- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT07598435
Rhythmic Initiation vs Isometric Training for Arm Recovery After Stroke (RIITSTROKE)
1 juin 2026 mis à jour par: Dr. Marium Zafar, University of Faisalabad
Comparative Effects of Rhythmic Initiation and Isometric Resistance Training on Upper Limb Motor Function, Strength, and Coordination in Subacute Stroke Patients
Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability worldwide.
Many stroke survivors experience persistent weakness, loss of motor control, and poor coordination in their upper limb, which limits their ability to perform daily activities and return to independent living.
This study compares two physical therapy approaches for patients in the subacute stage of stroke recovery (1 to 6 months after stroke).
The first approach is Rhythmic Initiation, a technique from Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) that uses smooth, guided movement patterns progressing from passive to active movement.
The second approach is Isometric Resistance Training, which involves holding static muscle contractions against resistance without moving the joint.
The study will enroll 40 patients aged 40 to 60 years with unilateral upper limb weakness from a first-time stroke.
Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either Rhythmic Initiation or Isometric Resistance Training for 30 minutes per session, 5 days per week, for 4 weeks.
The researchers will measure changes in motor function, muscle strength, coordination, and spasticity before and after the 4-week intervention.
The results will help physiotherapists understand which approach is more effective for upper limb rehabilitation in subacute stroke patients.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Recrutement
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
This is a single-blind, parallel-arm, randomized clinical trial.
Eligible participants will be recruited from Medina Teaching Hospital and The Canal Hospital in Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Inclusion criteria include age 40-60 years, both genders, clinically diagnosed first-ever subacute stroke (1-6 months post-onset), and unilateral upper limb involvement.
Exclusion criteria include severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale >3), recurrent or bilateral stroke, shoulder subluxation or pain limiting movement, and cognitive or perceptual deficits.
After providing written informed consent, participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either Group A (Rhythmic Initiation) or Group B (Isometric Resistance Training).
The randomization sequence will be generated using computer software, and allocation will be concealed in sealed opaque envelopes.
The outcome assessor will be blinded to group assignment.
Group A intervention: Rhythmic Initiation follows a four-step sequence-passive movement, active-assistive movement, active movement, and light resisted movement-using PNF diagonal patterns (D1 flexion/extension) for the affected upper limb.
Each session lasts 30 minutes, 5 days per week for 4 weeks.
The therapist emphasizes smooth rhythm and provides verbal cues throughout.
Group B intervention: Isometric Resistance Training involves static contractions of major upper limb muscles including shoulder abductors, elbow flexors/extensors, and wrist flexors/extensors.
Each contraction is held for 6 to 10 seconds at approximately 60-70% of maximum voluntary contraction.
Participants perform 10 repetitions per muscle group, completing 3 sets.
Rest periods of 30 to 60 seconds are provided between sets.
Sessions last 30 minutes, 5 days per week for 4 weeks.
Outcome measures are assessed at baseline (week 0) and after 4 weeks of intervention.
The primary outcome is upper extremity motor function measured by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) scale.
Secondary outcomes include muscle strength measured by handheld dynamometry (shoulder, elbow, wrist), coordination measured by the timed finger-to-nose test, and spasticity measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS).
Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 25.
Paired t-tests will examine within-group changes from baseline to week 4. Independent t-tests will compare between-group differences.
A p-value less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Type d'étude
Interventionnel
Inscription (Estimé)
40
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.
Coordonnées de l'étude
- Nom: Dr Muhammad Ateeb, PhD Public Health
- Numéro de téléphone: +923357333383
- E-mail: mateeb.oric@tuf.edu.pk
Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude
- Nom: Dr Marium Zafar, MS-NMPT
- Numéro de téléphone: +92 300 4561972
- E-mail: mariumzafar.dpt@tuf.edu.pk
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Punjab Province
-
Faisalābad, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 3800
- Recrutement
- The University of Faisalabad
-
Contact:
- Dr Anbreena Rasool, Doctor of Physical Therapy
- Numéro de téléphone: +92 345 7936825
- E-mail: anbreenarasool.DPT@tuf.edu.pk
-
-
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Adulte
Accepte les volontaires sains
Non
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinically diagnosed subacute stroke (1 to 6 months post-onset)
- Unilateral upper limb involvement
- Age 40 to 60 years
- Both genders
- Medically stable and able to participate in physical therapy
- Able to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale score >3)
- Recurrent or bilateral stroke
- Shoulder subluxation
- Shoulder or upper limb pain limiting active movement
- Cognitive or perceptual deficits impairing ability to follow instructions
- Other neurological disorder affecting upper limb (e.g., Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis)
- Orthopedic condition affecting upper limb function
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Seul
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Rhythmic Initiation Group
Participants receive Rhythmic Initiation technique for the affected upper limb.
Each 30-minute session follows a sequence: passive movement, active-assistive movement, active movement, and light resisted movement using PNF diagonal patterns (D1 or D2).
Sessions occur 5 days per week for 4 weeks.
|
What: Rhythmic Initiation technique from PNF. How: Therapist guides patient's affected upper limb through a four-step sequence-passive movement (therapist moves limb), active-assistive movement (patient helps with therapist assistance), active movement (patient moves independently), and light resisted movement (therapist adds gentle resistance).
The movement follows PNF diagonal pattern D1 (flexion-adduction-external rotation to extension-abduction-internal rotation) or D2.
Verbal cues emphasize smooth, rhythmic motion.
When: 30 minutes per session, 5 days per week.
How long: 4 weeks total.
By whom: Trained physical therapist.
Where: Outpatient rehabilitation department.
|
|
Expérimental: Isometric Resistance Training Group
Participants receive isometric strengthening exercises for upper limb muscles (shoulder abductors, elbow flexors/extensors, wrist flexors/extensors).
Contractions held 6-10 seconds at 60-70% MVC, 10 repetitions × 3 sets.
Sessions occur 30 minutes, 5 days/week for 4 weeks.
|
What: Isometric Resistance Training (static muscle contractions without joint movement).
How: Patient contracts target muscle against resistance provided by therapist or stationary object.
Target muscles include shoulder abductors, elbow flexors, elbow extensors, wrist flexors, and wrist extensors.
Each contraction held 6-10 seconds at 60-70% of maximum voluntary contraction.
Patient performs 10 repetitions per muscle group, completing 3 sets.
Rest 30-60 seconds between sets.
When: 30 minutes per session, 5 days per week.
How long: 4 weeks total.
By whom: Trained physical therapist.
Where: Outpatient rehabilitation department.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Upper Extremity Motor Function
Délai: Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)
|
Measured by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) scale.
The FMA-UE evaluates motor function, sensation, coordination, and reflex activity in the upper limb.
Scores range from 0 to 66, with higher scores indicating better motor function.
The assessment is performed by a blinded outcome assessor.
|
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Upper Limb Muscle Strength
Délai: Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)
|
Measured using a handheld dynamometer.
Maximum isometric strength recorded for shoulder abductors, elbow flexors, elbow extensors, wrist flexors, and wrist extensors.
Three trials per muscle group; best score recorded in kilograms or Newtons.
|
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)
|
|
Change in Upper Limb Coordination
Délai: Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)
|
Measured by the timed finger-to-nose test.
Patient seated, asked to alternately touch examiner's finger (held at shoulder height with arm fully extended) and then their own nose as quickly as possible.
Time to complete 10 repetitions recorded in seconds.
|
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)
|
|
Change in Spasticity
Délai: Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)
|
Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS).
Spasticity graded from 0 (no increase in muscle tone) to 4 (rigid in flexion or extension).
Assessed at shoulder, elbow, and wrist.
|
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Parrainer
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
19 janvier 2026
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
19 mai 2026
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
24 juin 2026
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
13 mai 2026
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
13 mai 2026
Première publication (Réel)
20 mai 2026
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
3 juin 2026
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
1 juin 2026
Dernière vérification
1 juin 2026
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- TUF/EIRB/ 218 /26
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
NON
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .