Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

TAP Block for Laparoscopic Appendicectomy in Adults

12 juin 2020 mis à jour par: Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Appendicectomy in Adults: A Double Blind Randomised Controlled Trial

Laparoscopic (key-hole) appendicectomy is a minimally invasive procedure when compared to open large bowel resection, but is still associated with a significant amount of pain and discomfort. Analgesia is commonly provided by a multi-modal technique involving varying combinations of paracetamol, Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), regional analgesia and oral or parenteral opioids. Opioids are associated with an increased incidence of nausea, vomiting and sedation which can complicate post-operative recovery. Different techniques of intraoperative infiltration of local anaesthetic to control postoperative pain are also being used. Their perceived benefits are thought to relate to reduced opioid consumption and therefore reduced opioid side effects.

Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block is a technique which numbs the nerves carrying pain sensation from the abdominal wall and provides effective and safe analgesia with minimal systemic side effects. Their perceived benefits are thought to relate to reduced opioid consumption and therefore reduced opioid side effects. The investigators believe ultrasound guided TAP blocks will reduce pain and morphine consumption with a resultant improved patient satisfaction, a reduction in post-operative nausea and vomiting and earlier hospital discharge.

The key research question the investigators are trying to answer is whether TAP block provide better pain relief than local anaesthetic infiltration of the laparoscopic port sites. Both techniques are currently being used in the investigator's hospital.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Summary of Study Design: The study will be a double blind randomised controlled trial with patients undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy randomly allocated into two groups. The study group will receive bilateral TAP blocks and the control group will receive local anaesthetic infiltration of the laparoscopic port sites

A double blind design was chosen to eliminate patient and observer bias in reporting of pain scores.

The presence of the control arm will ensure that any difference observed will be due to the effect of sensory nerve block due to the TAP block than due to the systemic effect of the injected local anaesthetic.

The null hypothesis will be that there is no difference between the groups in the amount of opioids consumed by the patients during 24 hours after the operation. The investigators chose this measurement as an objective but indirect measurement of efficacy of TAP block and pain relief thus received. Measurement of pain with various scoring methods are reliable only when concurrent reduction in consumption of pain killers are demonstrated.

Recruitment and randomisation:

All patients meeting the inclusion criteria will receive a patient information leaflet about the study during the procedure and investigators will gain informed consent during the procedure consultation. Investigators aim to recruit 288 patients with 144 patients in each group.

Informed consent will be taken the evening before, or on the morning of, surgery. Patients will then be randomly allocated into either the study group or a control group. Randomisation will occur by using computer generated random numbers using the block randomisation method. Group allocation will be kept in a consecutively numbered, opaque, sealed envelope in the controlled drugs cupboard in theatre-4/emergency theatre anaesthetic room of the John Radcliffe Hospital. Once the patient has consented, the anaesthetist will open the corresponding numbered envelope and perform bilateral TAP blocks after induction of general anaesthesia if the patient is in the study group. The surgeons will infiltrate the port sites with local anaesthetic at the end of the procedure if the patient is in the control group.

Blinding:

The study group will receive bilateral TAP blocks with 20mls 0.25% bupivacaine on each side and the skin punctures on either sides will be covered with a small plaster. Patients in the control group will receive subcutaneous infiltration of the laparoscopic port sites and specimen extraction site with equivalent amount bupivacaine at the end of the procedure and small plasters will be stuck on either flanks approximately where the skin punctures for TAP block will be made.

The assessor of pain scores and morphine doses (Recovery nurse, Ward Nursing Staff & SEU Foundation Doctor) and the patient will be blinded to group allocation.

Patient: Plasters will be stuck on flanks of all the patients, both study and control group, so that patient will not know if they have received TAP block.

Recovery nurse: During handover to recovery the anaesthetist and scrub nurse will not mention group allocation.

SEU Foundation Doctor: The foundation doctor who will be following up patients on the ward will not be present in the operating theatre, ensuring that they are blinded to the technique used.

The study duration will be from induction of anaesthesia until the patients are medically fit for discharge from hospital. No extra visits other than routinely required for the surgical procedure are expected.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

      • Oxford, Royaume-Uni, OX3 9DU
        • John Radcliffe Hospital

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

16 ans et plus (Enfant, Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
  • Male or Female, aged 16 years or above
  • Undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy for a clinical diagnosis of appendicitis
  • American Society of Anaesthetists physical status (ASA) 1-3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Opioid tolerance
  • Chronic abdominal pain
  • Allergy/Intolerance: Morphine, local anaesthetics, tramadol
  • BMI (Body Mass Index) >35 Kg/M2
  • Previous major abdominal surgery
  • High likelihood of conversion of open procedure
  • Patients unable to communicate in written and spoken English
  • Weight less than 50 kg
  • ASA > 3

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Double

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Bloc TAP
Les patients de ce bras recevront un bloc TAP guidé par ultrasons avec de la bupivacaïne 0,25 % 20 ml par côté ou jusqu'à un maximum de 1 mg/kg par côté et la ponction cutanée sera recouverte d'un petit pansement
Bock TAP guidé par ultrasons avec bupivacaïne 0,25 % 20 ml par côté ou jusqu'à un maximum de 1 mg/kg par côté et la ponction cutanée sera recouverte d'un petit pansement
Comparateur actif: Local anaesthetic infiltration
Laparoscopic port sites will be infiltrated with a total of 20 mls 0.5% bupivacaine subcutaneously at the end of the procedure in the control group and plasters will be stuck on either side approximately where a skin puncture for tap block would be made.
Laparoscopic port sites will be infiltrated with a total of 20 mls 0.5% bupivacaine subcutaneously at the end of the procedure in the control group and plasters will be stuck on either side approximately where a skin puncture for tap block would be made.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Opioid consumption in the first 12 hours after the operation
Délai: 12 hours
The primary endpoint will be consumption of morphine or other opioids (including tramadol) in the first 12 hours after the operation. This will be recorded from the drug chart. Morphine equivalents include fentanyl, codeine and tramadol and will be converted into total morphine consumption using recognised conversion ratios.
12 hours

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Numerical rating pain scores at emergence, 6, 12, 24 hours postoperatively
Délai: 24 hours after the operation
24 hours after the operation
Time to first request for rescue analgesia
Délai: 24 hours after the operation
The time will be calculated from the drug chart looking up when the first dose of rescue opioid was administered
24 hours after the operation
Nausea score at emergence, 6, 12, 24 hours postoperatively
Délai: 24 hours after the operation
24 hours after the operation
Total length of hospital stay
Délai: After the operation patients will be followed up till they are medically fit to be discharged from the hospital an expected length of 1-5 days
Time will be calculated from the medical notes, when the decision that the patient is medically fit to be discharged was made
After the operation patients will be followed up till they are medically fit to be discharged from the hospital an expected length of 1-5 days
Opioid consumption at 24 hours
Délai: 24 hours after the operation
Consumption of morphine or other opioids (including tramadol) in the first 24 hours after the operation. This will be recorded from the drug chart. Morphine equivalents include fentanyl, codeine and tramadol and will be converted into total morphine consumption using recognised conversion ratios
24 hours after the operation

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Michael Silva, MBBS,MD,FRCS, Consultant Upper G Surgeon
  • Chercheur principal: Nicholas Crabtree, MBChB,FRCA, Consultant Anaesthetist

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 août 2014

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 août 2014

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 août 2014

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

20 avril 2015

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

14 août 2017

Première publication (Réel)

17 août 2017

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

16 juin 2020

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

12 juin 2020

Dernière vérification

1 juin 2020

Plus d'information

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner