TAP Block for Laparoscopic Appendicectomy in Adults

June 12, 2020 updated by: Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Appendicectomy in Adults: A Double Blind Randomised Controlled Trial

Laparoscopic (key-hole) appendicectomy is a minimally invasive procedure when compared to open large bowel resection, but is still associated with a significant amount of pain and discomfort. Analgesia is commonly provided by a multi-modal technique involving varying combinations of paracetamol, Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), regional analgesia and oral or parenteral opioids. Opioids are associated with an increased incidence of nausea, vomiting and sedation which can complicate post-operative recovery. Different techniques of intraoperative infiltration of local anaesthetic to control postoperative pain are also being used. Their perceived benefits are thought to relate to reduced opioid consumption and therefore reduced opioid side effects.

Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block is a technique which numbs the nerves carrying pain sensation from the abdominal wall and provides effective and safe analgesia with minimal systemic side effects. Their perceived benefits are thought to relate to reduced opioid consumption and therefore reduced opioid side effects. The investigators believe ultrasound guided TAP blocks will reduce pain and morphine consumption with a resultant improved patient satisfaction, a reduction in post-operative nausea and vomiting and earlier hospital discharge.

The key research question the investigators are trying to answer is whether TAP block provide better pain relief than local anaesthetic infiltration of the laparoscopic port sites. Both techniques are currently being used in the investigator's hospital.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Summary of Study Design: The study will be a double blind randomised controlled trial with patients undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy randomly allocated into two groups. The study group will receive bilateral TAP blocks and the control group will receive local anaesthetic infiltration of the laparoscopic port sites

A double blind design was chosen to eliminate patient and observer bias in reporting of pain scores.

The presence of the control arm will ensure that any difference observed will be due to the effect of sensory nerve block due to the TAP block than due to the systemic effect of the injected local anaesthetic.

The null hypothesis will be that there is no difference between the groups in the amount of opioids consumed by the patients during 24 hours after the operation. The investigators chose this measurement as an objective but indirect measurement of efficacy of TAP block and pain relief thus received. Measurement of pain with various scoring methods are reliable only when concurrent reduction in consumption of pain killers are demonstrated.

Recruitment and randomisation:

All patients meeting the inclusion criteria will receive a patient information leaflet about the study during the procedure and investigators will gain informed consent during the procedure consultation. Investigators aim to recruit 288 patients with 144 patients in each group.

Informed consent will be taken the evening before, or on the morning of, surgery. Patients will then be randomly allocated into either the study group or a control group. Randomisation will occur by using computer generated random numbers using the block randomisation method. Group allocation will be kept in a consecutively numbered, opaque, sealed envelope in the controlled drugs cupboard in theatre-4/emergency theatre anaesthetic room of the John Radcliffe Hospital. Once the patient has consented, the anaesthetist will open the corresponding numbered envelope and perform bilateral TAP blocks after induction of general anaesthesia if the patient is in the study group. The surgeons will infiltrate the port sites with local anaesthetic at the end of the procedure if the patient is in the control group.

Blinding:

The study group will receive bilateral TAP blocks with 20mls 0.25% bupivacaine on each side and the skin punctures on either sides will be covered with a small plaster. Patients in the control group will receive subcutaneous infiltration of the laparoscopic port sites and specimen extraction site with equivalent amount bupivacaine at the end of the procedure and small plasters will be stuck on either flanks approximately where the skin punctures for TAP block will be made.

The assessor of pain scores and morphine doses (Recovery nurse, Ward Nursing Staff & SEU Foundation Doctor) and the patient will be blinded to group allocation.

Patient: Plasters will be stuck on flanks of all the patients, both study and control group, so that patient will not know if they have received TAP block.

Recovery nurse: During handover to recovery the anaesthetist and scrub nurse will not mention group allocation.

SEU Foundation Doctor: The foundation doctor who will be following up patients on the ward will not be present in the operating theatre, ensuring that they are blinded to the technique used.

The study duration will be from induction of anaesthesia until the patients are medically fit for discharge from hospital. No extra visits other than routinely required for the surgical procedure are expected.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Oxford, United Kingdom, OX3 9DU
        • John Radcliffe Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
  • Male or Female, aged 16 years or above
  • Undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy for a clinical diagnosis of appendicitis
  • American Society of Anaesthetists physical status (ASA) 1-3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Opioid tolerance
  • Chronic abdominal pain
  • Allergy/Intolerance: Morphine, local anaesthetics, tramadol
  • BMI (Body Mass Index) >35 Kg/M2
  • Previous major abdominal surgery
  • High likelihood of conversion of open procedure
  • Patients unable to communicate in written and spoken English
  • Weight less than 50 kg
  • ASA > 3

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TAP block
Patients in this arm will receive ultrasound guided TAP bock with Bupivacaine 0.25% 20ml per side or to a maximum 1mg/kg per side and the skin puncture will be covered with a small plaster
Ultrasound guided TAP bock with Bupivacaine 0.25% 20ml per side or to a maximum 1mg/kg per side and the skin puncture will be covered with a small plaster
Active Comparator: Local anaesthetic infiltration
Laparoscopic port sites will be infiltrated with a total of 20 mls 0.5% bupivacaine subcutaneously at the end of the procedure in the control group and plasters will be stuck on either side approximately where a skin puncture for tap block would be made.
Laparoscopic port sites will be infiltrated with a total of 20 mls 0.5% bupivacaine subcutaneously at the end of the procedure in the control group and plasters will be stuck on either side approximately where a skin puncture for tap block would be made.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opioid consumption in the first 12 hours after the operation
Time Frame: 12 hours
The primary endpoint will be consumption of morphine or other opioids (including tramadol) in the first 12 hours after the operation. This will be recorded from the drug chart. Morphine equivalents include fentanyl, codeine and tramadol and will be converted into total morphine consumption using recognised conversion ratios.
12 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numerical rating pain scores at emergence, 6, 12, 24 hours postoperatively
Time Frame: 24 hours after the operation
24 hours after the operation
Time to first request for rescue analgesia
Time Frame: 24 hours after the operation
The time will be calculated from the drug chart looking up when the first dose of rescue opioid was administered
24 hours after the operation
Nausea score at emergence, 6, 12, 24 hours postoperatively
Time Frame: 24 hours after the operation
24 hours after the operation
Total length of hospital stay
Time Frame: After the operation patients will be followed up till they are medically fit to be discharged from the hospital an expected length of 1-5 days
Time will be calculated from the medical notes, when the decision that the patient is medically fit to be discharged was made
After the operation patients will be followed up till they are medically fit to be discharged from the hospital an expected length of 1-5 days
Opioid consumption at 24 hours
Time Frame: 24 hours after the operation
Consumption of morphine or other opioids (including tramadol) in the first 24 hours after the operation. This will be recorded from the drug chart. Morphine equivalents include fentanyl, codeine and tramadol and will be converted into total morphine consumption using recognised conversion ratios
24 hours after the operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Silva, MBBS,MD,FRCS, Consultant Upper G Surgeon
  • Principal Investigator: Nicholas Crabtree, MBChB,FRCA, Consultant Anaesthetist

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Appendicitis

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) bock

3
Subscribe