Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Sequential Case Triangle-Based Learning and Psychosocial Care Competency in Nursing Students

30 juillet 2026 mis à jour par: Seda Er, Medipol University

Effect of Sequential Case Triangle-Based Project-Based Learning on Psychosocial Care Competency, Cooperative Learning, and Clinical Reasoning in Nursing Students

This study will look at whether a teaching method called "Sequential Case Triangle-Based Project-Based Learning" helps nursing students learn psychosocial care skills better. The study will take place during a Psychosocial Nursing course for fourth-year nursing students. Students will be divided into groups. Each group will work on one part of a patient case (creating the case, assessing it, or planning nursing care) using short role-play videos, building on the work of the group before them. Before and after the course, students will complete surveys measuring their psychosocial care competency, teamwork (cooperative learning) skills, and clinical reasoning skills. The study will compare students' scores before and after the course to see if this teaching method improved these skills.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

Background: Nursing education aims to develop critical thinking, problem-solving, and clinical reasoning skills, alongside the ability to provide holistic psychosocial care. Case-based and project-based learning are student-centered strategies shown to support these outcomes, but their combined application in a sequential, team-dependent format has not been widely studied in psychosocial nursing education.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of a Sequential Case Triangle-based project-based learning approach, applied within a Psychosocial Nursing course, on nursing students' self-assessed psychosocial care competency, cooperative learning, and clinical reasoning levels.

Hypotheses:

H1: Students' psychosocial care competency self-assessment scores will increase after the intervention.

H2: Students' cooperative learning scores will increase after the intervention. H3: Students' clinical reasoning levels will increase after the intervention.

Design: Single-group, pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design.

Setting: Fourth-year nursing students enrolled in the "Psychosocial Nursing" elective course (Turkish-medium and English-medium sections) at Istanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, during the 2025-2026 spring semester.

Intervention: Over the 15-week course, the class was divided into 20 main groups of 9 to 12 students each (179 participants in total), and every main group was split into three subgroups responsible for a sequential stage of the nursing process: case creation (depicting psychosocial responses to illness), psychosocial assessment, and planning/implementing psychosocial nursing interventions. Each subgroup prepared a short role-play video for its stage and submitted it to the course instructor, who forwarded it unedited to the next subgroup. Subgroups had no access to or prior knowledge of the case content created by the preceding subgroup; each stage was developed solely on the basis of the video received, without the ability to view or revise earlier work. In the final stage, the three videos were combined into one case narrative and discussed in class.

Outcomes were assessed using validated self-report instruments, administered face-to-face at baseline (course week 1) and post-intervention (course week 15).

Statistical Analysis: Data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0. Descriptive statistics (mean, SD, median, min-max for quantitative variables; frequency and percentage for categorical variables) were reported. Pretest-posttest comparisons used the paired-samples t-test; group comparisons used the Student's t-test (two groups) or one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test (three or more groups); associations between variables were assessed with Pearson correlation. Significance was set at p<0.05, 95% confidence interval.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

179

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

  • Turquie (Türkiye)
    • Kavacık
      • Istanbul, Kavacık, Turquie (Türkiye), 34810
        • Istanbul Medipol University

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Enfant
  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Enrolled in the "Psychosocial Nursing" elective course
  • Willing to voluntarily participate in the study and sign the Informed Consent Form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to complete the course (e.g., more than five absences, failure to submit the project assignment, or withdrawal from the course)

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Autre
  • Répartition: N / A
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Groupe expérimental
Comportemental: Sequential Case Triangle Based Project
Intervention: Over the 15-week course, the class was divided into 20 main groups of 9 to 12 students each and every main group was split into three subgroups responsible for a sequential stage of the nursing process: case creation (depicting psychosocial responses to illness), psychosocial assessment, and planning/implementing psychosocial nursing interventions. Each subgroup prepared a short role-play video for its stage and submitted it to the course instructor, who forwarded it unedited to the next subgroup. Subgroups had no access to or prior knowledge of the case content created by the preceding subgroup; each stage was developed solely on the basis of the video received, without the ability to view or revise earlier work. In the final stage, the three videos were combined into one case narrative and discussed in class.
Autres noms:
  • Sequential Case Triangle-Based Project-Based Learning Approach

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Psychosocial Care Competency Self-Assessment
Délai: Baseline (course week 1) and post-intervention (course week 15)
The Psychosocial Care Competency Self-Assessment Scale is an 18-item, 5-point Likert-type self-report scale with four subscales (symptom identification, use of knowledge, intervention, and diagnosis). Total scores range from 18 (minimum) to 90 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better self-assessed psychosocial care competency.
Baseline (course week 1) and post-intervention (course week 15)
Clinical Reasoning
Délai: Baseline (course week 1) and post-intervention (course week 15)
The Clinical Reasoning Scale for Nursing Students is a 16-item, 5-point Likert-type self-report scale with four subscales (awareness of clinical clues, verification of clinical problems, action determination and implementation, and evaluation and reflection). Total scores range from 16 (minimum) to 80 (maximum), with higher scores indicating a higher level of clinical reasoning.
Baseline (course week 1) and post-intervention (course week 15)

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Cooperative Learning
Délai: Baseline (course week 1) and post-intervention (course week 15)
The Cooperative Learning Scale is a 15-item, 5-point Likert-type self-report scale with five factors (interpersonal skills, group processing, positive interdependence, supportive interaction, and individual accountability), with no reverse-scored items. Total scores range from 15 (minimum) to 75 (maximum), with higher scores indicating higher cooperative learning skills.
Baseline (course week 1) and post-intervention (course week 15)

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Medipol University

Les enquêteurs

  • Chaise d'étude: Seda Er, Medipol University

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

  • Thought process Thought process 2,000 karakter sınırına uyacak şekilde sadece ölçeklerin geçerlik/uyarlama kaynaklarını seçtim (arka plan/literatür atıflarını çıkardım): Karataş, H., Kelleci, M.; Psikososyal Bakım Yetkinliği Öz Değerlendirme Ölçeği'nin geliştirilmesi geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması; Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi; 2021; 12(3); 263-271. Fernandez-Rio, J., Cecchini, J. A., Morgan, K., Mendez-Gimenez, A., Lloyd, R.; Validation of the cooperative learning scale and cooperation global factor using bifactor structural equation modelling; Psicología Educativa; 2022; 28(2); 91-97. Güngör, P., Kaya Uyanık, G., Yeşil, R.; İşbirlikli Öğrenme Ölçeği: Türkçeye Uyarlama Çalışması; MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi; 2025; 14(Eğitim Bilimleri Ek Sayısı); 31-49. Huang, H. M., Huang, C. Y., Lin, K. C., Yu, C. H., Cheng, S. F.; Development and psychometric testing of the clinical reasoning scale among nursing students enrolled in three types of programs in Taiwan; Journal of Nursing Research; 2023; 31(2); e263. Bal, B., Kaba, N. K., Öztürk, H.; Hemşirelik Öğrencileri için Klinik Muhakeme Ölçeğinin Türkçe Geçerliği ve Güvenirliği: Bir Metodolojik Çalışma; Journal of Nursology; 2024; 27(2); 129-135.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

9 février 2026

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

18 mai 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

18 mai 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

26 juillet 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

26 juillet 2026

Première publication (Réel)

30 juillet 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

31 juillet 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

30 juillet 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juillet 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Mots clés

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • E-10840098-50.04-1698

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner