Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Physical Activity and Social Support Prompting Via Phone Messaging

8 mars 2017 mis à jour par: Shinyi Wu, University of Southern California

Phone Messaging for Physical Activity and Social Support Prompting Among Low-Income Latino Patients: A Randomized Pilot Study

The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility, perceived usefulness, and potential effectiveness of a short text or voice message intervention to activate 1) physical activity behavior change among low-income, urban, Latino patients in diabetes management and 2) supportive behaviors by family members or close friends.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Despite the promise of phone-based interventions to effectively support diabetes self-management (DSM), little is known about their impact on the outcomes of highly vulnerable populations such as low-income, inner-city, racial/ethnic minorities. And while phone-based interventions have generally been successful at reaching and engaging adults with diabetes, they have failed to do the same with family members/friends (FF) whom are a promising source of ongoing support for DSM. The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility, perceived usefulness, and potential effectiveness of a short text or voice message (ST/VM) intervention to activate 1) physical activity (PA) behavior change among low-income, urban, Latino patients in diabetes management and 2) supportive behaviors by FF. The investigators conducted a 12-week pilot study in which participants were randomized into one of three study arms: control, phone messaging (PM), and phone messaging plus social support from FF (PM+FF). Participants were recruited in person from a diabetes management program at a safety-net ambulatory care clinic. All participants were given a pedometer and walking log for self-monitoring. Participants in the PM and PM+FF arms received ST/VMs as reminders to review daily step goals and to self-monitor; explaining the benefits of regular PA, importance of regular PA to daily life, and ways to overcome commonly identified barriers to PA; asking participants to report on PA performance; providing feedback based on responses. Participants in the PM+FF identified a FF to receive ST/VMs with suggested behaviors that are perceived as supportive by individuals making PA behavior changes. Participants received semi-structured assessments in person at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. Participants were asked about the extent to which the program enhanced the participant's ability to make PA behavior changes. The primary outcome measures were daily step counts and perceived FF social support.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

42

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age greater than or equal to 18 years
  • Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes
  • No medical conditions restricting patient from beginning a walking program
  • Preferred language of English or Spanish, self-identifies as a Hispanic
  • Ability to walk without the use of assistive devices such as canes or walkers
  • Available to attend three interviews at the clinic
  • Does not plan to move away from the region or be out of the country during the next three months
  • Has a working phone where they can receive regular short text or voice messages for three months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Soins de soutien
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Autre: Control
Pedometers and walking logs
Participants were recommended to use the pedometer and walking log to self-monitor how many steps participants walked each day. Participants were recommended to gradually increase daily steps over the course of 12 weeks until reaching 10,000 steps per day. Participants were also recommended to walk at a brisk pace for 3000 of these steps, which roughly translates to 30 minutes per day.
Expérimental: Phone Messaging
Participants were recommended to use the pedometer and walking log to self-monitor how many steps participants walked each day. Participants were recommended to gradually increase daily steps over the course of 12 weeks until reaching 10,000 steps per day. Participants were also recommended to walk at a brisk pace for 3000 of these steps, which roughly translates to 30 minutes per day.
Participants received short text or voice messages (depending on participant preference) as reminders to review daily step goals and to self-monitor; explaining the benefits of regular physical activity, importance of regular physical activity to daily life, and ways to overcome commonly identified barriers to physical activity; asking participants to report on their physical activity performance; providing feedback based on responses.
Expérimental: Phone Messaging + Family/Friend Support
Participants were recommended to use the pedometer and walking log to self-monitor how many steps participants walked each day. Participants were recommended to gradually increase daily steps over the course of 12 weeks until reaching 10,000 steps per day. Participants were also recommended to walk at a brisk pace for 3000 of these steps, which roughly translates to 30 minutes per day.
Participants received short text or voice messages (depending on participant preference) as reminders to review daily step goals and to self-monitor; explaining the benefits of regular physical activity, importance of regular physical activity to daily life, and ways to overcome commonly identified barriers to physical activity; asking participants to report on their physical activity performance; providing feedback based on responses.
Participants identified a family member or close friend (FF) to receive short text or voice messages (depending on FF preference) with suggested behaviors that are perceived as supportive by individuals making physical activity behavior changes.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in average daily steps assessed by pedometers
Délai: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in average daily steps assessed using pedometer 7-day data storage
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in body mass index
Délai: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in Body Mass Index, which was calculated as weight (in kilograms) over height squared (in centimeters)
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in exercise self-efficacy assessed using the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale
Délai: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in exercise self-efficacy assessed using the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in barriers self-efficacy assessed using the Barriers Self-Efficacy Scale
Délai: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in barriers self-efficacy assessed using the Barriers Self-Efficacy Scale
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in perceived family/friend social support assessed using the Social Support and Exercise Survey
Délai: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in perceived family/friend social support assessed using the Social Support and Exercise Survey
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

Autres mesures de résultats

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in perceived usefulness assessed using patient interviews
Délai: 6 weeks, 12 weeks
At the 6- and 12-week follow-up interviews, participants were asked a series of unstructured questions regarding the extent to which the program enhanced a participant's ability to make physical activity behavior changes. These questions inquired about participants' thoughts on setting PA goals, self-monitoring, educational and feedback ST/VMs, and the idea of using ST/VMs to communicate with patients about PA behavior change. For participants in the PM+FF arms, the questions also inquired about supportive behaviors exhibited by FF since the start of the program and participants' thoughts on the idea of using ST/VMs to communicate with FF about patients' PA behavior changes. Investigators also asked if participants would be willing to participate in a similar program in the future and if participants would be willing to recommend the program to other patients. The latter two were yes/no questions.
6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in perceived usability of pedometers assessed via patient interviews
Délai: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Semi-structured patient interview questions inquiring about the degree to which participants perceived the pedometers to be easy to use
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in perceived barriers to receipt of and engagement with ST/VMs assessed via patient interviews
Délai: 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Semi-structured patient interview questions inquiring about participants' perceived barriers to the receipt of and engagement with ST/VMs
6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in engagement with ST/VMs requiring a response assessed via call logs
Délai: 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Percentage of times that participants responded to ST/VMs requiring a response
6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in receipt of ST/VMs assessed via self-report and call logs
Délai: 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Percentage of short text messages delivered that were received assessed via self-report, and percentage of voice messages that were received assessed via call logs
6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in non-compliance with wearing pedometer assessed via pedometer and walking log
Délai: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Percentage of patients that did not wear the pedometer for a minimum of three consecutive days for at least 10 hours per day. This data will be obtained using the pedometer 7-day memory storage and participants' self-reported hours of use.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Recruitment and retention rates assessed via recruitment and follow-up logs
Délai: 1 day (Recruitment), 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Percentage of patients that were screened, were eligible to participate, and enrolled in the study. Percentage of patients who completed the 6-week and 12-week follow-up assessments.
1 day (Recruitment), 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Sufficiency or restrictiveness of eligibility criteria assessed via recruitment logs
Délai: 1 day (Recruitment)
Percentage of patients that were screened, but were ineligible to participate and the reasons why
1 day (Recruitment)

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Shinyi Wu, Ph.D., University of Southern California

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 avril 2015

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 novembre 2015

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 novembre 2015

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

12 avril 2016

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

29 juillet 2016

Première publication (Estimation)

1 août 2016

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

13 mars 2017

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

8 mars 2017

Dernière vérification

1 mars 2017

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • HS-13-00471
  • 3U54NS081764-03S1 (Subvention/contrat des NIH des États-Unis)

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

INDÉCIS

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner