Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Sperm, Exposure and Endocrine Disruptors (SEED)

10 luglio 2026 aggiornato da: Jenna Hua, Million Marker Wellness, Inc.

Endocrine Disruptors and Men's Reproductive Health: A Randomized Behavioral Intervention to Increase Environmental Health Literacy and Reduce Exposures Among Men With Low Semen Quality

The proposed research aims to 1) measure male participants' urinary levels of EDCs and sperm quality before and after report-back and EDC reduction intervention and assess changes, 2) assess the extent to which MM's program (testing, curriculum, and report-back) alters participant environmental health literacy (EHL), readiness to change (RtC), and product/lifestyle choices, and 3) test the feasibility and acceptability of MM's program to male participants. The primary study subjects are adult men of reproductive age. The study aims to have 60 participants complete the study.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

The SEED study hypothesizes that our report-back and intervention program will increase environmental health literacy and EDC-reduction behavior, reduce urinary EDCs, and improve semen quality in a sample of US men with low semen quality. And the intervention program will have a larger effect than report-back only. The study will consist of three Aims: 1) Measure male participants' urinary levels of EDCs and semen quality before and after report-back and EDC reduction intervention and assess change. 60 men, with previously established low semen quality, will be recruited from Fellow Health customers (a direct-to-consumer semen testing company). All participants' EDC exposures will be assessed via the MM test kit and receive personalized report-back. Subsequently, in a randomized-controlled trial, 30 participants (i.e. the intervention group) will engage in an 8-session online EDC environmental health literacy curriculum, as well as an online forum and coaching sessions, aimed to increase environmental health literacy and exposure reduction behavior. Thirty participants (i.e. the control group) will receive the report-back only. After completion of the curriculum, participants will retest urinary EDCs. Semen quality at these two time points will also be collected. Differences between the intervention and control groups will be assessed. 2) Assess the extent to which MM's program (testing, curriculum, and report-back) alters participant environmental health literacy, readiness to change, and product/lifestyle choices. Measures of environmental health literacy, willingness/readiness to reduce exposure, exposure reduction behavior, and sources of exposure will be assessed pre- and post-testing/intervention via previously validated surveys, including environmental health literacy and readiness to change (i.e. ready to reduce exposure), and lifestyle audits (including product use, diet, and lifestyle factors). Differences between the intervention and control groups will be assessed. 3) Test the feasibility and acceptability of MM's program to male participants. The usability, feasibility, and overall acceptability of the MM intervention program (i.e. testing, report-back, curriculum, coaching sessions) will be assessed in participants via the System Usability Score and other participant satisfaction questions. Further, focus groups and key informant interviews will be conducted in a subset of participants following the study to gather both qualitative and quantitative information to assess and improve the MM program.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

100

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Backup dei contatti dello studio

Luoghi di studio

    • California
      • Berkeley, California, Stati Uniti, 94704
        • Million Marker Wellness Inc.

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men,
  • Reproductive Age,
  • Good Health,
  • Non-Smoker
  • English-Speaking
  • No Occupational/Medical Risks
  • not using steroids or TRT/hormone replacement supplements
  • low sperm count=total motile count below 20 million/ml
  • tested by Fellow in the last 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women
  • Non-Reproductive Age
  • Poor Health
  • Smoker
  • Non-English Speaking
  • Occupational/Medical Risks
  • using steroids or TRT/hormone replacement supplements
  • total motile count over 20 mil/ml, tested by Fellow over 3 months ago

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Separare

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Education Intervention
Study participants receive lifestyle audit and educational intervention program in addition to urine and sperm testing.
Participants receive a 14 module intervention program about endocrine disrupting chemicals and reducing exposures. Participants must complete at least 8 modules over the course of 8 weeks.
Nessun intervento: Control
Study participants receive urine and sperm testing only.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Change in Environmental Health Literacy
Lasso di tempo: 12-weeks
This surveys assesses EDC-specific environmental health literacy, based on questions in a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree) or 1 (never) to 5 (always). Responses will be reverse coded during analysis as needed so that higher numbers reflect positive outcomes (higher EDC-EHL).
12-weeks
Change in Sperm Count
Lasso di tempo: 12 Weeks
Changes measured from Fellow Sperm Test- total motile count at the baseline and post intervention.
12 Weeks
Change in Readiness to Change
Lasso di tempo: 12 weeks
The Readiness to Change question asks participants to choose the response (sentence) that most accurately describes their current efforts and interest in limiting their exposure to harmful chemicals. Responses will be coded from 1 to 5 with 5 reflecting greater readiness to reduce risky behaviors.
12 weeks
Change in Metabolites
Lasso di tempo: 12 weeks
Urinary EDC metabolites include bisphenols, phthalates, parabens and oxybenzone.
12 weeks

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Change in Sexual Satisfaction (From the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Survey)
Lasso di tempo: 12-weeks
Measured pre and post intervention to Likert style questions from 1 to 5 on overall self reported sexual satisfaction with higher score indicating more satisfied. Two questions taken from validated survey questions from the international index of erectile function survey including "how satisfied have you been with your overall sex life?" https://www.browardurologycenter.com/pdf/International-Index-of-Erectile-Function-IIEF-Questionnaire.pdf
12-weeks
Change in Sexual Health Inventory (SHIM)
Lasso di tempo: 12-weeks

Validated survey measured pre and post intervention

Add the numbers corresponding to questions 1-5.

TOTAL:

The Sexual Health Inventory for Men further classifies ED severity with the following breakpoints:

1-7 Severe ED 8-11 Moderate ED 12-16 Mild to Moderate ED 17-21 Mild ED

12-weeks
Product Usage
Lasso di tempo: 12 Weeks
Changes in # of reported product usage including personal care, household, and hair products with more products being worse and less products being better.
12 Weeks
System Usability Score (SUS)
Lasso di tempo: 12-weeks
SUS is a validated survey measuring the usability of the intervention program at the end of intervention. The score is calculated from 0 to 100 with the greater the score indicating better perceived usability. Scores 60 and greater are considered acceptable.
12-weeks
Change in Stress
Lasso di tempo: 12-weeks
Change in stress (from validated survey Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4)). Summarize 4 questions for a score of 0-16. Higher score equals greater stress.
12-weeks
Intervention Completion
Lasso di tempo: At the end of intervention (12-weeks)
Number of total modules completed/requirements completed
At the end of intervention (12-weeks)
Change in General Health
Lasso di tempo: 12 weeks
Change in self rated general health ( Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)) "In general my health is" from very good to very bad (coded 1 to 5, 5 being very good). These variables are exploratory and may or may not be included in final analysis.
12 weeks
Change in Sleep
Lasso di tempo: 12 weeks
Change in sleep (BRFSS- Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System), including self reported hours of sleep and sleep quality from very good to very bad(coded 1 to 5, 5 being very good). These variables are exploratory and may or may not be included in final analysis.
12 weeks
Change in Physical Activity
Lasso di tempo: 12 Weeks

Change in physical activity (validated survey International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)) using calculated MET (Metabolic Equivalent of Task) scores to classify into low, moderate or high physical activity (higher being better).

MET score = (how many days × how many minutes × how hard the activity is), added across all activity types." Walking= 3.3 METs Moderate activity=4.0 METs Vigorous activity=8.0 METs

These variables are exploratory and may or may not be included in final analysis.

12 Weeks

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Direttore dello studio: Johanna Rochester, PhD, Million Marker Wellness

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Pubblicazioni generali

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

15 giugno 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

1 dicembre 2026

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

1 marzo 2027

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

26 giugno 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

10 luglio 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

14 luglio 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

14 luglio 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

10 luglio 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 luglio 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

SÌ

Descrizione del piano IPD

Million Marker will disseminate research results and findings to the scientific community through presentations at scientific meetings and conferences and publications in academic journals, as well as through the mass media and online postings. The Principal Investigator of this study will make data and associated documentation/metadata available to external researchers under a data-sharing agreement in which a specific commitment is made to use the data for research purposes only, to not provide the data to a third party or distribute it in any form, and to properly acknowledge the source of funding for the collection of the data and the researchers involved in this study.

Periodo di condivisione IPD

Starting six months after publication

Criteri di accesso alla condivisione IPD

Researchers must submit an acceptable research plan (goals of the proposed research, the specific hypotheses to be examined, justification for research and methods), be affiliated with a recognized research institution, have demonstrated expertise in the area of the proposed research project, and receive independent approval from their governing institutional review board. Data will be available for use only to answer the specific question(s) indicated in the research plan. The researchers must provide a list of variable names and an outline of how research findings will be disseminated; and will be asked to sign a data-sharing agreement that commits to: 1) not attempt to identify any individual participant, 2) secure the data using appropriate software technology, 3) and destroy or return all data once analyses are complete. All final datasets will be de-identified. Final authorship on manuscripts will require review and approval by the Principal Investigators of this study.

Tipo di informazioni di supporto alla condivisione IPD

  • STUDIO_PROTOCOLLO
  • LINFA
  • ICF

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi