Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Sperm, Exposure and Endocrine Disruptors (SEED)

10 juillet 2026 mis à jour par: Jenna Hua, Million Marker Wellness, Inc.

Endocrine Disruptors and Men's Reproductive Health: A Randomized Behavioral Intervention to Increase Environmental Health Literacy and Reduce Exposures Among Men With Low Semen Quality

The proposed research aims to 1) measure male participants' urinary levels of EDCs and sperm quality before and after report-back and EDC reduction intervention and assess changes, 2) assess the extent to which MM's program (testing, curriculum, and report-back) alters participant environmental health literacy (EHL), readiness to change (RtC), and product/lifestyle choices, and 3) test the feasibility and acceptability of MM's program to male participants. The primary study subjects are adult men of reproductive age. The study aims to have 60 participants complete the study.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

The SEED study hypothesizes that our report-back and intervention program will increase environmental health literacy and EDC-reduction behavior, reduce urinary EDCs, and improve semen quality in a sample of US men with low semen quality. And the intervention program will have a larger effect than report-back only. The study will consist of three Aims: 1) Measure male participants' urinary levels of EDCs and semen quality before and after report-back and EDC reduction intervention and assess change. 60 men, with previously established low semen quality, will be recruited from Fellow Health customers (a direct-to-consumer semen testing company). All participants' EDC exposures will be assessed via the MM test kit and receive personalized report-back. Subsequently, in a randomized-controlled trial, 30 participants (i.e. the intervention group) will engage in an 8-session online EDC environmental health literacy curriculum, as well as an online forum and coaching sessions, aimed to increase environmental health literacy and exposure reduction behavior. Thirty participants (i.e. the control group) will receive the report-back only. After completion of the curriculum, participants will retest urinary EDCs. Semen quality at these two time points will also be collected. Differences between the intervention and control groups will be assessed. 2) Assess the extent to which MM's program (testing, curriculum, and report-back) alters participant environmental health literacy, readiness to change, and product/lifestyle choices. Measures of environmental health literacy, willingness/readiness to reduce exposure, exposure reduction behavior, and sources of exposure will be assessed pre- and post-testing/intervention via previously validated surveys, including environmental health literacy and readiness to change (i.e. ready to reduce exposure), and lifestyle audits (including product use, diet, and lifestyle factors). Differences between the intervention and control groups will be assessed. 3) Test the feasibility and acceptability of MM's program to male participants. The usability, feasibility, and overall acceptability of the MM intervention program (i.e. testing, report-back, curriculum, coaching sessions) will be assessed in participants via the System Usability Score and other participant satisfaction questions. Further, focus groups and key informant interviews will be conducted in a subset of participants following the study to gather both qualitative and quantitative information to assess and improve the MM program.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

100

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

    • California
      • Berkeley, California, États-Unis, 94704
        • Million Marker Wellness Inc.

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men,
  • Reproductive Age,
  • Good Health,
  • Non-Smoker
  • English-Speaking
  • No Occupational/Medical Risks
  • not using steroids or TRT/hormone replacement supplements
  • low sperm count=total motile count below 20 million/ml
  • tested by Fellow in the last 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women
  • Non-Reproductive Age
  • Poor Health
  • Smoker
  • Non-English Speaking
  • Occupational/Medical Risks
  • using steroids or TRT/hormone replacement supplements
  • total motile count over 20 mil/ml, tested by Fellow over 3 months ago

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Education Intervention
Study participants receive lifestyle audit and educational intervention program in addition to urine and sperm testing.
Participants receive a 14 module intervention program about endocrine disrupting chemicals and reducing exposures. Participants must complete at least 8 modules over the course of 8 weeks.
Aucune intervention: Control
Study participants receive urine and sperm testing only.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in Environmental Health Literacy
Délai: 12-weeks
This surveys assesses EDC-specific environmental health literacy, based on questions in a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree) or 1 (never) to 5 (always). Responses will be reverse coded during analysis as needed so that higher numbers reflect positive outcomes (higher EDC-EHL).
12-weeks
Change in Sperm Count
Délai: 12 Weeks
Changes measured from Fellow Sperm Test- total motile count at the baseline and post intervention.
12 Weeks
Change in Readiness to Change
Délai: 12 weeks
The Readiness to Change question asks participants to choose the response (sentence) that most accurately describes their current efforts and interest in limiting their exposure to harmful chemicals. Responses will be coded from 1 to 5 with 5 reflecting greater readiness to reduce risky behaviors.
12 weeks
Change in Metabolites
Délai: 12 weeks
Urinary EDC metabolites include bisphenols, phthalates, parabens and oxybenzone.
12 weeks

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in Sexual Satisfaction (From the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Survey)
Délai: 12-weeks
Measured pre and post intervention to Likert style questions from 1 to 5 on overall self reported sexual satisfaction with higher score indicating more satisfied. Two questions taken from validated survey questions from the international index of erectile function survey including "how satisfied have you been with your overall sex life?" https://www.browardurologycenter.com/pdf/International-Index-of-Erectile-Function-IIEF-Questionnaire.pdf
12-weeks
Change in Sexual Health Inventory (SHIM)
Délai: 12-weeks

Validated survey measured pre and post intervention

Add the numbers corresponding to questions 1-5.

TOTAL:

The Sexual Health Inventory for Men further classifies ED severity with the following breakpoints:

1-7 Severe ED 8-11 Moderate ED 12-16 Mild to Moderate ED 17-21 Mild ED

12-weeks
Product Usage
Délai: 12 Weeks
Changes in # of reported product usage including personal care, household, and hair products with more products being worse and less products being better.
12 Weeks
System Usability Score (SUS)
Délai: 12-weeks
SUS is a validated survey measuring the usability of the intervention program at the end of intervention. The score is calculated from 0 to 100 with the greater the score indicating better perceived usability. Scores 60 and greater are considered acceptable.
12-weeks
Change in Stress
Délai: 12-weeks
Change in stress (from validated survey Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4)). Summarize 4 questions for a score of 0-16. Higher score equals greater stress.
12-weeks
Intervention Completion
Délai: At the end of intervention (12-weeks)
Number of total modules completed/requirements completed
At the end of intervention (12-weeks)
Change in General Health
Délai: 12 weeks
Change in self rated general health ( Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)) "In general my health is" from very good to very bad (coded 1 to 5, 5 being very good). These variables are exploratory and may or may not be included in final analysis.
12 weeks
Change in Sleep
Délai: 12 weeks
Change in sleep (BRFSS- Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System), including self reported hours of sleep and sleep quality from very good to very bad(coded 1 to 5, 5 being very good). These variables are exploratory and may or may not be included in final analysis.
12 weeks
Change in Physical Activity
Délai: 12 Weeks

Change in physical activity (validated survey International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)) using calculated MET (Metabolic Equivalent of Task) scores to classify into low, moderate or high physical activity (higher being better).

MET score = (how many days × how many minutes × how hard the activity is), added across all activity types." Walking= 3.3 METs Moderate activity=4.0 METs Vigorous activity=8.0 METs

These variables are exploratory and may or may not be included in final analysis.

12 Weeks

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Directeur d'études: Johanna Rochester, PhD, Million Marker Wellness

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

15 juin 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 décembre 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 mars 2027

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

26 juin 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

10 juillet 2026

Première publication (Réel)

14 juillet 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

14 juillet 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

10 juillet 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juillet 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

OUI

Description du régime IPD

Million Marker will disseminate research results and findings to the scientific community through presentations at scientific meetings and conferences and publications in academic journals, as well as through the mass media and online postings. The Principal Investigator of this study will make data and associated documentation/metadata available to external researchers under a data-sharing agreement in which a specific commitment is made to use the data for research purposes only, to not provide the data to a third party or distribute it in any form, and to properly acknowledge the source of funding for the collection of the data and the researchers involved in this study.

Délai de partage IPD

Starting six months after publication

Critères d'accès au partage IPD

Researchers must submit an acceptable research plan (goals of the proposed research, the specific hypotheses to be examined, justification for research and methods), be affiliated with a recognized research institution, have demonstrated expertise in the area of the proposed research project, and receive independent approval from their governing institutional review board. Data will be available for use only to answer the specific question(s) indicated in the research plan. The researchers must provide a list of variable names and an outline of how research findings will be disseminated; and will be asked to sign a data-sharing agreement that commits to: 1) not attempt to identify any individual participant, 2) secure the data using appropriate software technology, 3) and destroy or return all data once analyses are complete. All final datasets will be de-identified. Final authorship on manuscripts will require review and approval by the Principal Investigators of this study.

Type d'informations de prise en charge du partage d'IPD

  • PROTOCOLE D'ÉTUDE
  • SÈVE
  • CIF

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner