Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Soft and Hard Tissue Healing Following Alveolar Ridge Preservation of Mandibular Third Molar Extraction Socket Filled With Auto Tooth Bone Graft or Alloplastic Graft (AutoToothGraft)

26 juillet 2026 mis à jour par: Tan Chuey Chuan, University of Malaya
This study compared two bone graft materials: 1. Auto Tooth Bone (ATB) (made from the patient's own extracted tooth) and 2. EthOss® a synthetic alternative. This is to see how well they prevent bone and gum damage after lower wisdom tooth removal. In this split-mouth trial, participants had both lower wisdom teeth removed, with one socket receiving ATB and the other receiving EthOss®. Over a 24-week follow-up period, researchers tracked patient clinically on their comfort, gum healing, and new bone growth using X-rays. The study found that both materials performed similarly and showing no significant differences in pain, swelling, complications, or gum healing. While there was a statistical difference in final bone depth. Both grafts successfully stimulated new bone growth, proving that ATB and EthOss® are equally safe, reliable, and effective options for supporting recovery after wisdom tooth surgery.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Description détaillée

Surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars may lead to complications that include periodontal defects at the second molar. Alveolar socket preservation with graft material can reduce this complication. This study aims to assess the soft and hard tissue healing of the surgical sites following the removal of impacted mandibular third molars with alveolar socket preservation using auto tooth bone graft (ATB) or EthOss® alloplastic graft and comparing for any difference between both grafts. This is a split-mouth, double blinded, randomized controlled study. Participants underwent surgical removal of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars with either socket filled with ATB or EthOss® alloplastic graft. The participants were reviewed 1 week and 4 weeks post-operative for signs of graft reaction/rejection. Periodontal assessments were performed at post-operative week 12 and 24 to assess the soft tissue healing. Radiological assessment was done at post-operative week 24 to assess bone depth. There was no significant difference between ATB and EthOss® graft in the healing of the soft tissue adjacent to the sockets, post-operative sequelae (pain, trismus and facial swelling) or post-operative complications. However, a statistically significant difference was observed in bone depth within both groups. The healing outcomes and bone quality achieved with ATB and EthOss® are comparable. Both materials have demonstrated effective osteoconductive properties, making them reliable materials for bone regeneration. This equivalency in clinical performance supports the use of either material as viable alternatives for bone regeneration procedures with predictable results.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

12

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Wilayah Perseketuan Kuala Lumpur
      • Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Perseketuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaisie, 50603
        • Faculty of Dentistry Universiti Malaya

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who requires surgical removal of bilateral impacted M3.

    • Patient with impacted bilateral M3 which are sound.
    • Impacted bilateral M3 classified as Class I or II with Level A or B according to Pell and Gregory's classification.
    • Presence of M2 adjacent to the M3 to be extracted.
    • Patient aged 18 to 35 years old.
    • Patient with periodontal status of:
    • Basic Periodontal Score (BPE) 2 at lower right and lower left sextants.
    • Full mouth plaque score <30%.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Impacted M3 associated in the following conditions:

    • Fracture of angle of mandible.
    • Radiological evidence of cyst or tumour.
    • Incomplete root formation.
    • Acute pulpitis or severe pericoronitis that is not under-controlled.
    • Gross dental caries.

      • Retained roots of mandibular third molar with history of removal of unerupted/impacted M3.
      • Patient's age <18 years old or > 35 years old
      • M2 with periapical inflammation, periodontitis, distal caries or delayed or non-responsive pulp sensibility test to exclude tooth with perio-endo lesion.
      • Pregnant woman.
      • Patient on oral contraceptives.
      • Current or previous bisphosphonate therapy or history of radiotherapy to the jaws.
      • Active smoker.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
  • Masquage: Tripler

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: Auto Tooth Graft
This is a split-mouth, randomized, within-subject clinical trial using a crossover assignment model. Each participant serves as their own control, receiving both Intervention 1. Auto Tooth Graft and Intervention 2. Ethoss alloplast material simultaneously on opposite sides of the lower third molar
auto tooth graft (dentin graft) is taken from patient's extracted lower wisdom tooth. Ethoss is a synthetic material
Comparateur actif: Ethoss
This is a split-mouth, randomized, within-subject clinical trial using a crossover assignment model. Each participant serves as their own control, receiving both Intervention 1. Auto Tooth Graft and Intervention 2. Ethoss alloplast material simultaneously on opposite sides of the lower third molar
auto tooth graft (dentin graft) is taken from patient's extracted lower wisdom tooth. Ethoss is a synthetic material

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Periodontal health assessment on lower second molar
Délai: baseline on day of surgery, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after surgery
  1. Modified Plaque Score (from Score 0: No plaque present. Score 1: No visible plaque, but a periodontal probe skimmed across the tooth surface reveals soft plaque biofilm on the tip. Score 2: Visible plaque that can be easily seen with the naked eye without using a probe., modified bleeding score and gingival recession, periodontal pocketing depth)-- the lower the score, the better the periodontal health.
  2. Modified Bleeding Score (Score 0: No bleeding observed after probing. Score 1: Bleeding is present.)-- the lower the score, the better the periodontal health.
  3. Periodontal Pocketing Depth (PPD) (measurement in milimeter, 1-3mm indicate healthy sulcus while >5mm indicate periodontal disesase)-- the lower the score, the better the periodontal health.
  4. Gingival Recession- measurement in mm for gingival margin below the cementoenamel junction. - the lower the score, the better the periodontal health.
baseline on day of surgery, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after surgery

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Bone gain
Délai: radiograph taken prior to surgery and 24 weeks after surgery
Comparing bone gain in lower third molar socket by comparing pre operative and post operative radiograph. Measurement in milimeter.
radiograph taken prior to surgery and 24 weeks after surgery

Autres mesures de résultats

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Pain, swelling and mouth opening
Délai: Prior to surgery, 1 week and 4 weeks after the surgery
clinical measurement of the mouth opening (in milimeter) and pain (Visual analog scale 0 to 10 from no pain to most pain) and swelling of the cheek (measured as the sum of the length of the two lines along the pre-determined facial reference points from the outer corner of the eye to the angle of mandible and tragus of the ear to the corner of the mouth. This was performed using a measuring tape. The percentage of facial swelling was calculated based on the differences between baseline measurements with measurements taken during baseline)
Prior to surgery, 1 week and 4 weeks after the surgery

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Chuey Chuan Tan, MClinDent (OMFS), Universiti Malaya, Malaysia
  • Directeur d'études: Wei Cheong Ngeow, Phd, University of Malaya

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

  • 1. NICE. Guidance on the Extraction of Wisdom Teeth. NICE Guidance 2000. Available from: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta1/chapter/2-Clinical-need-and-practice (accessed 2026 June 9). 2. Kan KW, Liu JK, Lo EC, Corbet EF, Leung WK. Residual periodontal defects distal to the mandibular second molar 6-36 months after impacted third molar extraction. J Clin Periodontol 2002:29:1004-1011. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.291105.x. 3. Renton T, Coulthard P, Chiu G, Master S, Brookes V, Atack N, et al. Parameters of care for patients undergoing mandibular third molar surgery. Faculty of Dental Surgery, The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2020. Available from: www.rcseng.ac.uk/-/media/files/rcs/fds/guidelines/3rd-molar-guidelines--april-2021.pdf (accessed 2026 June 9). 4. Zhang Y, Chen X, Zhou Z, Hao Y, Li H, Cheng Y, et al. Effects of Impacted Lower Third Molar Extraction on Periodontal Tissue of the Adjacent Second Molar. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2021:17:235-247. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S298147. 5. Bouloux GF, Steed MB, Perciaccante VJ. Complications of third molar surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2007:19:117-128, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2006.11.013. 6. Cho H, Lynham AJ, Hsu E. Postoperative interventions to reduce inflammatory complications after third molar surgery: review of the current evidence. Aust Dent J 2017:62:412-419. doi: 10.1111/adj.12526. 7. Kumar N, Prasad K, Ramanujam L, K R, Dexith J, Chauhan A. Evaluation of treatment outcome after impacted mandibular third molar surgery with the use of autologous platelet-rich fibrin: a randomized controlled clinical study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015:73:1042-1049. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.11.013. 8. Nguyen NT, Le SH, Nguyen BT. The effect of autologous demineralized dentin matrix on postoperative complications and wound healing following lower third molar surgery: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial. J Dent Sci 2025:20:553-559. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.04.026. 9. Peng KY, Tseng YC, Shen EC, Chiu SC, Fu E, Huang YW. M

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

1 août 2023

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 octobre 2025

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 octobre 2025

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

7 juillet 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

20 juillet 2026

Première publication (Réel)

23 juillet 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

28 juillet 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

26 juillet 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juillet 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • DF OS2316/0084 (P)
  • UMG027E-2023 (Autre subvention/numéro de financement: Universiti Internal Grant (DPRG))

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Description du régime IPD

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared to protect participant confidentiality and privacy. The informed consent approved by the Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board (IRB) did not include explicit authorization from participants for secondary data sharing or broad external repository deposition. Furthermore, due to the granular nature of the clinical data collected, full de-identification cannot be guaranteed without risk of re-identification. Aggregate data, summary statistics, and primary outcomes will instead be made available through peer-reviewed publications.

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner