Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Quality of Life of Patients With Colorectal Neoplasm and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening

13 mai 2016 mis à jour par: Professor Cindy L.K. Lam, The University of Hong Kong

A Study on Health-related Quality of Life of Patients With Colorectal Neoplasm and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Hong Kong

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cancer among Chinese in Hong Kong and the second leading cause of cancer death in this population. Several screening strategies has been associated with improved survival and may affect patients' health-related quality of life (HRQOL). HRQOL impact should be used to adjust for survival in terms of quality adjusted life years (QALY) in the evaluation of cost-effectiveness of any intervention including screening.

Objectives: to determine the HRQOL and health preference of patients with different stages of colorectal neoplasm, and to determine the most cost-effective CRC screening strategy for increasing QALYs.

Design and Subjects: A longitudinal survey to collect data on HRQOL associated with colorectal neoplasm for Markov modeling on cost-effectiveness of CRC screening. A stratified sample of 420 patients with colorectal polyps and different stages of CRC will be recruited from colorectal clinics of Queen Mary Hospital for health preference and HRQOL assessment. The HRQOL over time will be measured at baseline, 6 and 12 months later. Health preference data will be integrated with cost and effectiveness data obtained from the literature to determine the cost-effectiveness of currently recommended CRC screening strategies by Markov modeling.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure is the SF-6D health preference value and QALYs. Secondary outcomes are the SF-12v2 and FACT-C scores. The outcomes will be compared between patients with different stages of colorectal neoplasm. Markov modeling study will estimate the expected QALYs gained and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for each CRC screening strategy.

Results: The study will provide information on HRQOL of patients with colorectal neoplasm to guide health services. The Markov Model will identify the most cost-effective CRC screening strategy for Hong Kong Chinese, which can inform policy makers and the public for the prevention of CRC of the population.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Les conditions

Description détaillée

The aims are to determine the HRQOL and health preference (utility) of different stages of colorectal neoplasm in order to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different CRC screening strategies for the Chinese population in Hong Kong.

The specific objectives are:

  1. To determine the HRQOL preference values of patients in different stage of colorectal neoplasm in order to estimate the quality of life adjustment applicable to each stage of colorectal neoplasm.
  2. To evaluate the HRQOL of patients with colorectal neoplasm in order to find out their concerns and needs.
  3. To find out whether HRQOL preference of people with colorectal neoplasm changes with time.
  4. To determine the expected life years gained from the reduction in the incidence and mortality rates of CRC for each CRC screening strategy base on literature review.
  5. To determine the QALY gained from each CRC strategy by combining the preference value with life years gained.
  6. To identify the most cost-effective CRC screening strategy and to determine the incremental cost per additional QALY gained compared to no screening, by Markov modelling.

The study hypotheses are:

  1. Patients with colorectal neoplasm including those with polyps have lower HRQOL than the general population.
  2. There is a gradient reduction in HRQOL preference among patients with different stages colorectal neoplasm from polyp to metastatic cancer.
  3. HRQOL preference of patients with colorectal neoplasm is stable if there is no change in the disease stage.
  4. Annual I-FOBT is the most cost-effective CRC screening strategy for the Chinese population in Hong Kong.

Type d'étude

Observationnel

Inscription (Réel)

587

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

      • Hong Kong Island, Hong Kong
        • Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong
      • Hong Kong Island, Hong Kong
        • Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital
      • Hong Kong Island, Hong Kong
        • Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

Méthode d'échantillonnage

Échantillon non probabiliste

Population étudiée

All Chinese patients of 18 years old or above with a histology of confirmed colorectal polyp or cancer for at least six months were recruited from specialist outpatient medical and surgical colorectal clinics of Queen Mary hospital in Hong Kong.

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years or above
  • Have life expectancy of at least 6 months
  • Have confirmed diagnosis of any of the following colorectal neoplasm classified by the screening surveillance guideline and UICC/AJCC (TNM) staging system
  • Have given consent to take part in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to understand or communicate in Cantonese or Chinese
  • Significant cognitive impairment judged by the doctor to be unable to answer the questionnaire
  • Too ill to carry out an interview
  • Refuse to give consent

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

Cohortes et interventions

Groupe / Cohorte
Low-risk Colorectal Polyps
≤2 adenomas or 3-4 adenomas all of which are <1cm
High-risk Colorectal Polyps
≥5 adenomas or ≥3 adenomas at least one of which is ≥1cm
Stage I CRC
at least six months since diagnosis of Stage I CRC
Stage II CRC
at least six months since diagnosis of Stage II CRC
Stage III CRC
at least six months since diagnosis of Stage III CRC
Stage IV CRC
at least six months since diagnosis of Stage IV CRC

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
SF-6D Preference-based Value
Délai: Twelve months
HRQOL preference value measured by The Chinese (HK) SF-6D Health Survey was calculated by the HK population specific algorithm. It ranges from 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health).
Twelve months
Quality-adjusted life years for each screening strategy
Délai: Baseline
The effectiveness of CRC screening is quantified by Quality-adjusted life years, which was calculated as the product of average duration of each health state (including no illness) and the SF-6D preference value for that particular health state.
Baseline
Direct Health Care Costs for each CRC screening strategy
Délai: Baseline
The direct health care costs of different CRC screening strategies and treatments of different stages of CRC were estimated using the costs published by the Government Gazette.
Baseline

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
HRQOL by SF-12v2 and FACT-C
Délai: Twelve months
HRQOL measured by the SF-12v2 and FACT-C was evaluated to identify the major problems of life of CRC patients.
Twelve months
Health Service Utilizations
Délai: Baseline
Health service utilizations of patients with colorectal neoplasm were assessed to investigate their associations with HRQOL.
Baseline
Factors Associated with HRQOL
Délai: Baseline
Factors including type of treatments that may affect HRQOL of patients with CRC were explored.
Baseline

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Cindy L.K. Lam, MD, Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 octobre 2009

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 juillet 2010

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 juin 2012

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

28 août 2013

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

14 janvier 2014

Première publication (Estimation)

16 janvier 2014

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)

16 mai 2016

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

13 mai 2016

Dernière vérification

1 mai 2016

Plus d'information

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner