Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Crisugabalin in NMOSD Neuropathic Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Exploratory Trial (TERMINATOR)

9 juillet 2026 mis à jour par: Tang-Du Hospital

Efficacy and Safety of Crisugabalin in Treating Neuropathic Pain Related to Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders: a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Exploratory Trial

This study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled exploratory investigation conducted in China.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Crisugabalin, a China-developed novel third-generation calcium channel modulator, for neuropathic pain in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive Crisugabalin or placebo for 2 weeks , followed by an 8-week open-label extension period .The main questions of this study aim to answer are:

Does Crisugabalin lower pain scores after 2 weeks and 10 weeks? What medical problems do participants have when taking crisugabalin? This trial is to compare Crisugabalin to a placebo for the first 2 weeks to see if it reduces pain.

Participants will:

Take Crisugabalin or a placebo twice daily for 2 weeks (double-blind) Then take Crisugabalin for 8 more weeks (open-label) Visit the clinic at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 Complete questionnaires about pain, sleep, spasms, anxiety, and depression Last updated on December 2, 2025

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

110

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

  • Chine
    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, Chine
        • Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University
        • Contact:
    • Chaoyang
      • Beijing, Chaoyang, Chine
        • the First Hospital of Tsinghua University
        • Contact:
          • Yujuan Jiao
          • Numéro de téléphone: 86+13701352593
          • E-mail: spqjiao@126.com
    • Chongqing Municipality
      • Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, Chine
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
        • Contact:
    • Heilongjiang
      • Harbin, Heilongjiang, Chine
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
        • Contact:
          • Di Zhong
          • Numéro de téléphone: 86+13766851510
          • E-mail: dityan@163.com
    • Inner Mongolia
      • Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, Chine
        • Inner Mongolia People's Hospital
        • Contact:
    • Jinlin
      • Changchun, Jinlin, Chine
        • The First Hospital of Jilin University
        • Contact:
    • Liaoning
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, Chine
        • The First Hospital of China Medical University
        • Contact:
    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, Chine
        • Tangdu Hospotal
        • Contact:
          • Jun Guo
          • Numéro de téléphone: 86-29-8477 8844
    • Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region
      • Ürümqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Chine
        • Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region People's Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Maimaiti Mayinur
          • Numéro de téléphone: +8613565918992
          • E-mail: maiynur2@163.com
    • Yunnan
      • Kunming, Yunnan, Chine
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
        • Contact:
          • Linming Zhang
          • Numéro de téléphone: +8618288661591
          • E-mail: zlmeek@163.com

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

**Inclusion Criteria:**

Subjects who meet all of the following criteria will be enrolled in this study:

  1. Able to understand and voluntarily sign the written informed consent form;
  2. Male or female aged between 18 years (inclusive) and 75 years;
  3. Diagnosed with aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) according to the International Panel for NMO Diagnosis (IPND, 2015) criteria;
  4. Patients with comorbid neuropathic pain, DN4 ≥ 4; no change in medication dosage within the past month;
  5. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain score ≥ 4 at screening;
  6. First-time use of Crisugabalin Capsules.

**Exclusion Criteria:**

Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will not be enrolled in this study:

  1. Presence of peripheral neuropathy or pain unrelated to NMOSD that, in the investigator's judgment, may confound the assessment;
  2. Known history of allergy to the investigational drug components, or to other drugs with similar chemical structures, or to any excipients;
  3. Prior use of pregabalin ≥ 300 mg/day, gabapentin ≥ 1200 mg/day, or mirogabalin ≥ 30 mg/day with lack of clinical efficacy as judged by the investigator;
  4. Severe liver or kidney function abnormalities, meeting any of the following clinical laboratory findings:

1) Liver function: alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 3 × upper limit of normal (ULN); 2) Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m² (calculated using the simplified MDRD formula); 5. Women who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant during the study period, or currently breastfeeding; subjects who are unwilling to use reliable contraceptive measures (including condoms, spermicides, intrauterine devices, etc.) from the time of signing the ICF until 28 days after the last dose of the investigational drug; 6. Current use of IL-6 receptor blockers (e.g., tocilizumab, satralizumab); 7. History of suicidal behavior or suicidal ideation; 8. Participation in any other clinical study within 30 days prior to screening; 9. The investigator determines that there are other situations in which participation in the study is inappropriate.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Tripler

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Crisugabalin group
Si meining
Médicament: Crisugabalin
Crisugabalin 20-40mg bid
Comparateur placebo: Placebo group
Si meining
Médicament: Placebo+Crisugabalin
Placebo+Crisugabalin
Autres noms:
  • Placebo

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score
Délai: Change from baseline in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment

Patients rate their average pain intensity over the past 24 hours on an 11-point scale (0-10), with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain.

  • Min / Max: 0 / 10
  • Severity relationship:** Higher scores indicate greater pain severity. Pain levels are categorized as: Mild (1-3), Moderate (4-6), Severe (7-10)
Change from baseline in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) response rate
Délai: Change from baseline between Crisugabalin and placebo during the 2-week and 10 -week treatment period.
Proportion of subjects with ≥30% and ≥50% reduction in NRS from baseline between Crisugabalin and placebo during the 2-week and 10 -week treatment period
Change from baseline between Crisugabalin and placebo during the 2-week and 10 -week treatment period.
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) score
Délai: Change from baseline in the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) score after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment

The Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) comprises three main components for pain assessment:

  1. Pain Rating Index (PRI): This includes 11 sensory descriptors and 4 affective descriptors. Each item is rated on a 4-point intensity scale: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. The PRI yields a total score ranging from 0 to 45 (sensory subscale: 0-33; affective subscale: 0-12).
  2. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): A 10-cm unmarked horizontal line anchored by 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain. Patients mark a cross on the line to indicate their average pain level over the past 24 hours. The score is determined by measuring the distance from the 0 end to the mark (in cm), or by reading directly from a scale on the reverse side.
  3. Present Pain Intensity (PPI): A 6-point scale ranging from 0 = no pain to 5 = excruciating pain. Patients select the level that best matches their subjective pain experience at the present moment.

Score Ranges:

PRI: 0 - 45 VAS: 0 - 10 PPI: 0 - 5
Change from baseline in the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) score after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment
Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS) score
Délai: Change from baseline in the Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS) score after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment
  • Interpretation:Patients rate how much pain interfered with sleep over the past 24 hours on a 0-10 scale, where 0 = pain does not interfere with sleep and 10 = completely unable to sleep.
  • Min / Max:0 / 10
  • Severity relationship:** Higher scores indicate greater sleep disruption due to pain.
Change from baseline in the Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS) score after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment
Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS) score
Délai: Change from baseline in the Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS) score after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment
  • Interpretation: Two parts - spasm frequency (0-4, where higher = more frequent) and, if present, severity (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). If frequency = 0, severity is not assessed.
  • Min / Max:Frequency: 0-4; Severity (if spasms present): 1-3
  • Severity relationship: Higher frequency and severity scores indicate more problematic muscle spasms.
Change from baseline in the Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS) score after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) score
Délai: Change from baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) score after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment
  • Interpretation:A clinician-rated scale with 14 items, each scored 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = very severe. Total score reflects anxiety severity.
  • Min / Max: 0 / 56
  • Severity relationship: Higher total scores indicate more severe anxiety.
Change from baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) score after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) score
Délai: Change from baseline in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) score after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment
  • Interpretation: Clinician-rated scale for depressive symptoms. Most items scored 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = very severe. A few items use a 0-2 scale (0 = absent, 1 = mild-moderate, 2 = severe).
  • Min / Max:0 / 74 (approximate for 24 items)
  • Severity relationship: Higher total scores indicate more severe depression.
Change from baseline in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) score after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment
Incidence of adverse reactions
Délai: Change from baseline during 2 and 10 weeks of treatment
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and the incidence of TEAEs during the study period for Crisugabalin and placebo.
Change from baseline during 2 and 10 weeks of treatment
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score
Délai: Change from baseline in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score after 10 weeks of treatment
  • Interpretation: A 7-point scale assessing overall improvement since treatment began.
  • 1 = Very much improved
  • 2 = Much improved
  • 3 = Minimally improved
  • 4 = No change
  • 5 = Minimally worse
  • 6 = Much worse
  • 7 = Very much worse
  • Min / Max: 1 / 7
  • Severity relationship: Lower scores indicate greater improvement; higher scores indicate worsening.
Change from baseline in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score after 10 weeks of treatment
EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level（EQ-5D-5L） score
Délai: Change from baseline in the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level（EQ-5D-5L） score after 10 weeks of treatment
  • Interpretation: Measures health-related quality of life across 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), each rated 1 = no problems to 5 = extreme problems. A VAS from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health) is also included.
  • Min / Max: Dimension scores: 1-5 per dimension; VAS: 0-100
  • Severity relationship:Higher dimension scores indicate worse function/more problems; higher VAS score indicates better overall health.
Change from baseline in the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level（EQ-5D-5L） score after 10 weeks of treatment

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Tang-Du Hospital

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Jun Guo, Tang-Du Hospital

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

15 juin 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

31 octobre 2027

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

31 décembre 2027

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

15 avril 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

9 juillet 2026

Première publication (Réel)

13 juillet 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

13 juillet 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

9 juillet 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juillet 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Mots clés

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • 202603-06

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner