Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Home-Based Supportive Care Program for NMIBC Patients Receiving Intravesical Perfusion: Construction and Preliminary Application (NMIBC-HSC)

Construction and Preliminary Application of Home-Based Supportive Care Program for Patients With Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Undergoing Intravesical Perfusion Therapy

This study focuses on patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer who receive intravesical perfusion therapy. Outpatient perfusion treatment is usually short-term and procedure-oriented, so patients often lack continuous, comprehensive support after returning home, and may face physical discomfort, psychological stress and unmet self-management needs during home recovery. This study aims to identify real-world difficulties and needs of patients in home-based recovery, construct a personalized home supportive care program covering physical symptom relief, psychological support and disease management education, and test its preliminary application effect. It is expected to reduce patients' treatment-related discomfort, improve treatment adherence, and enhance their quality of life.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

(1)Identification of Supportive Care Needs for Patients Receiving Postoperative Intravesical Chemotherapy for Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (Qualitative Study): Employing a descriptive qualitative research approach based on the Supportive Care Needs Framework, semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with patients undergoing postoperative intravesical chemotherapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). This systematically explored the authentic care needs of patients across multiple dimensions including physiological, psychological, social, emotional, spiritual, informational, and practical aspects, providing precise evidence for subsequent scheme development.

(2) Summary of Best Evidence for Supportive Care of NMIBC Patients Undergoing Postoperative Intravesical Chemotherapy (Evidence-Based Research): Centered on the core needs identified through qualitative research, an evidence-based nursing research methodology was utilized. Systematic retrieval of domestic and international databases, guideline websites, and evidence-based resource libraries was performed. The retrieved clinical guidelines, expert consensus statements, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and quasi-experimental studies underwent rigorous quality assessment and evidence extraction to formulate a comprehensive summary of best supportive care evidence for this population.

(3) Development of a Supportive Care Scheme for NMIBC Patients Undergoing Postoperative Intravesical Chemotherapy (Delphi Method): Integrating patient needs derived from qualitative research with best evidence from evidence-based research, a draft supportive care scheme was formulated. The Delphi expert consultation method was employed, inviting experts from urology medicine, nursing, and rehabilitation fields to participate in two rounds of consultations. Through calculation of expert positive coefficient, authority coefficient, and Kendall's harmony coefficient, items were screened and revised, ultimately constructing a scientific, systematic, and operable supportive care scheme.

(4) Evaluation of the Feasibility of the Supportive Care Scheme: Following scheme formulation, feasibility evaluation was conducted using NMIBC patients receiving postoperative intravesical chemotherapy attending the outpatient department of a tertiary hospital in Nanjing. Participants were divided into an intervention group (receiving the newly developed supportive care scheme) and a control group (receiving routine outpatient care). During the study, patient recruitment and retention rates, intervention implementation processes, and compliance were observed and recorded. Post-intervention, acceptability of the scheme and perceived implementation burden by both patients and staff were collected to evaluate its feasibility in clinical practice.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

40

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

  • Nom: Chunhua Zheng, Bachelor
  • Numéro de téléphone: +8613584042177
  • E-mail: 303618002@qq.com

Lieux d'étude

    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, Chine, 210001
        • Nanjing First Hospital

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients pathologically diagnosed with NMIBC, who have undergone TURBT and are receiving intravesical perfusion therapy; Aged 18 years old or above; Clear consciousness with basic literacy and communication skills; Expected survival time ≥ 6 months; Voluntary participation with signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients complicated with severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, hepatic or renal dysfunction, or mental disorders; Patients combined with other malignant tumors; Patients with a history of severe allergic reactions or contraindications to intravesical perfusion therapy.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Soins de soutien
  • Répartition: Non randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Supportive care program
Establishing a Dedicated Nursing Team: The team consists of one urology specialty nurse (team leader), one attending physician, one rehabilitation therapist, one dietitian, one psychological counselor, and the researchers of this study. All members received uniform protocol training prior to intervention to ensure homogeneity in intervention delivery. This comprehensive supportive care program is implemented for patients undergoing post-operative intravesical therapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, encompassing physiological/practical support, informational support, psychological/emotional support, and social/spiritual support, with the aim of enhancing treatment adherence and quality of life.
Establishing a Dedicated Nursing Team: The team consists of one urology specialty nurse (team leader), one attending physician, one rehabilitation therapist, one dietitian, one psychological counselor, and the researchers of this study. All members received uniform protocol training prior to intervention to ensure homogeneity in intervention delivery. This comprehensive supportive care program is implemented for patients undergoing post-operative intravesical therapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, encompassing physiological/practical support, informational support, psychological/emotional support, and social/spiritual support, with the aim of enhancing treatment adherence and quality of life.
Comparateur actif: Implementing routine urology outpatient infusion nursing
Includes: routine medical history inquiry and verification prior to infusion; monitoring of the patient's vital signs and clinical condition changes during infusion; routine verbal instructions on post-infusion precautions (such as increased water intake and frequent urination) after infusion; distribution of standard outpatient paper educational materials; and simple telephone follow-up in accordance with departmental routine procedures.
Includes: Routine medical history inquiry and verification before infusion; Monitoring of the patient's vital signs and changes in condition during infusion; Routine verbal instructions on precautions after infusion (such as drinking plenty of water and urinating frequently); Distribution of routine outpatient paper educational leaflets; Conducting simple telephone follow-ups in accordance with the department's routine procedures.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Clinical Treatment Adherence
Délai: 6 months after intervention
Treatment adherence will be evaluated by infusion completion rate,calculated as (actual number of infusions received / total planned infusions prescribed) × 100%.
6 months after intervention

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Bladder-cancer-specific quality of life
Délai: Baseline、3 months、6 months after intervention
This outcome will evaluate bladder-cancer-specific quality of life using the validated Chinese version of the EORTC-QLQ-NMIBC24 scale. Higher scores correspond to greater symptom burden and worse quality-of-life status.
Baseline、3 months、6 months after intervention
Recruitment rate and infoermed consent rate
Délai: Baseline
Calculate the proportion of eligible patients who sign informed consent and formally enroll into the study among all screened eligible subjects.
Baseline
Patient Satisfaction and Acceptance
Délai: 3months after intervention
A self-designed questionnaire with 5 items using 5-point Likert scale is adopted to score patients'satisfaction and acceptance of the supportive care program
3months after intervention
Satisfaction of supportive care needs
Délai: Baseline, 3 months after intervention, 6 months after intervention
The Short-Form Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS-SF34) is administered at three time points to evaluate changes in patients' supportive care needs between two groups.
Baseline, 3 months after intervention, 6 months after intervention

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 août 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 septembre 2027

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 décembre 2027

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

20 août 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

20 août 2026

Première publication (Réel)

24 août 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

24 août 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

20 août 2026

Dernière vérification

1 août 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner