Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Effect of Different Apical Motion Algorithms on Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Treatment

16 juillet 2026 mis à jour par: Hatice BÜYÜKÖZER ÖZKAN, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University

The Effect of Using A Single Nickel-Titanium File System With Rotary And Reciprocation Kinematics in Different Apical Motion Modes on Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Treatment

Brief Summary

This prospective, randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the effect of different endodontic motor settings used during root canal treatment on postoperative pain.

During root canal treatment, the inner part of the tooth is cleaned and shaped using specialized rotating instruments. These instruments can operate with different motion patterns, and the motor may respond differently as the instrument approaches the tip of the root. The influence of these technical variations on postoperative pain has not been clearly established.

Adult participants requiring root canal treatment for mandibular premolar teeth will be enrolled in the study. Participants will be randomly assigned to different groups. In each group, root canal treatment will be performed using different motor motion settings. All procedures applied in this study are routine and safe treatment methods commonly used in clinical endodontic practice.

After treatment, participants' pain levels will be monitored through telephone follow-ups. Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). In addition, analgesic intake will be recorded.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether different endodontic motor settings influence postoperative pain and patient comfort following root canal treatment. The findings are expected to contribute to safer and more comfortable root canal treatment protocols.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Detailed Description

Postoperative pain remains one of the most relevant short-term outcomes in endodontic treatment and may be influenced by several mechanical and biological factors during root canal preparation. Among these factors, the kinematics of nickel-titanium instrumentation systems and the apical motion algorithms integrated into endodontic motors may affect debris extrusion, apical stress, and periapical tissue irritation. Although different motor settings are routinely used in clinical practice, the influence of these apical motion modes on postoperative pain has not been sufficiently clarified.

This prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial is designed to investigate the effect of different apical motion algorithms used during root canal treatment on postoperative pain. The study will focus on mandibular premolar teeth diagnosed with chronic apical periodontitis and requiring primary root canal treatment. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of six treatment groups according to the kinematic system used during canal preparation (rotary or reciprocating) and the apical motion mode of the endodontic motor (auto apical stop, auto apical reverse, or off mode).

All treatments will be performed by the investigator using a standardized clinical protocol under local anesthesia and rubber dam isolation. Working length determination, irrigation, ultrasonic activation, canal preparation, obturation, and coronal restoration procedures will be standardized in order to minimize operator- and technique-related variability. A single nickel-titanium file system will be used in all groups to reduce the confounding effect of instrument design.

The main purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of different apical motion modes, under rotary and reciprocating kinematics, results in differences in postoperative pain intensity. In addition, the study seeks to provide clinically relevant evidence regarding whether these motor settings influence patient comfort after treatment. The findings are expected to contribute to the optimization of endodontic instrumentation protocols and to support more evidence-based selection of motor settings in daily clinical practice.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

120

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18-70 years
  • Systemically healthy individuals (ASA I)
  • Mandibular premolar teeth diagnosed with chronic apical periodontitis
  • Periapical Index (PAI) score ≥ 3 confirmed radiographically
  • Teeth indicated for single-visit root canal treatment
  • Patients able to understand and complete the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
  • Written informed consent provided

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with systemic diseases or medically compromised conditions
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  • Use of analgesics or antibiotics within the previous 7 days
  • Teeth with root resorption
  • Teeth with immature apices
  • Previously endodontically treated teeth
  • Patients unable to provide informed consent

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Double

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Rotary + Apical Stop
Participants receive root canal treatment using continuous rotary instrumentation with the auto apical stop function activated.
Standardized primary root canal treatment performed under local anesthesia and rubber dam isolation.
Canal preparation performed using continuous rotary motion.
Endodontic motor operated with the auto apical stop mode activated.
Expérimental: Rotary + Apical Reverse
Participants receive root canal treatment using continuous rotary instrumentation with the auto apical reverse function activated.
Standardized primary root canal treatment performed under local anesthesia and rubber dam isolation.
Canal preparation performed using continuous rotary motion.
Endodontic motor operated with the auto apical reverse mode activated.
Expérimental: Rotary + Apical Off
Participants receive root canal treatment using continuous rotary instrumentation with the apical action mode turned off.
Standardized primary root canal treatment performed under local anesthesia and rubber dam isolation.
Canal preparation performed using continuous rotary motion.
Endodontic motor operated with the apical action mode turned off.
Expérimental: Reciprocating + Apical Stop
Participants receive root canal treatment using reciprocating instrumentation with the auto apical stop function activated.
Standardized primary root canal treatment performed under local anesthesia and rubber dam isolation.
Endodontic motor operated with the auto apical stop mode activated.
Canal preparation performed using reciprocating motion.
Expérimental: Reciprocating + Apical Reverse
Participants receive root canal treatment using reciprocating instrumentation with the auto apical reverse function activated.
Standardized primary root canal treatment performed under local anesthesia and rubber dam isolation.
Endodontic motor operated with the auto apical reverse mode activated.
Canal preparation performed using reciprocating motion.
Expérimental: Reciprocating + Apical Off
Participants receive root canal treatment using reciprocating instrumentation with the apical action mode turned off.
Standardized primary root canal treatment performed under local anesthesia and rubber dam isolation.
Endodontic motor operated with the apical action mode turned off.
Canal preparation performed using reciprocating motion.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Postoperative Pain Intensity
Délai: Repeated measurements at 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 7 days after treatment.
Postoperative pain intensity will be assessed using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Higher scores indicate greater postoperative pain intensity. The same outcome measure will be assessed repeatedly at predefined postoperative time points to evaluate changes in postoperative pain intensity over time.
Repeated measurements at 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 7 days after treatment.

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Analgesic Intake
Délai: Within 7 days after treatment
Analgesic intake will be assessed as the total number of analgesic tablets taken by each participant during the first 7 days after treatment.
Within 7 days after treatment

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Hatice BÜYÜKÖZER ÖZKAN, Associate Professor, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

20 juillet 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

15 février 2027

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

15 mars 2027

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

11 mars 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

16 juillet 2026

Première publication (Réel)

20 juillet 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

20 juillet 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

16 juillet 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juillet 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Description du régime IPD

Individual participant data will not be shared due to ethical restrictions, institutional policies, and the requirements of the Turkish Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 6698, KVKK). Participant confidentiality will be strictly protected, and the collected data will be used solely for the purposes of the approved study protocol.

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner