Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Sequential Case Triangle-Based Learning and Psychosocial Care Competency in Nursing Students

30 juli 2026 bijgewerkt door: Seda Er, Medipol University

Effect of Sequential Case Triangle-Based Project-Based Learning on Psychosocial Care Competency, Cooperative Learning, and Clinical Reasoning in Nursing Students

This study will look at whether a teaching method called "Sequential Case Triangle-Based Project-Based Learning" helps nursing students learn psychosocial care skills better. The study will take place during a Psychosocial Nursing course for fourth-year nursing students. Students will be divided into groups. Each group will work on one part of a patient case (creating the case, assessing it, or planning nursing care) using short role-play videos, building on the work of the group before them. Before and after the course, students will complete surveys measuring their psychosocial care competency, teamwork (cooperative learning) skills, and clinical reasoning skills. The study will compare students' scores before and after the course to see if this teaching method improved these skills.

Studie Overzicht

Toestand

Voltooid

Conditie

Interventie / Behandeling

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

Background: Nursing education aims to develop critical thinking, problem-solving, and clinical reasoning skills, alongside the ability to provide holistic psychosocial care. Case-based and project-based learning are student-centered strategies shown to support these outcomes, but their combined application in a sequential, team-dependent format has not been widely studied in psychosocial nursing education.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of a Sequential Case Triangle-based project-based learning approach, applied within a Psychosocial Nursing course, on nursing students' self-assessed psychosocial care competency, cooperative learning, and clinical reasoning levels.

Hypotheses:

H1: Students' psychosocial care competency self-assessment scores will increase after the intervention.

H2: Students' cooperative learning scores will increase after the intervention. H3: Students' clinical reasoning levels will increase after the intervention.

Design: Single-group, pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design.

Setting: Fourth-year nursing students enrolled in the "Psychosocial Nursing" elective course (Turkish-medium and English-medium sections) at Istanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, during the 2025-2026 spring semester.

Intervention: Over the 15-week course, the class was divided into 20 main groups of 9 to 12 students each (179 participants in total), and every main group was split into three subgroups responsible for a sequential stage of the nursing process: case creation (depicting psychosocial responses to illness), psychosocial assessment, and planning/implementing psychosocial nursing interventions. Each subgroup prepared a short role-play video for its stage and submitted it to the course instructor, who forwarded it unedited to the next subgroup. Subgroups had no access to or prior knowledge of the case content created by the preceding subgroup; each stage was developed solely on the basis of the video received, without the ability to view or revise earlier work. In the final stage, the three videos were combined into one case narrative and discussed in class.

Outcomes were assessed using validated self-report instruments, administered face-to-face at baseline (course week 1) and post-intervention (course week 15).

Statistical Analysis: Data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0. Descriptive statistics (mean, SD, median, min-max for quantitative variables; frequency and percentage for categorical variables) were reported. Pretest-posttest comparisons used the paired-samples t-test; group comparisons used the Student's t-test (two groups) or one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test (three or more groups); associations between variables were assessed with Pearson correlation. Significance was set at p<0.05, 95% confidence interval.

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Werkelijk)

179

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studie Locaties

  • Turkije (Türkiye)
    • Kavacık
      • Istanbul, Kavacık, Turkije (Türkiye), 34810
        • Istanbul Medipol University

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

  • Kind
  • Volwassen
  • Oudere volwassene

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Ja

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Enrolled in the "Psychosocial Nursing" elective course
  • Willing to voluntarily participate in the study and sign the Informed Consent Form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to complete the course (e.g., more than five absences, failure to submit the project assignment, or withdrawal from the course)

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Ander
  • Toewijzing: NVT
  • Interventioneel model: Opdracht voor een enkele groep
  • Masker: Geen (open label)

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Experimenteel: Experimentele groep
Gedragsmatig: Sequential Case Triangle Based Project
Intervention: Over the 15-week course, the class was divided into 20 main groups of 9 to 12 students each and every main group was split into three subgroups responsible for a sequential stage of the nursing process: case creation (depicting psychosocial responses to illness), psychosocial assessment, and planning/implementing psychosocial nursing interventions. Each subgroup prepared a short role-play video for its stage and submitted it to the course instructor, who forwarded it unedited to the next subgroup. Subgroups had no access to or prior knowledge of the case content created by the preceding subgroup; each stage was developed solely on the basis of the video received, without the ability to view or revise earlier work. In the final stage, the three videos were combined into one case narrative and discussed in class.
Andere namen:
  • Sequential Case Triangle-Based Project-Based Learning Approach

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Psychosocial Care Competency Self-Assessment
Tijdsspanne: Baseline (course week 1) and post-intervention (course week 15)
The Psychosocial Care Competency Self-Assessment Scale is an 18-item, 5-point Likert-type self-report scale with four subscales (symptom identification, use of knowledge, intervention, and diagnosis). Total scores range from 18 (minimum) to 90 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better self-assessed psychosocial care competency.
Baseline (course week 1) and post-intervention (course week 15)
Clinical Reasoning
Tijdsspanne: Baseline (course week 1) and post-intervention (course week 15)
The Clinical Reasoning Scale for Nursing Students is a 16-item, 5-point Likert-type self-report scale with four subscales (awareness of clinical clues, verification of clinical problems, action determination and implementation, and evaluation and reflection). Total scores range from 16 (minimum) to 80 (maximum), with higher scores indicating a higher level of clinical reasoning.
Baseline (course week 1) and post-intervention (course week 15)

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Cooperative Learning
Tijdsspanne: Baseline (course week 1) and post-intervention (course week 15)
The Cooperative Learning Scale is a 15-item, 5-point Likert-type self-report scale with five factors (interpersonal skills, group processing, positive interdependence, supportive interaction, and individual accountability), with no reverse-scored items. Total scores range from 15 (minimum) to 75 (maximum), with higher scores indicating higher cooperative learning skills.
Baseline (course week 1) and post-intervention (course week 15)

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Sponsor

Medipol University

Onderzoekers

  • Studie stoel: Seda Er, Medipol University

Publicaties en nuttige links

De persoon die verantwoordelijk is voor het invoeren van informatie over het onderzoek stelt deze publicaties vrijwillig ter beschikking. Dit kan gaan over alles wat met het onderzoek te maken heeft.

Algemene publicaties

  • Thought process Thought process 2,000 karakter sınırına uyacak şekilde sadece ölçeklerin geçerlik/uyarlama kaynaklarını seçtim (arka plan/literatür atıflarını çıkardım): Karataş, H., Kelleci, M.; Psikososyal Bakım Yetkinliği Öz Değerlendirme Ölçeği'nin geliştirilmesi geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması; Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi; 2021; 12(3); 263-271. Fernandez-Rio, J., Cecchini, J. A., Morgan, K., Mendez-Gimenez, A., Lloyd, R.; Validation of the cooperative learning scale and cooperation global factor using bifactor structural equation modelling; Psicología Educativa; 2022; 28(2); 91-97. Güngör, P., Kaya Uyanık, G., Yeşil, R.; İşbirlikli Öğrenme Ölçeği: Türkçeye Uyarlama Çalışması; MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi; 2025; 14(Eğitim Bilimleri Ek Sayısı); 31-49. Huang, H. M., Huang, C. Y., Lin, K. C., Yu, C. H., Cheng, S. F.; Development and psychometric testing of the clinical reasoning scale among nursing students enrolled in three types of programs in Taiwan; Journal of Nursing Research; 2023; 31(2); e263. Bal, B., Kaba, N. K., Öztürk, H.; Hemşirelik Öğrencileri için Klinik Muhakeme Ölçeğinin Türkçe Geçerliği ve Güvenirliği: Bir Metodolojik Çalışma; Journal of Nursology; 2024; 27(2); 129-135.

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Werkelijk)

9 februari 2026

Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)

18 mei 2026

Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)

18 mei 2026

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

26 juli 2026

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

26 juli 2026

Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)

30 juli 2026

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

31 juli 2026

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

30 juli 2026

Laatst geverifieerd

1 juli 2026

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Trefwoorden

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • E-10840098-50.04-1698

Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)

Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?

NEE

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Nee

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren