Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

MMR Status Modulates the Predictive Value of Lymphatic Invasion for Lymph Node Metastasis in Gastric Cancer

29. Mai 2026 aktualisiert von: Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

Mismatch Repair (MMR) Status Modulates the Predictive Value of Lymphatic Invasion for Lymph Node Metastasis in Gastric Cancer

Brief Summary

Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is a key factor influencing treatment decisions and prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. Lymphatic invasion (LI) is an important pathological predictor of LNM and a core component of the eCURA risk scoring system after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer. However, whether LI has the same predictive value for LNM across different mismatch repair (MMR) statuses remains unclear. Compared with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) gastric cancer, deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) gastric cancer has distinct molecular pathological features and an immune-enriched tumor microenvironment. In early gastric cancer, if LI is associated with a lower LNM risk in dMMR tumors than in pMMR tumors, existing LI-based eCURA risk assessment may overestimate LNM risk in patients with dMMR early gastric cancer and consequently affect decisions regarding additional surgery after ESD. Therefore, this study aims to systematically evaluate the impact of MMR status on the association between LI and LNM using upfront-surgery and post-ESD additional-surgery cohorts from our center, and to explore the potential clinical value of MMR status in refining eCURA-based risk stratification for early gastric cancer.

Studienübersicht

Studientyp

Beobachtungs

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

3000

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Probenahmeverfahren

Nicht-Wahrscheinlichkeitsprobe

Studienpopulation

Patients with pathologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma treated at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. The study population includes two retrospective cohorts: patients who underwent upfront radical surgery between January 2018 and April 2026, and patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) between January 2021 and March 2026 with available mismatch repair (MMR) status. Patients are classified according to MMR status as deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or proficient mismatch repair (pMMR).

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Upfront surgery cohort

    • Patients who underwent radical surgery for gastric cancer at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University.
    • Patients who did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, or other antitumor treatments that may affect the pathological assessment of the primary tumor or lymph node metastasis before surgery.
    • Patients with pathologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma after surgery, including Siewert type II and III tumors only.
    • Patients with definite pathological assessment of lymphatic invasion and regional lymph node status.
    • Patients with available and definite MMR status.
  2. ESD cohort

    • Patients who underwent ESD for gastric cancer at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University.
    • Patients with pathologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma after ESD, including Siewert type II and III tumors only.
    • Patients with complete post-ESD pathological information, including histological type, depth of invasion, tumor size, ulcerative findings, lymphatic invasion status, venous invasion status, horizontal margin status, and vertical margin status.
    • Patients with available and definite MMR status.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Upfront surgery cohort

    • Patients with other pathological types, such as gastric squamous cell carcinoma or neuroendocrine carcinoma.
    • Patients who received neoadjuvant treatment before surgery, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, or other systemic antitumor treatments.
    • Patients with missing postoperative pathological information, resulting in inability to determine lymphatic invasion or regional lymph node metastasis status.
    • Patients with missing or indeterminate MMR status.
    • Patients with concurrent malignancies that may interfere with the determination of the origin of lymph node metastasis.
  2. ESD cohort

    • Patients with other pathological types, such as gastric squamous cell carcinoma or neuroendocrine carcinoma.
    • Patients with missing post-ESD pathological information that precludes eCURA classification, eCURA risk score calculation, or assessment of lymphatic invasion status.
    • Patients with missing or indeterminate MMR status.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

Kohorten und Interventionen

Gruppe / Kohorte
Intervention / Behandlung
dMMR gastric cancer
Patients with gastric cancer classified as deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) based on routine pathological testing.
Mismatch repair (MMR) status was assessed as part of routine pathological evaluation. Patients were classified as deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) according to immunohistochemical expression of MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6.
Lymphatic invasion status was determined from routine pathological reports and classified as LI-positive or LI-negative.
pMMR gastric cancer
Patients with gastric cancer classified as proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) based on routine pathological assessment.
Mismatch repair (MMR) status was assessed as part of routine pathological evaluation. Patients were classified as deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) according to immunohistochemical expression of MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6.
Lymphatic invasion status was determined from routine pathological reports and classified as LI-positive or LI-negative.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Lymph Node Metastasis Rate Among LI-Positive Gastric Cancer Patients
Zeitfenster: At postoperative pathological assessment, approximately 14 days after upfront surgery
LI positivity is defined as lymphatic invasion explicitly documented in the pathological report or tumor emboli within lymphatic vessels confirmed by D2-40 immunohistochemistry. LNM is defined as regional lymph node metastasis confirmed by postoperative pathological examination. The LNM rate among LI-positive patients is calculated as the number of patients with LNM divided by the total number of LI-positive patients in the corresponding group.
At postoperative pathological assessment, approximately 14 days after upfront surgery

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
LI Positivity Rate According to MMR Status
Zeitfenster: At postoperative pathological assessment, approximately 14 days after upfront surgery
This outcome evaluates differences in LI positivity rate between patients with dMMR and pMMR gastric cancer. LI positivity rate is calculated as the number of LI-positive patients divided by the total number of patients in each MMR group.
At postoperative pathological assessment, approximately 14 days after upfront surgery
Overall LNM Rate According to MMR Status
Zeitfenster: At postoperative pathological assessment, approximately 14 days after upfront surgery
This outcome evaluates differences in overall LNM rate between patients with dMMR and pMMR gastric cancer. Overall LNM rate is calculated as the number of patients with pathologically confirmed LNM divided by the total number of patients in each MMR group.
At postoperative pathological assessment, approximately 14 days after upfront surgery
eCURA Risk Stratification and LI Contribution in the Gastric Cancer ESD Cohort
Zeitfenster: At pathological assessment of the ESD specimen, approximately 14 days after ESD
This outcome evaluates differences in eCURA classification, eCURA risk score distribution, and the contribution of LI to the risk score between dMMR and pMMR patients in the gastric cancer ESD cohort. LI contribution is assessed based on its role in eCURA-C2 classification and/or its component score contribution within the eCURA risk scoring system.
At pathological assessment of the ESD specimen, approximately 14 days after ESD
LNM Rate Among LI-Positive Patients in the cohort undergoing additional gastrectomy after ESD
Zeitfenster: At postoperative pathological assessment, approximately 14 days after additional surgery
This outcome evaluates differences in LNM risk between LI-positive dMMR and pMMR patients with early gastric cancer who underwent additional surgery after ESD. LNM is defined as regional lymph node metastasis confirmed by pathological examination of the additional surgical specimen. LNM rate is calculated as the number of patients with LNM divided by the total number of LI-positive patients in each MMR group.
At postoperative pathological assessment, approximately 14 days after additional surgery

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

1. Juli 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

30. November 2026

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

31. Juli 2027

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

19. Mai 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

29. Mai 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

4. Juni 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

4. Juni 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

29. Mai 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Mai 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

Individual participant data will not be publicly shared due to patient privacy concerns and institutional data protection regulations. De-identified aggregate data may be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request and with appropriate institutional approval.

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren