Interest of Combining Speech Therapy With a Non-invasive Brain Stimulation (tDCS) for the Aphasic Patient (Taph)
25 juillet 2016 mis à jour par: AZOUVI, Centre d'Investigation Clinique et Technologique 805
Aphasia is a frequent symptom after a left hemisphere stroke.
It has serious impacts on social, family and professional lives.
Aphasic patients need to be rehabilitated.
To date, no pharmacological treatment being available only speech and language therapy (SLT) can improve patients, but its efficiency is moderate.
Several studies have investigated the link between the recovery of language and neural reorganization.
tDCs, a noninvasive technology for modulating neural excitability, could potentiate the effects of the SLT.
About 25 studies in literature have described beneficial effects of tDCs coupled with SLT on aphasic patients.
However to the investigator knowledge the feasibility of tDCs and speech therapy in clinical pathways has never been investigated.
That is why the investigator propose to study in real care conditions how SLT proves more efficient on the recovery of language in a discursive assessment when coupled with active stimulation than with placebo stimulation.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Inconnue
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
This is a multicenter, cross-over, randomized, controlled and double blind study. 24 patients will be included between November 2015 and November 2017.
During each session of speech and language treatment, aphasics will receive a weak 2 milli amperes (electric) current delivered by a tDCs device for 20 minutes. The stimulation will be either active or placebo. Each stage of the cross over will last three weeks. Patients will be administered the usual number of SLT sessions, no particular therapy being imposed. To evaluate the long-time effects of the therapy, three follow-up measures will be proposed.
Type d'étude
Interventionnel
Inscription (Anticipé)
24
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.
Lieux d'étude
-
-
-
Garches, France, 92380
- Recrutement
- Hôpital Raymond Poincaré
-
Contact:
- PHILIPPE AZOUVI, MDPHD
- Numéro de téléphone: 0033147107074
- E-mail: philippe.azouvi@rpc.aphp.fr
-
Contact:
- SANDRA POTTIER, CRA
- Numéro de téléphone: 0033147104469
- E-mail: sandra.pottier@rpc.aphp.fr
-
-
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)
Accepte les volontaires sains
Non
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
Tout
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient more than 18 years
- Aphasic Following a brain injury identified by MRI.
- Present a aphasia severity score> 1 on the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE) severity scale.
- No Post stroke delay is retained but the patient should be stable from a medical point of view.
- Master Of the French language in spoken and written
- Affiliated to a social security
- Patient Who signed the informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Other previous neurological pathologies
- epileptic crisis during the previous 2 months
- Patient denies
- Presence of a cranial flap
- intracerebral metal hardware Presence
- Patient under guardianship
- Patient unable to understand the study
- Patient subject to an exclusion period for another search.
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation croisée
- Masquage: Double
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Aphasics Patients
Patients which have difficulties to speak.
Improvement of language for aphasics patients.
|
Aphasics patients receive active stimulation during SLT
|
|
Comparateur factice: Aphasics Patients control
Patients which have difficulties to speak will receive Sham tDCS +SLT for aphasics patients control
|
Aphasics patients receive active stimulation during SLT
Aphasics patients control receive sham stimulation during SLT
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
change of number of names, without error and not repeated in the speech
Délai: Baseline measures: start of Week 1, 2 and 3. Outcomes measures: 1 assessment at the end of the 5 th week, 1 at the beginning of the 7th week, 1 at the end of the 9 th week and 1 at the end of the 10th week. Follow-up measures: 12th, 14th, 16th
|
The participant must answer a simple question "explain me your job or your study". Their production will be recorded and analyzed. For evaluate the stability of participant performances before the stimulation period three based line will be propose. The third base line corresponds to the start of the first stimulation period. After the three week of tdcs coupled with the SLT a new assessment will be realized. One week later begin the new stage of cross over. An assessment will be administered just before and just after the second stimulation period. Then, three follow-up assessments (one all two weeks) will be proposed during one and half month. |
Baseline measures: start of Week 1, 2 and 3. Outcomes measures: 1 assessment at the end of the 5 th week, 1 at the beginning of the 7th week, 1 at the end of the 9 th week and 1 at the end of the 10th week. Follow-up measures: 12th, 14th, 16th
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
verbal fluency
Délai: Baseline measures: start of Week 1, 2 and 3. Outcomes measures: 1 assessment at the end of the 5 th week, 1 at the beginning of the 7th week, 1 at the end of the 9 th week and 1 at the end of the 10th week. Follow-up measures: 12th, 14th, 16th week.
|
the participant has two minutes to find the most animal names words beginning by letter p. Investigator collect the number of correct words and calculate the standard deviation according to published norms.
|
Baseline measures: start of Week 1, 2 and 3. Outcomes measures: 1 assessment at the end of the 5 th week, 1 at the beginning of the 7th week, 1 at the end of the 9 th week and 1 at the end of the 10th week. Follow-up measures: 12th, 14th, 16th week.
|
|
working memory
Délai: baseline measures: start of Week 1, 2 and 3. Outcomes measures: 1 assessment at the end of the 5 th week, 1 at the beginning of the 7th week, 1 at the end of the 9 th week and 1 at the end of the 10th week. Follow-up measures: 12th, 14th, 16th week.
|
the participant repeats the numbers in the same order or inverted order.
Investigator collect the highest group of number repeated
|
baseline measures: start of Week 1, 2 and 3. Outcomes measures: 1 assessment at the end of the 5 th week, 1 at the beginning of the 7th week, 1 at the end of the 9 th week and 1 at the end of the 10th week. Follow-up measures: 12th, 14th, 16th week.
|
|
visual exploration
Délai: baseline measures: start of Week 1, 2 and 3. Outcomes measures: 1 assessment at the end of the 5 th week, 1 at the beginning of the 7th week, 1 at the end of the 9 th week and 1 at the end of the 10th week. Follow-up measures: 12th, 14th, 16th week.
|
a paper with a lot of drawing is presented to the participant.
The participant must delete all the bells as fast as possible.
Investigator collect the number of bell omissions
|
baseline measures: start of Week 1, 2 and 3. Outcomes measures: 1 assessment at the end of the 5 th week, 1 at the beginning of the 7th week, 1 at the end of the 9 th week and 1 at the end of the 10th week. Follow-up measures: 12th, 14th, 16th week.
|
|
every day life scale
Délai: Baseline measures: start of Week 1, 2 and 3. Outcomes measures: 1 assessment at the end of the 5 th week, 1 at the beginning of the 7th week, 1 at the end of the 9 th week and 1 at the end of the 10th week. Follow-up measures: 12th, 14th, 16th week.
|
a questionnaire is proposed to the participant in order to better understanding how is the communication with their close or with unknown person in a conversation or phone
|
Baseline measures: start of Week 1, 2 and 3. Outcomes measures: 1 assessment at the end of the 5 th week, 1 at the beginning of the 7th week, 1 at the end of the 9 th week and 1 at the end of the 10th week. Follow-up measures: 12th, 14th, 16th week.
|
|
likert scale
Délai: at the end of the 9 th week, a likert 5 grade scale was proposed.
|
likert scale are proposed to know how the stimulation is tolerated and accepted by the participant, the patient family and the speech therapist.
|
at the end of the 9 th week, a likert 5 grade scale was proposed.
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Philippe AZOUVI, MDPHD, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré
Publications et liens utiles
La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.
Publications générales
- Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3(Pt 3):633-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x.
- Greener J, Enderby P, Whurr R. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.
- Elsner B, Kugler J, Pohl M, Mehrholz J. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in patients with aphasia after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 1;(5):CD009760. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009760.pub3.
- Robey RR. A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in the treatment of aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998 Feb;41(1):172-87. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4101.172.
- Klippi A, Sellman J, Heikkinen P, Laine M. Current clinical practices in Aphasia Therapy in Finland: challenges in moving towards national best practice. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2012;64(4):169-78. doi: 10.1159/000341106. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude
1 novembre 2015
Achèvement primaire (Anticipé)
1 novembre 2017
Achèvement de l'étude (Anticipé)
1 octobre 2018
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
29 octobre 2015
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
20 novembre 2015
Première publication (Estimation)
24 novembre 2015
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)
26 juillet 2016
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
25 juillet 2016
Dernière vérification
1 juillet 2016
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 2014-A01773-44
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .