Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

The Green Room: Virtual Nature for Mental Well-being in the Acute Psychiatry Ward (GREEN ROOM)

12 juin 2026 mis à jour par: Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

The Green Room: A Mixed-Methods Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Virtual Reality-Based Nature Exposure in an Acute Psychiatry Ward

This study evaluates the feasibility, acceptability and clinical impact of a virtual reality (VR)- based nature intervention in an acute psychiatric inpatient unit. Participants are randomly assigned to recieve VR nature sessions (using Nature Treks VR on Meta Quest 3) in addition to standard care, or standard care alone. The primary outcome is change in percieved stress (PSS-19) from admission to discharge. The study uses a mixed-methods design combining randomized controlled trial with a qualitative phase.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

THE GREEN ROOM is a sequential, explanatory mixed-methods study comprising two phases. Phase 1 is a qualitative study (n=40; patients and healthcare professionals) using the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework to identify barriers and facilitators to VR implementation in an acute psychiatric ward, and to co-create the final VR intervention content with patients and staff. Phase 2 is the randomised controlled trial described in this record.

Phase 2 participants are randomised 1:1 to receive VR-based nature exposure sessions (Nature Treks VR, Meta Quest 3) in addition to treatment as usual, or treatment as usual alone. Randomisation is stratified by legal admission status (voluntary vs. involuntary) using two separate pre-generated sequential allocation lists (n=60 per stratum). Allocation concealment is maintained through sequential, pre-fixed assignment managed by the research assistant; the Principal Investigator remains blinded to individual allocations during data collection, and the statistical analyst remains blinded until the analysis plan is finalised and locked.

Intervention-group participants are offered VR sessions of 10\u201315 minutes approximately every other day throughout hospitalisation, on a strictly voluntary basis. Participants may freely choose and switch between all nature environments available within the Nature Treks VR application. During the first VR session, a consecutive sub-sample of intervention participants (estimated n\u224850) additionally undergo physiological monitoring (heart rate and heart rate variability) using a consumer-grade wearable device (Fitbit).

The primary analysis will use a mixed-design ANOVA (or ANCOVA with baseline score as covariate) to evaluate change in PSS-10 from admission to discharge, following an intention-to-treat approach. Missing data will be handled under a Missing-At-Random assumption within the mixed-effects model framework, with complete-case analysis as a sensitivity check. Two exploratory subgroup analyses are pre-specified: by legal admission status and by primary diagnostic category.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

120

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

  • Espagne
    • Barcelona
      • Barcelona, Barcelona, Espagne
        • Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
        • Contact:

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

Adults aged 18 to 65 years. Admitted to the Acute Psychiatry Ward (regardless of voluntary or involuntary legal status).

Sufficient cognitive and clinical stability to provide informed consent and engage with the VR equipment, as determined by the clinical team.

Ability to communicate effectively in Spanish.

Exclusion Criteria:

History of photosensitive epilepsy or severe seizure disorders. Presence of active facial injuries, infections, or skin conditions that prevent the hygienic use of the VR headset.

Pre-existing severe vertigo, balance disorders, or high susceptibility to motion sickness.

Acute clinical state involving high risk of agitation or behavioral dysregulation that could compromise participant or equipment safety.

Severe visual or hearing impairments that cannot be corrected and would hinder the VR experience.

Patients who have previously participated in the study during a prior admission are not eligible for re-enrolment.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Soins de soutien
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: VR + Treatment as Usual
Participants receive voluntary VR nature sessions (10-15 minutes, every other day) using Meta Quest 3, in addition to standar psychiatric care.
Comportemental: Virtual Reality Nature Exposure
Voluntary immersive nature sessions using Nature Treks VR softwere on Meta Quest 3 head-mounted displays. Sessions last 10-15 minutes and are offered every other day throughout hospitalization. Participants freely choose among all available nature environments within the application.
Comparateur actif: Treatment as Usual (TAU)
Participantrs receive standard pharmacological and psychotherapeutic care provided by the acute psychiatry ward, without VR sessions.
Autre: Treatment as Usual (TAU)
Standard pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions provided by the acute psychiatry ward.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10) score
Délai: From admission (baseline) to discharge (average 2-3 weeks)
Change in PSS-10 total score from baseline assessment (T0, al clinical stabilization) to discharge assessment (T2). The Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10) is a 10-item self-report questionnaire measuring the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful. Scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater perceived stress.
From admission (baseline) to discharge (average 2-3 weeks)

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) score
Délai: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
The WHO-5 is a 5-item self-report measure of psychological well-being. Raw scores range from 0 to 25, with higher scores indicating better well-being.
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Views On Inpatient Care (VOICE) score
Délai: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
The VOICE is a patient-reported outcome measure assessing satisfaction with inpatient psychiatric care. Scores range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Client's Assessment of Treatment (CAT) score
Délai: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
The CAT is an 8-item self-report measure of satisfaction with inpatient psychiatric treatment. Scores range from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Length of hospital stay
Délai: From admission to discharge, an average of 2 weeks
Total number of days from admission to discharge, extracted from medical records.
From admission to discharge, an average of 2 weeks
Rate of discharge against medical advice (DAMA)
Délai: Throughout hospitalization, an average 2 weeks.
Proportion of participants who self-discharge against medical advice during the study period.
Throughout hospitalization, an average 2 weeks.
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory - State subscale (STAI-S) score
Délai: Day 1
The STAI-S is a 20-item self-report measure of state anxiety. Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.
Day 1
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) score
Délai: Day 1
The PANAS consists of two 10-item subscales measuring positive and negative affect. Each subscale ranges from 10 to 50. For the positive affect subscale, higher scores indicate more positive affect (better outcome); for the negative affect subscale, higher scores indicate more negative affect (worse outcome).
Day 1
System Usability Scale (SUS) score
Délai: Day 1
The SUS is a 10-item questionnaire assessing perceived usability of a system. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better usability.
Day 1
Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) total severity score
Délai: Day 1
The SSQ is a 16-item checklist assessing symptoms of nausea, oculomotor disturbance, and disorientation associated with virtual reality use. The total severity score ranges from 0 to 235.93, with higher scores indicating greater simulator sickness symptoms (worse outcome).
Day 1
Percentage of offered VR sessions accepted
Délai: Throughout hospitalization (intervention group only) an average 2 weeks.
Percentage of offered VR sessions accepted by each participant in the intervention group, ranging from 0% to 100%, as a measure of intervention adherence and feasibility. Higher percentages indicate better adherence.
Throughout hospitalization (intervention group only) an average 2 weeks.

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Pablo Barrio Gimenez, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

10 juin 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 décembre 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 décembre 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

9 juin 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

12 juin 2026

Première publication (Réel)

17 juin 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

17 juin 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

12 juin 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juin 2025

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Mots clés

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • HCB/2025/0704 (Identificateur de registre: CEIm- Hospital Clinic de Barcelona)

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner