Alveolar Ridge Preservation Procedures
5 juillet 2022 mis à jour par: University of Tennessee
Clinical Evaluation Of Soft Tissue Closure In Alveolar Ridge Preservation Procedures
Tooth loss is accompanied by different patterns of bone loss.
Up to 50% loss of alveolar crestal bone width will likely occur 1 year after tooth loss, especially in the anterior maxilla.
A great percentage of the process of alveolar bone resorption occurs within the first 3 to 6 months post-extraction.
If ridge preservation is not conducted, 40%-60% of the total alveolar bone volume is lost during the first 2-3 years post-extraction, and this phenomenon has shown to continue to occur at a rate of 0.25%-0.5% loss per year.
It has been proposed that ridge augmentation procedures may reduce the expected ridge reduction after tooth loss.
Ridge augmentation procedures may require the use of bone grafts and non-resorbable or non-resorbable barrier membranes.
The use of non-resorbable barrier membranes for ridge augmentation has the clinical disadvantage of needing a second procedure for its removal during the healing phase.
Osteogen® plug (OPP) consists of a non-ceramic bone graft incorporated in type I bovine Achilles tendon collagen.
OPP was first developed to serve as a one-step grafting solution for ridge preservation without the need for a barrier membrane
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Complété
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
There will be two(2) groups of standardized treatment (tooth extractions will not take place for research purposes. The Periodontal clinic receives referred tooth extraction indications for treatment as part of the patient's overall treatment plan) evaluated for this study. Subjects will be randomized to either treatment a) standard of care treatment for tooth extraction and ridge augmentation procedures with Cytoplast GRB, or b) standard of the care treatment protocol and ridge augmentation procedures with Osteogen.
Each individual extraction site of the enrolled subject will be randomly assigned to Group A and/or Group B for the ridge augmentation procedure. It is possible for a subject to be randomized to both treatment groups. Randomization is like a "coin toss" prior to the initiation of the surgical procedure. The "coin toss" will be to define the procedure to be conducted for the smallest tooth number first. A computer-generated randomization assignment has been populated for the ridge augmentation assignments. The surgical procedure will be conducted following standard procedures for tooth exodontia and ridge preservation.The selected individual sites will be subjected to the standard of care extraction protocol and then randomized to one of two(2) ridge augmentation procedures. Intra-oral photographs will be made at the same optic focal distance using a ruler which will be used to evaluate areas where the membrane is still exposed and not epithelized. At 20 weeks postoperatively, each study subject will return for implant placement in the ridge preservation area. Excess tissue will be collected if the subject has a standard of care implant-related procedure where tissue could need to be removed for implant placement purposes. For example, if a patient undergoes a tooth extraction, ridge augmentation, and implant placement then any portion of the excised tooth and connective tissue will be kept for later analyses of histology discovery. No additional tissue will be collected for research purposes. There will be one screening visit, a treatment visit, and 7 post-operative follow-up visits at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 20 weeks. Subjects will visit the clinic a total of eight (9) times. Of the 9 visits, 1 visit is standard of care, 3 visits are a combined standard of care and research procedure visits and 5 are strictly for research purposes. The nonabsorbable membranes in the control will be removed after 4-6 weeks in a most atraumatic manner with the help of a tweezer without disturbing the underlying new connective tissue formation. As there is no need for removal of the absorbable membrane in the experimental group.
Type d'étude
Observationnel
Inscription (Réel)
14
Contacts et emplacements
Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Tennessee
-
Memphis, Tennessee, États-Unis, 38163
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center
-
-
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
12 ans et plus (Enfant, Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)
Accepte les volontaires sains
Oui
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
Tout
Méthode d'échantillonnage
Échantillon non probabiliste
Population étudiée
Up to twenty (20) participants, at least 12 years old, needing a tooth (teeth) extraction(s) with a combined extraction site preservation treatment of 20 extraction sites.
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
UT Clinic Participates
- Participates that live within 100 miles of UTHSC.
- Participates at least 12 years of age. If participants are 13-14 years of age, the premolars and molars will be included in this study. #2-15 & #18-31.
- Participates willing to cooperate with the post-operative instructions;
- Participates with 2 or more (multiples of 2) teeth needing Maxillary/mandibular and anterior/posterior teeth extractions without restrictions due to the percentage of surface area after the extraction and not interfering with the tooth's alveolar soft tissue exposed surface area.
- Participates with the availability of returning for 8 visits for data collection.
- Participants are willing to cooperate with answering the VAS and taking standardized photographs.
- Participants are physically able to tolerate surgical procedures based on current medical history.
- Participates able to provide voluntary consent; read and understand English
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participates with Diabetes
- History of use of bisphosphonates
- Current smoker
- If the participant is 12-13 years of age, the tooth/teeth to be removed will not be a primary tooth due to the permanent teeth developing underneath the primary teeth.
- Pregnant and lactating women
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
Cohortes et interventions
Groupe / Cohorte |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Group A (Osteogen plug®)
The surgical procedure will be conducted following standard procedures for tooth exodontia and ridge preservation.
The selected individual sites will be subjected to the standard of care extraction protocol and then randomized to receive treatment with a type I bovine Achilles tendon collagen with bioactive resorbable calcium apatite crystals (CCAC)(Osteogen) ridge augmentation procedures.
Intra-oral photographs will be made at the same optic focal distance using a ruler which will be used to evaluate areas where the membrane is still exposed and not epithelized.
At 4-6 weeks and again at 20 weeks postoperatively, each study subject will return for implant placement in the ridge preservation area.
|
A type I bovine Achilles tendon collagen with bioactive resorbable calcium apatite crystals (CCAC)
|
|
Group B ( MInerOss® )
The surgical procedure will be conducted following standard procedures for tooth exodontia and ridge preservation.
The selected individual sites will be subjected to the standard of care extraction protocol and then randomized to a cortico-cancellous bone chips mix with polytetrafluoroethylene (dPTFE)(Cytoplast) barrier membrane ridge augmentation procedures.
Intra-oral photographs will be made at the same optic focal distance using a ruler which will be used to evaluate areas where the membrane is still exposed and not epithelized.
At 4-6 weeks and again at 20 weeks postoperatively, each study subject will return for implant placement in the ridge preservation area.
|
A cortico-cancellous bone chips mix with polytetrafluoroethylene (dPTFE)(Cytoplast) barrier membrane.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Histological Bone Formation Changes
Délai: 4 weeks
|
histomorphometric evaluation of the grafted bone.
The area fraction (AF) of newly formed bone was measured automatically.
The area fraction represents the percentage of the newly formed bone trabeculae to the total area of the microscopic field.
The mean area fraction (MAF) for each case was calculated.
Estimation of osteocytes count in each microscopic field, viable osteocytes within their lacunae in the newly formed bone
|
4 weeks
|
|
Histological Bone Formation Changes
Délai: 6 weeks
|
histomorphometric evaluation of the grafted bone.
The area fraction (AF) of newly formed bone was measured automatically.
The area fraction represents the percentage of the newly formed bone trabeculae to the total area of the microscopic field.
The mean area fraction (MAF) for each case was calculated.
Estimation of osteocytes count in each microscopic field, viable osteocytes within their lacunae in the newly formed bone
|
6 weeks
|
|
Histological Bone Formation Changes
Délai: 20 weeks
|
histomorphometric evaluation of the grafted bone.
The area fraction (AF) of newly formed bone was measured automatically.
The area fraction represents the percentage of the newly formed bone trabeculae to the total area of the microscopic field.
The mean area fraction (MAF) for each case was calculated.
Estimation of osteocytes count in each microscopic field, viable osteocytes within their lacunae in the newly formed bone
|
20 weeks
|
|
Clinical Dimensional Changes
Délai: 4 weeks
|
|
4 weeks
|
|
Clinical Dimensional Changes
Délai: 6 weeks
|
|
6 weeks
|
|
Clinical Dimensional Changes
Délai: 20 weeks
|
|
20 weeks
|
|
Evaluate Patient Pain
Délai: 20 weeks
|
Evaluate patient pain during the wound healing phase using the visual analog scale (VAS). Scale range (0-10) : 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Minimum Value: 0 = no pain Maximum Value: 10 = worse pain ever imaged |
20 weeks
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Cimara F Ferreira, PhD, University of Tennessee
Publications et liens utiles
La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.
Publications générales
- Ashman A. Postextraction ridge preservation using a synthetic alloplast. Implant Dent. 2000;9(2):168-76. doi: 10.1097/00008505-200009020-00011.
- Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Aug;23(4):313-23.
- Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Feb;32(2):212-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x.
- Nevins M, Camelo M, De Paoli S, Friedland B, Schenk RK, Parma-Benfenati S, Simion M, Tinti C, Wagenberg B. A study of the fate of the buccal wall of extraction sockets of teeth with prominent roots. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006 Feb;26(1):19-29.
- Fickl S, Schneider D, Zuhr O, Hinze M, Ender A, Jung RE, Hurzeler MB. Dimensional changes of the ridge contour after socket preservation and buccal overbuilding: an animal study. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 May;36(5):442-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01381.x.
- Lekovic V, Camargo PM, Klokkevold PR, Weinlaender M, Kenney EB, Dimitrijevic B, Nedic M. Preservation of alveolar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbable membranes. J Periodontol. 1998 Sep;69(9):1044-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.9.1044.
- McCormack HM, Horne DJ, Sheather S. Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med. 1988 Nov;18(4):1007-19. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700009934.
- Molnar JA, Lew WK, Rapp DA, Gordon ES, Voignier D, Rushing S, Willner W. Use of standardized, quantitative digital photography in a multicenter Web-based study. Eplasty. 2009;9:e4. Epub 2009 Jan 12.
- Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. 1972. J Prosthet Dent. 2003 May;89(5):427-35. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00158-6. No abstract available.
- Barber HD, Lignelli J, Smith BM, Bartee BK. Using a dense PTFE membrane without primary closure to achieve bone and tissue regeneration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Apr;65(4):748-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.042.
- Wang HL, Boyapati L. "PASS" principles for predictable bone regeneration. Implant Dent. 2006 Mar;15(1):8-17. doi: 10.1097/01.id.0000204762.39826.0f.
- Kosinski T. A Simple and Cost-Effective Socket Preservation Technique. Dent Today. 2016 Apr;35(4):90, 92, 94-5. No abstract available.
- Feng L, Zhang L, Cui Y, Song TX, Qiu ZY, Wang XM, Tan BS. Clinical evaluations of mineralized collagen in the extraction sites preservation. Regen Biomater. 2016 Mar;3(1):41-8. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbv027. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
- Nevins M, Parma-Benfenati S, Janke UW, Kleyer A, Rasperini G, Tinti C, Schupbach P, Kim DM. The efficacy of mineralized allograft cortical and cancellous chips in maxillary sinus augmentations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014 Nov-Dec;34(6):789-93. doi: 10.11607/prd.1720.
- Park JC, Koo KT, Lim HC. The hidden X suture: a technical note on a novel suture technique for alveolar ridge preservation. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2016 Dec;46(6):415-425. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2016.46.6.415. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
- Evian CI, Rosenberg ES, Coslet JG, Corn H. The osteogenic activity of bone removed from healing extraction sockets in humans. J Periodontol. 1982 Feb;53(2):81-5. doi: 10.1902/jop.1982.53.2.81.
- Dahlin C, Linde A, Gottlow J, Nyman S. Healing of bone defects by guided tissue regeneration. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988 May;81(5):672-6. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198805000-00004.
- Beth-Tasdogan NH, Mayer B, Hussein H, Zolk O. Interventions for managing medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 6;10(10):CD012432. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012432.pub2.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
8 février 2019
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
6 janvier 2021
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
11 janvier 2021
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
16 mai 2022
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
10 juin 2022
Première publication (Réel)
15 juin 2022
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
8 juillet 2022
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
5 juillet 2022
Dernière vérification
1 mai 2022
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 18-06428-FB
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.
Non
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .