Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Neurocognitive Assessment CNSL and LGG

13 juillet 2026 mis à jour par: Lakshmi Nayak, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Neurocognitive Evaluation Using Digital Technology: A Pilot Study in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma and Low-grade Gliomas

This study is to determine whether self-administered digital cognitive tests can serve as accurate and reliable alternatives to established neuropsychological tests for evaluating cognitive functioning in participants with primary central nervous system lymphoma and low-grade gliomas.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

This is a prospective, longitudinal, pilot study evaluating the validity and reliability of select digital cognitive tests compared to traditional neuropsychological measures in participants with newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and IDH-mutant low-grade gliomas (LGG).

Participants will complete both traditional paper-and-pencil neuropsychological tests and digital cognitive assessments at baseline, 6 months, and at post-treatment or 12-month follow-up, depending on diagnosis. Quality of life and mood will be assessed using the FACT-br and HADS questionnaires and Brain MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging). The study will evaluate validity, as well as test-retest reliability of digital cognitive tests, and explore associations between cognitive performance and neuroimaging outcomes.

It is expected about 36 people will participate in this research study within 12 months.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

36

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histopathologically confirmed newly diagnosed primary CNS diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) OR
  • Histopathologically confirmed IDH-M low grade glioma diagnosis in the past 12 months who have not started tumor directed therapy (if applicable).
  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Ability to consent to study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have severe visual impairment that cannot be corrected with glasses to read regular sized print.
  • Patients who have known psychiatric or substance abuse disorders that would interfere with their cooperation in completing the requirements of the study.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Diagnostique
  • Répartition: N / A
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Autre: Digital Cognitive Assessment

Participants with newly diagnosed PCNSL or IDH-mutant LGG will undergo both traditional neuropsychological testing and digital cognitive assessments (TestMyBrain and Mobile Toolbox) at specified timepoints (baseline, 6 months, post-treatment or 12-14 months). Quality of life and mood questionnaires will also be administered. Brain MRI data will be collected as part of standard care. Participants will be sent a link to complete the digital cognitive tests at home. Questionnaires will also be sent via email to complete. Data will be collected from brain MRIs obtained as part of standard of care/routine surveillance.

  • Screening visit
  • Baseline visit (2- months)
  • Follow-Up visit (3-month)
  • End of Treatment 2 months after completing treatment (PCNSL only)
  • Final Assessment 12-14 months after baseline (LGG only).
  • Brain MRI (standard of care) based on participant permission

There is no follow-up care as part of this research study.

Participants will complete a battery of digital cognitive tests using the TestMyBrain and Mobile Toolbox platforms, assessing attention, processing speed, executive function, and memory. Assessments will be conducted in clinic and at home at multiple timepoints.
Participants will complete standard paper-and-pencil neuropsychological tests, including WAIS-IV Digit Span, Brief Test of Attention, Symbol Digits Modalities Test, Trail Making Test Parts A and B, Stroop, and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised.
Participants will complete the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Brain (FACT-br) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at baseline and follow-up timepoints.
Brain MRI data will be collected as part of routine clinical care to assess tumor response, stability, or progression, and correlated with cognitive test results.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Evaluating the Construct Validity of Digital Cognitive Tests
Délai: Baseline assessment only, conducted at study enrollment for each participant.
To evaluate the construct validity of digital cognitive tests by comparing domain-specific composite scores derived from traditional neuropsychological and digital cognitive measures of attention, processing speed, executive functioning, and memory. Baseline traditional and digital cognitive data will be collected from PCNSL patients (before chemotherapy) and LGG patients (post-resection). Traditional tests include WAIS-IV Digit Span, Brief Test of Attention, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, Trail Making Test A/B, Stroop, and HVLT-R. Digital platforms include TestMyBrain (Digit Span, Digit Symbol Matching, Trails A/B, Reaction Time, Verbal Paired Associates) and Mobile Toolbox (Arrow Matching, Sequences, Number-Symbol Match, Shape-Color Sorting, and Associative Memory). Moderate to strong correlations between traditional and digital composite domain-specific composite scores will be interpreted as having evidence of convergent validity.
Baseline assessment only, conducted at study enrollment for each participant.
Evaluating the Discriminant Validity of Digital Cognitive Tests with Emotional Wellbeing Measures
Délai: Baseline
To evaluate the discriminant validity of the digital cognitive tests in both cohorts ( PCNSL and LGG) by examining correlations between digital global composite indices of TestMyBrain and Mobile Toolbox tests with the emotional wellbeing subscale of the FACT-BR and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale. For low-grade glioma (LGG) patients, assessments will be conducted at baseline; for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) patients, assessments will be conducted at baseline. Small magnitude correlations are expected to provide evidence of discriminant validity.
Baseline
Assessing Test-Retest Reliability of the Digital Cognitive Tests Across Repeated Administrations and Different Environments.
Délai: Baseline, 6 and 12 month follow ups
Test-retest reliability of the TestMyBrain and Mobile Toolbox cognitive tests will be evaluated in both cohorts (PCNSL and LGG) by examining correlations between baseline test scores of both groups and scores obtained at the 6-month and 12-month follow-up assessments. The baseline evaluation and 12-month evaluations will be completed in the clinic/hospital setting, and the 6-month follow-up digital cognitive tests will be completed at home. Correlations between baseline and 6-month scores will be used to evaluate the reliability of the digital cognitive measures across clinic-to-home testing environments. Correlations between baseline and 12-month scores will be used to evaluate the reliability of the digital cognitive measures across repeated assessments conducted in the same clinic/hospital environment.
Baseline, 6 and 12 month follow ups

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Lakshmi Nayak, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 septembre 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 janvier 2028

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 janvier 2029

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

16 juin 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

13 juillet 2026

Première publication (Réel)

17 juillet 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

17 juillet 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

13 juillet 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juillet 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

OUI

Description du régime IPD

The Dana-Farber / Harvard Cancer Center encourages and supports the responsible and ethical sharing of data from clinical trials. De-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript may only be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement. Requests may be directed to: [contact information for Sponsor Investigator or designee]. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research

Délai de partage IPD

Data can be shared no earlier than 1 year following the date of publication

Critères d'accès au partage IPD

Contact the Belfer office for Dana -Farber Innovations (BODFI) at innovations@dfci.harvard.edu

Type d'informations de prise en charge du partage d'IPD

  • PROTOCOLE D'ÉTUDE
  • SÈVE

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner