- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT07752498
Long-term Stability of Treatment With the Twin Block Appliance
The objective of this observational study is to investigate the long-term stability of treatment with the Twin block appliance in a patient group previously treated with a Twin block appliance. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does treatment with the Twin block appliance give a lasting treatment result or does the bite relapse over time due to different factors such as short treatment time, compliance or the patient's natural growth pattern?
- How many patients that had received treatment with Twin block appliance required additional treatment with fixed appliances and for what reason?
Researchers will compare the patients present bite at (T2) by using study casts and cephalometric x-rays and compare this data with previous registrations made pre- (T0) and post-treatment (T1). Additional factors, such as how much relapse a patient has on average, will also be investigated.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Description détaillée
Orthodontic treatment during growth is called interceptive orthodontics. The objective is to affect the growth of the jaws and the position of the teeth with the assistance of a removable orthodontic appliance. One such appliance is the Twin block appliance, which is used to treat patients with an Angle class II malocclusion (Clark et al., 2022). The prevalence of Angle class II malocclusion is approximately 25% (Proffit et al., 2013).
There is however a lack of studies on the long term treatment stability of the Twin block appliance (Ehsani et al., 2015). Treatment with removable appliances also carry a great cost for both the individual, the parents and for society as a whole (Permert et al., 1998). The objective of the present study is to present guidelines concerning which patients that would benefit the most from treatment with Twin block appliance over time.
The present study will use a previous patient material consisting of 72 patients from the study by Frilund et al., (2023) "Patient compliance with Twin Block appliance during treatment of Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial on two check-up prescriptions" to review the long term stability of treatment with Twin block appliance. These 72 patients were previously treated with a Twin block appliance. Their records will be reviewed to find patients who have had no additional orthodontic treament, and these patients will be asked to participate in the present study. If they accept, their present bite (T2) will be registered by study casts and with a cephalometric x-ray. This data (T2) will then be compared with their study casts and cephalometric data before treatment start (T0) and after treatment (T1). The main variables that will be investigated are overjet, overbite and molar relationship, as well as cephalometric values. The collected material will also be dichotomized into two groups, one with optimal current status with a neutral molar relation and a horizontal overjet of 4 mm or less, and one with a suboptimal current status presenting an angle class II molar relationship and/or an overjet greater that 4 mm.
The patients that recieved additional orthodontic treatment after their treatment with Twin block appliance will also be investigated to compare the reason for them having additional treatment and to investigate if the primary reason was relapse or other additional factors.
Statistical analysis of collected data will be perfofmed with the appropriate stastical models, depending on if the data has a normal distribution or not.
The study has recieved ethical approval from the ethical board at the University of Linköping, Dnr 2025-08312-02. All patients will have to give their informed consent to participate in the study by signing a consent form.
Results will be published in appropriate medical journals and at interdisciplinary conferences and lectures.
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Contacts et emplacements
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Jönköping County
-
Jönköping, Jönköping County, Suède, 551 11
- The Institute of Postgraduate Dental Education
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Enfant
- Adulte
- Adulte plus âgé
Accepte les volontaires sains
Méthode d'échantillonnage
Population étudiée
The patient cohort was originally recruited and treated from December 2018 to October 2020 The inclusion criteria for the previous study were healthy patients according to the American Society of Anaesthesiology Classification (ASA I and II), aged 8-14 years at treatment start and with an overjet of 6 mm or more together with an incomplete lip closure.
Exclusion criteria were severe chronic conditions such as asthma and allergy, neuropsychiatric disorders, craniofacial syndromes, and previous orthodontic treatment. Recruitment of the patients continued until the number of participants met the estimated sample size.
This patient group were then contacted again for recruitement to the present study during June 2026 to August 2026.
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient participated in the previous study "Patient compliance with Twin Block appliance during treatment of Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial on two check-up prescriptions" .Eur J Orthod. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjac046
Exclusion Criteria:
None
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
Cohortes et interventions
Groupe / Cohorte |
|---|
|
Long term follow-up without additional orthodontic treatment
Patients that recieved treatment with Twin block, without having recieved additional treatment afterwards.
|
|
Long term follow-up with additional orthodontic treatment
Patients that recieved treatment with Twin block and then also required additional treatment afterwards.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in horisontal overjet
Délai: From enrollment (T0) to follow up (T2), about 6 years later.
|
The difference in horisontal overjet measured in millimeters at follow up (T2), compared with pre- (T0) and post-treatment (T1) values.
|
From enrollment (T0) to follow up (T2), about 6 years later.
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Molar relationship
Délai: From enrollment (T0) to follow up (T2), about 6 years later.
|
Molar relationship at follow-up (T2), compared to molar relationship pre-(T0) and post-treatment (T1).
|
From enrollment (T0) to follow up (T2), about 6 years later.
|
|
Overbite
Délai: From enrollment (T0) to follow up (T2), about 6 years later.
|
The difference in vertical overjet measured in millimeters at follow up (T2), compared with pre- (T0) and post-treatment (T1) values.
|
From enrollment (T0) to follow up (T2), about 6 years later.
|
|
Cephalometric data
Délai: From enrollment (T0) to follow up (T2), about 6 years later.
|
Comparing cephalometric values of SNA, SNB and ANB pre- (T0), post-treatment (T1) and at follow-up (T2).
|
From enrollment (T0) to follow up (T2), about 6 years later.
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Anders Magnusson, Med dr., Region Jönköping
Publications et liens utiles
Publications générales
- O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Chadwick S, Connolly I, Cook P, Birnie D, Hammond M, Harradine N, Lewis D, McDade C, Mitchell L, Murray A, O'Neill J, Read M, Robinson S, Roberts-Harry D, Sandler J, Shaw I, Berk NW. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 2: Psychosocial effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Nov;124(5):488-94; discussion 494-5. doi: 10.1016/S0889540603006425.
- Ehsani S, Nebbe B, Normando D, Lagravere MO, Flores-Mir C. Short-term treatment effects produced by the Twin-block appliance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2015 Apr;37(2):170-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju030. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
- Permert L, Karlander EL, Wilhelm E. Treatment of malocclusions in children and adolescents at a public dental service clinic in Sweden: extent and cost. Swed Dent J. 1998;22(5-6):187-93.
- Cacciatore G, Ugolini A, Sforza C, Gbinigie O, Pluddemann A. Long-term effects of functional appliances in treated versus untreated patients with Class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019 Sep 6;14(9):e0221624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221624. eCollection 2019.
- Frilund E, Sonesson M, Magnusson A. Patient compliance with Twin Block appliance during treatment of Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial on two check-up prescriptions. Eur J Orthod. 2023 Mar 31;45(2):142-149. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjac046.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- Dnr 2025-08312-02
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Description du régime IPD
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .