Multi-center Validation Study of a Large Language Model-based Intelligent Agent for Blood Cell Analysis
I. Study Background: Currently, in most medical institutions, the review of blood cell analysis still heavily relies on manual verification by laboratory staff. This process requires a comprehensive analysis of instrument parameters, alarm flags, historical comparison results, and, when necessary, microscopic examination. However, with the increasing volume of test samples and the high concentration of review tasks during peak hours, the traditional manual review model increasingly shows problems such as prolonged turnaround time (TAT), uneven workload distribution, and decreased consistency in reviews. In recent years, intelligent review systems based on Large Language Models (LLM) have shown potential in analyzing abnormal results and stratifying sample risks by integrating preset rules, clinical diagnostic information, and multi-dimensional laboratory data, which is expected to optimize the review workflow.
II. Study Objective: To evaluate the difference in overall sample review turnaround time between the experimental process and the control process during the formal study phase, and to test its superiority.
III. Subjects: The investigators need to recruit approximately 20,000 subjects, regardless of age or gender.
IV. Study Procedures: If participants agree to participate in the study, participants only need to allow us to use participants test results after participants have completed your routine blood test (CBC).
V. Risks and Benefits:
- Risks: This study poses no risk to the subjects. The investigators only use the result data of patients after participants have had their routine blood test; there is no need for patients to undergo additional blood draws.
- Benefits: It will shorten the turnaround time for routine blood test results and share the workload of doctors in reviewing these results.
VI. Privacy: All of participants information will be kept strictly confidential and will only be used for this scientific research.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Enfant
- Adulte
- Adulte plus âgé
Accepte les volontaires sains
Méthode d'échantillonnage
Population étudiée
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects who underwent routine blood tests in the outpatient, emergency, or inpatient departments of the participating centers during the study period.
Corresponding samples must have complete instrument results, review trails, and report timestamp records.
Approved for inclusion by the Ethics Committee.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Samples collected during periods of instrument malfunction or interface transmission anomalies.
Missing key research data, particularly samples where the final review conclusion or key timestamps cannot be confirmed.
Subjects or their legal representatives explicitly refuse to participate in the study.
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
Cohortes et interventions
Groupe / Cohorte |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
LLM-Assisted Review Group
|
This study introduces an intelligent auxiliary review system based on a medical Large Language Model (LLM), aimed at optimizing the traditional CBC report review process. The core functions and intervention mechanisms are as follows: Multi-source Data Integration: The system integrates seamlessly with the Laboratory Information System (LIS) to automatically retrieve patient demographics (age, sex), current CBC indices, historical results, and clinical diagnoses. Deep Analysis and Anomaly Detection: Unlike traditional rule-based auto-verification, this system leverages the reasoning capability of LLMs to perform multidimensional clinical logic checks. It identifies out-of-range values and interprets their clinical significance by combining them with patient history (e.g., distinguishing physiological fluctuations from pathological changes). |
|
Standard Manual Review Group
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Délai |
|---|---|
|
Overall Report Turnaround Time
Délai: one year
|
one year
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Estimé)
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- KY2026-084
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .