulty with walking affects most stroke survivors. Walking deficits (e.g. reduced ankle flexion during swing phase, decreased forward propulsion during terminal stance) can cause risks of falls, slow walking speed, increased effort of walking, and difficulties with activities of daily living. Restoration of walking ability can improve quality of life, and is perceived as a major goal of rehabilitation by stroke survivors. Examples of interventions that are used to rehabilitate walking post-stroke are functional electrical stimulation, fast treadmill walking, and bio- feedback. While recent research has focused on comparing the effectiveness of different gait rehabilitation interventions, the neural and biomechanical mechanisms underlying different gait rehabilitation strategies are unknown. FastFES is a novel gait training intervention that combines the beneficial effects of two independent interventions: Fast treadmill walking and FES. The FastFES intervention incorporates principles of physiology, biomechanics, motor control and learning, and predictions of forward-dynamic gait simulations to improve post-stroke gait.

The overall purpose of this protocol is to assess the biomechanical and neurophysiologic effects of rehabilitative strategies and protocols that are commonly used during physical therapy treatment of gait disorders post-stroke among two cohorts of people. Aim 1 of the study will assess the changes in gait biomechanics, corticospinal excitability, and walking function during 18 sessions of gait retraining, with participants in Cohort 1. Aim 2 of the study assesses the effect of parameters such as walking speed (slow, fast, variable, split-belt walking), functional electrical stimulation parameters (short-term changes induced by fast versus FastFES, stimulation intensity, number of muscles stimulated), and bio-feedback on within-session changes in gait biomechanics, walking function, and corticospinal excitability, among participants in Cohort 2.

Within Cohort 1, participants will receive identical treatment throughout the 18 training sessions (i.e. FastFES training). Within Cohort 2, participants will participate in 3 training sessions of both FastFES and fast walking training, with a 3-week break between the two types of training.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

24

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, États-Unis, 30322
        • Emory University

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

30 ans à 80 ans (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic stroke (>6 months post stroke)
  • First (single) lesion
  • Able to walk with or without the use of a cane or walker
  • Sufficient cardiovascular health and ankle stability to walk for 6 minutes at a self-selected speed without an orthoses
  • Resting heart rate 40-100 beats per minute
  • Resting blood pressure between 90/60-70/90

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence of moderate/ severe chronic white matter disease or cerebellar stroke on MRI
  • Cerebellar signs (ataxic ("drunken") gait or decreased coordination during rapid alternating hand or foot movements
  • Insulin dependent diabetes
  • History of lower extremity joint replacement
  • Score of >1 on question 1b and >0 on question 1c on NIH Stroke Scale
  • Inability to communicate with investigators
  • Neglect/hemianopia, or unexplained dizziness in last 6 months
  • Neurologic conditions other than stroke
  • Orthopedic problems in the lower limbs or spine (or other medical conditions) that limit walking
  • Contraindications to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are: history of seizures, metal implants in the head or face, history of recurring or severe headaches/migraine, headache within the past 24 hours, presence of skull abnormalities or fractures, hemorrhagic stroke, history of dizziness, syncope, nausea, or loss of consciousness in the past 12 months

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Autre
  • Répartition: Non randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Cohort 1 - FastFES Training
Participants with chronic stroke in Cohort 1 will receive 18 training sessions of FastFES (fast treadmill walking with electrical stimulation).
Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is a technique that causes a muscle to contract through the use of an electrical current. The therapist applies an electrical current to either the skin over the nerve, or over the bulk of the muscle, and this will cause a muscle contraction. The FES is delivered to 2 muscle groups (dorsiflexor and plantarflexor) timed appropriately with the gait cycle. FastFES gait training sessions may comprise up to six 6-minute bouts of walking with rest breaks between bouts (total 30-minutes of walking). The last training bout (bout 6) may comprise 6-minutes of over ground walking, during which subjects will be asked to walk as fast as they can. For safety, a physical therapist will walk with and guard the subject during over ground walking.
Autres noms:
  • FastFES
Expérimental: Cohort 2 - FastFES and Fast Walking
Participants with chronic stroke in Cohort 2 who complete 3 sessions of FastFES and 3 sessions of fast walking.
Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is a technique that causes a muscle to contract through the use of an electrical current. The therapist applies an electrical current to either the skin over the nerve, or over the bulk of the muscle, and this will cause a muscle contraction. The FES is delivered to 2 muscle groups (dorsiflexor and plantarflexor) timed appropriately with the gait cycle. FastFES gait training sessions may comprise up to six 6-minute bouts of walking with rest breaks between bouts (total 30-minutes of walking). The last training bout (bout 6) may comprise 6-minutes of over ground walking, during which subjects will be asked to walk as fast as they can. For safety, a physical therapist will walk with and guard the subject during over ground walking.
Autres noms:
  • FastFES
Fast walking training sessions will be similar to FastFES in duration, dosage, structure but no FES will be provided.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP) Amplitude Measure in milliVolt (mV) of FastFES Versus Fast Walking After 3 Training Sessions in Cohort 2
Délai: Baseline, week 3 (after 3 sessions of one intervention), week 6 (after 3 sessions of the other intervention)
Change from baseline in MEP amplitude (transverse abdominal (TA) muscle) is used as a measure of corticospinal excitability that is assessed using a non-invasive technique called transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Electrical activity from muscles in response to the TMS will be collected using surface electromyography (EMG) sensors attached to muscles that play critical roles during FastFES versus Fast walking. TMS will be delivered using two Magstim 200 stimulators connected via a BiStim module. An average of 10 TMS-evoked MEP responses will be used to comparing mean peak-to-peak MEP amplitudes in response to suprathreshold TMS delivered to the hotspot.
Baseline, week 3 (after 3 sessions of one intervention), week 6 (after 3 sessions of the other intervention)
Change in H-Reflex /M-Wave (Hmax/Mmax) Ratio Among FastFES Versus Fast Walking After 3 Training Sessions in Cohort 2
Délai: Baseline, week 3 (after 3 sessions of one intervention), week 6 (after 3 sessions of the other intervention)
Change from baseline in (Hmax/Mmax) ratio is used as a measure of spinal reflex excitability, that is assessed using peripheral electrical stimulation delivered to the nerves innervating the ankle muscles. An electrical stimulation electrode is placed just above the knee, and used as the anode for tibial nerve stimulation. Electrical stimulation is delivered via surface electrodes in a static position to the popliteal fossa. The subject's EMG activity will be recorded while the cathode is moved at the back of the knee to determine the location that provides the best EMG response (H-reflex). EMG activity will be recorded while 50-60 electrical stimuli (short 1 ms square pulses, ranging in intensity in milliAmpere(mA) 1-80), 7-10 seconds apart, are delivered to the muscle. Also 5-20 electrical stimulus pulses at intensities are delivered that elicit a percentage of the maximum reflex response.
Baseline, week 3 (after 3 sessions of one intervention), week 6 (after 3 sessions of the other intervention)
Change in Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP) Amplitude Measure in milliVolt (mV) of FastFES After 18 Training Sessions in Cohort 1
Délai: Baseline and up to 6 weeks
Change from baseline in MEP amplitude (TA muscle in a resting state) is used as a measure of corticospinal excitability that is assessed using a non-invasive technique called transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Electrical activity from muscles in response to the TMS will be collected using surface electromyography (EMG) sensors attached to muscles that play critical roles during FastFES versus Fast walking. TMS will be delivered using two Magstim 200 stimulators connected via a BiStim module. An average of 10 TMS-evoked MEP responses will be used to comparing mean peak-to-peak MEP amplitudes in response to suprathreshold TMS delivered to the hotspot.
Baseline and up to 6 weeks
Change in H-Reflex /M-Wave (Hmax/Mmax) Ratio Among FastFES Versus Fast Walking After 18 Training Sessions in Cohort 1
Délai: Baseline and up to 6 weeks
Change from baseline in (Hmax/Mmax) ratio is used as a measure of spinal reflex excitability, that is assessed using peripheral electrical stimulation delivered to the nerves innervating the ankle muscles. An electrical stimulation electrode is placed just above the knee, and used as the anode for tibial nerve stimulation. Electrical stimulation is delivered via surface electrodes in a static position to the popliteal fossa. The subject's EMG activity will be recorded while the cathode is moved at the back of the knee to determine the location that provides the best EMG response (H-reflex). EMG activity will be recorded while 50-60 electrical stimuli (short 1 ms square pulses, ranging in intensity in milliAmpere(mA) 1-80), 7-10 seconds apart, are delivered to the muscle. Also 5-20 electrical stimulus pulses at intensities are delivered that elicit a percentage of the maximum reflex response.
Baseline and up to 6 weeks

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in Peak Anterior Ground Reaction Force (AGRF) of FastFES Versus Fast Walking After 3 Training Sessions in Cohort 2
Délai: Baseline, week 3 (after 3 sessions of one intervention), week 6 (after 3 sessions of the other intervention)
Change from baseline in peak AGRF during treadmill walking will be collected using a treadmill instrumented with two force platforms under each belt. Motion analysis data will be collected during 15- to 40-second long dynamic walking trials as subjects walk on a treadmill.
Baseline, week 3 (after 3 sessions of one intervention), week 6 (after 3 sessions of the other intervention)
Change in Peak Anterior Ground Reaction Force (AGRF) of FastFES Versus Fast Walking After 18 Training Sessions in Cohort 1
Délai: Baseline and up to 6 weeks
Change from baseline in peak AGRF during treadmill walking will be collected using a treadmill instrumented with two force platforms under each belt. Motion analysis data will be collected during 15- to 40-second long dynamic walking trials as subjects walk on a treadmill.
Baseline and up to 6 weeks

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Trisha Kesar, PT, PhD, Emory University

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

1 août 2013

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 mai 2019

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 mai 2019

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

15 août 2012

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

16 août 2012

Première publication (Estimation)

20 août 2012

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

10 mars 2021

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

17 février 2021

Dernière vérification

1 février 2021

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • IRB00058363
  • 5K01HD079584-02 (Subvention/contrat des NIH des États-Unis)
  • 13SDG13320000 (Autre identifiant: American Heart Association)

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Oui

produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.

Oui

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner