Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Neurocognitive Assessment CNSL and LGG

13 luglio 2026 aggiornato da: Lakshmi Nayak, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Neurocognitive Evaluation Using Digital Technology: A Pilot Study in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma and Low-grade Gliomas

This study is to determine whether self-administered digital cognitive tests can serve as accurate and reliable alternatives to established neuropsychological tests for evaluating cognitive functioning in participants with primary central nervous system lymphoma and low-grade gliomas.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

This is a prospective, longitudinal, pilot study evaluating the validity and reliability of select digital cognitive tests compared to traditional neuropsychological measures in participants with newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and IDH-mutant low-grade gliomas (LGG).

Participants will complete both traditional paper-and-pencil neuropsychological tests and digital cognitive assessments at baseline, 6 months, and at post-treatment or 12-month follow-up, depending on diagnosis. Quality of life and mood will be assessed using the FACT-br and HADS questionnaires and Brain MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging). The study will evaluate validity, as well as test-retest reliability of digital cognitive tests, and explore associations between cognitive performance and neuroimaging outcomes.

It is expected about 36 people will participate in this research study within 12 months.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

36

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histopathologically confirmed newly diagnosed primary CNS diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) OR
  • Histopathologically confirmed IDH-M low grade glioma diagnosis in the past 12 months who have not started tumor directed therapy (if applicable).
  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Ability to consent to study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have severe visual impairment that cannot be corrected with glasses to read regular sized print.
  • Patients who have known psychiatric or substance abuse disorders that would interfere with their cooperation in completing the requirements of the study.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Diagnostico
  • Assegnazione: N / A
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione di gruppo singolo
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Altro: Digital Cognitive Assessment

Participants with newly diagnosed PCNSL or IDH-mutant LGG will undergo both traditional neuropsychological testing and digital cognitive assessments (TestMyBrain and Mobile Toolbox) at specified timepoints (baseline, 6 months, post-treatment or 12-14 months). Quality of life and mood questionnaires will also be administered. Brain MRI data will be collected as part of standard care. Participants will be sent a link to complete the digital cognitive tests at home. Questionnaires will also be sent via email to complete. Data will be collected from brain MRIs obtained as part of standard of care/routine surveillance.

  • Screening visit
  • Baseline visit (2- months)
  • Follow-Up visit (3-month)
  • End of Treatment 2 months after completing treatment (PCNSL only)
  • Final Assessment 12-14 months after baseline (LGG only).
  • Brain MRI (standard of care) based on participant permission

There is no follow-up care as part of this research study.

Participants will complete a battery of digital cognitive tests using the TestMyBrain and Mobile Toolbox platforms, assessing attention, processing speed, executive function, and memory. Assessments will be conducted in clinic and at home at multiple timepoints.
Participants will complete standard paper-and-pencil neuropsychological tests, including WAIS-IV Digit Span, Brief Test of Attention, Symbol Digits Modalities Test, Trail Making Test Parts A and B, Stroop, and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised.
Participants will complete the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Brain (FACT-br) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at baseline and follow-up timepoints.
Brain MRI data will be collected as part of routine clinical care to assess tumor response, stability, or progression, and correlated with cognitive test results.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Evaluating the Construct Validity of Digital Cognitive Tests
Lasso di tempo: Baseline assessment only, conducted at study enrollment for each participant.
To evaluate the construct validity of digital cognitive tests by comparing domain-specific composite scores derived from traditional neuropsychological and digital cognitive measures of attention, processing speed, executive functioning, and memory. Baseline traditional and digital cognitive data will be collected from PCNSL patients (before chemotherapy) and LGG patients (post-resection). Traditional tests include WAIS-IV Digit Span, Brief Test of Attention, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, Trail Making Test A/B, Stroop, and HVLT-R. Digital platforms include TestMyBrain (Digit Span, Digit Symbol Matching, Trails A/B, Reaction Time, Verbal Paired Associates) and Mobile Toolbox (Arrow Matching, Sequences, Number-Symbol Match, Shape-Color Sorting, and Associative Memory). Moderate to strong correlations between traditional and digital composite domain-specific composite scores will be interpreted as having evidence of convergent validity.
Baseline assessment only, conducted at study enrollment for each participant.
Evaluating the Discriminant Validity of Digital Cognitive Tests with Emotional Wellbeing Measures
Lasso di tempo: Baseline
To evaluate the discriminant validity of the digital cognitive tests in both cohorts ( PCNSL and LGG) by examining correlations between digital global composite indices of TestMyBrain and Mobile Toolbox tests with the emotional wellbeing subscale of the FACT-BR and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale. For low-grade glioma (LGG) patients, assessments will be conducted at baseline; for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) patients, assessments will be conducted at baseline. Small magnitude correlations are expected to provide evidence of discriminant validity.
Baseline
Assessing Test-Retest Reliability of the Digital Cognitive Tests Across Repeated Administrations and Different Environments.
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 6 and 12 month follow ups
Test-retest reliability of the TestMyBrain and Mobile Toolbox cognitive tests will be evaluated in both cohorts (PCNSL and LGG) by examining correlations between baseline test scores of both groups and scores obtained at the 6-month and 12-month follow-up assessments. The baseline evaluation and 12-month evaluations will be completed in the clinic/hospital setting, and the 6-month follow-up digital cognitive tests will be completed at home. Correlations between baseline and 6-month scores will be used to evaluate the reliability of the digital cognitive measures across clinic-to-home testing environments. Correlations between baseline and 12-month scores will be used to evaluate the reliability of the digital cognitive measures across repeated assessments conducted in the same clinic/hospital environment.
Baseline, 6 and 12 month follow ups

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Lakshmi Nayak, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

1 settembre 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

1 gennaio 2028

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

1 gennaio 2029

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

16 giugno 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

13 luglio 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

17 luglio 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

17 luglio 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

13 luglio 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 luglio 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

Descrizione del piano IPD

The Dana-Farber / Harvard Cancer Center encourages and supports the responsible and ethical sharing of data from clinical trials. De-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript may only be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement. Requests may be directed to: [contact information for Sponsor Investigator or designee]. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research

Periodo di condivisione IPD

Data can be shared no earlier than 1 year following the date of publication

Criteri di accesso alla condivisione IPD

Contact the Belfer office for Dana -Farber Innovations (BODFI) at innovations@dfci.harvard.edu

Tipo di informazioni di supporto alla condivisione IPD

  • STUDIO_PROTOCOLLO
  • LINFA

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

3
Sottoscrivi