- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT07698379
Prevention of Burnout in Spanish Healthcare Professionals Through Attachment-Based Compassion Therapy (ABCT)
Mindfulness-based and Compassion-based Interventions in Anxious-Depressive Symptomatology in Mental Health Services: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Burnout is a common problem among healthcare professionals and may affect their psychological well-being, quality of life, and professional functioning. This study will examine whether an intensive compassion-based intervention can help reduce burnout and improve well-being in healthcare professionals. Participants will be randomly assigned to either an Attachment-Based Compassion Therapy intervention or a relaxation intervention. Outcomes will be measured before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and three months later.
Attachment-Based Compassion groups will be composed of 80 participants each, and TAU group will be composed of 80 participants (total sample n = 160).
Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey - MBI-HSS. Burnout will be assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey. This questionnaire evaluates the three main dimensions of burnout: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment.
Items are rated on a Likert-type scale according to the frequency with which the participant experiences each symptom. Scores are calculated separately for each burnout dimension.
In this study, emotional exhaustion and depersonalization will be considered the primary outcome variables, while reduced personal accomplishment will be considered a secondary outcome variable
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Spain
-
Zaragoza, Spain, Espagne, 50009
- Recrutement
- Miguel Servet University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Javier García Campayo, PhD
- Numéro de téléphone: +34976506578
- E-mail: jgarcamp@gmail.com
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Adulte
- Adulte plus âgé
Accepte les volontaires sains
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Active healthcare professionals (physicians and nurses) of both sexes.
- Understanding of spoken and written Spanish.
- Availability of a computer and internet connection.
- Written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous psychological treatment within the last year, or current psychological treatment.
Presence of a severe uncontrolled medical, infectious, or degenerative disease that may interfere with affective symptoms.
Presence of a mental disorder related to substance dependence/abuse, or any other disease affecting the central nervous system.
Suicide risk, defined as a score of ≥2 on item 9 of the PHQ-9. Scheduled surgical intervention during the course of the study.
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: La prévention
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Double
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Compassion condition
one weekend group sessions, held Friday evening, Saturday morning and evening and Sunday morning
|
Program consists of 8 session of 120 minutes/session (15-20 people) Written material andsound recordings will be offered as support elements. The estimated duration of the program is one weekend |
|
Expérimental: Relaxation condition
one weekend group sessions, held Friday evening, Saturday morning and evening and Sunday morning
|
Relaxation program consists of 8 sessions of 120 minutes/session (15-20 people) Written material and sound recordings will be offered as support elements. The estimated duration of the program is one weekend |
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
MASLACH BURNOUT INVENTORY HUMAN SERVICES SURVEY (MBI-HSS)
Délai: Baseline
|
In the compassion program group.
Burnout will be assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey.
This questionnaire evaluates three main dimensions of burnout in healthcare professionals: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "never or almost never" and 6 indicates "almost always or always".
Participants rate the frequency with which they experience each symptom.
Higher scores on emotional exhaustion and depersonalization indicate a worse outcome, reflecting higher levels of burnout.
Higher scores on personal accomplishment indicate a better outcome, whereas lower scores indicate reduced personal accomplishment and a worse outcome.
|
Baseline
|
|
MASLACH BURNOUT INVENTORY HUMAN SERVICES SURVEY (MBI-HSS)
Délai: baseline
|
In the relaxation program group.
Burnout will be assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey.
This questionnaire evaluates three main dimensions of burnout in healthcare professionals: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "never or almost never" and 6 indicates "almost always or always".
Participants rate the frequency with which they experience each symptom.
Higher scores on emotional exhaustion and depersonalization indicate a worse outcome, reflecting higher levels of burnout.
Higher scores on personal accomplishment indicate a better outcome, whereas lower scores indicate reduced personal accomplishment and a worse outcome.
|
baseline
|
|
MASLACH BURNOUT INVENTORY HUMAN SERVICES SURVEY (MBI-HSS)
Délai: Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
In the compassion program group.
Burnout will be assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey.
This questionnaire evaluates three main dimensions of burnout in healthcare professionals: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "never or almost never" and 6 indicates "almost always or always".
Participants rate the frequency with which they experience each symptom.
Higher scores on emotional exhaustion and depersonalization indicate a worse outcome, reflecting higher levels of burnout.
Higher scores on personal accomplishment indicate a better outcome, whereas lower scores indicate reduced personal accomplishment and a worse outcome.
|
Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
|
MASLACH BURNOUT INVENTORY HUMAN SERVICES SURVEY (MBI-HSS)
Délai: Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
In the relaxation program group.
Burnout will be assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey.
This questionnaire evaluates three main dimensions of burnout in healthcare professionals: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "never or almost never" and 6 indicates "almost always or always".
Participants rate the frequency with which they experience each symptom.
Higher scores on emotional exhaustion and depersonalization indicate a worse outcome, reflecting higher levels of burnout.
Higher scores on personal accomplishment indicate a better outcome, whereas lower scores indicate reduced personal accomplishment and a worse outcome.
|
Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
|
MASLACH BURNOUT INVENTORY HUMAN SERVICES SURVEY (MBI-HSS)
Délai: Three-months follow-up]
|
In the compassion program group.
Burnout will be assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey.
This questionnaire evaluates three main dimensions of burnout in healthcare professionals: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "never or almost never" and 6 indicates "almost always or always".
Participants rate the frequency with which they experience each symptom.
Higher scores on emotional exhaustion and depersonalization indicate a worse outcome, reflecting higher levels of burnout.
Higher scores on personal accomplishment indicate a better outcome, whereas lower scores indicate reduced personal accomplishment and a worse outcome.
|
Three-months follow-up]
|
|
MASLACH BURNOUT INVENTORY HUMAN SERVICES SURVEY (MBI-HSS)
Délai: Three-months follow-up]
|
In the relaxation program group.
Burnout will be assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey.
This questionnaire evaluates three main dimensions of burnout in healthcare professionals: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "never or almost never" and 6 indicates "almost always or always".
Participants rate the frequency with which they experience each symptom.
Higher scores on emotional exhaustion and depersonalization indicate a worse outcome, reflecting higher levels of burnout.
Higher scores on personal accomplishment indicate a better outcome, whereas lower scores indicate reduced personal accomplishment and a worse outcome.
|
Three-months follow-up]
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
MASLACH BURNOUT INVENTORY HUMAN SERVICES SURVEY (MBI-HSS)
Délai: Baseline
|
In the compassion program group. Burnout will be assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey. This questionnaire evaluates three main dimensions of burnout in healthcare professionals: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "never or almost never" and 6 indicates "almost always or always". Participants rate the frequency with which they experience each symptom. Higher scores on emotional exhaustion and depersonalization indicate a worse outcome, reflecting higher levels of burnout. Higher scores on personal accomplishment indicate a better outcome, whereas lower scores indicate reduced personal accomplishment and a worse outcome. It is the same questionnaire, but the variables measured in point 1, emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, are considered primary variables, whereas lack of personal accomplishment is considered a secondary variable. |
Baseline
|
|
MASLACH BURNOUT INVENTORY HUMAN SERVICES SURVEY (MBI-HSS)
Délai: baseline
|
In the relaxation program group. Burnout will be assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey. This questionnaire evaluates three main dimensions of burnout in healthcare professionals: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "never or almost never" and 6 indicates "almost always or always". Participants rate the frequency with which they experience each symptom. Higher scores on emotional exhaustion and depersonalization indicate a worse outcome, reflecting higher levels of burnout. Higher scores on personal accomplishment indicate a better outcome, whereas lower scores indicate reduced personal accomplishment and a worse outcome. It is the same questionnaire, but the variables measured in point 1, emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, are considered primary variables, whereas lack of personal accomplishment is considered a secondary variable. |
baseline
|
|
MASLACH BURNOUT INVENTORY HUMAN SERVICES SURVEY (MBI-HSS)
Délai: Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
In the compassion program group. Burnout will be assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey. This questionnaire evaluates three main dimensions of burnout in healthcare professionals: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "never or almost never" and 6 indicates "almost always or always". Participants rate the frequency with which they experience each symptom. Higher scores on emotional exhaustion and depersonalization indicate a worse outcome, reflecting higher levels of burnout. Higher scores on personal accomplishment indicate a better outcome, whereas lower scores indicate reduced personal accomplishment and a worse outcome. It is the same questionnaire, but the variables measured in point 1, emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, are considered primary variables, whereas lack of personal accomplishment is considered a secondary variable. |
Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
|
MASLACH BURNOUT INVENTORY HUMAN SERVICES SURVEY (MBI-HSS)
Délai: Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
In the relaxation program group. Burnout will be assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey. This questionnaire evaluates three main dimensions of burnout in healthcare professionals: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "never or almost never" and 6 indicates "almost always or always". Participants rate the frequency with which they experience each symptom. Higher scores on emotional exhaustion and depersonalization indicate a worse outcome, reflecting higher levels of burnout. Higher scores on personal accomplishment indicate a better outcome, whereas lower scores indicate reduced personal accomplishment and a worse outcome. It is the same questionnaire, but the variables measured in point 1, emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, are considered primary variables, whereas lack of personal accomplishment is considered a secondary variable. |
Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
|
MASLACH BURNOUT INVENTORY HUMAN SERVICES SURVEY (MBI-HSS)
Délai: Three-months follow-up]
|
In the compassion program group. Burnout will be assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey. This questionnaire evaluates three main dimensions of burnout in healthcare professionals: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "never or almost never" and 6 indicates "almost always or always". Participants rate the frequency with which they experience each symptom. Higher scores on emotional exhaustion and depersonalization indicate a worse outcome, reflecting higher levels of burnout. Higher scores on personal accomplishment indicate a better outcome, whereas lower scores indicate reduced personal accomplishment and a worse outcome. It is the same questionnaire, but the variables measured in point 1, emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, are considered primary variables, whereas lack of personal accomplishment is considered a secondary variable. |
Three-months follow-up]
|
|
MASLACH BURNOUT INVENTORY HUMAN SERVICES SURVEY (MBI-HSS)
Délai: Three-months follow-up]
|
In the relaxation program group. Burnout will be assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey. This questionnaire evaluates three main dimensions of burnout in healthcare professionals: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "never or almost never" and 6 indicates "almost always or always". Participants rate the frequency with which they experience each symptom. Higher scores on emotional exhaustion and depersonalization indicate a worse outcome, reflecting higher levels of burnout. Higher scores on personal accomplishment indicate a better outcome, whereas lower scores indicate reduced personal accomplishment and a worse outcome. It is the same questionnaire, but the variables measured in point 1, emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, are considered primary variables, whereas lack of personal accomplishment is considered a secondary variable |
Three-months follow-up]
|
|
Burnout Clinical Subtype Questionnaire BCSQ-12
Délai: Baseline
|
In the compassion program group.
Clinical burnout subtypes will be assessed using the Burnout Clinical Subtype Questionnaire-12.
This questionnaire evaluates three burnout profiles in healthcare professionals: overload, lack of development, and neglect/wear-out.
It includes 12 items distributed across these three dimensions, with four items per dimension.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "totally disagree" and 6 indicates "totally agree".
Participants select the response that best reflects how frequently they have experienced each statement.
Item scores are summed separately for each subscale, obtaining a raw score for each dimension.
Higher scores indicate a greater presence of the corresponding burnout subtype and therefore a worse outcome.
|
Baseline
|
|
Burnout Clinical Subtype Questionnaire BCSQ-12
Délai: baseline
|
In the relaxation program group.
Clinical burnout subtypes will be assessed using the Burnout Clinical Subtype Questionnaire-12.
This questionnaire evaluates three burnout profiles in healthcare professionals: overload, lack of development, and neglect/wear-out.
It includes 12 items distributed across these three dimensions, with four items per dimension.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "totally disagree" and 6 indicates "totally agree".
Participants select the response that best reflects how frequently they have experienced each statement.
Item scores are summed separately for each subscale, obtaining a raw score for each dimension.
Higher scores indicate a greater presence of the corresponding burnout subtype and therefore a worse outcome.
|
baseline
|
|
Burnout Clinical Subtype Questionnaire BCSQ-12
Délai: Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
In the compassion program group.
Clinical burnout subtypes will be assessed using the Burnout Clinical Subtype Questionnaire-12.
This questionnaire evaluates three burnout profiles in healthcare professionals: overload, lack of development, and neglect/wear-out.
It includes 12 items distributed across these three dimensions, with four items per dimension.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "totally disagree" and 6 indicates "totally agree".
Participants select the response that best reflects how frequently they have experienced each statement.
Item scores are summed separately for each subscale, obtaining a raw score for each dimension.
Higher scores indicate a greater presence of the corresponding burnout subtype and therefore a worse outcome.
|
Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
|
Burnout Clinical Subtype Questionnaire BCSQ-12
Délai: Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
In the relaxation program group.
Clinical burnout subtypes will be assessed using the Burnout Clinical Subtype Questionnaire-12.
This questionnaire evaluates three burnout profiles in healthcare professionals: overload, lack of development, and neglect/wear-out.
It includes 12 items distributed across these three dimensions, with four items per dimension.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "totally disagree" and 6 indicates "totally agree".
Participants select the response that best reflects how frequently they have experienced each statement.
Item scores are summed separately for each subscale, obtaining a raw score for each dimension.
Higher scores indicate a greater presence of the corresponding burnout subtype and therefore a worse outcome.
|
Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
|
Burnout Clinical Subtype Questionnaire BCSQ-12
Délai: Three-months follow-up]
|
In the compassion program group.
Clinical burnout subtypes will be assessed using the Burnout Clinical Subtype Questionnaire-12.
This questionnaire evaluates three burnout profiles in healthcare professionals: overload, lack of development, and neglect/wear-out.
It includes 12 items distributed across these three dimensions, with four items per dimension.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "totally disagree" and 6 indicates "totally agree".
Participants select the response that best reflects how frequently they have experienced each statement.
Item scores are summed separately for each subscale, obtaining a raw score for each dimension.
Higher scores indicate a greater presence of the corresponding burnout subtype and therefore a worse outcome.
|
Three-months follow-up]
|
|
Burnout Clinical Subtype Questionnaire BCSQ-12
Délai: Three-months follow-up]
|
In the relaxation program group.
Clinical burnout subtypes will be assessed using the Burnout Clinical Subtype Questionnaire-12.
This questionnaire evaluates three burnout profiles in healthcare professionals: overload, lack of development, and neglect/wear-out.
It includes 12 items distributed across these three dimensions, with four items per dimension.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "totally disagree" and 6 indicates "totally agree".
Participants select the response that best reflects how frequently they have experienced each statement.
Item scores are summed separately for each subscale, obtaining a raw score for each dimension.
Higher scores indicate a greater presence of the corresponding burnout subtype and therefore a worse outcome.
|
Three-months follow-up]
|
|
Sussex-Oxford Compassion for the Self Scale (SOCS-S)
Délai: Baseline
|
In the compassion program group.
Self-compassion will be assessed using the Sussex-Oxford Compassion for the Self Scale.
This self-report measure evaluates compassion toward oneself.
It includes 20 items distributed across five subscales: recognizing suffering, understanding the universality of suffering, feeling for the person suffering, tolerating the discomfort associated with suffering, and acting or being motivated to alleviate suffering.
Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates "not at all true" and 5 indicates "always true".
Participants select the response that best reflects their experience.
Higher scores indicate greater self-compassion and therefore a better outcome.
The Spanish validation has shown adequate psychometric properties.
|
Baseline
|
|
Sussex-Oxford Compassion for the Self Scale (SOCS-S)
Délai: baseline
|
In the relaxation program group.
Self-compassion will be assessed using the Sussex-Oxford Compassion for the Self Scale.
This self-report measure evaluates compassion toward oneself.
It includes 20 items distributed across five subscales: recognizing suffering, understanding the universality of suffering, feeling for the person suffering, tolerating the discomfort associated with suffering, and acting or being motivated to alleviate suffering.
Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates "not at all true" and 5 indicates "always true".
Participants select the response that best reflects their experience.
Higher scores indicate greater self-compassion and therefore a better outcome.
The Spanish validation has shown adequate psychometric properties.
|
baseline
|
|
Sussex-Oxford Compassion for the Self Scale (SOCS-S)
Délai: Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
In the compassion program group.
Self-compassion will be assessed using the Sussex-Oxford Compassion for the Self Scale.
This self-report measure evaluates compassion toward oneself.
It includes 20 items distributed across five subscales: recognizing suffering, understanding the universality of suffering, feeling for the person suffering, tolerating the discomfort associated with suffering, and acting or being motivated to alleviate suffering.
Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates "not at all true" and 5 indicates "always true".
Participants select the response that best reflects their experience.
Higher scores indicate greater self-compassion and therefore a better outcome.
The Spanish validation has shown adequate psychometric properties.
|
Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
|
Sussex-Oxford Compassion for the Self Scale (SOCS-S)
Délai: Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
In the relaxation program group.
Self-compassion will be assessed using the Sussex-Oxford Compassion for the Self Scale.
This self-report measure evaluates compassion toward oneself.
It includes 20 items distributed across five subscales: recognizing suffering, understanding the universality of suffering, feeling for the person suffering, tolerating the discomfort associated with suffering, and acting or being motivated to alleviate suffering.
Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates "not at all true" and 5 indicates "always true".
Participants select the response that best reflects their experience.
Higher scores indicate greater self-compassion and therefore a better outcome.
The Spanish validation has shown adequate psychometric properties.
|
Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
|
Sussex-Oxford Compassion for the Self Scale (SOCS-S)
Délai: Three-months follow-up]
|
In the compassion program group.
Self-compassion will be assessed using the Sussex-Oxford Compassion for the Self Scale.
This self-report measure evaluates compassion toward oneself.
It includes 20 items distributed across five subscales: recognizing suffering, understanding the universality of suffering, feeling for the person suffering, tolerating the discomfort associated with suffering, and acting or being motivated to alleviate suffering.
Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates "not at all true" and 5 indicates "always true".
Participants select the response that best reflects their experience.
Higher scores indicate greater self-compassion and therefore a better outcome.
The Spanish validation has shown adequate psychometric properties.
|
Three-months follow-up]
|
|
Sussex-Oxford Compassion for the Self Scale (SOCS-S)
Délai: Three-months follow-up]
|
In the relaxation program group.
Self-compassion will be assessed using the Sussex-Oxford Compassion for the Self Scale.
This self-report measure evaluates compassion toward oneself.
It includes 20 items distributed across five subscales: recognizing suffering, understanding the universality of suffering, feeling for the person suffering, tolerating the discomfort associated with suffering, and acting or being motivated to alleviate suffering.
Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates "not at all true" and 5 indicates "always true".
Participants select the response that best reflects their experience.
Higher scores indicate greater self-compassion and therefore a better outcome.
The Spanish validation has shown adequate psychometric properties.
|
Three-months follow-up]
|
|
Sussex-Oxford Compassion for Others Scale (SOCS-O)
Délai: Baseline
|
In the compassion program group.
Compassion for others will be assessed using the Sussex-Oxford Compassion for Others Scale.
This self-report measure evaluates compassion toward other people.
It includes 20 items distributed across five subscales: recognizing suffering, understanding the universality of suffering, feeling for the person suffering, tolerating the discomfort associated with suffering, and acting or being motivated to alleviate suffering.
Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates "not at all true" and 5 indicates "always true".
Participants select the response that best reflects their experience.
Higher scores indicate greater compassion for others and therefore a better outcome.
The Spanish validation has shown adequate psychometric properties.
|
Baseline
|
|
Sussex-Oxford Compassion for Others Scale (SOCS-O)
Délai: baseline
|
In the relaxation program group.
Compassion for others will be assessed using the Sussex-Oxford Compassion for Others Scale.
This self-report measure evaluates compassion toward other people.
It includes 20 items distributed across five subscales: recognizing suffering, understanding the universality of suffering, feeling for the person suffering, tolerating the discomfort associated with suffering, and acting or being motivated to alleviate suffering.
Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates "not at all true" and 5 indicates "always true".
Participants select the response that best reflects their experience.
Higher scores indicate greater compassion for others and therefore a better outcome.
The Spanish validation has shown adequate psychometric properties.
|
baseline
|
|
Sussex-Oxford Compassion for Others Scale (SOCS-O)
Délai: Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
In the compassion program group.
Compassion for others will be assessed using the Sussex-Oxford Compassion for Others Scale.
This self-report measure evaluates compassion toward other people.
It includes 20 items distributed across five subscales: recognizing suffering, understanding the universality of suffering, feeling for the person suffering, tolerating the discomfort associated with suffering, and acting or being motivated to alleviate suffering.
Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates "not at all true" and 5 indicates "always true".
Participants select the response that best reflects their experience.
Higher scores indicate greater compassion for others and therefore a better outcome.
The Spanish validation has shown adequate psychometric properties.
|
Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
|
Sussex-Oxford Compassion for Others Scale (SOCS-O)
Délai: Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
In the relaxation program group.
Compassion for others will be assessed using the Sussex-Oxford Compassion for Others Scale.
This self-report measure evaluates compassion toward other people.
It includes 20 items distributed across five subscales: recognizing suffering, understanding the universality of suffering, feeling for the person suffering, tolerating the discomfort associated with suffering, and acting or being motivated to alleviate suffering.
Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates "not at all true" and 5 indicates "always true".
Participants select the response that best reflects their experience.
Higher scores indicate greater compassion for others and therefore a better outcome.
The Spanish validation has shown adequate psychometric properties.
|
Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
|
Sussex-Oxford Compassion for Others Scale (SOCS-O)
Délai: Three-months follow-up]
|
In the compassion program group.
Compassion for others will be assessed using the Sussex-Oxford Compassion for Others Scale.
This self-report measure evaluates compassion toward other people.
It includes 20 items distributed across five subscales: recognizing suffering, understanding the universality of suffering, feeling for the person suffering, tolerating the discomfort associated with suffering, and acting or being motivated to alleviate suffering.
Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates "not at all true" and 5 indicates "always true".
Participants select the response that best reflects their experience.
Higher scores indicate greater compassion for others and therefore a better outcome.
The Spanish validation has shown adequate psychometric properties.
|
Three-months follow-up]
|
|
Sussex-Oxford Compassion for Others Scale (SOCS-O)
Délai: Three-months follow-up]
|
In the relaxation program group.
Compassion for others will be assessed using the Sussex-Oxford Compassion for Others Scale.
This self-report measure evaluates compassion toward other people.
It includes 20 items distributed across five subscales: recognizing suffering, understanding the universality of suffering, feeling for the person suffering, tolerating the discomfort associated with suffering, and acting or being motivated to alleviate suffering.
Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates "not at all true" and 5 indicates "always true".
Participants select the response that best reflects their experience.
Higher scores indicate greater compassion for others and therefore a better outcome.
The Spanish validation has shown adequate psychometric properties.
|
Three-months follow-up]
|
|
Depression Anxiety Stress Scales - DASS-21
Délai: Baseline
|
In the compassion program group.
Anxiety, depression, and stress symptoms will be assessed using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales - 21.
This self-report scale includes 21 items distributed across three subscales: anxiety, depression, and stress.
Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates "never" and 3 indicates "almost always".
Participants select the response that best reflects the frequency with which they have experienced each symptom.
Item scores are summed separately for each subscale, obtaining a total score for anxiety, depression, and stress.
Higher scores indicate greater severity of anxiety, depression, or stress symptoms and therefore a worse outcome.
The Spanish validation has shown adequate psychometric properties.
|
Baseline
|
|
Depression Anxiety Stress Scales - DASS-21
Délai: baseline
|
In the relaxation program group.
Anxiety, depression, and stress symptoms will be assessed using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales - 21.
This self-report scale includes 21 items distributed across three subscales: anxiety, depression, and stress.
Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates "never" and 3 indicates "almost always".
Participants select the response that best reflects the frequency with which they have experienced each symptom.
Item scores are summed separately for each subscale, obtaining a total score for anxiety, depression, and stress.
Higher scores indicate greater severity of anxiety, depression, or stress symptoms and therefore a worse outcome.
The Spanish validation has shown adequate psychometric properties.
|
baseline
|
|
Depression Anxiety Stress Scales - DASS-21
Délai: Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
In the compassion program group.
Anxiety, depression, and stress symptoms will be assessed using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales - 21.
This self-report scale includes 21 items distributed across three subscales: anxiety, depression, and stress.
Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates "never" and 3 indicates "almost always".
Participants select the response that best reflects the frequency with which they have experienced each symptom.
Item scores are summed separately for each subscale, obtaining a total score for anxiety, depression, and stress.
Higher scores indicate greater severity of anxiety, depression, or stress symptoms and therefore a worse outcome.
The Spanish validation has shown adequate psychometric properties.
|
Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
|
Depression Anxiety Stress Scales - DASS-21
Délai: Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
In the relaxation program group.
Anxiety, depression, and stress symptoms will be assessed using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales - 21.
This self-report scale includes 21 items distributed across three subscales: anxiety, depression, and stress.
Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates "never" and 3 indicates "almost always".
Participants select the response that best reflects the frequency with which they have experienced each symptom.
Item scores are summed separately for each subscale, obtaining a total score for anxiety, depression, and stress.
Higher scores indicate greater severity of anxiety, depression, or stress symptoms and therefore a worse outcome.
The Spanish validation has shown adequate psychometric properties.
|
Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
|
Depression Anxiety Stress Scales - DASS-21
Délai: Three-months follow-up]
|
In the compassion program group.
Anxiety, depression, and stress symptoms will be assessed using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales - 21.
This self-report scale includes 21 items distributed across three subscales: anxiety, depression, and stress.
Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates "never" and 3 indicates "almost always".
Participants select the response that best reflects the frequency with which they have experienced each symptom.
Item scores are summed separately for each subscale, obtaining a total score for anxiety, depression, and stress.
Higher scores indicate greater severity of anxiety, depression, or stress symptoms and therefore a worse outcome.
The Spanish validation has shown adequate psychometric properties.
|
Three-months follow-up]
|
|
Depression Anxiety Stress Scales - DASS-21
Délai: Three-months follow-up]
|
In the relaxation program group.
Anxiety, depression, and stress symptoms will be assessed using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales - 21.
This self-report scale includes 21 items distributed across three subscales: anxiety, depression, and stress.
Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates "never" and 3 indicates "almost always".
Participants select the response that best reflects the frequency with which they have experienced each symptom.
Item scores are summed separately for each subscale, obtaining a total score for anxiety, depression, and stress.
Higher scores indicate greater severity of anxiety, depression, or stress symptoms and therefore a worse outcome.
The Spanish validation has shown adequate psychometric properties.
|
Three-months follow-up]
|
|
FIVE FACETS MINDFULNESS QUESTIONNAIRE FFMQ
Délai: Baseline
|
In the compassion program group.
Mindfulness will be assessed using the short form of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire.
This self-report scale includes 15 items and evaluates the same five facets as the original version: observing, describing, acting with awareness, non-reactivity to inner experience, and non-judging of inner experience.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates "never or very rarely true" and 5 indicates "very often or always true".
Participants select the response that best reflects their experience.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of mindfulness and therefore a better outcome.
The Spanish validated version used in this study has shown a factorial structure consistent with the original scale.
|
Baseline
|
|
FIVE FACETS MINDFULNESS QUESTIONNAIRE FFMQ
Délai: baseline
|
In the relaxation program group.
Mindfulness will be assessed using the short form of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire.
This self-report scale includes 15 items and evaluates the same five facets as the original version: observing, describing, acting with awareness, non-reactivity to inner experience, and non-judging of inner experience.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates "never or very rarely true" and 5 indicates "very often or always true".
Participants select the response that best reflects their experience.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of mindfulness and therefore a better outcome.
The Spanish validated version used in this study has shown a factorial structure consistent with the original scale.
|
baseline
|
|
FIVE FACETS MINDFULNESS QUESTIONNAIRE FFMQ
Délai: Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
In the compassion program group.
Mindfulness will be assessed using the short form of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire.
This self-report scale includes 15 items and evaluates the same five facets as the original version: observing, describing, acting with awareness, non-reactivity to inner experience, and non-judging of inner experience.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates "never or very rarely true" and 5 indicates "very often or always true".
Participants select the response that best reflects their experience.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of mindfulness and therefore a better outcome.
The Spanish validated version used in this study has shown a factorial structure consistent with the original scale.
|
Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
|
FIVE FACETS MINDFULNESS QUESTIONNAIRE FFMQ
Délai: Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
In the relaxation program group.
Mindfulness will be assessed using the short form of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire.
This self-report scale includes 15 items and evaluates the same five facets as the original version: observing, describing, acting with awareness, non-reactivity to inner experience, and non-judging of inner experience.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates "never or very rarely true" and 5 indicates "very often or always true".
Participants select the response that best reflects their experience.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of mindfulness and therefore a better outcome.
The Spanish validated version used in this study has shown a factorial structure consistent with the original scale.
|
Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
|
FIVE FACETS MINDFULNESS QUESTIONNAIRE FFMQ
Délai: Three-months follow-up]
|
In the compassion program group.
Mindfulness will be assessed using the short form of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire.
This self-report scale includes 15 items and evaluates the same five facets as the original version: observing, describing, acting with awareness, non-reactivity to inner experience, and non-judging of inner experience.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates "never or very rarely true" and 5 indicates "very often or always true".
Participants select the response that best reflects their experience.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of mindfulness and therefore a better outcome.
The Spanish validated version used in this study has shown a factorial structure consistent with the original scale.
|
Three-months follow-up]
|
|
FIVE FACETS MINDFULNESS QUESTIONNAIRE FFMQ
Délai: Three-months follow-up]
|
In the relaxation program group.
Mindfulness will be assessed using the short form of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire.
This self-report scale includes 15 items and evaluates the same five facets as the original version: observing, describing, acting with awareness, non-reactivity to inner experience, and non-judging of inner experience.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates "never or very rarely true" and 5 indicates "very often or always true".
Participants select the response that best reflects their experience.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of mindfulness and therefore a better outcome.
The Spanish validated version used in this study has shown a factorial structure consistent with the original scale.
|
Three-months follow-up]
|
|
Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction Scale - General
Délai: Baseline
|
In the compassion program group.
Satisfaction and frustration of basic psychological needs will be assessed using the Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction in General Scale.
This self-report scale includes 16 items and evaluates three fundamental psychological needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 7, where 1 indicates "totally disagree" and 7 indicates "totally agree".
Participants select the response that best reflects their perceived satisfaction or frustration regarding these psychological needs.
Item scores are summed to obtain a total score.
Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction of basic psychological needs and therefore a better outcome.
The Spanish validation of the 16-item version has shown adequate psychometric properties.
|
Baseline
|
|
Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction Scale - General
Délai: baseline
|
In the relaxation program group.
Satisfaction and frustration of basic psychological needs will be assessed using the Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction in General Scale.
This self-report scale includes 16 items and evaluates three fundamental psychological needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 7, where 1 indicates "totally disagree" and 7 indicates "totally agree".
Participants select the response that best reflects their perceived satisfaction or frustration regarding these psychological needs.
Item scores are summed to obtain a total score.
Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction of basic psychological needs and therefore a better outcome.
The Spanish validation of the 16-item version has shown adequate psychometric properties.
|
baseline
|
|
Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction Scale - General
Délai: Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
In the compassion program group.
Satisfaction and frustration of basic psychological needs will be assessed using the Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction in General Scale.
This self-report scale includes 16 items and evaluates three fundamental psychological needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 7, where 1 indicates "totally disagree" and 7 indicates "totally agree".
Participants select the response that best reflects their perceived satisfaction or frustration regarding these psychological needs.
Item scores are summed to obtain a total score.
Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction of basic psychological needs and therefore a better outcome.
The Spanish validation of the 16-item version has shown adequate psychometric properties.
|
Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
|
Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction Scale - General
Délai: Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
In the relaxation program group.
Satisfaction and frustration of basic psychological needs will be assessed using the Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction in General Scale.
This self-report scale includes 16 items and evaluates three fundamental psychological needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 7, where 1 indicates "totally disagree" and 7 indicates "totally agree".
Participants select the response that best reflects their perceived satisfaction or frustration regarding these psychological needs.
Item scores are summed to obtain a total score.
Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction of basic psychological needs and therefore a better outcome.
The Spanish validation of the 16-item version has shown adequate psychometric properties.
|
Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
|
Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction Scale - General
Délai: Three months follow up
|
In the compassion program group.
Satisfaction and frustration of basic psychological needs will be assessed using the Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction in General Scale.
This self-report scale includes 16 items and evaluates three fundamental psychological needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 7, where 1 indicates "totally disagree" and 7 indicates "totally agree".
Participants select the response that best reflects their perceived satisfaction or frustration regarding these psychological needs.
Item scores are summed to obtain a total score.
Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction of basic psychological needs and therefore a better outcome.
The Spanish validation of the 16-item version has shown adequate psychometric properties.
|
Three months follow up
|
|
Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction Scale - General
Délai: Three months follow up
|
In the relaxation program group.
Satisfaction and frustration of basic psychological needs will be assessed using the Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction in General Scale.
This self-report scale includes 16 items and evaluates three fundamental psychological needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 7, where 1 indicates "totally disagree" and 7 indicates "totally agree".
Participants select the response that best reflects their perceived satisfaction or frustration regarding these psychological needs.
Item scores are summed to obtain a total score.
Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction of basic psychological needs and therefore a better outcome.
The Spanish validation of the 16-item version has shown adequate psychometric properties.
|
Three months follow up
|
|
Treatment Received Satisfaction Scale
Délai: Baseline
|
In the compassion program group.
Satisfaction with the treatment received will be assessed using the Treatment Received Satisfaction Scale.
This self-report scale includes 4 items designed to evaluate whether participants are satisfied with the intervention received and whether they perceive it as effective.
Items 1 and 2 are answered using five response options, while items 3 and 4 are answered using four response options.
The scale provides three specific components: satisfaction, problem resolution, and perceived emotional change.
A global score is calculated from these components according to the formula proposed by the authors.
The global score ranges from 0 to 300, with higher scores indicating greater perceived treatment effectiveness and therefore a better outcome.
|
Baseline
|
|
Treatment Received Satisfaction Scale
Délai: baseline
|
In the relaxation program group.
Satisfaction with the treatment received will be assessed using the Treatment Received Satisfaction Scale.
This self-report scale includes 4 items designed to evaluate whether participants are satisfied with the intervention received and whether they perceive it as effective.
Items 1 and 2 are answered using five response options, while items 3 and 4 are answered using four response options.
The scale provides three specific components: satisfaction, problem resolution, and perceived emotional change.
A global score is calculated from these components according to the formula proposed by the authors.
The global score ranges from 0 to 300, with higher scores indicating greater perceived treatment effectiveness and therefore a better outcome.
|
baseline
|
|
Treatment Received Satisfaction Scale
Délai: Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
In the compassion program group.
Satisfaction with the treatment received will be assessed using the Treatment Received Satisfaction Scale.
This self-report scale includes 4 items designed to evaluate whether participants are satisfied with the intervention received and whether they perceive it as effective.
Items 1 and 2 are answered using five response options, while items 3 and 4 are answered using four response options.
The scale provides three specific components: satisfaction, problem resolution, and perceived emotional change.
A global score is calculated from these components according to the formula proposed by the authors.
The global score ranges from 0 to 300, with higher scores indicating greater perceived treatment effectiveness and therefore a better outcome.
|
Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
|
Treatment Received Satisfaction Scale
Délai: Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
In the relaxation program group.
Satisfaction with the treatment received will be assessed using the Treatment Received Satisfaction Scale.
This self-report scale includes 4 items designed to evaluate whether participants are satisfied with the intervention received and whether they perceive it as effective.
Items 1 and 2 are answered using five response options, while items 3 and 4 are answered using four response options.
The scale provides three specific components: satisfaction, problem resolution, and perceived emotional change.
A global score is calculated from these components according to the formula proposed by the authors.
The global score ranges from 0 to 300, with higher scores indicating greater perceived treatment effectiveness and therefore a better outcome.
|
Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
|
Treatment Received Satisfaction Scale
Délai: Three-months follow-up]
|
In the compassion program group.
Satisfaction with the treatment received will be assessed using the Treatment Received Satisfaction Scale.
This self-report scale includes 4 items designed to evaluate whether participants are satisfied with the intervention received and whether they perceive it as effective.
Items 1 and 2 are answered using five response options, while items 3 and 4 are answered using four response options.
The scale provides three specific components: satisfaction, problem resolution, and perceived emotional change.
A global score is calculated from these components according to the formula proposed by the authors.
The global score ranges from 0 to 300, with higher scores indicating greater perceived treatment effectiveness and therefore a better outcome.
|
Three-months follow-up]
|
|
Treatment Received Satisfaction Scale
Délai: Three-months follow-up]
|
In the relaxation program group.
Satisfaction with the treatment received will be assessed using the Treatment Received Satisfaction Scale.
This self-report scale includes 4 items designed to evaluate whether participants are satisfied with the intervention received and whether they perceive it as effective.
Items 1 and 2 are answered using five response options, while items 3 and 4 are answered using four response options.
The scale provides three specific components: satisfaction, problem resolution, and perceived emotional change.
A global score is calculated from these components according to the formula proposed by the authors.
The global score ranges from 0 to 300, with higher scores indicating greater perceived treatment effectiveness and therefore a better outcome.
|
Three-months follow-up]
|
|
Reduced scale Highly Sensitive Person Scale to the Adult Spanish Population (RHSP)
Délai: Baseline
|
In the compassion program group.
Sensory processing sensitivity will be assessed using the Reduced Highly Sensitive Person Scale to the Adult Spanish Population.
This self-report scale includes 16 items designed to evaluate sensitivity in Spanish-speaking adults and to explore how sensitivity may influence different aspects of daily life and psychological well-being.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 7, where 0 indicates "totally disagree" and 7 indicates "totally agree".
Participants select the response that best reflects their experience.
Item scores are summed and divided by the number of items to obtain the final score.
Higher scores indicate greater sensory processing sensitivity.
|
Baseline
|
|
Reduced scale Highly Sensitive Person Scale to the Adult Spanish Population (RHSP)
Délai: baseline
|
In the relaxation program group.
Sensory processing sensitivity will be assessed using the Reduced Highly Sensitive Person Scale to the Adult Spanish Population.
This self-report scale includes 16 items designed to evaluate sensitivity in Spanish-speaking adults and to explore how sensitivity may influence different aspects of daily life and psychological well-being.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 7, where 0 indicates "totally disagree" and 7 indicates "totally agree".
Participants select the response that best reflects their experience.
Item scores are summed and divided by the number of items to obtain the final score.
Higher scores indicate greater sensory processing sensitivity.
|
baseline
|
|
Reduced scale Highly Sensitive Person Scale to the Adult Spanish Population (RHSP)
Délai: Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
In the compassion program group.
Sensory processing sensitivity will be assessed using the Reduced Highly Sensitive Person Scale to the Adult Spanish Population.
This self-report scale includes 16 items designed to evaluate sensitivity in Spanish-speaking adults and to explore how sensitivity may influence different aspects of daily life and psychological well-being.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 7, where 0 indicates "totally disagree" and 7 indicates "totally agree".
Participants select the response that best reflects their experience.
Item scores are summed and divided by the number of items to obtain the final score.
Higher scores indicate greater sensory processing sensitivity.
|
Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
|
Reduced scale Highly Sensitive Person Scale to the Adult Spanish Population (RHSP)
Délai: Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
In the relaxation program group.
Sensory processing sensitivity will be assessed using the Reduced Highly Sensitive Person Scale to the Adult Spanish Population.
This self-report scale includes 16 items designed to evaluate sensitivity in Spanish-speaking adults and to explore how sensitivity may influence different aspects of daily life and psychological well-being.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 7, where 0 indicates "totally disagree" and 7 indicates "totally agree".
Participants select the response that best reflects their experience.
Item scores are summed and divided by the number of items to obtain the final score.
Higher scores indicate greater sensory processing sensitivity.
|
Post-treatment 1 weekend from baseline
|
|
Reduced scale Highly Sensitive Person Scale to the Adult Spanish Population (RHSP)
Délai: Three-months follow-up]
|
In the compassion program group.
Sensory processing sensitivity will be assessed using the Reduced Highly Sensitive Person Scale to the Adult Spanish Population.
This self-report scale includes 16 items designed to evaluate sensitivity in Spanish-speaking adults and to explore how sensitivity may influence different aspects of daily life and psychological well-being.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 7, where 0 indicates "totally disagree" and 7 indicates "totally agree".
Participants select the response that best reflects their experience.
Item scores are summed and divided by the number of items to obtain the final score.
Higher scores indicate greater sensory processing sensitivity.
|
Three-months follow-up]
|
|
Reduced scale Highly Sensitive Person Scale to the Adult Spanish Population (RHSP)
Délai: Three-months follow-up]
|
In the relaxation program group.
Sensory processing sensitivity will be assessed using the Reduced Highly Sensitive Person Scale to the Adult Spanish Population.
This self-report scale includes 16 items designed to evaluate sensitivity in Spanish-speaking adults and to explore how sensitivity may influence different aspects of daily life and psychological well-being.
Each item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 7, where 0 indicates "totally disagree" and 7 indicates "totally agree".
Participants select the response that best reflects their experience.
Item scores are summed and divided by the number of items to obtain the final score.
Higher scores indicate greater sensory processing sensitivity.
|
Three-months follow-up]
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Estimé)
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 11/2026
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .