MMR Status Modulates the Predictive Value of Lymphatic Invasion for Lymph Node Metastasis in Gastric Cancer
16 juin 2026 mis à jour par: Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
Mismatch Repair (MMR) Status Modulates the Predictive Value of Lymphatic Invasion for Lymph Node Metastasis in Gastric Cancer
Brief Summary
Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is a key factor influencing treatment decisions and prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. Lymphatic invasion (LI) is an important pathological predictor of LNM and a core component of the eCURA risk scoring system after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer. However, whether LI has the same predictive value for LNM across different mismatch repair (MMR) statuses remains unclear. Compared with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) gastric cancer, deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) gastric cancer has distinct molecular pathological features and an immune-enriched tumor microenvironment. In early gastric cancer, if LI is associated with a lower LNM risk in dMMR tumors than in pMMR tumors, existing LI-based eCURA risk assessment may overestimate LNM risk in patients with dMMR early gastric cancer and consequently affect decisions regarding additional surgery after ESD. Therefore, this study aims to systematically evaluate the impact of MMR status on the association between LI and LNM using upfront-surgery and post-ESD additional-surgery cohorts from our center, and to explore the potential clinical value of MMR status in refining eCURA-based risk stratification for early gastric cancer.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Pas encore de recrutement
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Type d'étude
Observationnel
Inscription (Estimé)
3000
Contacts et emplacements
Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.
Coordonnées de l'étude
- Nom: Zhaoqing Tang
- Numéro de téléphone: 86-021-64041990
- E-mail: tang.zhaoqing@zs-hospital.sh.cn
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Adulte
- Adulte plus âgé
Accepte les volontaires sains
Non
Méthode d'échantillonnage
Échantillon non probabiliste
Population étudiée
Patients with pathologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma treated at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University.
The study population includes two retrospective cohorts: patients who underwent upfront radical surgery between January 2018 and April 2026, and patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) between January 2021 and March 2026 with available mismatch repair (MMR) status.
Patients are classified according to MMR status as deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or proficient mismatch repair (pMMR).
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
Upfront surgery cohort
- Patients who underwent radical surgery for gastric cancer at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University.
- Patients who did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, or other antitumor treatments that may affect the pathological assessment of the primary tumor or lymph node metastasis before surgery.
- Patients with pathologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma after surgery, including Siewert type II and III tumors only.
- Patients with definite pathological assessment of lymphatic invasion and regional lymph node status.
- Patients with available and definite MMR status.
ESD cohort
- Patients who underwent ESD for gastric cancer at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University.
- Patients with pathologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma after ESD, including Siewert type II and III tumors only.
- Patients with complete post-ESD pathological information, including histological type, depth of invasion, tumor size, ulcerative findings, lymphatic invasion status, venous invasion status, horizontal margin status, and vertical margin status.
- Patients with available and definite MMR status.
Exclusion Criteria:
Upfront surgery cohort
- Patients with other pathological types, such as gastric squamous cell carcinoma or neuroendocrine carcinoma.
- Patients who received neoadjuvant treatment before surgery, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, or other systemic antitumor treatments.
- Patients with missing postoperative pathological information, resulting in inability to determine lymphatic invasion or regional lymph node metastasis status.
- Patients with missing or indeterminate MMR status.
- Patients with concurrent malignancies that may interfere with the determination of the origin of lymph node metastasis.
ESD cohort
- Patients with other pathological types, such as gastric squamous cell carcinoma or neuroendocrine carcinoma.
- Patients with missing post-ESD pathological information that precludes eCURA classification, eCURA risk score calculation, or assessment of lymphatic invasion status.
- Patients with missing or indeterminate MMR status.
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
Cohortes et interventions
Groupe / Cohorte |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
dMMR gastric cancer
Patients with gastric cancer classified as deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) based on routine pathological testing.
|
Mismatch repair (MMR) status was assessed as part of routine pathological evaluation.
Patients were classified as deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) according to immunohistochemical expression of MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6.
Lymphatic invasion status was determined from routine pathological reports and classified as LI-positive or LI-negative.
|
|
pMMR gastric cancer
Patients with gastric cancer classified as proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) based on routine pathological assessment.
|
Mismatch repair (MMR) status was assessed as part of routine pathological evaluation.
Patients were classified as deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) according to immunohistochemical expression of MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6.
Lymphatic invasion status was determined from routine pathological reports and classified as LI-positive or LI-negative.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Lymph Node Metastasis Rate Among LI-Positive Gastric Cancer Patients
Délai: At postoperative pathological assessment, approximately 14 days after upfront surgery
|
LI positivity is defined as lymphatic invasion explicitly documented in the pathological report or tumor emboli within lymphatic vessels confirmed by D2-40 immunohistochemistry. LNM is defined as regional lymph node metastasis confirmed by postoperative pathological examination.
The LNM rate among LI-positive patients is calculated as the number of patients with LNM divided by the total number of LI-positive patients in the corresponding group.
|
At postoperative pathological assessment, approximately 14 days after upfront surgery
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
LI Positivity Rate According to MMR Status
Délai: At postoperative pathological assessment, approximately 14 days after upfront surgery
|
This outcome evaluates differences in LI positivity rate between patients with dMMR and pMMR gastric cancer.
LI positivity rate is calculated as the number of LI-positive patients divided by the total number of patients in each MMR group.
|
At postoperative pathological assessment, approximately 14 days after upfront surgery
|
|
Overall LNM Rate According to MMR Status
Délai: At postoperative pathological assessment, approximately 14 days after upfront surgery
|
This outcome evaluates differences in overall LNM rate between patients with dMMR and pMMR gastric cancer.
Overall LNM rate is calculated as the number of patients with pathologically confirmed LNM divided by the total number of patients in each MMR group.
|
At postoperative pathological assessment, approximately 14 days after upfront surgery
|
|
eCURA Risk Stratification and LI Contribution in the Gastric Cancer ESD Cohort
Délai: At pathological assessment of the ESD specimen, approximately 14 days after ESD
|
This outcome evaluates differences in eCURA classification, eCURA risk score distribution, and the contribution of LI to the risk score between dMMR and pMMR patients in the gastric cancer ESD cohort.
LI contribution is assessed based on its role in eCURA-C2 classification and/or its component score contribution within the eCURA risk scoring system.
|
At pathological assessment of the ESD specimen, approximately 14 days after ESD
|
|
LNM Rate Among LI-Positive Patients in the cohort undergoing additional gastrectomy after ESD
Délai: At postoperative pathological assessment, approximately 14 days after additional surgery
|
This outcome evaluates differences in LNM risk between LI-positive dMMR and pMMR patients with early gastric cancer who underwent additional surgery after ESD.
LNM is defined as regional lymph node metastasis confirmed by pathological examination of the additional surgical specimen.
LNM rate is calculated as the number of patients with LNM divided by the total number of LI-positive patients in each MMR group.
|
At postoperative pathological assessment, approximately 14 days after additional surgery
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Parrainer
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Estimé)
1 juillet 2026
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
30 novembre 2026
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
31 juillet 2027
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
19 mai 2026
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
29 mai 2026
Première publication (Réel)
4 juin 2026
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
18 juin 2026
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
16 juin 2026
Dernière vérification
1 juin 2026
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- B2026-354
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
NON
Description du régime IPD
Individual participant data will not be publicly shared due to patient privacy concerns and institutional data protection regulations.
De-identified aggregate data may be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request and with appropriate institutional approval.
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .